If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WTOP)   Your days of being able to see fat, gay, naked men strolling the streets of San Francisco may be coming to an end   (wtop.com) divider line 144
    More: Sad, San Francisco, board of supervisors, hiking boot, exhibitionism, nude, fat  
•       •       •

9569 clicks; posted to Main » on 18 Nov 2012 at 8:00 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



144 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-18 07:58:07 PM
Supervisor Scott Wiener's proposal would make it illegal for a person over the age of 5 to "expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza" or while using public transit.

Even when trying to be more conservative than usual, San Francisco manages to be all about the dick. 

Is there really a large enough subset of the Castro district complaining for this to pass?
 
2012-11-18 08:01:32 PM
is there really a large enough subset of the Castro district complaining for this to pass?

yes, there are a lot of families in the neighborhood, and even most gauys are fed up these guys

WEINER!!
 
2012-11-18 08:02:09 PM
Good. This means that they have passed a budget with cash to spare.
 
2012-11-18 08:02:28 PM

Lsherm: Supervisor Scott Wiener's proposal would make it illegal for a person over the age of 5 to "expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza" or while using public transit.

Even when trying to be more conservative than usual, San Francisco manages to be all about the dick. 

Is there really a large enough subset of the Castro district complaining for this to pass?


If they're fat, they're large enough to complain about, yes.

Especially if they're also hairy and pasty.
 
2012-11-18 08:03:22 PM
/hot, like some man on man lovin;.
 
2012-11-18 08:03:33 PM
If seeing nekkid people is offensive to you, avert your eyes.
 
2012-11-18 08:03:40 PM

Lsherm: Is there really a large enough subset of the Castro district complaining for this to pass?


It doesn't really matter, it's Wiener's personal vendetta. He's been quite the dick about these guys, pun intended.
 
2012-11-18 08:03:50 PM
Hah, this makes Fark, but not covering the cost of gender reassignment surgeries for uninsured transgender residents?
 
2012-11-18 08:04:34 PM

UNAUTHORIZED FINGER: If seeing nekkid people is offensive to you, avert your eyes.


Apparently people are required to look at everything, which is why California prop 37 failed.
 
2012-11-18 08:04:54 PM
that's what I get for not using the preview button, lets try this again

0-media-cdn.foolz.us
 
2012-11-18 08:05:24 PM
I'm all for equal rights, but keep your shorts on in public.
 
2012-11-18 08:05:42 PM
But what will evangelics get all false outraged about in its place?

/who am I kidding - they will find something
 
2012-11-18 08:07:10 PM

Lsherm: Is there really a large enough subset of the Castro district complaining for this to pass?


gayborhoods will find any reason to create lots of drama.

/which is why i refuse to live in one
 
2012-11-18 08:07:39 PM
At least the Folsom Street Fair won't be affected. That would have been sad.
 
2012-11-18 08:07:51 PM
Good, it is about time.
 
2012-11-18 08:08:43 PM
As something of a nudist, I have no problem with this.
 
2012-11-18 08:09:29 PM

BigNumber12: Hah, this makes Fark, but not covering the cost of gender reassignment surgeries for uninsured transgender residents?


Link
 
2012-11-18 08:10:45 PM
Stripped down to his sunglasses and hiking boots, McCray Winpsett, 37, said he understands the disgust of residents who would prefer not to see the body modifications and sex enhancement devices sported by some of the Castro nudists. But he thinks Wiener's prohibition goes too far in undermining a tradition "that keeps San Francisco weird."

"A few lewd exhibitionists are really ruining it for the rest of us," he said. "It's my time to come out now to present myself in a light and show what true nudity fetishism is all about so people can separate the difference between what a nudist is and an exhibitionist is."

/Really, it's not enough that you have a ghey pride parade and prance around like attention whores in outlandish outfits and do all you can to shove your gayness in peoples faces, but sex enhancement devices? I have nothing against gays, but really, have some farking class. You are not helping the people who share your gay lifestyle by making a spectacle out of yourself. You just look like a freak. Good job. How about ..being gay, as you want, and living a life of happiness and personal honor and pride, and respect?
 
2012-11-18 08:10:56 PM
WTOP

snort
 
2012-11-18 08:11:18 PM
I don't see what the big deal is. Nudity isn't inherently sexual. Actually, even if it were sexual I wouldn't really care. Let them get it on doggy style in the middle of the park. As long as they clean up when they're done seeing someone else do something doesn't harm me in any way.
 
2012-11-18 08:12:26 PM
If you don't want your children to see fat, gay naked men, then don't bring them to/live in San Francisco's Castro district.

Turns out, being naked is illegal in 99% of the rest of the country. Why live in/go to one of the few places it isn't if you don't like it?
 
2012-11-18 08:14:31 PM
pictures.hatsrack.com
 
2012-11-18 08:15:08 PM
my unsolicited opinion: I don't really care if you let your freak flag fly.
but, it does hurt your movement I feel.

/2cents
 
2012-11-18 08:16:14 PM
We're here
We're queer
We don't want any more bears?

