If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News)   American intelligence: "We altered Benghazi talking points to protect American spies." Republicans: "This is a poutrage. Surely Obama made you do it. He is all powerful, after all. Just like teh gheys and womans"   (foxnews.com) divider line 184
    More: Sad, Americans, GOP, obama, CIA Director David Petraeus, house intelligence committee, Libya, intelligence, spy  
•       •       •

2556 clicks; posted to Politics » on 21 Nov 2012 at 10:14 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



184 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-21 10:50:16 AM

unlikely: mrshowrules: unlikely: Also... when the current Republican leadership start showing some outrage for well-documented outright lies that were told intentionally and led directly to the deaths of 4500 Americans and god knows how many others, THEN they'll have a little credibility; until then they really ought to STFU and reflect on where they went so far off the rails.

/hint: Grover Norquist and Pat Robertson

To use a party analogy:

S. Rice lied about the the desert she brought being homemade (because she was told it was)

C. Rice lied about whether not the punch was poisoned

Nice. Brilliant. Smart AND funny.

I will likely quote that to my derpiest friends on facebook...


spell dessert correctly when you do. Because I was wondering where the sand came into play.

Remember kids: "Dessert has two S-es because you always want seconds."
 
2012-11-21 10:50:29 AM

stpickrell: Hey, so why is Benghazi impeachment-worthy and the various attacks on US embassies between 2002-08 not?


Bush = Jesus Christ
 
2012-11-21 10:51:20 AM

Jackson Herring: And conservatives continue to furiously jerk their micropenises about the death of four Americans.


Photographic proof....

4.bp.blogspot.com

Do not shake Romney's right hand.
 
2012-11-21 10:52:35 AM
They are trying to hype this up to counter the wreckage of their 'democrats are weak on defense' meme the GOP has pushed for decades.

This is why this is a major scandal, but all the attacks under Bush were not.
 
2012-11-21 10:53:31 AM

neenerist: /outrage poetry.....


Baa baa baa
baaa baa Obama.

Beach Boys Fan Boy Music.

Can we please stop talking about this yet? LOLZ!
 
2012-11-21 10:54:38 AM

mrshowrules: It might need some work. After all, Condi was actually in charge of the punch. Susan didn't even have to bring dessert.


S. Rice told everyone her sister's pie was homemade, because her sister said it was.

C. Rice lied about whether the punch was poisoned.

I don't know. I'll probably tweak it to fit the freeper cousin or uncle. Either way, high five and kudos to you.
 
2012-11-21 10:56:43 AM

Jake Havechek: stpickrell: Hey, so why is Benghazi impeachment-worthy and the various attacks on US embassies between 2002-08 not?

Bush = Jesus Christ


I guess then Carter, Clinton = Jesus Christ? Right, Little Bo Peep?
 
2012-11-21 10:56:59 AM

halfof33: neenerist: /outrage poetry.....

Baa baa baa
baaa baa Obama.

Beach Boys Fan Boy Music.

Can we please stop talking about this yet? LOLZ!


It is amusing that the right continuously confusing people mocking them as calls for and end to the 'discussion'.

By all means, keep it up.
 
2012-11-21 10:59:13 AM

amiable: This thread is worth it only for the amusement I am getting laughing at your posts. Please proceed.


You are laughing at a link to a summary of protests at US Embassies?

OH, OK then. Super post!

/I get that there are Obama fanboys here, but this thread is filled with liberal morans.
 
2012-11-21 11:00:02 AM

theknuckler_33: It is amusing that the right continuously confusing people mocking them as calls for and end to the 'discussion'.


Their advantage is never stooping to content. Olympian laughter; it's how they roll.
 
2012-11-21 11:00:48 AM

mark12A: Wow. It was an Al Quada attack, it was obvious to everyone involved, but it was embarrassing to the Obamessiah to have a terrorist attack just before the election. And it reveals how they left our embassey guys out hanging in the breeze. For political expediency.


...is that you, couchgnome?
 
2012-11-21 11:01:19 AM

HotWingConspiracy: mark12A: It's farking obvious what happened. They didn't need "spies" to tell them it was a coordinated assault. They farking could see it on the drone feed. There are no spies to protect.

They need spies to ID and find the attackers. No scandal. Not for you.


You've obviously not seen the part of the video where all of the terrorists raised their ID cards to the drone cameras. It was like doing "the wave" at a stadium. We already knew who they were. There was no need for spies, or for their protection.
 
2012-11-21 11:01:47 AM

halfof33: amiable: This thread is worth it only for the amusement I am getting laughing at your posts. Please proceed.

