Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   The shirtless FBI agent in the Petraeus clusterfark has been outed   (news.yahoo.com ) divider line
    More: Followup, Petraeus, FBI, Joint Terrorism Task Force, FBI Director Robert Mueller, House Majority Leader, Eric Cantor, cia director  
•       •       •

9504 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Nov 2012 at 9:34 AM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



131 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2012-11-15 09:16:51 AM  
Should have said "exposed", subby.
 
2012-11-15 09:38:05 AM  
I was really hoping it would be a woman... That seemed like the next logical step in this whole soap opera.
 
2012-11-15 09:38:32 AM  
www.mcclaneonline.com
I hope this doesn't impact his teaching job.
 
2012-11-15 09:38:56 AM  
I haven't been following this but what's wrong with a CIA guy enjoying pussy?

I thought most military guys liked banging male ass. This is a nice twist.
 
2012-11-15 09:40:13 AM  
Was he also hatless?
 
2012-11-15 09:40:18 AM  
Is his head misshapen?
 
2012-11-15 09:41:36 AM  
So, he's gay?
 
2012-11-15 09:42:58 AM  
Eggcellent.
 
2012-11-15 09:43:10 AM  
I find his paranoia that his being blocked from wasting taxpayer money on a frivolous "Cybercrimes" case involving a report of e-mail harassment to be a plot from up on high to prevent him from finding out the "Truth" about Benghazi to be appropriate grounds for immediate reassignment from FBI Agent to something more along the lines of meter maid.
 
2012-11-15 09:43:37 AM  

mc_madness: I haven't been following this but what's wrong with a CIA guy enjoying pussy?

I thought most military guys liked banging male ass. This is a nice twist.


you forgot the nttiawwt

And gay farkers need to weigh in and let us know if we need to see the topless photos. I can't tell.
 
2012-11-15 09:45:05 AM  

Rapmaster2000: [www.mcclaneonline.com image 405x299]
I hope this doesn't impact his teaching job.


I was thinking more of:

upload.wikimedia.org
 
2012-11-15 09:45:25 AM  
I want to care about this because it seems like it would be juicy but I can't bring myself to give a fark about it... sorry media.
 
2012-11-15 09:46:35 AM  
Farking fascist prevert.
 
2012-11-15 09:48:13 AM  
Well, his "cover up" paranoia was certainly well founded, what with Petraeus not having been inves... wait. Well he didn't have to appear in front of Congress over Benghaz... hold on. Well Broadwell isn't getting any scrutin... check that.

Well now his good friend Jill Kelley is persona non grata at MacDill. See! C-O-N... Spiracy!
 
2012-11-15 09:48:20 AM  

Skleenar: So, he's gay?


Gay mafia: Gay ambassador killed ------- Gay senator outraged -------- Gay FBI agent goes all rogue.

/Gay, gay, gay.
//Dont ask!
 
2012-11-15 09:49:04 AM  
Damn, even Uncle Fester is involved in this mess. Where does it end?
 
2012-11-15 09:49:06 AM  
From shirtless to shiatless in less than a week.
 
2012-11-15 09:49:17 AM  
www.squidmobile.com

Is it just me, or is the dome of his head shifted off to one side?

Am I wrong for picturing it wobbling back and forth like a mound of jello?
 
2012-11-15 09:49:28 AM  

Headso: I want to care about this because it seems like it would be juicy but I can't bring myself to give a fark about it... sorry media.


It is just a soap opera. I'm indulging myself with it because I don't normally follow gossip rags but there is very little "news" beyond whether Broadwell gets prosecuted for mis-handling classified information.
 
2012-11-15 09:50:59 AM  
Stopped reading after the word alleged was used three times by the agent's counsel. Reminds me of the time I worked for the IG and had to wear a suit -- the big joke was "What do you call a cop in a suit? Defendant." 

I do hope no one threw away the end of a career by trying to help Eric Cantor with his October Surprise. Now we all get the November, December and all of 2013 Congressional Hearing (We're too busy to do anything useful) Surprise.
 
2012-11-15 09:51:23 AM  
crooksandliars.com
 
2012-11-15 09:52:23 AM  
he who shall not be named...

/ definitely team slytherin...
 
2012-11-15 09:52:28 AM  
Mrs. JailhouseFistfark suspects this is a circle of swingers. Petraeus, the Kelley woman and her sister, General Allen, Broadwell, all of em', except maybe not Mrs. Petraeus. Or perhaps that's why she's so pissed: it's cutting into her Flag Officer Gangbang time. Rich people, high level military, and the spook community all live in these very insular worlds where they lose touch with the regular and ordinary. In fact, it is because their lives are so far from the ordinary that they are drawn to deviance. It becomes expected. The regular rules don't apply here. Nossir.

Swingers, I say. You saw the Mardi Gras pictures, right? Sure. Orgytime, only someone's gone and shiat in the hot-tub.
 
2012-11-15 09:54:43 AM  
An associate of Humphries told ABC News that it was hard to believe that Humphries had contacted elected officials about the case because "everyone knows that's professional suicide" and Humphries is "top notch."

The same could be said of Petraus.

And this guy looks like Rick Scott's twin. I wonder if the Governor underwent mitosis.
 
2012-11-15 09:56:13 AM  
scifiwire.com
 
2012-11-15 09:58:20 AM  
Throw in a mysterious masked stranger and a couple of long-lost twins and this has the makings of a helluva telonovela.
 
2012-11-15 09:58:23 AM  
www.punditmom.com

Doesn't see what all the fuss is about.

i.huffpost.com

Him, neither.
 
2012-11-15 10:02:26 AM  
i.i.com.com

I can't imagine he would be connected to any right wing hate groups.
 
2012-11-15 10:02:42 AM  
Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.
 
2012-11-15 10:03:52 AM  

chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.


BEGHAZIGATE!
 
2012-11-15 10:07:01 AM  

BolshyGreatYarblocks: Rapmaster2000: [www.mcclaneonline.com image 405x299]
I hope this doesn't impact his teaching job.

I was thinking more of:


Every time I see that pic it freaks me the F out. The crazy is strong (and obviously well documented) in that guy
 
2012-11-15 10:07:13 AM  
Wow, two Rick Scotts in FL? I'm scared....very very scared.
 
2012-11-15 10:07:27 AM  

chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.


