If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CBC)   It's a bigger conspiracy than we thought: "The general (Petraeus) was adamant there was no politicization of the process, no White House interference or political agenda"   (cbc.ca) divider line 123
    More: Interesting, Petraeus, White House, Libya, CIA, political agenda, United Nations Permanent Representative, U.S. European Command, Peter Schiff  
•       •       •

1753 clicks; posted to Politics » on 16 Nov 2012 at 2:54 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



123 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-16 03:23:41 PM

fringedmyotis: InmanRoshi: I listened to Rush a little yesterday for the lulz. He was already preparing his callers for this. He was throwing out the talkingpoint that Patreaus is an empty suit general emblematic of the state of the modern American Military that has been corrupted by modern liberal ideals of padding grades and not letting anyone fail.

....serving it up on a tee.

Why does Rush hate our troops?


Hey! He only hates the phoney soldiers. He loves the ones who refuse to salute (Democratic) presidents.
 
2012-11-16 03:25:08 PM
WE'RE NOT GOING TO STOP UNTIL YOU TELL US WHAT WE WANT TO HEAR!

/f*cking children
 
2012-11-16 03:26:01 PM
So just two weeks into the President's second term, he gets removed from office and replaced with Sarah Palin. Who knew?
 
2012-11-16 03:26:30 PM

mrshowrules: Petey4335: All of cable news except FNC

Fox News

Um, list needs editing.

I've been told that it is funnier to list it that way.


Of course it is.

Also, the list is chronological. It reads like a story, an unfolding plot. That's what makes it so brilliant.
 
2012-11-16 03:26:38 PM
So... god is NOT beautiful?
 
2012-11-16 03:27:52 PM
Why is Lindsay Graham on the list? I must have missed something.
 
2012-11-16 03:28:21 PM

AdolfOliverPanties: It was just a question. I can see the White House wanting to edit the report, remove sensitive content, but if other agencies get their mitts on it first, they might remove important info.


This stuff happens all the time in Fortune 500 companies. Write report for company. Is considered confidential. Report distributed to small group of managers on need-to-know basis. Those managers write summary for higher ups. Information from report gets blended into slide decks for wider consumption.

Not a conspiracy.

/consultant
 
2012-11-16 03:28:54 PM

Blue_Blazer: Why is Lindsay Graham on the list? I must have missed something.


He looks feminine and thin.
 
2012-11-16 03:30:37 PM

rthanu: Blue_Blazer: Why is Lindsay Graham on the list? I must have missed something.

He looks feminine and thin.


Well I'll grant that, but I just figured something must have happened, like him saying "Hey John, we're wrong give it up" or something.
 
2012-11-16 03:32:26 PM

boom: Aarontology: But this won't stop the 9/11/12 Truthers from going ahead with their witch hunt.

Benghazists.


soulfuldetroit.com
 
2012-11-16 03:32:47 PM

I_C_Weener: So, wny truth to the rumor that the CIA was using Bhengazi as a secret detention center?  And no, we can't take the CIA's word for it.  They are the farking CIA ferchrissakes.



I mean, what kind of answer could we really expect? I'm sure some crazy bloggers somewhere could tell us ALL about it in great mind-bending reality (from shiat they read in a sci-fi book). But unless there are pictures and reports across the news, it's just a smoke-thought.

- - - - - -

At the end of the day, as cold as it sounds, I just don't care.....

There are hundreds of American that get killed on the streets of America every day, there are thousands that go hungry, thousands without homes, rapes, thefts, failing infrastructure, failing education, and super storms destroying or crippling major American cities .... and people think I actually give a flying fark about a few folks getting shot in some 3rd world shiat-hole that I couldn't find on a map? Not even the President of the United States is safe to walk anywhere in the world.

Life is harsh and shiat happens, lets move on and progress.
 
2012-11-16 03:34:48 PM

Slowdog: mrshowrules: General Betrayus indeed.

List of People Conspiring Against the GOP, and therefore, America
(LOPCATGOPATA for short):


You gotta tack the Electoral College onto that. And/or America.



