If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Barack O'Fraudo)   From the same guy who brought you UnSkewedPolls comes BarackOFraudo.com, exposing how Obama stole the 2012 election with voter fraud   (barackofraudo.com) divider line 200
    More: Stupid, obama, elections in 2012, circumstantial evidence  
•       •       •

3283 clicks; posted to Politics » on 20 Nov 2012 at 9:33 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



200 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-20 10:24:20 AM
yeah, let's get this guy to do some math for us.
that'll make us feel better.

what ever happened to "Nate Silver was right and I was wrong?"

/bet he's still pissed about what all those mean internet people did to his site.
//he's milking the morans, not surprised.
 
2012-11-20 10:26:29 AM
Your blog sucks so hard, every pornography actress/actor on the planet considers it their "Holy Grail" when it comes to fellatio technique.
 
2012-11-20 10:26:48 AM

clambam: You've got to hand it to Barack and his magical time/weather machine. If Sandy had come just one week earlier, Obama might have lost NY and NJ--just ask anyone on Staten Island who still has no power what they think of Obama.

As to this kind of craziness--in retrospect it's too bad the repubs didn't go full derp and nominate Santorum or Perry. The electoral disaster would have been of truly epic proportions and we wouldn't have to hear from die-hard teabggers for the next four years about how Romney was too liberal and a true conservative would have won.


We wouldn't? Don't you think it's a little early in the day to be hitting the Purple Trainwreck Kush?
 
2012-11-20 10:26:55 AM

Fart_Machine: Comments section already forwarding to YouTube.


hold on....you mean after his site was gang raped by fark he still hasn't taken the necessary precautions to prevent that sort of thing?
 
2012-11-20 10:27:24 AM
Basically, what this idiot does here is look at voter turnout and sees it is down since 2008 and then says that must means Obama must have cheated, because there is no way the Democrats could have high voter turnout doesn''t understand three things:

1) Turnout may be down since 2008, but it's up since every other election (including 2010) in recent history.
2) The reason turnout was down was because most Conservatives despised what the GOP has become (a far right zealot extreme party) and did not like Mitt Romney (1. Mormon, 2. Massachusetts flip-flopper).
3) At the same time, Liberal turnout was UP, mainly because a. Obama was a community organizer and thus organized turnout, and b. the GOP zealots had been badmouthing him so much it fired up the liberals to vote (while at the same time pissing off the moderate Republicans

Note, his voter suppression lie was not as bad as the "voter registration" crap, I wrote about here:

My blog entry about voter registration fraud claims
 
2012-11-20 10:27:56 AM

mrspock42: No html sanitizing on the comments!


Did somebody insert a JS redirect to a YouTube video?
 
2012-11-20 10:30:06 AM

Jabberwookiee: mrspock42: No html sanitizing on the comments!

Did somebody insert a JS redirect to a YouTube video?


I'm not sure who would do such a thing, but a javascript window.location command would get the job done. ;)
 
2012-11-20 10:30:07 AM
Okay, we've given it two weeks. The Republicans have had time to accept the loss and move on, maybe expand their base...

...Oh, I see they've decided to double down. Again.
 
2012-11-20 10:30:43 AM

Dusk-You-n-Me: Zero evidence.


Like THAT'S ever stopped anyone.
 
2012-11-20 10:32:14 AM
static5.businessinsider.com

The thing that keeps bothering me about this picture is how in-focus the tree is behind him. It's as if the camera's face-detect passed over that pasty doughy thing in the center and said "It...it's gotta be in the tree!"

Either that or it's a photoshop, i can tell by the pixels, etc.
 
2012-11-20 10:32:49 AM

Fart_Machine: Comments section already forwarding to YouTube.


More evidence of voter fraud!

They don't want the truth to get out!
 
2012-11-20 10:32:55 AM

Bloody William: Fluorescent Testicle: Epicedion: The chicken's dead. You farked a chicken to death. It's pretty much all shame and disgrace from here. Happy now?

What? The chicken died months ago. At this point, they're using what's left of the wishbone as a urethral sound.

My dick just made a squeaking noise. That hasn't happened before.