You are laughing at a link to a summary of protests at US Embassies?

OH, OK then. Super post!

/I get that there are Obama fanboys here, but this thread is filled with liberal morans.


Could you please explain why this is a scandal? I mean it, talk to me as if I were a child (because I'm a liberal and dumb so haha) and walk me through the logic that makes the Benghazi attacks and the administration's initial confusion as to the details during the attacks and eventual assertion of an independent terrorist attack something over which I should be outraged.

Please, show me what makes this so bad and what they did so wrong.
 
2012-11-21 11:04:25 AM
The good part about this scandal is that you can ignore pretty much anyone that brings it up as a crackpot nutter.

"Did you hear about the solyndra-acorn-benghazi-dijon-conspiracy? "
 
2012-11-21 11:05:39 AM
halfof33:
imageshack.us


If the GOP had ANYTHING.

ANYTHING. They would start impeachment.

They don't. So they just keep chugging along with the fake outrage machine.
 
2012-11-21 11:06:32 AM

Headso: The good part about this scandal is that you can ignore pretty much anyone that brings it up as a crackpot nutter.

"Did you hear about the solyndra-acorn-benghazi-dijon-conspiracy? "


you forgot arugula
 
2012-11-21 11:07:12 AM
Why do Republicans hate America?
 
2012-11-21 11:07:38 AM

More_Like_A_Stain: HotWingConspiracy: mark12A: It's farking obvious what happened. They didn't need "spies" to tell them it was a coordinated assault. They farking could see it on the drone feed. There are no spies to protect.

They need spies to ID and find the attackers. No scandal. Not for you.

You've obviously not seen the part of the video where all of the terrorists raised their ID cards to the drone cameras. It was like doing "the wave" at a stadium. We already knew who they were. There was no need for spies, or for their protection.


You're also missing the part where we have surveillance drones patrolling every street corner of the world at any given moment, WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!
 
2012-11-21 11:11:19 AM
Let's make this fun:

What do you guys think the next phony scandal is going to be?
 
2012-11-21 11:11:33 AM
FOX News Channel just had a NEWS ALERT! because Lindsay Graham(R- whiny crybaby) sent a letter to Obama demanding the "facts on Benghazi".

Bret Baier is such a smarmy dick.
 
2012-11-21 11:11:46 AM

mark12A: Wow. You farktards will believe *anything* the intelligence folks say if it's good for your Obamessiah. If it isn't, then they're evil.

It's farking obvious what happened. They didn't need "spies" to tell them it was a coordinated assault. They farking could see it on the drone feed. There are no spies to protect.

What you have here is the "modified limited hangout". They are making up lies to cover for their initial lie that it was a video that triggered the assault. IT WAS NOT. It was an Al Quada attack, it was obvious to everyone involved, but it was embarrassing to the Obamessiah to have a terrorist attack just before the election. And it reveals how they left our embassey guys out hanging in the breeze. For political expediency.


lol whoa. And Obama won. What are you Contards gonna do now??
 
2012-11-21 11:12:15 AM

halfof33: Remember folks, posting actual links and facts (like the fact that Rice flasely claimed that the attacks were the result of an anti-Islamic video which served to inflame anti-American sentiment in Muslim countries) is trolling.


So explain to us why we should be outraged and why Obama should be impeached over it.

/I'm waiting...
 
2012-11-21 11:12:27 AM

Mrtraveler01: Let's make this fun:

What do you guys think the next phony scandal is going to be?


Obama destroyed Twinkies because he's a seekrit muslin.
 
2012-11-21 11:12:39 AM
The new 9/11 Truthers are just as crazy as the old Truthers.
 
2012-11-21 11:12:41 AM
 
2012-11-21 11:13:59 AM

wongway: "I did not let them 4 die" Obama

I went to bed for the 8 hrs they were attacked


Forever???
 
2012-11-21 11:14:12 AM

Fart_Machine: The new 9/11 Truthers are just as crazy as the old Truthers.


They're a little worse.

Old 9/11 Truthers: Crazy conspiracy theory AND THE ADMINISTRATION IS GOING TO WAR OVER IT!

New 9/11 Truthers: Crazy conspiracy theory AND THE ADMINISTRATION ISN'T GOING TO WAR OVER IT!
 
2012-11-21 11:14:57 AM
Whitewater 2: Electric Boogaloo


by the way, no crime was committed in the Whitewater debacle
 
2012-11-21 11:14:59 AM

Mrtraveler01: Let's make this fun:

What do you guys think the next phony scandal is going to be?