Put in as:
Electoral College
Americans
 
2012-11-16 03:34:53 PM
What exactly is the "scandal" according to Republicans? That either we

A.) didn't send in a plane that everyone agrees would take hours to get there

-or-

B.) that there wasn't enough security there when the CIA specifically asked that we didn't have lots of security there?

Those are what the right seem to be implying, but then what reason would Obama have to lie about whether or not it was a terrorist attack if he knew from the beginning like they claimed? If everyone told him it was a terrorist attack from day 1 (which they didn't, there was lots of competing intel), he could have just ran with that and it would have probably helped his reelection. It wouldn't make any sense to do so and there is plenty of evidence that he didn't.

It's almost as if that are saying it is a scandal and politicizing the deaths of Americans without any kind of clear narrative or evidence.
 
2012-11-16 03:35:46 PM

HellRaisingHoosier: I_C_Weener: So, wny truth to the rumor that the CIA was using Bhengazi as a secret detention center?  And no, we can't take the CIA's word for it.  They are the farking CIA ferchrissakes.


I mean, what kind of answer could we really expect? I'm sure some crazy bloggers somewhere could tell us ALL about it in great mind-bending reality (from shiat they read in a sci-fi book). But unless there are pictures and reports across the news, it's just a smoke-thought.

- - - - - -

At the end of the day, as cold as it sounds, I just don't care.....

There are hundreds of American that get killed on the streets of America every day, there are thousands that go hungry, thousands without homes, rapes, thefts, failing infrastructure, failing education, and super storms destroying or crippling major American cities .... and people think I actually give a flying fark about a few folks getting shot in some 3rd world shiat-hole that I couldn't find on a map? Not even the President of the United States is safe to walk anywhere in the world.

Life is harsh and shiat happens, lets move on and progress.


b- b- b- but they didn't call it terrorism right away! It's important!
 
2012-11-16 03:36:12 PM

Blue_Blazer: rthanu: Blue_Blazer: Why is Lindsay Graham on the list? I must have missed something.

He looks feminine and thin.

Well I'll grant that, but I just figured something must have happened, like him saying "Hey John, we're wrong give it up" or something.


Link 

Although, I think he walked it back later.
 
2012-11-16 03:36:19 PM

keylock71: Yeah, still not sure what I'm supposed to be outraged and righteously indignant about here...


You should be feeling the hate and outrage before the "scandal" even happens. You haven't been getting your daily dose of right wing media, that's the problem.
 
2012-11-16 03:36:58 PM

ivan: Blue_Blazer: rthanu: Blue_Blazer: Why is Lindsay Graham on the list? I must have missed something.

He looks feminine and thin.

Well I'll grant that, but I just figured something must have happened, like him saying "Hey John, we're wrong give it up" or something.

Link 

Although, I think he walked it back later.


Thanks.
 
2012-11-16 03:37:03 PM

Philip Francis Queeg: Summoner101: I actually feel kinda bad for Petraeus. He's venerated by all politicians for what he did in the Middle East, now he's being used as a pawn in a bullshiat "investigation."

However, he probably prefers being in Washington getting grilled by a panel of hostile Senators to being home alone with his wife right now.


Based upon MY wife's comments, I know I would be in Washington.
 
2012-11-16 03:37:54 PM
This is outrageous. Truly outrageous. Truly, truly, truly outrageous.
 
2012-11-16 03:38:26 PM

ivan: Blue_Blazer: rthanu: Blue_Blazer: Why is Lindsay Graham on the list? I must have missed something.

He looks feminine and thin.

Well I'll grant that, but I just figured something must have happened, like him saying "Hey John, we're wrong give it up" or something.

Link 

Although, I think he walked it back later.


Actually that can't be it. His name is near the bottom of the list, which suggests that something recent happened right?
 
2012-11-16 03:43:46 PM

SnakeLee: What exactly is the "scandal" according to Republicans? That either we

A.) didn't send in a plane that everyone agrees would take hours to get there

-or-

B.) that there wasn't enough security there when the CIA specifically asked that we didn't have lots of security there?