Could be a nutritional issue. Are you getting enough heroin in your diet?
 
2012-11-20 10:33:19 AM

Marcus Aurelius: Looks like someone is crying out for more attention.


....using the same tired and obvious tactics seen so often here. Faced with questions regarding financial ties between the Romneys and companies owning Ohio polling machines, last minute and illegal patches orchestrated by a Republican to Ohio polling machines and wild rumors of Anonymous running interference, the Right wingnuts like clockwork play the 'no, you' card. The Internet's incredible benefits often don't seem worth the cost of revealing the dishonesty and stupidity of so many.
 
2012-11-20 10:33:43 AM

mrspock42: Jabberwookiee: mrspock42: No html sanitizing on the comments!

Did somebody insert a JS redirect to a YouTube video?

I'm not sure who would do such a thing, but a javascript window.location command would get the job done. ;)


That's what I was thinking. Oh man...I wonder if JS could be used to mess with the CSS on the comments page...but likewise, I would never do such a thing.
 
2012-11-20 10:34:29 AM

Wasteland: This. He's making it terribly tempting to see about trying this milk-the-rubes racket, myself. This wasn't even a very good con, and he's probably made out like a bandit.


I bet you could make an even bigger killing if the site actually looked good instead of these Angelfire piece of shiat sites he keeps producing. I could put something together that looks a gazillion times better and professional in a half day while this dickbag just keeps pumping out the same garbage across different domains. It is indeed tempting.
 
2012-11-20 10:36:31 AM
OFraudo? I thought Fartbongo was the accepted standard permutation.

/Also, Chambers is fat.
 
2012-11-20 10:38:25 AM

Summer Glau's Love Slave: OFraudo? I thought Fartbongo was the accepted standard permutation.

/Also, Chambers is fat.


Since he won ... err.... stole the elections any name goes.
 
2012-11-20 10:40:51 AM
imageshack.us
 
2012-11-20 10:42:01 AM

TeDDD: Barack O'Fraudo? The Kenyan-Irish Hobbit trying to destroy The One Ring?


He loves his precious.
 
2012-11-20 10:42:09 AM
I just gotta say this: if Obama really did fraud his way to victory, he and his team executed flawlessly. I mean, in addition to the massive, statewide ballot-stuffing and machine-hacking that took place all over Republican states and there's zero evidence for, he managed to get state-level polls to reflect the final outcome in advance of the election. That takes hard work and dedication.
 
2012-11-20 10:42:44 AM
Republicans, put your trust in this man. No matter what the liberals try to tell you about math, remember there's no substitution for a common sense conservative.

Follow this man to victory.
 
2012-11-20 10:43:55 AM

Cubicle Jockey: TeDDD: Barack O'Fraudo? The Kenyan-Irish Hobbit trying to destroy The One Ring?

He loves his precious.



Bah. "image too large" my ass.

chawedrosin.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-11-20 10:45:28 AM

jso2897: clambam: You've got to hand it to Barack and his magical time/weather machine. If Sandy had come just one week earlier, Obama might have lost NY and NJ--just ask anyone on Staten Island who still has no power what they think of Obama.

As to this kind of craziness--in retrospect it's too bad the repubs didn't go full derp and nominate Santorum or Perry. The electoral disaster would have been of truly epic proportions and we wouldn't have to hear from die-hard teabggers for the next four years about how Romney was too liberal and a true conservative would have won.

We wouldn't? Don't you think it's a little early in the day to be hitting the Purple Trainwreck Kush?


A genuine Tea Party candidate would have lost to Obama in a landslide. I think it would be very hard to say then "Rick Santorum wasn't conservative enough, that's why we lost." I mean, I suppose they could say that but that's a little crazy even for the crazies. At a certain point being a true believer in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary becomes too much for even a Teabagger to support. Maybe I'm wrong, but under the circumstances a CATscan might be in order because we've gone past the realm of mere mental illness into something more organic.
 
