If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Deadline)   Breaking Dawn 2 takes the weekend box office with $137 million, holding Skyfall and Lincoln at bay in the 2 and 3 spots. But we can all rest easier knowing the reign of sparkly vampires is, blessedly, over   (deadline.com) divider line 109
    More: Followup, human beings, Breaking Dawn, Lisa Kudrow, Catherine Hardwicke, Chris Weitz, New York Film Festival, vampires, Melissa Rosenberg  
•       •       •

771 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 18 Nov 2012 at 9:21 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



109 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-18 01:10:24 PM  
Slavery is not the kind of issue where someone who is opposed to it will feel "Hey, we don't need to do anything about it *now*, let's just wait."
 
2012-11-18 01:12:50 PM  
I saw Skyfall for the second time last night. Unhappy to report that Breaking Dawn had very long lines before AND after I left the movie.

I saw Lincoln at an advanced screening last week. It was very good, too. Amazing acting, especially from TLJ. Welcomingly, it was not as Spielberg-y as the trailers lead you to believe.
 
2012-11-18 01:12:54 PM  

Larry Mahnken: DamnYankees: Larry Mahnken: The one problem I had with the movie (other than the fact that you could understand what Tad was saying, but it's a movie, so that's fine) is that it was portrayed as though without the 13th Amendment, the South would have surrendered. It is true that some Northerners believed that this was true, but Stephens was not empowered by Davis to agree to anything without the precondition of Confederate Independence. The film portrays the Hampton Roads Conference falling apart because of slavery.

You can't really expect them to hire an actor who had a cleft palate.

They didn't need to do that, but he should have had a lisp and talked very quickly. But it didn't really bother me much.

Also, they portray the 13th Amendment as something that needed to be passed before the war ended, otherwise public sentiment would be against it. In point of fact, it would have been easily passed by the new Congress in March, and been ratified just as it was. Lincoln just didn't want to wait.


I was under the impression that it was also a wedge to put between the confederates and potential European allies.

While they enjoyed seeing the upstart nation tear itself apart, the had a huge problem with slavery. Once Lincoln had did this, Europeans couldn't politically support the Confederacy.
 
2012-11-18 01:14:34 PM  

Larry Mahnken: Slavery is not the kind of issue where someone who is opposed to it will feel "Hey, we don't need to do anything about it *now*, let's just wait."


The Senate passed it almost 10 months prior. He clear waited that long. Your blanket statement that he just wanted it passed ASAP doesn't really explain why it was done when it was done.
 
2012-11-18 01:15:48 PM  

Doran: I saw Skyfall for the second time last night. Unhappy to report that Breaking Dawn had very long lines before AND after I left the movie.


You can't take it to heart TOO much.

Lowest common denominator and all that.


texdent: Maybe with this being the final Twitard movie, Mtv Movie Awards will finally get off the Twilight band wagon.


Even so, I *really* wouldn't hold up the MTV Movie Awards as anything remotely smacking of good.
 
2012-11-18 01:17:38 PM  

Darth_Lukecash: Larry Mahnken: DamnYankees: Larry Mahnken: The one problem I had with the movie (other than the fact that you could understand what Tad was saying, but it's a movie, so that's fine) is that it was portrayed as though without the 13th Amendment, the South would have surrendered. It is true that some Northerners believed that this was true, but Stephens was not empowered by Davis to agree to anything without the precondition of Confederate Independence. The film portrays the Hampton Roads Conference falling apart because of slavery.

You can't really expect them to hire an actor who had a cleft palate.

They didn't need to do that, but he should have had a lisp and talked very quickly. But it didn't really bother me much.

Also, they portray the 13th Amendment as something that needed to be passed before the war ended, otherwise public sentiment would be against it. In point of fact, it would have been easily passed by the new Congress in March, and been ratified just as it was. Lincoln just didn't want to wait.

I was under the impression that it was also a wedge to put between the confederates and potential European allies.

While they enjoyed seeing the upstart nation tear itself apart, the had a huge problem with slavery. Once Lincoln had did this, Europeans couldn't politically support the Confederacy.


That was the Emancipation Proclamation. By 1865, there was no possibility of foreign intervention.

Another reason Lincoln wanted the Amendment passed as soon as possible is that he felt it could help break Southern morale and end the war sooner (that perhaps some Southerners felt that if they kept fighting long enough, they could at least preserve slavery, and Lincoln wanted to make it clear as soon as possible that that was not going to happen.)
 