Those are what the right seem to be implying, but then what reason would Obama have to lie about whether or not it was a terrorist attack if he knew from the beginning like they claimed? If everyone told him it was a terrorist attack from day 1 (which they didn't, there was lots of competing intel), he could have just ran with that and it would have probably helped his reelection. It wouldn't make any sense to do so and there is plenty of evidence that he didn't.

It's almost as if that are saying it is a scandal and politicizing the deaths of Americans without any kind of clear narrative or evidence.


Let's not forgot the right was successful in spearheading budget cuts in the area of diplomatic security either. They really don't see any connection to lopping the security budget and lack of security. Which is reason number 3,588,779,678 that shows that this just another bs attempt to blame Obama for anything.
 
2012-11-16 03:44:34 PM

fringedmyotis: mrshowrules: Petey4335: All of cable news except FNC

Fox News

Um, list needs editing.

I've been told that it is funnier to list it that way.

What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?


I think each and every item on that list had it's own Fark thread at one point or another. Don't recall that one specifically.
 
2012-11-16 03:46:50 PM

fringedmyotis: mrshowrules: Petey4335: All of cable news except FNC

Fox News

Um, list needs editing.

I've been told that it is funnier to list it that way.

What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?


In all fairness LF toilets are the devils work.
 
2012-11-16 03:48:39 PM

Blue_Blazer: ivan: Blue_Blazer: rthanu: Blue_Blazer: Why is Lindsay Graham on the list? I must have missed something.

He looks feminine and thin.

Well I'll grant that, but I just figured something must have happened, like him saying "Hey John, we're wrong give it up" or something.

Link 

Although, I think he walked it back later.

Actually that can't be it. His name is near the bottom of the list, which suggests that something recent happened right?


You're right.

Maybe the missus will tell us.
 
2012-11-16 03:51:06 PM
So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.

What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.

Seriously. Grow up.

Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.

Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Good god people.
 
2012-11-16 03:54:43 PM
Or maybe it was just incompetence.
 
2012-11-16 03:57:22 PM
This is a complete clusterfark .. for the Republicans. The harder they hammer at this, the stupider they seem.

OH, SO THE GENERAL RESIGNED! MUST HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE!

Well, he's going to testify.

THE GENERAL IS NOT TELLING THE TRUTH AND HAS FAULTY MEMORY!
 
2012-11-16 03:58:15 PM

mrshowrules: fringedmyotis: mrshowrules: Petey4335: All of cable news except FNC

Fox News

Um, list needs editing.

I've been told that it is funnier to list it that way.

What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?

I think each and every item on that list had it's own Fark thread at one point or another. Don't recall that one specifically.


I've said it before, if I had a time machine, one of the first things I'd do is compile links showing the reason every entry on the LOPCATGOPATA made the list.

Hell, I might start a Google Doc on that this weekend. I don't want to get into it on my phone.
 
2012-11-16 04:00:12 PM

MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.

What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.

Seriously. Grow up.

Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.

Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Good god people.


Yes I can see how you are outraged that you were lied to during the debates.
 
2012-11-16 04:01:03 PM

MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.


Yes. I think I can use the royal "we" here and say: yes we are. Even some of us non-liberals are ignoring it. Ignoring the heck out of it.

What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.

Seriously. Grow up.

Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.

Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Good god people.


You do a good job of sounding outraged, and for that you should be commended. Unfortunately, you'd be hard pressed to pull many people in, because that spew was just pretty impotent. It's hard to see who you might be trying to get riled up one way or the other, and you don't have any implications that sound substantial. It's more like: "But mommy, you said I could play outside this weekend!! You lied!!!" Yes, son, I know what I said, but it's raining, and it's cold, and at some point you have to grow up and learn that things change sometimes. It's not the end of the world.

/iow, you sound like a brat
 
2012-11-16 04:01:42 PM

MyRandomName: Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.


Just curious, what do you think the motive was to "lie to our faces". What political benefit exactly does Obama gain from it?