I'm keeping an eye on Gaza.
 
2012-11-21 11:15:24 AM

halfof33: Remember folks, posting actual links and facts (like the fact that Rice flasely claimed that the attacks were the result of an anti-Islamic video which served to inflame anti-American sentiment in Muslim countries) is trolling.


What is trolling is claiming the parenthetical statement is a fact. She did her job and gave the statements she was authorized to make. Period.
 
2012-11-21 11:15:32 AM
Even in the assumption that the White House was "lying" about the circumstances behind Benghazi, what farking difference does it make?
 
2012-11-21 11:16:03 AM
I say they suggest an improper relationship between obama and that hot asian prime minister. I'll be in my bunk.
 
2012-11-21 11:16:49 AM

halfof33: Remember folks, posting actual links and facts (like the fact that Rice our intelligence community, in order to protect assests flasely claimed that the attacks were the result of an anti-Islamic video which served to inflame anti-American sentiment in Muslim countries) is trolling


Fixed. No scandal. Not for you.
 
2012-11-21 11:16:58 AM
Sad to say, even the Right-Winged Loons (A common sub-species here in Alberta) have their panties in a bunch over this 'scandal'. Recently made a comment on the local rag site and got jumped by Fox News herp, derp and potato. In that order.
 
2012-11-21 11:18:07 AM

Mrtraveler01: So explain to us why we should be outraged and why Obama should be impeached over it.

/I'm waiting...


This is the part of the thread where you post the proof where I said he ought to be impeached over it.

"I'm Waiting."

/I get it, people don't care that administration let a grossly inaccurate story get published, which served to further inflame the situation. Stop asking questions people, the Obama will make it all better.
//farking sheep
 
2012-11-21 11:19:20 AM

halfof33: /I get it, people don't care that administration let a grossly inaccurate story get published, which served to further inflame the situation. Stop asking questions people, the Obama will make it all better.


Bloody William: Could you please explain why this is a scandal? I mean it, talk to me as if I were a child (because I'm a liberal and dumb so haha) and walk me through the logic that makes the Benghazi attacks and the administration's initial confusion as to the details during the attacks and eventual assertion of an independent terrorist attack something over which I should be outraged.

Please, show me what makes this so bad and what they did so wrong.


Come on. Walk me through it. This isn't obvious to my tiny liberal mind, so you need to explain it to me slowly.
 
2012-11-21 11:19:30 AM
Let me explain this one more time:

Individuals and groups affiliated with al Qaeda publicly took credit for the attack in the immediate aftermath. Any eleven year old with internet access could find out this super-private state secret; so spare us the spook spin on this clusterfark.

Even if we were to accept your James Bond story, tell us whose bright idea it was to use some poor schmuck and his youtube video as the scapegoat for your tard-handed opus. I'm sure he takes pride in being an unwilling patriot and martyr for your deep-cover operatives who cleverly deduced what the rest of the world already knew.
 
2012-11-21 11:20:34 AM

halfof33: Mrtraveler01: So explain to us why we should be outraged and why Obama should be impeached over it.

/I'm waiting...

This is the part of the thread where you post the proof where I said he ought to be impeached over it.

"I'm Waiting."

/I get it, people don't care that administration let a grossly inaccurate story get published, which served to further inflame the situation. Stop asking questions people, the Obama will make it all better.
//farking sheep


It further inflamed the situation in what way? What further incidents can be directly linked to Rice's statement?
 
2012-11-21 11:21:36 AM

wongway: "I did not let them 4 die" Obama

I went to bed for the 8 hrs they were attacked


Went to bed? Not even close. He ate Iranian caviar from Reggie Love's butthole while MOOOOOChele said (and I totes believe this is her exact pattern of speech), "there be 4 fewer honkeys in the muthaland, y'all biatch asses!"

It is known.
 
2012-11-21 11:22:19 AM

Jake Havechek: FOX News Channel just had a NEWS ALERT! because Lindsay Graham(R- whiny crybaby) sent a letter to Obama demanding the "facts on Benghazi".

Bret Baier is such a smarmy dick.


There are questions to be answered here. Which terminal and what Word Processing software was used to soften the language in the initial Intelligence talking points to protect classified operations?

Why was the White House not consulted on these particular changes? Why wasn't the GOP warned that they were farking a chicken and would look like complete idiots if they kept trying to make this a scandal?

We need answers.
 
2012-11-21 11:23:04 AM

theknuckler_33: What is trolling is claiming the parenthetical statement is a fact. She did her job and gave the statements she was authorized to make. Period.