2012-11-18 01:18:42 PM  

DamnYankees: Larry Mahnken: Slavery is not the kind of issue where someone who is opposed to it will feel "Hey, we don't need to do anything about it *now*, let's just wait."

The Senate passed it almost 10 months prior. He clear waited that long. Your blanket statement that he just wanted it passed ASAP doesn't really explain why it was done when it was done.


Wrong, he didn't wait. The House voted on it, and fell short.
 
2012-11-18 01:29:43 PM  

Larry Mahnken: DamnYankees: Larry Mahnken: Slavery is not the kind of issue where someone who is opposed to it will feel "Hey, we don't need to do anything about it *now*, let's just wait."

The Senate passed it almost 10 months prior. He clear waited that long. Your blanket statement that he just wanted it passed ASAP doesn't really explain why it was done when it was done.

Wrong, he didn't wait. The House voted on it, and fell short.


Ah ok. Makes more sense.
 
2012-11-18 01:31:49 PM  

DamnYankees: Larry Mahnken: DamnYankees: Larry Mahnken: Slavery is not the kind of issue where someone who is opposed to it will feel "Hey, we don't need to do anything about it *now*, let's just wait."

The Senate passed it almost 10 months prior. He clear waited that long. Your blanket statement that he just wanted it passed ASAP doesn't really explain why it was done when it was done.

Wrong, he didn't wait. The House voted on it, and fell short.

Ah ok. Makes more sense.


Enough nitpicking.

I was 90% sure that I would be disappointed in the film. I loved it.

I'm going to see Spielberg deliver the keynote on Monday morning during the Gettysburg Address anniversary ceremony at the National Cemetery in Gettysburg. I guess I don't have to throw any rotten fruit at him.
 
2012-11-18 01:45:35 PM  

skinink: I liked Skyfall, but I guess my expectations were high after all the great reviews it's been getting. It isn't one of the best films this year. I thought the ending was underwhelming. I did like how they went into Bond's history though.


I just want to ask: in the 2014 Bond film, can we FINALLY have the appearance of SPECTRE?
 
2012-11-18 01:50:38 PM  

OtherLittleGuy: skinink: I liked Skyfall, but I guess my expectations were high after all the great reviews it's been getting. It isn't one of the best films this year. I thought the ending was underwhelming. I did like how they went into Bond's history though.

I just want to ask: in the 2014 Bond film, can we FINALLY have the appearance of SPECTRE?


images.wikia.com

I'm in.
 
2012-11-18 01:52:23 PM  

firegoat: SockMonkeyHolocaust: The Lincoln movie looks terrible. The trailer they cut for it is so bad, I kept expecting to see a scene with Lincoln wearing sunglasses, holding a pump shotgun and saying, "Let's go emancipate some slaves."

I would go see that movie.


FDR: American Badass! came out last month. Barry Bostwick (yes, "Brad" from RHPS) plays Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who, from his wheelchair-of-death, deals out WW2-style justice upon the Nazi werewolves who gave him polio. It is every bit as awesome as it sounds.
 
2012-11-18 01:52:35 PM  

OtherLittleGuy: I just want to ask: in the 2014 Bond film, can we FINALLY have the appearance of SPECTRE?


That raises two questions:

1.) Who the hell would you cast as Blofeld? (I know he changes appearances, but that first appearance has to be a doozy.)

2.) Do you retell the story of Tracy from On Her Majesty's Secret Service?
 
2012-11-18 02:03:25 PM  

Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: That raises two questions:

1.) Who the hell would you cast as Blofeld? (I know he changes appearances, but that first appearance has to be a doozy.)


I guess Patrick Stewart wold be too obvious but would also be badass.
 
2012-11-18 02:05:47 PM  

Mugato: I guess Patrick Stewart wold be too obvious but would also be badass.


I'd love this, actually.

There are different ways you can go with Blofeld.

Donald Pleasence made Blofeld come across as more of a cerebral threat. Telly Savalas made Blofeld more of a physical presence.

Patrick Stewart would be more of a lean towards the Pleasence Blofeld, and I would be all right with that.
 
2012-11-18 02:14:04 PM  

DamnYankees: Larry Mahnken: That's the story the movie was pushing, but it's not reality. Kushner bent reality a bit to make the film more dramatic.

I don't doubt anything you're saying, but then what's the explanation for why Lincoln wanted it passed under the existing Congress? He must have had a reason.