..... hold up, before you answer that, let me get the popcorn ready. This should be good.
 
2012-11-16 04:03:37 PM

Gonz: mrshowrules: fringedmyotis: mrshowrules: Petey4335: All of cable news except FNC

Fox News

Um, list needs editing.

I've been told that it is funnier to list it that way.

What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?

I think each and every item on that list had it's own Fark thread at one point or another. Don't recall that one specifically.

I've said it before, if I had a time machine, one of the first things I'd do is compile links showing the reason every entry on the LOPCATGOPATA made the list.

Hell, I might start a Google Doc on that this weekend. I don't want to get into it on my phone.


Take the list and divide up with Farkers to find the appropriate links. I'll take 20 on the list if you are up to consolidating it.
 
2012-11-16 04:05:55 PM

MyRandomName: Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.


Even if your spittle-flecked diatribe is the truth, how does it farking matter? What, specifically, would have changed? How would the ultimate outcome have been different?

What's the point of the poutrage?
 
2012-11-16 04:09:30 PM

InmanRoshi: MyRandomName: Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Just curious, what do you think the motive was to "lie to our faces". What political benefit exactly does Obama gain from it?

..... hold up, before you answer that, let me get the popcorn ready. This should be good.


If ithe attack is about the video then it isn't because there is a secret CIA prison inside a US embassy or because Obama overthrew Libya's government for kicks and giggles.
 
2012-11-16 04:11:52 PM

MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.

What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.

Seriously. Grow up.

Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.

Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Good god people.


When you hold Bush to the same standard that you are holding Obama to when it comes to lying, I'll start to give a shiat about how outraged you are about this.

Until then, this is nothing but a political witchhunt by a bunch of people still butthurt that Romney lost. 

Seriously, I stopping caring about what you guys think and how outraged you were a long time ago.
 
2012-11-16 04:12:00 PM

MyRandomName: libs libs libs libs libs


www.heyhotshot.com
 
2012-11-16 04:12:07 PM

fringedmyotis: What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?


I don't remember either, but it turns out there's plenty out there.
 
2012-11-16 04:12:53 PM

MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.

What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.

Seriously. Grow up.

Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.

Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Good god people.


Because the annex was a black ops site and you myopic mouthbreathers don't give a fark if releasing classified sensitive information might actually cost more lives.

Now stfu and let adults handle this.
 
2012-11-16 04:14:08 PM

MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.

What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.

Seriously. Grow up.

Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.

Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Good god people.


The coward is finally back.
 
2012-11-16 04:14:18 PM

fringedmyotis: What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?


Republicans are upset because low-flow toilets can't get rid of the large amount of shiat they spew constantly as easy.
 
2012-11-16 04:16:15 PM

MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report.

The C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies prepared unclassified talking points on the attack for members of Congress, and in them the references to Qaeda affiliates were changed to the less specific "extremists" to avoid revealing to insurgents that American intelligence agencies were eavesdropping on their electronic communications.


This is an outrage! Give it up. It's not a scandal.

Link
 
2012-11-16 04:16:44 PM

MyRandomName: Seriously.


I was perfectly content to wait a while on details from a country with a new government from a recent revolution and wasn't expecting the full story from the UN ambassador on BOEING PRESENTS GENERAL ELECTRIC'S MEET THE PRESS(did Gregory swear her in?) less than a week after the incident.

I was, however, expecting the wacky right to grasp at any straw they could to poke Obama with especially after they lost the election.
 
2012-11-16 04:17:03 PM

MyRandomName: Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.


1. No, he referred to "acts of terror."

2. Do presidents routinely brief the UN ambassador?

Link

Acting CIA Director Michael Morell told lawmakers in a closed-door briefing yesterday that Rice's televised account, five days after the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, was based on an early agency assessment that the episode stemmed from a spontaneous demonstration, according to the lawmakers, Representatives Adam Schiff and Charles "Dutch" Ruppersberger.
 
2012-11-16 04:17:10 PM

flux: fringedmyotis: What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?

I don't remember either, but it turns out there's plenty out there.