And I'm pretty sure I pointed out that she was just the administrations mouthpiece, right? And that the adminstration had more than enough information before she was sent on her little errands to stop her from repeating it.

You think this is about RICE????? Mind Boggles.

/Ignore... (just kidding, I'm not a complete pussy)
 
2012-11-21 11:23:18 AM

Polly Ester: Let me explain this one more time:

Individuals and groups affiliated with al Qaeda publicly took credit for the attack in the immediate aftermath. Any eleven year old with internet access could find out this super-private state secret; so spare us the spook spin on this clusterfark.

Even if we were to accept your James Bond story, tell us whose bright idea it was to use some poor schmuck and his youtube video as the scapegoat for your tard-handed opus. I'm sure he takes pride in being an unwilling patriot and martyr for your deep-cover operatives who cleverly deduced what the rest of the world already knew.


And there are those that wonder why the GOP loses the educated votes.
 
2012-11-21 11:23:30 AM

mark12A: Obamessiah


*chug*
 
2012-11-21 11:24:16 AM

halfof33: theknuckler_33: What is trolling is claiming the parenthetical statement is a fact. She did her job and gave the statements she was authorized to make. Period.

And I'm pretty sure I pointed out that she was just the administrations mouthpiece, right? And that the adminstration had more than enough information before she was sent on her little errands to stop her from repeating it.

You think this is about RICE????? Mind Boggles.

/Ignore... (just kidding, I'm not a complete pussy)


She had the same information congress had, which makes their outrage hilarious. Maybe they should skip more briefings so they can hold more angry press conferences about how there aren't enough briefings.
 
2012-11-21 11:24:26 AM

Mrtraveler01: Let's make this fun:

What do you guys think the next phony scandal is going to be?


Is there any way to merge Benghazi, Fast and Furious, Solyndra and the bust of Churchill into some sort of crazy ass Voltron?
 
2012-11-21 11:24:26 AM

halfof33: which served to further inflame the situation.


That's a weak conclusion. The existence of the video was already widely known and there is literally nothing to suggest that Rice's TV appearances led to or exacerbated other protests.
 
2012-11-21 11:24:37 AM

halfof33: Remember folks, posting actual links and facts (like the fact that Rice flasely claimed that the attacks were the result of an anti-Islamic video which served to inflame anti-American sentiment in Muslim countries) is trolling.


Nice work McGruff, this new find should blow the case wide open.
 
2012-11-21 11:24:52 AM

Polly Ester: Let me explain this one more time:

Individuals and groups affiliated with al Qaeda publicly took credit for the attack in the immediate aftermath. Any eleven year old with internet access could find out this super-private state secret; so spare us the spook spin on this clusterfark.

Even if we were to accept your James Bond story, tell us whose bright idea it was to use some poor schmuck and his youtube video as the scapegoat for your tard-handed opus. I'm sure he takes pride in being an unwilling patriot and martyr for your deep-cover operatives who cleverly deduced what the rest of the world already knew.


Protip: Not everybody who claims responsibility for terrorist attacks are actually behind those terrorist attacks.
 
2012-11-21 11:25:07 AM

YoungSwedishBlonde: More_Like_A_Stain: HotWingConspiracy: mark12A: It's farking obvious what happened. They didn't need "spies" to tell them it was a coordinated assault. They farking could see it on the drone feed. There are no spies to protect.

They need spies to ID and find the attackers. No scandal. Not for you.

You've obviously not seen the part of the video where all of the terrorists raised their ID cards to the drone cameras. It was like doing "the wave" at a stadium. We already knew who they were. There was no need for spies, or for their protection.

You're also missing the part where we have surveillance drones patrolling every street corner of the world at any given moment, WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!


imgs.xkcd.com 
Obligatory
 
2012-11-21 11:25:25 AM

Polly Ester: Let me explain this one more time:

Individuals and groups affiliated with al Qaeda publicly took credit for the attack in the immediate aftermath. Any eleven year old with internet access could find out this super-private state secret; so spare us the spook spin on this clusterfark.

Even if we were to accept your James Bond story, tell us whose bright idea it was to use some poor schmuck and his youtube video as the scapegoat for your tard-handed opus. I'm sure he takes pride in being an unwilling patriot and martyr for your deep-cover operatives who cleverly deduced what the rest of the world already knew.


So we should take their word for it and stop investigating how it was planned and what groups they were working with within the country. Gotcha. Polly Ester believes al Qaeda are infallible bearers of truth
 
Displayed 50 of 184 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report