Potential to blackmail the highest intelligence officer in the land, duh. And as I said in another thread, this whole thing has revealed some serious flaws in the system that are being overshadowed by the sleaze.
 
2012-11-15 10:13:39 AM  

chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.


Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?
 
2012-11-15 10:19:30 AM  

Diogenes: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Potential to blackmail the highest intelligence officer in the land, duh. And as I said in another thread, this whole thing has revealed some serious flaws in the system that are being overshadowed by the sleaze.


there is no potential for blackmail. We all know about it now.

As for your serious flaws idea. That is as stupid as it gets.
 
2012-11-15 10:21:39 AM  

Diogenes: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Potential to blackmail the highest intelligence officer in the land, duh. And as I said in another thread, this whole thing has revealed some serious flaws in the system that are being overshadowed by the sleaze.


There's also the angle of "he wanted to." Perhaps he's stepping out of the spotlight not only to repair (or sever) his marriage, but also to avoid the typical chain of "denial, admission, tear-jerking press conference, worse reveal, admission, resignation in disgrace" that we see with these things. He comes out of the situation with some dignity left that could benefit him in the long term with respect to employment.
 
2012-11-15 10:22:46 AM  

GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?


Dp you havr evidence that this woman is a spy?
 
2012-11-15 10:22:48 AM  

GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?


I was going to say that too, except now everyone knows about it, so a potential spy would have no leverage. As for the reasons most politicians resign during sex scandals - that is because they have betrayed the trust of their constituents. In Petraeus' case, however, he has not been elected by anyone and he has no constituency. If he can still perform his job well, why not apologize, say he'll make things up with the wife, and keep on rolling?
 
2012-11-15 10:23:03 AM  

chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.


They only condone torture and death.
 
2012-11-15 10:24:20 AM  
I don't think I'd ever send a shirtless picture to a family friend, that's odd.
 
2012-11-15 10:24:21 AM  
I immediately thought of Mr. Medulla.

cfs3.tistory.com
 
2012-11-15 10:27:25 AM  

ExcaliburPrime111: GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?

I was going to say that too, except now everyone knows about it, so a potential spy would have no leverage. As for the reasons most politicians resign during sex scandals - that is because they have betrayed the trust of their constituents. In Petraeus' case, however, he has not been elected by anyone and he has no constituency. If he can still perform his job well, why not apologize, say he'll make things up with the wife, and keep on rolling?


key word - potential
 
2012-11-15 10:30:17 AM  

chuckufarlie: Diogenes: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Potential to blackmail the highest intelligence officer in the land, duh. And as I said in another thread, this whole thing has revealed some serious flaws in the system that are being overshadowed by the sleaze.

there is no potential for blackmail. We all know about it now.

As for your serious flaws idea. That is as stupid as it gets.


Yo dog, I know it's tough having only 2 digits in your IQ number but....

Yes, it's exposed now. It wasn't a month ago, which is why it was a potential security threat.
 
2012-11-15 10:30:18 AM  

ExcaliburPrime111: GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?

I was going to say that too, except now everyone knows about it, so a potential spy would have no leverage. As for the reasons most politicians resign during sex scandals - that is because they have betrayed the trust of their constituents. In Petraeus' case, however, he has not been elected by anyone and he has no constituency. If he can still perform his job well, why not apologize, say he'll make things up with the wife, and keep on rolling?


An additional wrinkle here is that Petraeus could concievably be bound under the UCMJ, which has
statues prohibiting adultery among officers, though since he's retired it probably doesn't apply.
 
2012-11-15 10:34:20 AM  

chuckufarlie: ExcaliburPrime111: GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?

I was going to say that too, except now everyone knows about it, so a potential spy would have no leverage. As for the reasons most politicians resign during sex scandals - that is because they have betrayed the trust of their constituents. In Petraeus' case, however, he has not been elected by anyone and he has no constituency. If he can still perform his job well, why not apologize, say he'll make things up with the wife, and keep on rolling?

key word - potential


Well played on the troll got me.
 
2012-11-15 10:35:06 AM  

DjangoStonereaver: ExcaliburPrime111: GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?

I was going to say that too, except now everyone knows about it, so a potential spy would have no leverage. As for the reasons most politicians resign during sex scandals - that is because they have betrayed the trust of their constituents. In Petraeus' case, however, he has not been elected by anyone and he has no constituency. If he can still perform his job well, why not apologize, say he'll make things up with the wife, and keep on rolling?

An additional wrinkle here is that Petraeus could concievably be bound under the UCMJ, which has
statues prohibiting adultery among officers, though since he's retired it probably doesn't apply.


Well, the current reports are that he only started the affair after retiring. I could see him resigning if he violated military law, but if the reports are true, there is no Article 134 violation here.
 
2012-11-15 10:36:53 AM  
If an email essentially saying, "Stay away from my man" is enough to require a full blown FBI investigation, then how is the FBI getting anything done, what with all of the ongoing investigations I'm sure they're conducting sparked by Facebook catfights?
 
2012-11-15 10:37:48 AM  

chuckufarlie: Diogenes: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Potential to blackmail the highest intelligence officer in the land, duh. And as I said in another thread, this whole thing has revealed some serious flaws in the system that are being overshadowed by the sleaze.

there is no potential for blackmail. We all know about it now.

As for your serious flaws idea. That is as stupid as it gets.


The reason it's a career ender here is because it's a breach of protocol. Yes, in this instance, the cat's out of the bag. But the policy is in place so this shiat, and the potential for security and intelligence breaches, doesn't happen in the first place.

Your suggesting the rules are irrelevant once the transgression has occurred. THAT is as stupid as it gets.
 
2012-11-15 10:41:24 AM  

ExcaliburPrime111: GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?

I was going to say that too, except now everyone knows about it, so a potential spy would have no leverage. As for the reasons most politicians resign during sex scandals - that is because they have betrayed the trust of their constituents. In Petraeus' case, however, he has not been elected by anyone and he has no constituency. If he can still perform his job well, why not apologize, say he'll make things up with the wife, and keep on rolling?


Hm, that is a good point.

My response is he carried on the affair for months potentially exposing the country to problems. He handled himself improperly so he isn't fit to serve in the position as CIA director
 
2012-11-15 10:44:04 AM  

chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.


I suspect that there were some classified documents in the Google Docs dead drop that the lovers shared or the mistress got some clasified info via pillow talk. Both are serious breaches of security, especially for the Director of the C.I.Farking.A.