Knows all too well.
 
2012-11-16 04:18:29 PM

PreMortem: MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.

What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.

Seriously. Grow up.

Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.

Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Good god people.

Because the annex was a black ops site and you myopic mouthbreathers don't give a fark if releasing classified sensitive information might actually cost more lives.

Now stfu and let adults handle this.


Hey, they are happy to use the blood of 4 Americans to smear the president without knowing any of the facts.

More blood is even easier to smear.
 
2012-11-16 04:19:01 PM

Mrtraveler01: flux: fringedmyotis: What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?

I don't remember either, but it turns out there's plenty out there.

Knows all too well.


Goes better with the picture:

images.mises.org
 
2012-11-16 04:20:55 PM
Senators McLamebrain and Graham Cracker obviously know better.

Rumor in DC is that obvious closet case Graham Cracker is about to be revealed by his transdressor paramour.
 
2012-11-16 04:21:10 PM
I'm gonna keep posting this til a fark independent claims it's all true...

~tinfoilhat~The best one so far that I've heard goes like this:

Obama in conjunction with the CIA and/or State Dept. and/or Pentagon was trying to stage a positive (for O) October Surprise. The idea was to get US embedded plants amongst the Arab Springers to rile up enough outrage over a comically bad US gov't made counter-propaganda film that a large but mostly non-violent spectacle of a protest would form outside the consulate. In the ensuing 'storming' of the consulate, the Ambassador et al. would be 'taken hostage' by said US friendly plants. Then conveniently, right before the election, the O man would send in the USS Drone SEAL Team Infinity Rangers Rambo part XI squad to liberate them and play that up as foreign policy kick-ass vote for me cred.

Of course this all got botched when some unexpected real terror types showed up with rocket launchers and shiat.

The evidence for this being that the CIA was holding a couple Al Qaidas already during the raid, whom would conveniently have their brains splattered during said rescue mission. Also, the evidence that after the botched 'kidnapping' went wrong, the supposedly pissed off protesters tried like hell to keep the Ambassador alive. Also, also, the Administration had the half-assed 'it was all about a shiatty movie no one has seen' story ready to go, and stupidly rolled it out even after it was obvious that real terrorists were involved.

Alternatively; the Clintons and/or CIA and/or State Dept. and/or Pentagon intentionally botched the mission to make O look bad and lose, so when Mittens took helm of the US headed for a double dip depression, Hilary would be a shoo in come 2016.

Oh, and Petraeus something something knew too much something something fell on his biographer, er, sword something something, or something.

~/tinfoilhat~
 
2012-11-16 04:21:40 PM

MyRandomName: So liberals in this thread are completely ignoring that the report was changed to remove mention of al Qaeda and terrorism and was merely a shell of the original report. Ignoring the fact that the cia report did nit mention a video or protest as a cause. Ignoring the fact that this was know leas that 48 hours after the attacks, 3 days before the talk show visits.

What the fark. Seriously. The administration pushed a false narrative of events. There was zero evidence that a film or protest took place. That was known that night. The administration pushed a narrative backed wIth zero evidence when the cia knew the cause. This doesn't raise any hairs for you liberals.

Seriously. Grow up.

Obama said in the debates he called it terrorism in the rose garden. He said yesterday he sent out rice with the best intelligence he had 5 days after the rose garden. Of he is telling the truth on both accounts, he sent her out with intentionally misleading accounts. He either lied at the debates or purposefully mislead America through rice.

Yet you are all such good and loyal soldiers you brush this off. He farking lied to your faces.

Good god people.


WTF am I reading?

Get yourself to a shrink man. I'm the one with Mad in his name but you are just barking... Oh, wait, someone must be blowing a whistle I can't hear.
 
2012-11-16 04:22:32 PM

fringedmyotis: What the crikey-fark are Low Flow Toilets doing on there?


IT had to do with some guys list about hte five unintended consequences of the obama election. Low water usage toilets was in the list. It was from 2 days after the election or so.
 
Displayed 50 of 123 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report