If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Google)   Sqrt(x^2+y^2)   (google.com) divider line 95
    More: Interesting, kde, sqrt  
•       •       •

13911 clicks; posted to Geek » on 19 Nov 2012 at 10:40 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



95 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-19 07:31:25 AM
dejareviewer.files.wordpress.com


/content6.flixster.com
 
2012-11-19 08:23:14 AM
I read that as "squirt" and thought of porn and was impressed by the green. Then I realized I spend far too much time on the interwebs.

/I was told there would be no math
 
2012-11-19 08:30:49 AM
Dammit subby!

I had shiat to do today.
 
2012-11-19 10:17:31 AM

Donnchadha: Dammit subby!

I had shiat to do today.


Fortunately, my computer doesn't support WebGL, and we're running WSUS so I can't just go to Windows Update

/although there are still other ways
 
2012-11-19 10:30:24 AM
Wow, I can throw my TI86 away now.
 
2012-11-19 10:44:26 AM

OtherLittleGuy: [dejareviewer.files.wordpress.com image 321x279]


/[content6.flixster.com image 350x350]


1 + 2 + 1 + SHUT UP!
 
2012-11-19 10:45:26 AM
Sweet.
 
2012-11-19 10:46:00 AM

KarmicDisaster: Wow, I can throw my TI86 away now.


TI-86 can't do 3D graphs --- the TI-89 can though.
 
2012-11-19 10:47:33 AM
Actually, now that I look at it...the search term input is sqrt(x2 * y2), but Google graphed sqrt(x(2y^2)).
 
2012-11-19 10:51:37 AM
*trippin balls*
 
2012-11-19 10:52:27 AM

Donnchadha: KarmicDisaster: Wow, I can throw my TI86 away now.

TI-86 can't do 3D graphs --- the TI-89 can though.


....with that awesome 160 x 100 black and white LCD screen, yeah.
 
2012-11-19 10:53:11 AM

Bondith: Actually, now that I look at it...the search term input is sqrt(x2 * y2), but Google graphed sqrt(x(2y^2)).


I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed that.
 
2012-11-19 10:56:01 AM
log(sqrt(x^2+y^2)) = black hole = O_O
 
2012-11-19 10:58:52 AM
Reminds me of the old Apple Graphing Calculator app that was included with some version of the OS, years ago. (Hm, still seems to be around, called Grapher)

Spent hours playing with that in the computer lab in grade school, trying to get bizarre, 3-d animated zero divides to do weird shiat.

/not a nerd
//can't imagine why you'd think that
 
2012-11-19 11:01:13 AM

HMS_Blinkin: Donnchadha: KarmicDisaster: Wow, I can throw my TI86 away now.

TI-86 can't do 3D graphs --- the TI-89 can though.

....with that awesome 160 x 100 black and white LCD screen, yeah.


...and it only costs $149.99. The same price it cost when I was in high school. in 1996.

No wonder Texas Instruments is getting creamed financially. These things should cost $20 based on component prices. Stupid.
 
2012-11-19 11:03:37 AM
Came for Pythagoras, leaving.
 
2012-11-19 11:04:09 AM
How do we rule 34 this thing?
 
2012-11-19 11:04:17 AM

Bondith: Actually, now that I look at it...the search term input is sqrt(x2 * y2), but Google graphed sqrt(x(2y^2)).


It's the URL. If you type it in manually, it works fine. But the web server/browser/whatever is stripping out the "+" sign from the formula when you click on the link.
 
2012-11-19 11:09:12 AM

gameshowhost: log(sqrt(x^2+y^2)) = black hole = O_O


I like THIS version better
 
2012-11-19 11:10:39 AM

47 is the new 42: Bondith: Actually, now that I look at it...the search term input is sqrt(x2 * y2), but Google graphed sqrt(x(2y^2)).

I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed that.


Order of operations is for people that actually finish coding their projects, why would you expect it in a google app?
 
2012-11-19 11:12:23 AM

whistleridge: HMS_Blinkin: Donnchadha: KarmicDisaster: Wow, I can throw my TI86 away now.