I haven't read up on all of the historical details of its passing, but it would seem to me that with the slave states out of the Union because of the war, it would be incredibly easy to shove through anti-slavery legislation and for an anti-slavery Admendment to be ratified by 2/3s of the states. Once those states rejoin the Union after the end of the war, their representatives will wind up acting as spoilers to delay a 2/3s majority indefinitely. The abolitionists would have had a very small window where they could ram through the needed legislation without the consent of the South.

The situation then is not all that different than right now. Imagine that Obama wanted to push an Amendment creating a single payer healthcare system through. It would be SO much easier to pass if the Congressmen and Senators from the south were temporarily not there to vote against it.
 
2012-11-18 02:19:00 PM  

Mad_Radhu: DamnYankees: Larry Mahnken: That's the story the movie was pushing, but it's not reality. Kushner bent reality a bit to make the film more dramatic.

I don't doubt anything you're saying, but then what's the explanation for why Lincoln wanted it passed under the existing Congress? He must have had a reason.

I haven't read up on all of the historical details of its passing, but it would seem to me that with the slave states out of the Union because of the war, it would be incredibly easy to shove through anti-slavery legislation and for an anti-slavery Admendment to be ratified by 2/3s of the states. Once those states rejoin the Union after the end of the war, their representatives will wind up acting as spoilers to delay a 2/3s majority indefinitely. The abolitionists would have had a very small window where they could ram through the needed legislation without the consent of the South.

The situation then is not all that different than right now. Imagine that Obama wanted to push an Amendment creating a single payer healthcare system through. It would be SO much easier to pass if the Congressmen and Senators from the south were temporarily not there to vote against it.


Though the Southern states had vacated their congressional seats, allowing Congress to have a quorum without them, the states were still in the Union. There were 25 states loyal to the Union, 27 were needed to ratify a Constitutional Amendment. So they needed two Confederate States to ratify any Constitutional Amendment.
 
2012-11-18 02:23:29 PM  

Larry Mahnken: Though the Southern states had vacated their congressional seats, allowing Congress to have a quorum without them, the states were still in the Union. There were 25 states loyal to the Union, 27 were needed to ratify a Constitutional Amendment. So they needed two Confederate States to ratify any Constitutional Amendment.


Yes, they mention this in the film - Stephens basically acknowledges it would sail through even counting the Southern states since a few of them would easily pass it.
 
2012-11-18 02:39:21 PM  
Sounds like Lincoln got killed at the theater...
 
2012-11-18 03:04:12 PM  
My impression was that Lincoln needed the amendment passed before the war ended because his emancipation proclamation only applied to the rebel states during the war. So without an amendment banning slavery, all those freed during the war would be forced back into bondage when Lincolns war powers were removed
 
2012-11-18 03:30:06 PM  

Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: OtherLittleGuy: I just want to ask: in the 2014 Bond film, can we FINALLY have the appearance of SPECTRE?

That raises two questions:

1.) Who the hell would you cast as Blofeld? (I know he changes appearances, but that first appearance has to be a doozy.)

2.) Do you retell the story of Tracy from On Her Majesty's Secret Service?


1) My choices:
Patrick Stewart
Kevin Spacey
Benedict Cumberbatch
Idris Elba
Christopher Eccleston
Kenneth Branaugh
Christoph Waltz

2) It's debatable whether or not to tell the Tracy story again. After all, you had Vesper in 'Casino Royal' which had pretty much the same effect on Bond.
 
2012-11-18 03:43:23 PM  

Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: Mugato: I guess Patrick Stewart wold be too obvious but would also be badass.

I'd love this, actually.

There are different ways you can go with Blofeld.

Donald Pleasence made Blofeld come across as more of a cerebral threat. Telly Savalas made Blofeld more of a physical presence.

Patrick Stewart would be more of a lean towards the Pleasence Blofeld, and I would be all right with that.


I think I just orgasmed.
 
2012-11-18 03:52:07 PM  

OtherLittleGuy: skinink: I liked Skyfall, but I guess my expectations were high after all the great reviews it's been getting. It isn't one of the best films this year. I thought the ending was underwhelming. I did like how they went into Bond's history though.

I just want to ask: in the 2014 Bond film, can we FINALLY have the appearance of SPECTRE?


EON doesn't have the rights to SPECTRE, McClory does - it's that long complicated Thunderball/Fleming/rights etc story. Same with the name Blofeld, I believe.

The organization Quantum in the (extremely poor) QOS was a semi-tribute to Spectre.
 
