If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NextGov)   Pentagon memo on over-classification of documents classified "For Official Use Only"   (nextgov.com) divider line 18
    More: Ironic, memoranda, inspectors general, information technology, documents  
•       •       •

2416 clicks; posted to Main » on 23 Nov 2012 at 10:29 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



18 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-11-23 10:29:12 AM
Well, that actually makes sense.

/dnrtfa
 
2012-11-23 10:35:24 AM
FOUO is one of the absolute lowest classification markings in existence. Aside from unclassified, that is.
 
2012-11-23 10:38:00 AM
/snerk
 
2012-11-23 10:41:33 AM

seancakes: FOUO is one of the absolute lowest classification markings in existence. Aside from unclassified, that is.


FOUO IS Unclassified.

It's a caveat placed on Unclassified information meaning it is not intended for public release. It isn't a classification unto itself.

The lowest level that is actually "Classified" from a legal/technical standpoint is Confidential.
 
2012-11-23 10:44:00 AM

seancakes: FOUO is one of the absolute lowest classification markings in existence. Aside from unclassified, that is.


FOUO isn't a real classification. It's all over government forms. There is Classified, Secret, Top-Secret, and UltraFa...

***NO CARRIER***
 
2012-11-23 10:58:34 AM
*adjusts Command Security Manager hat*

Ahem...

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO): applies to unclassified information that is exempt from mandatory release to the public under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be used for protecting a variety of information.

There are three levels of classification defined in terms of level of damage -- CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET.

However, there are many different levels of special handling. FOUO is a special handling caveat, specifically, a type of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

And now I feel like I've worked on my day off...

*shakes tiny fist*
 
2012-11-23 11:00:01 AM
Well ##### and ##### in a #####.
 
2012-11-23 11:01:48 AM

EZ Writer: *adjusts Command Security Manager hat*

Ahem...

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO): applies to unclassified information that is exempt from mandatory release to the public under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be used for protecting a variety of information.

There are three levels of classification defined in terms of level of damage -- CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET.

However, there are many different levels of special handling. FOUO is a special handling caveat, specifically, a type of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

And now I feel like I've worked on my day off...

*shakes tiny fist*


I'm counting your post as quarterly security training.
 
2012-11-23 11:02:59 AM

Iceman_Cometh: EZ Writer: *adjusts Command Security Manager hat*

Ahem...

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO): applies to unclassified information that is exempt from mandatory release to the public under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be used for protecting a variety of information.

There are three levels of classification defined in terms of level of damage -- CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET.

However, there are many different levels of special handling. FOUO is a special handling caveat, specifically, a type of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

And now I feel like I've worked on my day off...

*shakes tiny fist*

I'm counting your post as quarterly security training.


Me too
 
2012-11-23 11:03:58 AM
i hope they used a cover sheet.
 
2012-11-23 11:22:15 AM

Evil Twin Skippy: Iceman_Cometh: EZ Writer: *adjusts Command Security Manager hat*

Ahem...

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO): applies to unclassified information that is exempt from mandatory release to the public under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be used for protecting a variety of information.

There are three levels of classification defined in terms of level of damage -- CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET.

However, there are many different levels of special handling. FOUO is a special handling caveat, specifically, a type of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

And now I feel like I've worked on my day off...

*shakes tiny fist*

I'm counting your post as quarterly security training.

Me too


Three? Thanks Security Manager ;)
 
2012-11-23 11:28:40 AM
Use of this memo as toilet paper is discouraged unless it is an official evacuation.
 
2012-11-23 11:31:04 AM
A few years back my company sent out a memo reminding us that things marked "company confidential" should not be taken home, and should be disposed of in the shredder. I sent mail pointing out that everything was marked 'company confidential', including the cafeteria menus.

Never heard back, and the menus were still confidential for the 2 years I remained with the company.
 
2012-11-23 11:32:43 AM
*Ctl-F "unclassified"*
13 matches.
*whistles nonchalantly and leaves*
 
2012-11-23 11:45:19 AM
I'm curious to what the problem with the ammo is. Is it tolerances in manufacturing (porosity in the material) or improper balance, or is it a problem with the weapons not producing enough spin to accurately fire the round downrange or?
 
2012-11-23 11:57:58 AM
No irony police douchebags yet? *checks watch*
 
2012-11-23 11:59:48 AM
My timesheet at work is stamped FOUO.

There are a lot of articles lately that are only IRONIC, AMUSING, etc if you lack even a basic understanding of what's going on.
 
2012-11-23 03:23:55 PM
I had a buddy that used to work for the NSA. He told hilarious stories over things that were classified Top Secret and TS/SCI.

I think my favorite is that it's TS/SCI @ NSA for the POs for toilet paper. That's right -- according to my buddy, they created a Special Compartmented Intelligence classification for the # of toilet paper rolls they purchase. (This was 1994, btw.)

I asked, "WTF?"

He told me that he asked his Security Officer about it, and the SO told him that it was a hold over from the Cold War. Someone got the idea that the Rooskies might be able to reverse calculate how many people worked @ NSA based on how much TP they went through, and at that time, the # of people working @ NSA was considered Vital National Security Information.

Probably BS. Probably like the Dominos/Pentagon thing. Still a funny story.
 
Displayed 18 of 18 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report