TI-86 can't do 3D graphs --- the TI-89 can though.

....with that awesome 160 x 100 black and white LCD screen, yeah.

...and it only costs $149.99. The same price it cost when I was in high school. in 1996.

No wonder Texas Instruments is getting creamed financially. These things should cost $20 based on component prices. Stupid.


Especially considering I have a graphing calculator app on my smartphone that does everything my TI-86 can do, does it faster and with a clearer image, and was a FREE download. The only reason I keep the TI is that my math professor (wisely) doesn't allow the use of calculators with wireless capability during exams.
 
2012-11-19 11:14:22 AM
Hasn't Wolfram Alpha been doing this for years? Seriously awesome engine for very specific types of searches.
 
2012-11-19 11:17:35 AM
 
2012-11-19 11:21:07 AM

Bondith: OtherLittleGuy: [dejareviewer.files.wordpress.com image 321x279]


/[content6.flixster.com image 350x350]

1 + 2 + 1 + SHUT UP!


3D graphing capability is just a red herring
 
2012-11-19 11:24:01 AM
Why is this interesting? A statement on the simplicity of complex math graphing on the intarwebs or something?
 
2012-11-19 11:28:32 AM

xelnia: redmond24: How do we rule 34 this thing?

Someone posted a few examples awhile back. The best:

exp((‑(((x-4)^2+(y-4)^2)^2))/1000)+exp((‑(((x+4)^2+(y+4)^2)^2))/1000 ) + 0.1*exp(‑(((x+4)^2+(y+4)^2)^2))+0.1*exp(‑(((x-4)^2+(y-4)^2)^2))


I smirked.
 
2012-11-19 11:30:39 AM
With teeth

sqrt(x^2+1 y^3)
 
2012-11-19 11:32:19 AM

Bondith: Actually, now that I look at it...the search term input is sqrt(x2 * y2), but Google graphed sqrt(x(2y^2)).


The plus sign is treated as a space character in urls. To get it to be an actual plus side, subby would've had to use the escaped version (%2B). So you were really meant to end up here: 

https://www.google.com/search?output=search&q=sqrt(x^2+y^2)
 
2012-11-19 11:34:59 AM
Oh no! We are sorry, but your browser does not seem to support WebGL.

You can upgrade by clicking this link.

You may want to download one of the following browsers to view WebGL content.

The following browsers support WebGL on Windows:

Mozilla Firefox

Google Chrome



www.gearedforgamers.com
 
2012-11-19 11:35:06 AM
 
2012-11-19 11:49:52 AM
So where's my WebGL SecondLife viewer? Hmph.
 
2012-11-19 11:53:56 AM

xelnia: redmond24: How do we rule 34 this thing?

Someone posted a few examples awhile back. The best:

exp((‑(((x-4)^2+(y-4)^2)^2))/1000)+exp((‑(((x+4)^2+(y+4)^2)^2))/1000 ) + 0.1*exp(‑(((x+4)^2+(y+4)^2)^2))+0.1*exp(‑(((x-4)^2+(y-4)^2)^2))


A mathematical model....that describes boobs. I've lived the perfect life so far.
 
2012-11-19 11:54:03 AM
Math - art that never stops giving.
 
2012-11-19 11:59:56 AM
Just found out that WebGL.org is a lie, because also Opera supports it, only you have to enable HW acceleration and WebGL.

Great.

image.spreadshirt.com
 
2012-11-19 12:07:57 PM
To be fair, the TI nSpire(AKA, the non-deprecated TI-89) has a 160x100 color screen.
 
2012-11-19 12:09:55 PM
hehe teh Boobies is cool.
 
2012-11-19 12:11:38 PM
the reason TI calculators cost what they do is the same reason college textbooks do
 
2012-11-19 12:13:44 PM

whistleridge: HMS_Blinkin: Donnchadha: KarmicDisaster: Wow, I can throw my TI86 away now.

TI-86 can't do 3D graphs --- the TI-89 can though.

