SnakeLee: What exactly is the "scandal" according to Republicans? That either weA.) didn't send in a plane that everyone agrees would take hours to get there-or-B.) that there wasn't enough security there when the CIA specifically asked that we didn't have lots of security there?Those are what the right seem to be implying, but then what reason would Obama have to lie about whether or not it was a terrorist attack if he knew from the beginning like they claimed? If everyone told him it was a terrorist attack from day 1 (which they didn't, there was lots of competing intel), he could have just ran with that and it would have probably helped his reelection. It wouldn't make any sense to do so and there is plenty of evidence that he didn't.It's almost as if that are saying it is a scandal and politicizing the deaths of Americans without any kind of clear narrative or evidence.
Petey4335: All of cable news except FNCFox NewsUm, list needs editing.
phaseolus: Aarontology: But this won't stop the 9/11/12 Truthers from going ahead with their witch hunt.Hey, when you post nonsense in 20 threads and keep the list of all the thread numbers in your wallet, you don't just quit witch huntin'. You've invested. You have a reputation to maintain.
MyRandomName: Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.
MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.Seriously. Grow up.Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.Good god people.
AdolfOliverPanties: It was just a question. I can see the White House wanting to edit the report, remove sensitive content, but if other agencies get their mitts on it first, they might remove important info.
Aarontology: But this won't stop the 9/11/12 Truthers from going ahead with their witch hunt.
Slaves2Darkness: hillbillypharmacist: They must have something really big on this guy.Barack Obama, he is more of a knife in the back then a boot to the head kind of guy.
AdolfOliverPanties: Why do other agencies get to edit CIA reports? What are these agencies?
Want more news before we break it? Try
See what's behind the green doorand help keep the tap flowing
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 18 2017 16:08:29
Runtime: 0.231 sec (230 ms)