2012-11-18 04:00:53 PM  
QoS wasn't that farking bad, you losers.

REMEMBER THE INVISIBLE CAR AND DESPAIR.
 
2012-11-18 04:19:59 PM  

23FPB23: So, the deal is in our house: she goes to sci-fi/comic book movies with me, I go to Twilight movies with her.

Two things:

CGI baby is creepy.

Aro's fruity, over-the-top laugh when he mind-melds or whatever with Tressome' or whatever she's called, is so goofy my g/f laughed out loud. The theater at that moment was so quiet you could hear a pin drop. We still can't figure out if everyone else was shocked to the point of awe by this weird element, or if they all take this shiat so seriously that they find no humor except in the places you're "supposed" to laugh.

His outburst was so, so weird and and fruity. I can't believe they left it in.


Oh, and it seems like I saw this movie before. A small group of various heroes with various talents gathers to fight a fruity, dark haired villain in a cape, and his army of dark, almost robotic followers.


I went to see the movie at the drive-in with a friend of mine, since I knew there was no way in hell the fiancee would go with me. It was a double feature- they showed Breaking Dawn Part 1 and 2. Even though we are fans of the books, we spent most of the time making fun of the movie. The Aro part caught us both off guard at first- then we laughed hysterically after. The other part we loved is when the immortal baby got thrown into the fire.
 
2012-11-18 04:26:20 PM  

I Like Bread: Sounds like Lincoln got killed at the theater...


Obvious joke aside, it actually did very well. This isn't the type of movie that has a huge first weekend that accounts for 45% of its gross. It will most likely stay in the theaters through the entire awards season, and the 20 million it opened with was actually about twice as was expected.
 
2012-11-18 04:28:10 PM  

RoyFokker'sGhost: 1) My choices:
Patrick Stewart
Kevin Spacey
Benedict Cumberbatch
Idris Elba
Christopher Eccleston
Kenneth Branaugh
Christoph Waltz


Out of that lot, I'd be torn between Patrick Stewart and Christoph Waltz, with Chris Eccleston as a dark horse pick.

I wouldn't mind seeing Idris Elba as Bond somewhere down the pike, though.


RoyFokker'sGhost: 2) It's debatable whether or not to tell the Tracy story again. After all, you had Vesper in 'Casino Royal' which had pretty much the same effect on Bond.


See, that's what I was thinking. You had the downer ending with Casino Royale, so I think they would be hesitant to go the same route with the Tracy plotline.

They could reengineer the whole story, though, so... who knows?


Metaluna Mutant: EON doesn't have the rights to SPECTRE, McClory does - it's that long complicated Thunderball/Fleming/rights etc story. Same with the name Blofeld, I believe.


Right, I forgot about that.

That's why we had "Man in Wheelchair" and not Blofeld in For Your Eyes Only.


The All-Powerful Atheismo: I think I just orgasmed.


Would that not rock?

"Hello, Mister Bond... we've been expecting you."
 
2012-11-18 04:29:34 PM  

Pauly Math: Lincoln has done pretty well so far in the theaters, which historically has not been the case.

/so, so sorry


This!
 
2012-11-18 04:31:39 PM  

Larry Mahnken: There were slaves in states that remained loyal to the Union, as well as areas of the Confederacy not covered under the Emancipation Proclamation because they were under Union control on January 1st, 1863. There was a practical effect on them.


BIngo. Maryland was a slave State but stayed in the Union. It was legal to own slaves in the District of Columbia as well. Without an amendment abolishing slavery, things would have gotten messy fast.
 
2012-11-18 04:32:35 PM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: Mugato: I guess Patrick Stewart wold be too obvious but would also be badass.

I'd love this, actually.

There are different ways you can go with Blofeld.

Donald Pleasence made Blofeld come across as more of a cerebral threat. Telly Savalas made Blofeld more of a physical presence.

Patrick Stewart would be more of a lean towards the Pleasence Blofeld, and I would be all right with that.

I think I just orgasmed.


And yet still I'm not a studio executive.
Patrick Stewart's never been a villain in anything I've seen (well he was a Borg for a while but he didn't want to be) but I think he'd be badass as a Bond villain.
 
2012-11-18 04:35:05 PM  

Jadedgrl: The Aro part caught us both off guard at first- then we laughed hysterically after. The other part we loved is when the immortal baby got thrown into the fire.