My suspicion is that Petraeus was allowed cop to the lesser offense of adultery to sweep it under the rug and the decision was delayed due to political reasons. The all this wacko stuff came to light.

Electon-coverage burnot made the MSM hungry for the story. Plus it keeps getting more weird by the day what with this skinhead fool and Gen. Allen's involvement.

Many people appear to have made poor decisions along the way and I'm certain many more could be uncovered if we just looked. It's sad to think that this is the way our governmnet is run.
 
2012-11-15 10:47:11 AM  
Give him a break - the Coneheads a unfamiliar with our customs.

At least he wasn't forcing a senso ring over her head...
 
2012-11-15 10:50:52 AM  

wambu: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

I suspect that there were some classified documents in the Google Docs dead drop that the lovers shared or the mistress got some clasified info via pillow talk. Both are serious breaches of security, especially for the Director of the C.I.Farking.A.

My suspicion is that Petraeus was allowed cop to the lesser offense of adultery to sweep it under the rug and the decision was delayed due to political reasons. The all this wacko stuff came to light.

Electon-coverage burnot made the MSM hungry for the story. Plus it keeps getting more weird by the day what with this skinhead fool and Gen. Allen's involvement.

Many people appear to have made poor decisions along the way and I'm certain many more could be uncovered if we just looked. It's sad to think that this is the way our governmnet is run.


I am not interested in your suspicions, they are pointless.
 
2012-11-15 10:54:34 AM  

GrizzlyPouch: ExcaliburPrime111: GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Lets say I'm a Chinese spy:

Listen up Davey boy, if you don't let me in on insert sensitive national security secret here, I'll expose your affair and ruin your personal and professional life.

Does that about sum it up?

I was going to say that too, except now everyone knows about it, so a potential spy would have no leverage. As for the reasons most politicians resign during sex scandals - that is because they have betrayed the trust of their constituents. In Petraeus' case, however, he has not been elected by anyone and he has no constituency. If he can still perform his job well, why not apologize, say he'll make things up with the wife, and keep on rolling?

Hm, that is a good point.

My response is he carried on the affair for months potentially exposing the country to problems. He handled himself improperly so he isn't fit to serve in the position as CIA director


POTENTIALLY

That is why you do not have an affair, just in case some COULD happen. It appears that the lady is not a spy so the POTENTIAL problem is not real so why should he resign?
 
2012-11-15 10:54:52 AM  

chuckufarlie: wambu: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

I suspect that there were some classified documents in the Google Docs dead drop that the lovers shared or the mistress got some clasified info via pillow talk. Both are serious breaches of security, especially for the Director of the C.I.Farking.A.

My suspicion is that Petraeus was allowed cop to the lesser offense of adultery to sweep it under the rug and the decision was delayed due to political reasons. The all this wacko stuff came to light.

Electon-coverage burnot made the MSM hungry for the story. Plus it keeps getting more weird by the day what with this skinhead fool and Gen. Allen's involvement.

Many people appear to have made poor decisions along the way and I'm certain many more could be uncovered if we just looked. It's sad to think that this is the way our governmnet is run.

I am not interested in your suspicions, they are pointless.


Yes, you are. Otherwise you wouldn't have taken the time to to read any of these comments, much less post your own
 
2012-11-15 10:56:03 AM  
Post-election purges continue.
 
2012-11-15 10:56:10 AM  

Pick13: [scifiwire.com image 330x306]


Holy crap, that puts a whole new angle on this. The Obama time machine did screw up the Benghazi alternate future!

Next we'll discover Gen Allen is a shapeshifter.
 
2012-11-15 10:56:31 AM  

Diogenes: chuckufarlie: Diogenes: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

Potential to blackmail the highest intelligence officer in the land, duh. And as I said in another thread, this whole thing has revealed some serious flaws in the system that are being overshadowed by the sleaze.

there is no potential for blackmail. We all know about it now.

As for your serious flaws idea. That is as stupid as it gets.

The reason it's a career ender here is because it's a breach of protocol. Yes, in this instance, the cat's out of the bag. But the policy is in place so this shiat, and the potential for security and intelligence breaches, doesn't happen in the first place.

Your suggesting the rules are irrelevant once the transgression has occurred. THAT is as stupid as it gets.


care to cite that protocol? I am not aware of any protocol and I am pretty sure that you are not either.
 
2012-11-15 10:58:12 AM  

FatherChaos: I immediately thought of Mr. Medulla.

[cfs3.tistory.com image 454x272]


I went back a little further....

l1.yimg.comfarm3.staticflickr.com
 
2012-11-15 10:58:58 AM  

Sweaty Dynamite: If an email essentially saying, "Stay away from my man" is enough to require a full blown FBI investigation, then how is the FBI getting anything done, what with all of the ongoing investigations I'm sure they're conducting sparked by Facebook catfights?


Socialism. Look it up.
 
2012-11-15 11:00:20 AM  

wambu: I suspect that there were some classified documents in the Google Docs dead drop that the lovers shared or the mistress got some clasified info via pillow talk. Both are serious breaches of security, especially for the Director of the C.I.Farking.A.


I've worked with sensitive info before (at a hospital) and the idea that you'd casually share something like a patient's name - or a missile site, or a troop movement, or anything remotely resembling sensitive information - is so ludicrous, especially for someone who managed to not be a farkup for 30+ years in the military (even earning some stars), it barely warrants consideration.

You'd need some kind of something (evidence, allegation) to lead you down that path. Unless our Ms Kelley knows things she shouldn't (or has documents she shouldn't even have seen), I'd abandon that speculation.

// I know she had sensitive documents in her house, but so do many, many people (with government-issued laptops)
// should she never have been near them in the first place (i.e. is she not even cleared to know what's in them), forget the "having them in an insecure facility" part
 
2012-11-15 11:03:24 AM  

GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: wambu: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

I suspect that there were some classified documents in the Google Docs dead drop that the lovers shared or the mistress got some clasified info via pillow talk. Both are serious breaches of security, especially for the Director of the C.I.Farking.A.

My suspicion is that Petraeus was allowed cop to the lesser offense of adultery to sweep it under the rug and the decision was delayed due to political reasons. The all this wacko stuff came to light.

Electon-coverage burnot made the MSM hungry for the story. Plus it keeps getting more weird by the day what with this skinhead fool and Gen. Allen's involvement.