2012-11-20 10:48:10 AM
from his fb info:

This page is dedicated to political activities and finding friends who agree with my limited government, pro-freedom, conservative point of view.
Lives in Duffield, Virginia


/fixed
 
2012-11-20 10:48:57 AM

WalkingCarpet: I bet you could make an even bigger killing if the site actually looked good instead of these Angelfire piece of shiat sites he keeps producing. I could put something together that looks a gazillion times better and professional in a half day while this dickbag just keeps pumping out the same garbage across different domains. It is indeed tempting.


I can't imagine his target audience cares one whit about well-crafted web design.
 
2012-11-20 10:48:59 AM
So far, the evidence of fraud in each of four states:

1.) "Democrats are known for years for stuffing ballot boxes in X"
2.) The vote percentages in X changed throughout the day as they counted more and more counties.
3.) "That raises the question, where in the state where those last voters counted from and reported from?"
4.) These areas "will be the focus of efforts to find any reports and evidence of vote fraud in the state."

So in short, this guy's evidence is "hey guys, we should totally look for evidence." I guess that's enough to launch a ZOMG ELECTION WAS STOLEN website.

I am particularly amused with point (3). Wasn't this guy like a big deal in election forecasting in conservative circles, like just a few weeks ago? And now here he is, weeks after the election, wondering aloud what precincts reported when---is he not aware that everyone had this information, and in fact used it to declare projected winners on election day?

/Either that, or he's just doing this to show off his HTML TABLE chops
 
2012-11-20 10:50:03 AM
Has a single person stepped up to say their Romney vote was not counted in one of those 100% Obama precincts?
 
2012-11-20 10:50:26 AM

Summer Glau's Love Slave: OFraudo? I thought Fartbongo was the accepted standard permutation.

/Also, Chambers is fat.


Like, Orca fat...
 
2012-11-20 10:52:32 AM

WalkingCarpet: Wasteland: This. He's making it terribly tempting to see about trying this milk-the-rubes racket, myself. This wasn't even a very good con, and he's probably made out like a bandit.

I bet you could make an even bigger killing if the site actually looked good instead of these Angelfire piece of shiat sites he keeps producing. I could put something together that looks a gazillion times better and professional in a half day while this dickbag just keeps pumping out the same garbage across different domains. It is indeed tempting.


The most amusing thing would be to go as all out as you can with the right wing derp, solicit donations, and then donate it to a soup kitchen or the Dems.
 
2012-11-20 10:59:25 AM
Can we post his home address yet?
 
2012-11-20 10:59:54 AM
i.imgur.com
 
2012-11-20 11:03:43 AM
Im just glad hes back..You know you are too! His Derp is so adorable. If he goes on to try and explain why Oregon was supposed to be red he will be my internet BFF
 
2012-11-20 11:04:04 AM
If I had Dean Chambers' crippling gambling debts I'd try to raise some scratch too.
 
2012-11-20 11:07:28 AM
Thanks a lot, Fraudbongo!
 
2012-11-20 11:10:26 AM

WalkingCarpet: I bet you could make an even bigger killing if the site actually looked good instead of these Angelfire piece of shiat sites he keeps producing.


It'll make for a great portfolio, however, if he applies for an IT job in 1996.
 
2012-11-20 11:11:51 AM
Shouldn't it be BarackOFrauda?

You know, because his name ends with an A, not an O?
 
2012-11-20 11:15:34 AM
Christ, what an asshole.
 
2012-11-20 11:15:58 AM

qorkfiend: I just gotta say this: if Obama really did fraud his way to victory, he and his team executed flawlessly. I mean, in addition to the massive, statewide ballot-stuffing and machine-hacking that took place all over Republican states and there's zero evidence for, he managed to get state-level polls to reflect the final outcome in advance of the election. That takes hard work and dedication.


Wish I could remember the psychological term, but this is a thing that people are prone to do that seems especially common among conspiracy theorists. People see their side as incompetent but with good intentions while seeing their opponents as hypercompetent but with evil intentions. For all the complaints about Democrats always snatching defeat from the jaws of victory around here, they have had a few years of significant policy victories both in legislatures and at the ballot box. Freepers constantly complain about how ineffectual Republicans have been since the good old days of the 1980's, forgetting how effective Bush was at pushing for policies in his first term and forgetting the failures/compromises Reagan made.