/SF Municipal policy based on 3F20
 
2012-11-18 08:18:38 PM

gingerjet: Lsherm: Is there really a large enough subset of the Castro district complaining for this to pass?

gayborhoods will find any reason to create lots of drama.

/which is why i refuse to live in one


They don't like hipster twinks who have been reamed in every sling bar in the city.
 
2012-11-18 08:19:46 PM
"the city's famously gay Castro District and the supervisor who represents the area.

Supervisor Scott Wiener's...."


i45.tinypic.com
 
2012-11-18 08:20:18 PM
This thread is useless without (SFW) pics of hot, mostly naked gay men.
 
2012-11-18 08:21:32 PM
In other news, all this time it's been legal to walk on the streets of San Francisco with your knob out.
 
2012-11-18 08:22:14 PM
The only reason anyone has a problem with nudity is because from a young age we've all been told it's a problem for no other reason than it just is. I love most of the things society has given us, but it's also excellent at brainwashing people with completely arbitrary rules and opinions that have no basis in anything whatsoever. We're told we should be offended, and so we are.
 
2012-11-18 08:22:48 PM

theflatline: They don't like hipster twinks who have been reamed in every sling bar in the city.


Been kicked out of a few eagle bars in your time?
 
2012-11-18 08:24:20 PM
However, large numbers of Farkers will continue to do so in their basements
 
2012-11-18 08:24:57 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO (gasp) OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo
 
2012-11-18 08:25:36 PM
p3wclan.files.wordpress.com

Be careful what you wish for.
 
2012-11-18 08:25:58 PM
(This comment has been removed)
 
2012-11-18 08:27:14 PM
Banning only ugly nekkid people seems more fair and balanced.
 
2012-11-18 08:27:45 PM
As a non San Franciscan? Why do they have to show there junk to everyone all the time? You have parades, festivals and nightclubs that appreciate your nakedness. Is it pure exhibitionism?

It seems rather unpractical unless your really doing it for other reason sex, shock value etc..
 
2012-11-18 08:28:39 PM
Are they causing a heap of trouble for all concerned?
 
2012-11-18 08:28:58 PM
I go to San Francisco all the time and I have never seen anyone walking around nekked. I must not be hanging around the right neighborhoods.
 
2012-11-18 08:30:57 PM

TheOther: Banning only ugly nekkid people seems more fair and balanced.


Precisely.

Fat, hairy, old people should never be naked. Gay or straight, male or female. I do not want to see droopy tits, saggy balls and dry wrinkly skin (including my own in case you were wondering). Hot, firm, tanned bodies can go naked all day long and I'm okay with that.

Everyone else can assemble at my home and we'll be naked in private.
 
2012-11-18 08:31:41 PM
I remember as a public park police officer in our local big city, we would often receive telephone complaints about guys sucking each other off in the public restrooms in the park, or walking down the trails in the woods and rogering each other. We would get quite a few of these complaints. Not that i can blame the public, nothing like walking into the public restroom and seeing some dude sucking cack, and trying to explain to your little son with you, what he just saw. Not cool.

So anyway, we would be forced to dress in plainclothes, and bust these guys. This is how it usually went.

We would go in, and act like we are using the urinal, either there would be a gay guy in there already, or one would go in after seeing us go in. Then one of three things would happen. He would make a lewd sexual proposal, reach around and try to grab your junk, or you would turn around and he would be fapping looking at you. Either way, he was getting arrested. This was a ticket for lewd conduct, indecent exposure, or propositioning a police officer. 99 percent of the time they wouldn't show up in court to fight it, as they didn't want to stand there in front of everyone while i say "Yes your Honor, i saw suspect X whipping the bishop when i turned around after using the bathroom". They would just pay the fine. Now, as i said before..i have nothing against gay people, it's not my place to judge them on their sexual preference. However, i do have issue with them doing that shiat in public, where the general public might view them, esp in a park where there are kids present that might walk in on them. All I'm saying is..have some personal pride and class, people that do this shiat make the rest of the gay people easy to stereotype. And the police would rather not have to be bait and see you do that shiat. We would rather be having doughnuts and coffee.

/thanks..
//The police.
 
2012-11-18 08:32:53 PM
MAN what the fark. That shiat is worse than that picture of horse penis raping a cop's anus I keep posting. I repeat what the FUUUUUUg.
 
2012-11-18 08:33:22 PM
Scott Wiiiiiieeeeeeeennnnnneeeeeerrrrrrrr

that's the only part of TFA that matters to me. That the public official in a gay town is named Wiener. The only thing that would be more perfect would be if his first name was Randy, Richard, or Harry.
 
2012-11-18 08:38:01 PM
Supervisor Wiener or is it Wiener Supervisor?
 
2012-11-18 08:38:07 PM
NTTAWWT

/obligatory
 
2012-11-18 08:40:32 PM

UNAUTHORIZED FINGER: If seeing nekkid people is offensive to you, avert your eyes.


hurray! may common sense prevail. nudity is natural and wonderful. if i was Great Dictator people would eat in private and fark in public. it would be a nicer world. too many folks have atrocious table manners.
 