Many people appear to have made poor decisions along the way and I'm certain many more could be uncovered if we just looked. It's sad to think that this is the way our governmnet is run.

I am not interested in your suspicions, they are pointless.

Yes, you are. Otherwise you wouldn't have taken the time to to read any of these comments, much less post your own


no, I am not. Your suspicions are pointless. I did not ask for suspicions.
 
2012-11-15 11:06:03 AM  

chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?


UCMJ Article 134- Adultery
 
2012-11-15 11:07:28 AM  

Sweaty Dynamite: If an email essentially saying, "Stay away from my man" is enough to require a full blown FBI investigation, then how is the FBI getting anything done, what with all of the ongoing investigations I'm sure they're conducting sparked by Facebook catfights?


The reality of the situation is even sadder than that.

"The emails that Jill Kelley showed an FBI friend near the start of last summer were not jealous lover warnings like 'stay away from my man', a knowledgeable source tells The Daily Beast. . . .

"'More like, 'Who do you think you are? . . .You parade around the base . . . You need to take it down a notch,'" according to the source, who was until recently at the highest levels of the intelligence community and prefers not to be identified by name.

"The source reports that the emails did make one reference to Gen. David Petraeus, but it was oblique and offered no manifest suggestion of a personal relationship or even that he was central to the sender's spite. . . .

"When the FBI friend showed the emails to the cyber squad in the Tampa field office, her fellow agents noted the absence of any overt threats.

"No, 'I'll kill you' or 'I'll burn your house down,'' the source says. 'It doesn't seem really that bad.'

"The squad was not even sure the case was worth pursuing, the source says.

"'What does this mean? There's no threat there. This is against the law?' the agents asked themselves by the source's account.

"At most the messages were harassing. The cyber squad had to consult the statute books in its effort to determine whether there was adequate legal cause to open a case.

"'It was a close call,' the source says.

"What tipped it may have been Kelley's friendship with the agent."
 

So, basically, based on nothing resembling a threat, the FBI launched a warrantless investigation into the personal life of the CIA director.

That this deeply personal motive was what spawned the FBI investigation is bolstered by the fact that the initial investigating agent "was barred from taking part in the case over the summer due to superiors' concerns that he was personally involved in the case" - indeed, "supervisors soon became concerned that the initial agent might have grown obsessed with the matter" - and was found to have "allegedly sent shirtless photos" to Kelley, and "is now under investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility, the internal-affairs arm of the FBI".
 
2012-11-15 11:09:14 AM  

Diogenes: chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?

UCMJ Article 134- Adultery


Which would apply if the affair happened while he was in the Military. The CIA has different rules regarding this kind of stuff.

If it turns out Petraeus is lying about when the affair occurred (which is quite possible considering the time period that Broadwell was "embedded" (trolol) with the General), then we are in for an escalation in this stranger than fiction shiatstorm.

There is obviously more going on here than we will ever be privy to.
 
2012-11-15 11:10:25 AM  

toomuchwhargarbl: Sweaty Dynamite: If an email essentially saying, "Stay away from my man" is enough to require a full blown FBI investigation, then how is the FBI getting anything done, what with all of the ongoing investigations I'm sure they're conducting sparked by Facebook catfights?

Socialism. Look it up.

Study it out.

FTFY
 
2012-11-15 11:19:03 AM  
I particularly like the San Francisco Chronicle's take on this:

All Americans who regard privacy as a fundamental right should be unnerved by the breadth and the detail of a search through personal correspondence in the scandal that brought down CIA Director David Petraeus.

For a moment, put aside the question of whether Petraeus and Gen. John Allen, the top NATO commander in Afghanistan, showed seriously poor judgment in their dealings with two women. The evidence to date suggests they did.

Still, the seemingly unfettered ability of federal investigators to expand a search that began with socialite Jill Kelley complaining to an FBI friend about online harassment shows the extent to which our Fourth Amendment protection against "unreasonable search and seizure" has been obliterated in the post-9/11 expansion of government surveillance. Kelley's grievance might have fallen on deaf ears if it had gone to someone other than an FBI agent who was out to impress her - as suggested by the shirtless photos he sent her.

The ability of government agents to conduct intrusive domestic surveillance in the absence of evidence of a crime is something many Americans assumed was forbidden by the reforms that followed the reign of J. Edgar Hoover, who used the tools at his disposal to mine embarrassing personal details about his enemies, real and perceived.

The extent of modern government surveillance is underscored by the numbers: requests for personal information on 34,000 Google accounts; the 1.7 billion e-mails, phone calls and other communications intercepted and stored each day by the National Security Agency.

These tools can be used for good (tracking terrorists and foiling their plots) and for ill (digging up dirt on political foes). Limits on these powers must be defined and overseen.

Congress needs to revisit the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which was passed when Facebook inventor Mark Zuckerberg was a toddler. It's absurd that an e-mail should not have the same protection as a letter in a file cabinet. Yes, law-enforcement investigators should be able to track and read a suspect's e-mail - but only after making their case to a judge.

This nation must respect and vigilantly maintain a balance between security and privacy, famously defined by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis in 1928 as the "right to be left alone."
 
2012-11-15 11:23:01 AM  
cdn.ifanboy.com

Lock them all up!

/hot like the cheerleader
 
2012-11-15 11:23:51 AM  
Looking through the coverage of this 'scandal' it amazed me the lengths that grown-ass men will go to in response to some fawning attention from an attractive woman. Tell me that you don't look at the picture of 'shaved my head to conceal my receding hairline' agent next to the picture of 'socialite with fake boobs' and think that here's a guy trying to impress a woman that has always been out of his league. Same deal with Allen and Petraeus (though at least Petraeus got his knob polished) - it all just smacks of trying to impress women way to young for them by talking about all their power and confidential knowledge.

It shouldn't surprise me - I'm sure I'd respond in the same way if I hadn't taken the precaution of having zero power or influence over anything of importance.
 
2012-11-15 11:24:41 AM  

chuckufarlie: wambu: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

I suspect that there were some classified documents in the Google Docs dead drop that the lovers shared or the mistress got some clasified info via pillow talk. Both are serious breaches of security, especially for the Director of the C.I.Farking.A.

My suspicion is that Petraeus was allowed cop to the lesser offense of adultery to sweep it under the rug and the decision was delayed due to political reasons. The all this wacko stuff came to light.

