Son of Thunder: Save your "technically legal means perfectly fine" nonsense for the lawyers.
Son of Thunder: Cyclometh: So, do we go back to the original thread and ask everyone who called Clash a pervert, pedophile and deviant to recant and apologize?I know the difference between a pedophile and an ephebophile, so that part doesn't apply, but I did call him a pervert and a deviant. You get no apology. He was nailing a kid who could have been in the same high school as his daughter. In addition to "pervert" and "deviant", I'll add "creep", "sleeze", and "skeevey". "Technically legal" does not equal "good idea".
Cyclometh: So, do we go back to the original thread and ask everyone who called Clash a pervert, pedophile and deviant to recant and apologize?This is an object lesson in why we are assumed innocent until proven guilty in court. It's something that should extend outside that also, but the media needs their blood.
Cythraul: [img.gawkerassets.com image 400x452]Is that him? Although not my type, I can see why Elmo definitely wanted some of that.
Son of Thunder: What magnificent judgment Clash demonstrated, hopping into the sack with such a nice boy.
Want to see behind the curtain? Try
It's how we feed the squirrel
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jan 16 2018 19:19:47
Runtime: 0.251 sec (251 ms)