2012-11-18 08:41:32 PM

TuteTibiImperes: I don't see what the big deal is. Nudity isn't inherently sexual.


Hygeine. Naked people sit on things. Clothing isnt just for modesty and warmth Its also for health reasons.

Do you want your 4 year old to crawl around on a bus seat that has had dozens of naked san franciscan butt cracks sliding over it that morning?
 
2012-11-18 08:42:16 PM

Bit'O'Gristle: I remember as a public park police officer in our local big city, we would often receive telephone complaints about guys sucking each other off in the public restrooms in the park, or walking down the trails in the woods and rogering each other. We would get quite a few of these complaints. Not that i can blame the public, nothing like walking into the public restroom and seeing some dude sucking cack, and trying to explain to your little son with you, what he just saw. Not cool.

So anyway, we would be forced to dress in plainclothes, and bust these guys. This is how it usually went.

We would go in, and act like we are using the urinal, either there would be a gay guy in there already, or one would go in after seeing us go in. Then one of three things would happen. He would make a lewd sexual proposal, reach around and try to grab your junk, or you would turn around and he would be fapping looking at you. Either way, he was getting arrested. This was a ticket for lewd conduct, indecent exposure, or propositioning a police officer. 99 percent of the time they wouldn't show up in court to fight it, as they didn't want to stand there in front of everyone while i say "Yes your Honor, i saw suspect X whipping the bishop when i turned around after using the bathroom". They would just pay the fine. Now, as i said before..i have nothing against gay people, it's not my place to judge them on their sexual preference. However, i do have issue with them doing that shiat in public, where the general public might view them, esp in a park where there are kids present that might walk in on them. All I'm saying is..have some personal pride and class, people that do this shiat make the rest of the gay people easy to stereotype. And the police would rather not have to be bait and see you do that shiat. We would rather be having doughnuts and coffee.

/thanks..
//The police.


Either you're trolling, or you're really invested in the sexual goings-on of gay men. That's the 2nd verbose post in this thread you've made on the subject of where and when gay men should be gay.
 
2012-11-18 08:43:42 PM

Bit'O'Gristle: I remember as a public park police officer in our local big city, we would often receive telephone complaints about guys sucking each other off in the public restrooms in the park, or walking down the trails in the woods and rogering each other. We would get quite a few of these complaints. Not that i can blame the public, nothing like walking into the public restroom and seeing some dude sucking cack, and trying to explain to your little son with you, what he just saw. Not cool.

So anyway, we would be forced to dress in plainclothes, and bust these guys. This is how it usually went.

We would go in, and act like we are using the urinal, either there would be a gay guy in there already, or one would go in after seeing us go in. Then one of three things would happen. He would make a lewd sexual proposal, reach around and try to grab your junk, or you would turn around and he would be fapping looking at you. Either way, he was getting arrested. This was a ticket for lewd conduct, indecent exposure, or propositioning a police officer. 99 percent of the time they wouldn't show up in court to fight it, as they didn't want to stand there in front of everyone while i say "Yes your Honor, i saw suspect X whipping the bishop when i turned around after using the bathroom". They would just pay the fine. Now, as i said before..i have nothing against gay people, it's not my place to judge them on their sexual preference. However, i do have issue with them doing that shiat in public, where the general public might view them, esp in a park where there are kids present that might walk in on them. All I'm saying is..have some personal pride and class, people that do this shiat make the rest of the gay people easy to stereotype. And the police would rather not have to be bait and see you do that shiat. We would rather be having doughnuts and coffee.

/thanks..
//The police.


Did you work the I-95 rest area in Virginia at mile marker 107? Because that place gets farking scary after 8pm. I have to drive from Richmond to DC twice a week and I've stopped there more than I'd like (I have the bladder of a nine year old girl). It's led me to a new rule about rest areas: if I recognize you at a rest area from the last time I was at the same rest area at a different time - you're probably up to no good. Who hangs out at rest areas for hours at a time? People up to no good, that's who. It would be different if I stopped at the rest area at the same time each commute day, then said person could just be on the same commute schedule I'm on. But I don't, so clearly this guy is hanging out there. Creeeeeeeepy.

All of this could be solved if Virginia would just trick out their rest areas like Maryland does and turn them into commerce centers with restaurants, but apparently VA state law means they have to be poorly lit hovels with a bathroom and vending machines.
 
2012-11-18 08:44:05 PM

TuteTibiImperes: Actually, even if it were sexual I wouldn't really care. Let them get it on doggy style in the middle of the park.


It's been said before many times but the people who'd get it on in the park aren't the people you'd want to see getting it on in the park. Even you'd be like, "Ew, gross!"
 
2012-11-18 08:44:09 PM

Coco LaFemme: Either you're trolling, or you're really invested in the sexual goings-on of gay men. That's the 2nd verbose post in this thread you've made on the subject of where and when gay men should be gay.


I was pondering that too. He must also vote republican.
 
Displayed 50 of 144 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report