Electon-coverage burnot made the MSM hungry for the story. Plus it keeps getting more weird by the day what with this skinhead fool and Gen. Allen's involvement.

Many people appear to have made poor decisions along the way and I'm certain many more could be uncovered if we just looked. It's sad to think that this is the way our governmnet is run.

I am not interested in your suspicions, they are pointless.


i.imgur.com
 
2012-11-15 11:27:01 AM  
www.squidmobile.com
www.mattderody.com

I thought he looked pretty good shirtless, but he should have kept the hair.
 
2012-11-15 11:37:12 AM  
Lots of People: We already know about the affair, so we don't have to worry about blackmail, so he should be able to keep his job.

Not true. For all we know, Petraeus has had dozens of affairs, it's just that coontil now) he's only been sleeping with sane people. But even if Broadwell was his only paramour, he still can't be the head of the CIA anymore.

The fact that Petraeus is vulnerable to the attention of a young female admirer is exactly the sort of weakness intelligence officers look for when they're trying to acquire assets. You have to add to that the fact that he was perfectly fine with violating a solemn vow until he got caught, and that he intended to keep his prestigious and high-paying job... until he got caught. He was also deeply involved with a group of people who had everything to gain by exposing classified and personal information in exchange for money, privileges and inside access*. You don't have to be a psychologist to understand why foreign intelligence agencies would be interested in a guy like that. And now his weaknesses and vulnerabilities are extremely public; they don't even have to work to figure him out.

This is how you turn someone against their country. You find what their problems are and promise you can fix them. There are bonus points if you can make their problems worse. Petraeus can't be the head of the CIA for the same reason you wouldn't want an addict or someone with severe financial problems to be head of the CIA. It's not the moral violations that are a problem. It's the vulnerability this scandal has exposed. And the best way to solve it is to get that guy (and his con artist friends) away from classified information.

I'm not saying Petraeus is a bad person or that his public service wasn't valuable. But once you do something once it's easy to do it again, and next time it might not be with someone who has a security clearance.

*Speaking of inside access, what does one have to do to be come an "honorary consul" of a foreign country? Why would the government of South Korea lead that person to believe they had "diplomatic inviolability?" Do you really think it's an accident that someone who holds fancy parties for top military brass is also helping South Korean nationals make "trade" and "cultural" connections in the U.S.?
 
2012-11-15 11:40:13 AM  
Is anyone on the right wing upset that this Kelley woman is of Middle Eastern descent? Because I think there have been some reccent cases where the right wing didn't cotton much to middle eastern women being married to folks or being in positions of authority.
 
2012-11-15 11:41:28 AM  

the opposite of charity is justice: [crooksandliars.com image 369x284]


First thing that crossed my mind too.
 
2012-11-15 11:43:44 AM  

spongeboob: Is anyone on the right wing upset that this Kelley woman is of Middle Eastern descent? Because I think there have been some reccent cases where the right wing didn't cotton much to middle eastern women being married to folks or being in positions of authority.


The Marine General she was engaged in heavy schmoozing with is probably solid Republican.
 
2012-11-15 11:48:50 AM  
Is his name Salman Khan?

/very few will get it
 
2012-11-15 11:48:57 AM  

wambu: chuckufarlie: wambu: chuckufarlie: Can somebody explain to me how any of this is important? why should Petraeus resign for having sex with a woman that was not his wife? If everybody inside the beltway was held up to that standard, they would all have to resign. They only person that should be pissed is his wife.

I suspect that there were some classified documents in the Google Docs dead drop that the lovers shared or the mistress got some clasified info via pillow talk. Both are serious breaches of security, especially for the Director of the C.I.Farking.A.

My suspicion is that Petraeus was allowed cop to the lesser offense of adultery to sweep it under the rug and the decision was delayed due to political reasons. The all this wacko stuff came to light.

Electon-coverage burnot made the MSM hungry for the story. Plus it keeps getting more weird by the day what with this skinhead fool and Gen. Allen's involvement.

Many people appear to have made poor decisions along the way and I'm certain many more could be uncovered if we just looked. It's sad to think that this is the way our governmnet is run.

I am not interested in your suspicions, they are pointless.

[i.imgur.com image 410x361]


who told you that people are supposed to post their own stupid suspicions?
 
2012-11-15 11:51:48 AM  

Diogenes: chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?

UCMJ Article 134- Adultery


the man is retired.
 
2012-11-15 11:53:01 AM  

Diogenes: chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?

UCMJ Article 134- Adultery


The UCMJ isn't applied to non-military members, only Broadwell would be punishable under UCMJ as she is a reservist.

spif: Diogenes: chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?

UCMJ Article 134- Adultery

Which would apply if the affair happened while he was in the Military. The CIA has different rules regarding this kind of stuff.

If it turns out Petraeus is lying about when the affair occurred (which is quite possible considering the time period that Broadwell was "embedded" (trolol) with the General), then we are in for an escalation in this stranger than fiction shiatstorm.

There is obviously more going on here than we will ever be privy to.


It really doesn't look like all that much is going on, just a bunch of catty biatches that getting loud at the O-club and Broadwell sent a few anonymous emails to escalate the catty-ness. You can find some variation of this bullshiat on every military installation in the country, this just happens to have occurred at US Central Command and to a woman that has an FBI agent trying to get in her pants.
 
2012-11-15 12:01:26 PM  

chuckufarlie: Diogenes: chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?

UCMJ Article 134- Adultery

the man is retired.


He wasn't retired when Broadwell was embedded with him in Afghanistan. It's just a quesiton of when the affair began.
 
2012-11-15 12:09:20 PM  

kokomo61: chuckufarlie: Diogenes: chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?

UCMJ Article 134- Adultery

the man is retired.

He wasn't retired when Broadwell was embedded with him in Afghanistan. It's just a quesiton of when the affair began.


does not matter
 
2012-11-15 12:21:26 PM  
Not hot.

We're doing the "this or this" thing with the men also, right?
 
2012-11-15 12:24:30 PM  

BullBearMS: "The emails that Jill Kelley showed an FBI friend near the start of last summer were not jealous lover warnings like 'stay away from my man', a knowledgeable source tells The Daily Beast. . . .
"'More like, 'Who do you think you are? . . .You parade around the base . . . You need to take it down a notch,'" according to the source, who was until recently at the highest levels of the intelligence community and prefers not to be identified by name.
"The source reports that the emails did make one reference to Gen. David Petraeus, but it was oblique and offered no manifest suggestion of a personal relationship or even that he was central to the sender's spite. . . .