Jonah Goldberg has actually done a good job pushing back against this comfortable logic that we're so tempted to participate in. When your argument starts with assumptions that your foe hates this country and is able to secretly plan perfect crimes to cause its downfall you've already failed. Both sides love this country and want to do what is best for it, but neither side is spectacularly good at it and have vastly different opinions of what would be best for it. Goldberg is still an asshole of the highest caliber for trying to claim liberals are trying to institute Nazism in America, but at least he does so in a way that claims they do it because they think it would make it better off (faint praise to be sure.)
 
2012-11-20 11:23:44 AM
Times like these make we with I had no conscience so I could get filthy rich pandering to the right-wing outrage machine...
 
2012-11-20 11:27:55 AM

astro716: [static5.businessinsider.com image 400x300]

The thing that keeps bothering me about this picture is how in-focus the tree is behind him. It's as if the camera's face-detect passed over that pasty doughy thing in the center and said "It...it's gotta be in the tree!"

Either that or it's a photoshop, i can tell by the pixels, etc.


I'm with you here. There's no history to this guy - he pops up out of nowhere with his Unskewed Polls site, proceeds to become the darling of the Republicans because he tells them what they want to hear and gets everything massively wrong, using a methodology that doesn't make sense to anyone who can think twice about it (which obviously eliminates Republicans...).

Did you see how his original prediction went from 330+ Romney to 276 Romney in the space of a week? No one's predictions swung by that much in so short a time. This was a sign that "Dean Chambers" realised that he could keep the racket going after the election if only he made his prediction seem closer to the truth than it actually was. So suddenly his prediction is off by "only: 70 points and not over a hundred. he does better than half a dozen "pundits", gets instant respectability, and can continue making money off the idiots he cons.

His only interview has been on the phone, when he... surprise surprise, admitted to being wrong (and that Silver was right). Something that the Barones and Scarboroughs have not done. Result? Instant credibility.

He is a scam, and he'll make money as long as there are idiots providing his sites with eyeballs.
 
2012-11-20 11:29:24 AM
 
2012-11-20 11:31:07 AM

beerrun: Your blog REALLY sucks!


But it's getting lots of traffic and that's all that matters!

//no, I didn't click
 
2012-11-20 11:32:18 AM

Wellon Dowd: His evidence of fraud in Virginia seems to be that the Democratic-leaning parts of the Commonwealth are Democratic-leaning.


Very suspicious. Why would Democratic-leaning parts of Virginia vote for Obama? The plot thickens.
 
2012-11-20 11:33:05 AM

Car_Ramrod: Shouldn't it be Barack O'Frauda instead of O'Fraudo?


Quick, someone register barackofrauda.com and point it to moveon.org.
 
2012-11-20 11:33:49 AM

Arkanaut: HotWingConspiracy: Dusk-You-n-Me: Zero evidence.

That's the best evidence, it can't be challenged!

In other news, Lincoln was a homosexual, Amelia Earhart was abducted by aliens, and Glenn Beck raped and murdered a girl in 1990.


Wait, wait - Glenn Beck raped and murdered a girl in 1990? Is this true? Does anyone have a relevant link?

To think the mainstream media would overlook such a shocking story.
 
2012-11-20 11:38:19 AM

Sock Ruh Tease: comment page


.....and it's forwarding to lemon party.
 
2012-11-20 11:39:49 AM
This Freedom of Speech thing you yanks have is a little overrated
 
2012-11-20 11:39:52 AM

Car_Ramrod: Shouldn't it be Barack O'Frauda instead of O'Fraudo?


He's using the masculine word ending, duh.
 
2012-11-20 11:41:21 AM

Grungehamster: Of course, he also told me I have to see "2016" if I really want to get what sort of person Obama really is.


Heh. I need to get the right wing twits at work to start signing a pledge listing out the predictions and then have it notarized. When at the end of four years none of their predictions are true have them agree to never open their ignorant assed fat mouths about politics again, ever.
 
2012-11-20 11:45:39 AM
This is obviously ACORN's fault,
 
Displayed 50 of 200 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report