Yeah I was flabbergasted at dude's laugh. Reminded me of "Friday I'm In Love" crossed with Mike Meyer's Cat In The Hat or something. That shiat was Fruity Pebbles. As far as the baby was concerned, I heard a few 14 year olds gasping in horror. I'm pretty sure my gal (26) stopped taking this stuff very seriously after like the third film or so. I don't "hate" the series, nor do I whine at taking her, but damn I'm glad its over. If they make any more, I'm fairly certain she won't be too interested. I guess escapist romance loses its its luster after you have a baby of your own.
 
2012-11-18 04:56:55 PM  

Mugato: And yet still I'm not a studio executive.
Patrick Stewart's never been a villain in anything I've seen (well he was a Borg for a while but he didn't want to be) but I think he'd be badass as a Bond villain.


I caught him playing the title role in a PBS production of Macbeth.

He was so freakin' good in that. Very unnerving.
 
2012-11-18 05:06:31 PM  

I Like Bread: Sounds like Lincoln got killed at the theater...


Too soon.

Jerk.
 
2012-11-18 05:33:09 PM  

Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: I'll rest easier when the Twilight author is launched into the deep recesses of space with no means to send communication back to Earth.


Can we send her cheesy movies?

The worst, we can find?

You know, as revenge?
 
2012-11-18 05:39:32 PM  

Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: Mugato: And yet still I'm not a studio executive.
Patrick Stewart's never been a villain in anything I've seen (well he was a Borg for a while but he didn't want to be) but I think he'd be badass as a Bond villain.

I caught him playing the title role in a PBS production of Macbeth.

He was so freakin' good in that. Very unnerving.


I only caught one episode recently, but Stewart was also good as Sejanus in the series I, Claudius. And he had hair, although I have significant doubts that it was his own.
 
2012-11-18 05:49:42 PM  

TheZorker: Can we send her cheesy movies?

The worst, we can find?

You know, as revenge?


Hah!

In her case, the best revenge may be sending her GOOD movies.

You know, with capable actors, interesting stories, actual character growth, whip-smart dialogue, etc.


born_yesterday: I only caught one episode recently, but Stewart was also good as Sejanus in the series I, Claudius. And he had hair, although I have significant doubts that it was his own.


AND he was really good in this one episode of Frasier.

He wasn't playing a villain, but still, he knocked it out of the park.
 
2012-11-18 06:12:28 PM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: QoS wasn't that farking bad, you losers.

REMEMBER THE INVISIBLE CAR AND DESPAIR.


No kidding. And the water mafia angle is more real than most people realize.Try negotiating water deals between Iraq and Iran without a whole phalanx of bodyguards.
 
2012-11-18 06:18:25 PM  

Mugato: Patrick Stewart's never been a villain in anything I've seen (well he was a Borg for a while but he didn't want to be) but I think he'd be badass as a Bond villain.


He was great in Conspiracy Theory
 
2012-11-18 06:21:51 PM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: He was great in Conspiracy Theory


*looks that up on Wikipedia, sees Julia Roberts' name listed*

I'll have to take your word for that, sadly.
 
2012-11-18 06:31:54 PM  

Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: The All-Powerful Atheismo: He was great in Conspiracy Theory

*looks that up on Wikipedia, sees Julia Roberts' name listed*

I'll have to take your word for that, sadly.


She was alright too. That movie was underrated.

But without Captain Picard it would have been awful.
 
2012-11-18 06:44:17 PM  

T-Servo: The All-Powerful Atheismo: QoS wasn't that farking bad, you losers.

REMEMBER THE INVISIBLE CAR AND DESPAIR.

No kidding. And the water mafia angle is more real than most people realize.Try negotiating water deals between Iraq and Iran without a whole phalanx of bodyguards.


Perception is reality, and I don't perceive a takeover of water rights in Bolivia beneficial to a Bond movie.
 
2012-11-18 07:03:26 PM  
Saw ":Lincoln" this weekend. What a joke. If this movie is supposed to be historically accurate then where were the vampires? And "spoiler alert' Lincoln dying at the end, how did this ending test well? Totally unbelievable.
 
2012-11-18 07:30:51 PM  

Mugato: The All-Powerful Atheismo: Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: Mugato: I guess Patrick Stewart wold be too obvious but would also be badass.

I'd love this, actually.

There are different ways you can go with Blofeld.

Donald Pleasence made Blofeld come across as more of a cerebral threat. Telly Savalas made Blofeld more of a physical presence.

Patrick Stewart would be more of a lean towards the Pleasence Blofeld, and I would be all right with that.