Sounds about right A woman who would call 911 because there's paparazzi out in front of her house was probably ticked right off that someone would make disparaging comments about her in anonymous emails. So much so that she needed to contact the FBI, and rock her entire privileged little world because someone offended HER.

And this is why you don't hang around with crazy people.
 
2012-11-15 12:24:30 PM  
There are so many threads on this scandal. We really ought to use one of them to discuss whether Petraeus might be subject to UCMJ.
 
2012-11-15 12:25:56 PM  
www.twcenter.net
 
I loved him in The Right Stuff.
 
2012-11-15 12:33:26 PM  
notreallyworking.files.wordpress.com

CIA Superior: What did we learn, Palmer?
CIA Officer: I don't know, sir.
CIA Superior: I don't farkin' know either. I guess we learned not to do it again.
CIA Officer: Yes, sir.
CIA Superior: I'm farked if I know what we did.
CIA Officer: Yes, sir, it's, uh, hard to say
CIA Superior: Jesus Farking Christ.
 
2012-11-15 12:33:51 PM  

Lunaville: Not hot.

We're doing the "this or this" thing with the men also, right?


It's only fair.
 
2012-11-15 12:56:09 PM  

chuckufarlie: kokomo61: chuckufarlie: Diogenes: chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?

UCMJ Article 134- Adultery

the man is retired.

He wasn't retired when Broadwell was embedded with him in Afghanistan. It's just a quesiton of when the affair began.

does not matter


Chuck there's just so much fail in your posts it's impossible to respond to it all
 
2012-11-15 01:05:42 PM  

chuckufarlie: the man is retired.


Article 2 of the UCMJ states that the code applies to retired personnel, as they still receive benefits from the military. The CIA has rules against adultery as well.

And he voluntarily resigned.

Lunaville: There are so many threads on this scandal. We really ought to use one of them to discuss whether Petraeus might be subject to UCMJ.


I'm beginning to wonder if I'm wasting my keystrokes, but I've tried.
 
2012-11-15 01:21:16 PM  

GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: kokomo61: chuckufarlie: Diogenes: chuckufarlie: care to cite that protocol?

UCMJ Article 134- Adultery

the man is retired.

He wasn't retired when Broadwell was embedded with him in Afghanistan. It's just a quesiton of when the affair began.

does not matter

Chuck there's just so much fail in your posts it's impossible to respond to it all


You cannot apply the code to the man after he has retired, no matter when it happened. It is when you find out about it that counts. You are full of fail, you are just not aware of it.
 
2012-11-15 01:23:38 PM  

factoryconnection: chuckufarlie: the man is retired.

Article 2 of the UCMJ states that the code applies to retired personnel, as they still receive benefits from the military. The CIA has rules against adultery as well.

And he voluntarily resigned.

Lunaville: There are so many threads on this scandal. We really ought to use one of them to discuss whether Petraeus might be subject to UCMJ.

I'm beginning to wonder if I'm wasting my keystrokes, but I've tried.


As the head of the CIA, he was not receiving retirement benefits from the military. The fact that he voluntarily resigned has nothing to do with it.

Yes, you are wasting your keystrokes because you have no idea what you are talking about.
 
2012-11-15 01:24:33 PM  
 
2012-11-15 01:29:53 PM  

BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.


that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.
 
2012-11-15 01:34:56 PM  

chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.


Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?

dl.dropbox.com
 
2012-11-15 01:54:28 PM  

BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.

Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?


Lol bull I gave up.

Can't make 2+2=5 no matter how many times you look at it
 
2012-11-15 01:59:22 PM  
i submitted this with a better headline last night, and i'm not ashamed to repost it:

Shirtless Fred Humphries revealed as FBI Agent in Washington White Sex Scandal.

\harrumph
 
2012-11-15 02:06:59 PM  

GrizzlyPouch: Lol bull I gave up.

Can't make 2+2=5 no matter how many times you look at it


You can admit it. You're going to miss all that blathering nonsense. dl.dropbox.com
 
2012-11-15 02:09:16 PM  

BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.

Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?

[dl.dropbox.com image 640x480]


yes, but unlike you, I actually know what that means. When he was caught, the man was not entitled to receive retirement pay because he was receiving payment from the CIA.

You don't have to like it, but that is the way it works.
 
2012-11-15 02:10:33 PM  

GrizzlyPouch: BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.

Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?

Lol bull I gave up.

Can't make 2+2=5 no matter how many times you look at it


you just do not understand "government speak". That is not your fault. However, pretending to know what you are talking about is your fault.
 
2012-11-15 02:16:18 PM  

chuckufarlie: yes, but unlike you, I actually know what that means. When he was caught, the man was not entitled to receive retirement pay because he was receiving payment from the CIA.

You don't have to like it, but that is the way it works.


No. You just don't understand how double dipping the Federal retirement system works.

You put off collecting your military retirement pay so that your time in the armed forces counts towards an additional retirement account as a civil servant.

Seriously, just stop. You're making yourself look more and more retarded here.
 
2012-11-15 02:22:48 PM  
[checks link hoping to see attractive guy]

GAH!

images.wikia.com
 
2012-11-15 04:15:43 PM  

BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.

Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?

[dl.dropbox.com image 640x480]


Snap!
 
2012-11-15 04:17:25 PM  

chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.

Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?

[dl.dropbox.com image 640x480]

yes, but unlike you, I actually know what that means. When he was caught, the man was not entitled to receive retirement pay because he was receiving payment from the CIA.

You don't have to like it, but that is the way it works.


The double-down is impressive but only if you can back it up.
 
2012-11-15 04:21:01 PM  

BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: yes, but unlike you, I actually know what that means. When he was caught, the man was not entitled to receive retirement pay because he was receiving payment from the CIA.

You don't have to like it, but that is the way it works.

No. You just don't understand how double dipping the Federal retirement system works.

You put off collecting your military retirement pay so that your time in the armed forces counts towards an additional retirement account as a civil servant.

Seriously, just stop. You're making yourself look more and more retarded here.


you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it. He will be entitled to it at a later date. That is how the wording works.

You don't have to like it, but that is the way it works.
 
