Fart_Machine: It also should be noted that selling off their brands means someone else will most likely pick them up to resume the flow of Twinkies and Ho Ho's to our starved masses.
Fart_Machine: Needlessly Complicated: We are giving makers of sugary snacks a tax break for advertising. Why the hell are we doing that?The point they're making is why single out junk food companies when it's applied across the board to everyone?I'm saying why are we giving tax breaks to any company for advertising.
LordJiro: They're so desperate, they're grabbing straws they've already discarded.Christ, the modern GOP cannot collapse fast enough. GTFO and let adults take your place in government.
Lost Thought 00: Fart_Machine: Apparently not giving them a tax break is legislating morality.It is. The tax breaks aren't specifically for producing junk food, they are general purpose tax breaks everyone enjoys. This is like trying to ban mortgage tax deductions for gay couples.
Want more stories with less ads? Try
It's what the cool kids are doing.It's also how we pay the bills.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Feb 21 2018 08:56:20
Runtime: 0.282 sec (281 ms)