....with that awesome 160 x 100 black and white LCD screen, yeah.

...and it only costs $149.99. The same price it cost when I was in high school. in 1996.

No wonder Texas Instruments is getting creamed financially. These things should cost $20 based on component prices. Stupid.


Say what you want about current pricing, but I still have my TI-86 and TI-89 (that I got in high school.... in 1996).... and they run just perfectly. I have no reason to replace them.

That being said, the fancy sparkly crap they're trying to push these days is just stupid. I hope mine never break so I don't have to replace them with this crap. Oh, but they're fancy colors with curved keys! Shut up -- graphing calculators are to be utilitarian. The TI-86 is already too fancy with it's Apple Infringing rounded corners... *ahem*

Um... I mean... yeah...
 
2012-11-19 12:24:43 PM
Not a bookmark so I can check this out when I can get home and be on a REAL computer instead of this piece of crap work gave me.


/You'd think someone doing IT management for an ISP would have a powerhouse.
//but noooooooo.....
 
2012-11-19 12:52:21 PM
Would a Fark Math Guy explain to me why this is a 3D function? Where does the third dimension come from?

-kthnkbi
 
2012-11-19 12:53:25 PM

H31N0US: Came for Pythagoras, leaving.


Are you at least going to call him later?
 
2012-11-19 12:57:11 PM

Rent Party: Would a Fark Math Guy explain to me why this is a 3D function? Where does the third dimension come from?

-kthnkbi


for graphing purposes when you have two variables and no "=" anywhere, it's assumed that what you want is "the third variable =".

In this case, since you have x and y, "z=" is implied.
 
2012-11-19 12:58:46 PM

Rent Party: Would a Fark Math Guy explain to me why this is a 3D function? Where does the third dimension come from?

-kthnkbi


It's a function from 2 dimensional space to 1 dimensional space. So to draw the graph, you need 2+1=3 dimensions.
 
2012-11-19 01:01:18 PM

xelnia: redmond24: How do we rule 34 this thing?

Someone posted a few examples awhile back. The best:

exp((‑(((x-4)^2+(y-4)^2)^2))/1000)+exp((‑(((x+4)^2+(y+4)^2)^2))/1000 ) + 0.1*exp(‑(((x+4)^2+(y+4)^2)^2))+0.1*exp(‑(((x-4)^2+(y-4)^2)^2))


That was funny. Wish I could work that into my PDE class's homework without getting fired.
 
2012-11-19 01:12:42 PM

traylor: Oh no! We are sorry, but your browser does not seem to support WebGL.


I got this, too, with FF. Firefox insists that I need to upgrade my graphics card drivers to allow this functionality on my computer. However it works fine with Chrome, so it's not my graphics card. What gives?
 
2012-11-19 01:15:59 PM

The Bestest: Rent Party: Would a Fark Math Guy explain to me why this is a 3D function? Where does the third dimension come from?

-kthnkbi

for graphing purposes when you have two variables and no "=" anywhere, it's assumed that what you want is "the third variable =".

In this case, since you have x and y, "z=" is implied.


And also...


It's a function from 2 dimensional space to 1 dimensional space. So to draw the graph, you need 2+1=3 dimensions.


Thank you both. Fark has made me smarter, which almost never happens. :)
 
2012-11-19 01:19:20 PM
You can put other stuff in there. For example, I asked to calculate "one hunk of burning love" and received lots of data on the Elvis Presley album of the same name.
 
2012-11-19 01:20:46 PM

Rent Party: Would a Fark Math Guy or Gal (paging techmom) explain to me why this is a 3D function? Where does the third dimension come from?

-kthnkbi


FTFY on the basis of "girls do math too"

/and one atomic F*** YOU to Barbie for trying to say otherwise
//biatch
 
2012-11-19 01:24:20 PM
shuisman.com
 
2012-11-19 01:24:23 PM

Rent Party: Thank you both. Fark has made me smarter, which almost never happens. :)


Should I insult you or something just to even it out?
 
Displayed 50 of 95 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report