2012-11-15 04:22:33 PM  

mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.

Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?

[dl.dropbox.com image 640x480]

yes, but unlike you, I actually know what that means. When he was caught, the man was not entitled to receive retirement pay because he was receiving payment from the CIA.

You don't have to like it, but that is the way it works.

The double-down is impressive but only if you can back it up.


you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it. He will be entitled to it at a later date. That is how the wording works.
 
2012-11-15 04:37:13 PM  

chuckufarlie: you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it.


No. He is entitled to it. He chose to defer collecting it because in the long term double dipping the Federal retirement system brings in a bigger overall return.

Most people think to themselves, "I'm in a hole. I'll stop digging."

But not you. You're the most special type of tard of all!

chuckufarlie: You cannot apply the code to the man after he has retired, no matter when it happened.


Bonus points for just shifting to a new lie after the old one plays out though.
 
2012-11-15 04:38:45 PM  

chuckufarlie: mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.

Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?

[dl.dropbox.com image 640x480]

yes, but unlike you, I actually know what that means. When he was caught, the man was not entitled to receive retirement pay because he was receiving payment from the CIA.

You don't have to like it, but that is the way it works.

The double-down is impressive but only if you can back it up.

you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it. He will be entitled to it at a later date. That is how the wording works.


I don't think so because otherwise why not just say the word "collecting" to avoid the ambiguity. Obviously, the goal is to indicate that you are subject to the UCMJ beyond active duty so long as you are entitled to retirement pay from them not just collecting it.

I think you should just take your lumps and move on.
 
2012-11-15 04:53:42 PM  

BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it.

No. He is entitled to it. He chose to defer collecting it because in the long term double dipping the Federal retirement system brings in a bigger overall return.

Most people think to themselves, "I'm in a hole. I'll stop digging."

But not you. You're the most special type of tard of all!

chuckufarlie: You cannot apply the code to the man after he has retired, no matter when it happened.

Bonus points for just shifting to a new lie after the old one plays out though.


None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.
 
2012-11-15 04:54:36 PM  

mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: Retired members of the uniformed services who are entitled to retirement pay are also subject to the UCMJ, as are retired reservists who are receiving hospital care in the VA system.

that is absolutely wonder! Right on target!!

Oh wait, retired members who go to work for the Federal Govt. do not receive retirement pay. Other than that, you are a genius.

Did you notice the part where it says "entitled to" instead of "while actively receiving"?

[dl.dropbox.com image 640x480]

yes, but unlike you, I actually know what that means. When he was caught, the man was not entitled to receive retirement pay because he was receiving payment from the CIA.

You don't have to like it, but that is the way it works.

The double-down is impressive but only if you can back it up.

you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it. He will be entitled to it at a later date. That is how the wording works.

I don't think so because otherwise why not just say the word "collecting" to avoid the ambiguity. Obviously, the goal is to indicate that you are subject to the UCMJ beyond active duty so long as you are entitled to retirement pay from them not just collecting it.

I think you should just take your lumps and move on.


None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.
 
2012-11-15 06:30:11 PM  
Humphries "referred the matter to the FBI in accordance to proper protocol," Berger added, and the FBI investigation is taking its course.

My question about this has always been: since when are harassing emails the interest of the FBI?


mrshowrules: I think you should just take your lumps and move on.


Not gonna happen. That one is like a brain damaged pitbull.
 
2012-11-15 06:37:28 PM  
Here it is!

seattletimes.com

in case my sub goes red
 
2012-11-15 06:59:25 PM  

fusillade762: Humphries "referred the matter to the FBI in accordance to proper protocol," Berger added, and the FBI investigation is taking its course.

My question about this has always been: since when are harassing emails the interest of the FBI?


mrshowrules: I think you should just take your lumps and move on.

Not gonna happen. That one is like a brain damaged pitbull.


another smug little asshole. what are the odds
 
2012-11-15 07:05:34 PM  
i'm guessing these sorts of shenanigans happen all the time in the upper echelons of corporate power as well. The only difference is it never sees the light of day. Just lawyers and NDAs.
 
2012-11-15 07:26:32 PM  

fusillade762: That one is like a brain damaged pitbull.


I noticed.

chuckufarlie: None of your little morons is every going to learn anything


dl.dropbox.com
 
2012-11-15 07:37:33 PM  

chuckufarlie: None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.


You are entitled to respect from your fellow farkers. You are just not entitled to it right now.

You are the poster child for the Conservatives disconnect with reality. Which celebrity should I send my cheque to for the search for a cure? You are truly hopeless.
 
2012-11-15 07:40:29 PM  

chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it.

No. He is entitled to it. He chose to defer collecting it because in the long term double dipping the Federal retirement system brings in a bigger overall return.

Most people think to themselves, "I'm in a hole. I'll stop digging."

But not you. You're the most special type of tard of all!

chuckufarlie: You cannot apply the code to the man after he has retired, no matter when it happened.

Bonus points for just shifting to a new lie after the old one plays out though.

None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.


Ah you're drunk. Now I get it
 
2012-11-15 07:45:16 PM  

chuckufarlie: fusillade762: Humphries "referred the matter to the FBI in accordance to proper protocol," Berger added, and the FBI investigation is taking its course.

My question about this has always been: since when are harassing emails the interest of the FBI?


mrshowrules: I think you should just take your lumps and move on.

Not gonna happen. That one is like a brain damaged pitbull.

another smug little asshole. what are the odds


The odds? I would say that the odds of any Farker feeling intellectually superior to you (or smug) would be fairly high indeed I'm afraid.
 
2012-11-15 08:13:08 PM  
i.imgur.com

/sorry
 
2012-11-15 08:14:41 PM  

mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.

You are entitled to respect from your fellow farkers. You are just not entitled to it right now.

You are the poster child for the Conservatives disconnect with reality. Which celebrity should I send my cheque to for the search for a cure? You are truly hopeless.


I'm probably right of glen beck and I can see this guy is making no sense
 
2012-11-15 08:19:47 PM  

GrizzlyPouch: mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.

You are entitled to respect from your fellow farkers. You are just not entitled to it right now.

You are the poster child for the Conservatives disconnect with reality. Which celebrity should I send my cheque to for the search for a cure? You are truly hopeless.

I'm probably right of glen beck and I can see this guy is making no sense


I didn't mean he was the poster child of Conservatives just the ones disconnected from reality. If you catch by drift (do people still say that?).
 