I think I just orgasmed.

And yet still I'm not a studio executive.
Patrick Stewart's never been a villain in anything I've seen (well he was a Borg for a while but he didn't want to be) but I think he'd be badass as a Bond villain.


Check out a little film from 1997 called "Masterminds", starring a pre-Mad Men Vincent Kartheiser. He also played the villain in a not-so-little film that same year called Conspiracy Theory.
 
2012-11-18 07:42:41 PM  

FuryOfFirestorm: Mugato: The All-Powerful Atheismo: Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: Mugato: I guess Patrick Stewart wold be too obvious but would also be badass.

I'd love this, actually.

There are different ways you can go with Blofeld.

Donald Pleasence made Blofeld come across as more of a cerebral threat. Telly Savalas made Blofeld more of a physical presence.

Patrick Stewart would be more of a lean towards the Pleasence Blofeld, and I would be all right with that.

I think I just orgasmed.

And yet still I'm not a studio executive.
Patrick Stewart's never been a villain in anything I've seen (well he was a Borg for a while but he didn't want to be) but I think he'd be badass as a Bond villain.

Check out a little film from 1997 called "Masterminds", starring a pre-Mad Men Vincent Kartheiser. He also played the villain in a not-so-little film that same year called Conspiracy Theory.


Ok. I'm not his biographer.
 
2012-11-18 07:54:54 PM  

CPT Ethanolic: Subby apparently has no idea how Hollywood works. If there is money to be made, it will be milked to death.

/Star Wars 7-9?


The thing is Lucas never really milked the franchise the way it should. It was all ad hoc and poorly managed. He could of been worth 5 times the 4 billion if he actually managed things correctly.
 
2012-11-18 07:59:44 PM  

gingerjet: CPT Ethanolic: Subby apparently has no idea how Hollywood works. If there is money to be made, it will be milked to death.

/Star Wars 7-9?

The thing is Lucas never really milked the franchise the way it should. It was all ad hoc and poorly managed. He could of been worth 5 times the 4 billion if he actually managed things correctly.


If Lucas really wanted to milk the franchise there would have been a lot more movies between 1983 and 1999.
 
2012-11-18 08:18:59 PM  

unyon: robsul82: Not sure why it especially stuck in my craw this year, but the Oscar horses have been missing their endings so far. Both Flight and Lincoln went on past where the natural ending was. Just niggling and annoying, lol.

There's nothing I hate more than when nigglers ruin the end of a perfectly good movie.


Nigglers, please.
 
2012-11-18 08:24:00 PM  

Mugato: FuryOfFirestorm: Mugato: The All-Powerful Atheismo: Toshiro Mifune's Letter Opener: Mugato: I guess Patrick Stewart wold be too obvious but would also be badass.

I'd love this, actually.

There are different ways you can go with Blofeld.

Donald Pleasence made Blofeld come across as more of a cerebral threat. Telly Savalas made Blofeld more of a physical presence.

Patrick Stewart would be more of a lean towards the Pleasence Blofeld, and I would be all right with that.

I think I just orgasmed.

And yet still I'm not a studio executive.
Patrick Stewart's never been a villain in anything I've seen (well he was a Borg for a while but he didn't want to be) but I think he'd be badass as a Bond villain.

Check out a little film from 1997 called "Masterminds", starring a pre-Mad Men Vincent Kartheiser. He also played the villain in a not-so-little film that same year called Conspiracy Theory.

Ok. I'm not his biographer.


Sorry if I came off as snarky. I was just sincerely offering some films that Stewart starred in as a villain. I think there was a TV movie of Moby Dick where he played Ahab, if you consider Ahab a villain. IIRC, there's was a cable TV movie of A Christmas Carol where he played Scrooge, as well. Happy viewing!
 
2012-11-18 08:36:57 PM  

T-Servo: Oh, has Spoony done another drunken rant about Breaking Dawn? I know Mrs Servo is going to force me to watch it, and he really helped me come down from the trauma last year. 

/link worth watching in case you missed it


Yes
 
2012-11-18 08:39:21 PM  
I guess I really am the only person who didn't love Skyfall.

Too many throwaway characters (including the bond girl and the caretaker), the story wasn't all that exciting, the fan service throwback was done ham-handedly, and there wasn't a surprising event in the whole damn movie. It was OK... many parts enjoyable... but I wouldn't put it much about Quantum.
 
Displayed 50 of 109 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report