That guy has the hairiest arms I've ever seen. Robin Williams has nothing on him.

/Why yes, I do have exactly nothing

I'm more amazed that CNN scored an interview with Bigfoot.

Bugs, you chucklefark.

biyaaatci: I've solved it! Are you ready for what the truth is? 'Cause it will blow your mind...


Everyone in Denver is as high as shiat.

Your Boss: My professional opinion. Her skirt is too long, and those boots are not makin' it.

Where did you get that dress, it's awful, and those shoes and that coat, jeeeeez!

ITGreen:

[stopthedrugwar.org image 300x295]

Oh yeah.

OMG They caught bugs near the lens AHHHHHHH Everyone Panic!

Cymbal: Damn, that's one fine reporter. I have made the deposit and will be soon making a withdrawal from the spank bank.

The mutherfarking "spank bank"?? BWHAHAHA!

Only on Fark do folks announce their plans to masturbate.

WayneKerr: "Explain localized debris."

You basically did. A shredder or drill or sander or fire or god-knows-what, launches very-small particulate matter into the air, where it can be carried around on air currents like a small scale version of a plastic bag on the wind. If it's vaguely reflective debris, you can easily get the glints that the 'original cameraman' is ready to call fire from a "thruster". And small-scale air currents and very light objects can do some pretty wild zipping around on otherwise-too-small-to-see air currents. At very small scales you can easily see things like, say, the metal on a camera tripod leg heating up in the direct sunlight, creating tiny little columns of hot air that can 'launch' such debris upward (comparatively) violently.

Mix in the facts that the recording involves: A) a tripod B) noonday sun C) what appears to be a location in or around a construction site

Of course it's not an alien spacecraft... has no one here ever heard of RODS???



Link

Captain Steroid: I never said it was me! You can't prove anything! I have rights! >_>'

That's no Earth insect!!! Did you see where it activated its metallic green space thrusters?!

Who ever heard of metallic green color appearing on a fly???

I'm not sayin' it.

david icke lizard people came for the legal dope

in real life though depth of field shows it is not a bug

Bugs morons. Or possibly a hummingbird.

Would it have killed them to post the unmolested original video? Or would that have made it too easy for us?

Gyrfalcon: ITGreen: Knucklepopper: That looked suspiciously like Balloon Boy's flying machine.

What is it about Colorado that makes everyone here so damn gullible regarding this sort of tripe?

They did just legalize pot...

Pffft. 

Do you really think legality has influenced people who honor the plant's natural human benefits over the misappropriated history of its detractors' making describing the negativities?

Gonad the Ballbarian: Just bugs flying in front of the camera

My thought too. Everyone just assumes they're something off in the distance. And, it explains why people looking up at the sky don't see them (although the credulous reporter assumes it's because they fly too fast to be seen by the naked eye). Also explains why they seem to be visible when filmed across an open area of the type that might, say, be inhabited by insects.

WayneKerr: ringersol: If they show up even semi-regularly, why wouldn't you set up a camera in a different location, watching the same patch of sky?
That way you'd be able to rule out any localized bugs or debris.

Explain localized debris. I know that certain metal shredders are known to lauch items into the air, but...

What, you don't have localized debris where you live? Shoot, around my place you have to duck everytime you walk out the door.

RembrandtQEinstein: [s9.postimage.org image 500x252]

They're easy.

Be sure to kill the mind-holder first.

It destroys both.

x-com tactics out.

*)

Indubitably: RembrandtQEinstein: [s9.postimage.org image 500x252]

They're easy.

Be sure to kill the mind-holder first.

It destroys both.

x-com tactics out.

*)

P.S. I think it's feedback.

Superjew: Those bugs are cool.

yes, thank you. You can even the screen that they land on in the guys original footage.

That dude and that tv station are in line for cock punches.

It can't be a toy, a journalist would have checked it out, right?

What I don't understand is why they didn't set up two cameras next to one another, one focused at the far distance, and one focused immediately in front of the far-focused camera lens.

ufo video? Let's run through the checklist...

Using Burning_Monk's youtube link: Denver UFO Video

* Out-of-focus or low-res 'ufo' - check
* Fast jumps between multiple video clips to disorient the viewer - check
* Sped-up framerate. Look at the clouds (at 0:20) and bird (starting at 1:01, flying in front of the ridge on the right side towards the left) - check

Brilliant... not.

Drake Maijstral: ufo video? Let's run through the checklist...

Using Burning_Monk's youtube link: Denver UFO Video

* Out-of-focus or low-res 'ufo' - check
* Fast jumps between multiple video clips to disorient the viewer - check
* Sped-up framerate. Look at the clouds (at 0:20) and bird (starting at 1:01, flying in front of the ridge on the right side towards the left) - check

Brilliant... not.

B-b-b-b-b-ut, look into the Denver terminal.

That is all.

*)

Indubitably: Drake Maijstral: ufo video? Let's run through the checklist...

Using Burning_Monk's youtube link: Denver UFO Video

* Out-of-focus or low-res 'ufo' - check
* Fast jumps between multiple video clips to disorient the viewer - check
* Sped-up framerate. Look at the clouds (at 0:20) and bird (starting at 1:01, flying in front of the ridge on the right side towards the left) - check

Brilliant... not.

B-b-b-b-b-ut, look into the Denver terminal.

That is all.

*)

P.S. Especially look at the veiny horse used as a centerpiece. Seriously, just look at it closely. With the glowing eyes. Veiny horse, glowy eyes. You do the math.

P.P.S. Maths.

IggyFan: I've got a fail tag right here for ya subby.

This. And another for whoever greenlighted this POS.

Gyrfalcon: Indubitably: Gyrfalcon: ITGreen: Knucklepopper: That looked suspiciously like Balloon Boy's flying machine.

What is it about Colorado that makes everyone here so damn gullible regarding this sort of tripe?

They did just legalize pot...

Pffft. 

Do you really think legality has influenced people who honor the plant's natural human benefits over the misappropriated history of its detractors' making describing the negativities?

Wait....what?

Read it slow.

PunGent: IggyFan: I've got a fail tag right here for ya subby.

This. And another for whoever greenlighted this POS.

Point of sale.

I make you money.

I know that, btw.

Do you know I know>?

dewatson: What I don't understand is why they didn't set up two cameras next to one another, one focused at the far distance, and one focused immediately in front of the far-focused camera lens.

Not even necessary. Simplest way to debunk it is to just set up a white screen or something some distance from the camera that blocks the sky. If you see bugs flying across that, mystery solved.

I won't dismiss any "evidence" out of hand, 'cause, hey, it'd be neat if we really did find flying saucers. But that was disappointing.

Nice to know we have proof that a Yeti exists.

Znuh: Well now. That's pretty damned freaky.

Again annoyed nobody thought to take a camera with high enough resolution to allow us a better, closer view.

Actually, professional TV cameras have high enough resolution, but lenses matter more than resolution. The camera has that as well. What the 'too low of resolution' crowd doesn't seem to grasp is that all the TV guy was able to do is point the camera in the general direction and hope he got something, this wasn't an object you saw and then pointed the camera at.

This is all covered in the news story, BTW.