2012-11-15 08:21:16 PM  

zerkalo: Here it is!

[seattletimes.com image 608x456]

in case my sub goes red


well, that is pretty funny and not flirtatious. I can see sending that to a friend if I was him.
 
2012-11-15 08:33:46 PM  

BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it.

No. He is entitled to it. He chose to defer collecting it because in the long term double dipping the Federal retirement system brings in a bigger overall return.

Most people think to themselves, "I'm in a hole. I'll stop digging."

But not you. You're the most special type of tard of all!

chuckufarlie: You cannot apply the code to the man after he has retired, no matter when it happened.

Bonus points for just shifting to a new lie after the old one plays out though.



It seems a routine for him. In this thread an obvious Hitchhiker's Guide reference (missing the ground to fly) sails over his head, and as a result he contradicts the person making the reference, then shifts to pretending he got the reference, and there, too, he tops it off with calling someone "another smug fark douchebag" for pointing out his failure. The flailing was so funny I had him favorited from that time.
 
2012-11-15 08:38:26 PM  

mrshowrules: GrizzlyPouch: mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.

You are entitled to respect from your fellow farkers. You are just not entitled to it right now.

You are the poster child for the Conservatives disconnect with reality. Which celebrity should I send my cheque to for the search for a cure? You are truly hopeless.

I'm probably right of glen beck and I can see this guy is making no sense

I didn't mean he was the poster child of Conservatives just the ones disconnected from reality. If you catch by drift (do people still say that?).


10-4 I get what you mean

I was confused because I didn't realize any farkers recognized a difference between regular conservatives and the nut job variety
 
2012-11-15 08:40:45 PM  

Isildur: It seems a routine for him. In this thread an obvious Hitchhiker's Guide reference (missing the ground to fly) sails over his head, and as a result he contradicts the person making the reference, then shifts to pretending he got the reference, and there, too, he tops it off with calling someone "another smug fark douchebag" for pointing out his failure. The flailing was so funny I had him favorited from that time.


Almost sad really.
 
2012-11-15 08:43:02 PM  

zerkalo: Here it is!


That shows the guy might have a sense of humor, is not suggestive, except of getting shot at.

Why does the dummy on the right look like Patrick Stewart?
 
2012-11-15 08:43:12 PM  

Isildur: BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it.

No. He is entitled to it. He chose to defer collecting it because in the long term double dipping the Federal retirement system brings in a bigger overall return.

Most people think to themselves, "I'm in a hole. I'll stop digging."

But not you. You're the most special type of tard of all!

chuckufarlie: You cannot apply the code to the man after he has retired, no matter when it happened.

Bonus points for just shifting to a new lie after the old one plays out though.


It seems a routine for him. In this thread an obvious Hitchhiker's Guide reference (missing the ground to fly) sails over his head, and as a result he contradicts the person making the reference, then shifts to pretending he got the reference, and there, too, he tops it off with calling someone "another smug fark douchebag" for pointing out his failure. The flailing was so funny I had him favorited from that time.


No kidding. The entertainment value is 10/10, I'm still checking this thread just to see what he'll type next

Chuck, tip of the hat to you
 
2012-11-15 08:44:13 PM  

GrizzlyPouch: 10-4 I get what you mean

I was confused because I didn't realize any farkers recognized a difference between regular conservatives and the nut job variety


You guys really need to clean house and fast. A weak Conservative party is not good for anyone.
 
2012-11-15 08:56:06 PM  

mrshowrules: GrizzlyPouch: 10-4 I get what you mean

I was confused because I didn't realize any farkers recognized a difference between regular conservatives and the nut job variety

You guys really need to clean house and fast. A weak Conservative party is not good for anyone.


Haha I hear ya

Just need to quit trying to legislate morality. I don't condone abortion, marijuana etc. doesnt mean anyone should take away your right to do these things
 
2012-11-15 09:15:06 PM  

mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.

You are entitled to respect from your fellow farkers. You are just not entitled to it right now.

You are the poster child for the Conservatives disconnect with reality. Which celebrity should I send my cheque to for the search for a cure? You are truly hopeless.


take a look around some of my posts, you little moron and you will see that I am most certainly not a conservative. That is just another area where you think you know a whole lot more than you do. Little smucks like you make me laugh. You walk around all day with your head up your ass and that makes you think that you are the smartest guy in your little world.

It must be nice to be so egotistical that you never question the idea that you might be wrong. Like that conservative tag you tried to push on me.
 
2012-11-15 09:17:50 PM  

GrizzlyPouch: chuckufarlie: BullBearMS: chuckufarlie: you put off collecting your military retirement means that you are currently not entitled to it.

No. He is entitled to it. He chose to defer collecting it because in the long term double dipping the Federal retirement system brings in a bigger overall return.

Most people think to themselves, "I'm in a hole. I'll stop digging."

But not you. You're the most special type of tard of all!

chuckufarlie: You cannot apply the code to the man after he has retired, no matter when it happened.

Bonus points for just shifting to a new lie after the old one plays out though.

None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.

Ah you're drunk. Now I get it


what is it that produces little biatches like you? You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. This country is going to go to hell when your generation takes over.
 
2012-11-15 09:25:34 PM  

GrizzlyPouch: mrshowrules: chuckufarlie: None of you understand the meaning of the words that you are reading. Therein lies your problem. Within DOD, entitled to mean entitled to NOW.

I have no shifted my argument. I just did not realize how much had to be explained to you. I have shifted nothing, I and just trying to get a bunch of know-it-alls to understand something. I should have known better than to try. None of your little morons is every going to learn anything because you think that you already know everything. Smug little assholes.

You are entitled to respect from your fellow farkers. You are just not entitled to it right now.

You are the poster child for the Conservatives disconnect with reality. Which celebrity should I send my cheque to for the search for a cure? You are truly hopeless.

I'm probably right of glen beck and I can see this guy is making no sense


tell me something, you dipshiat, What does a person's political leanings have to do with his ability to interpret government speak? Of course, admitting that you are right of Glen Beck puts you pretty well down the intelligence level, even around here,
 
2012-11-15 10:32:31 PM  

zerkalo: Here it is!

[seattletimes.com image 608x456]

in case my sub goes red


does he have some sort of 'condition' that makes all his hair fall out all over his body?
/naked mole rat.
 
Displayed 131 of 131 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report