If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Obama takes McCain and Graham to the woodshed on live television   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 250
    More: Cool, John McCain, obama, fair hearings, Susan Rice, East Room, confirmation, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton  
•       •       •

6832 clicks; posted to Politics » on 14 Nov 2012 at 4:15 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



250 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-14 04:44:25 PM  

bradkanus: It's hilarious to see the left defend a guy who is one story #4 about Benghazi and flailing about in his own press conference trying to redirect the nation's attention from his fark up and his staff's fark up.

Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU. If you're fine with that, great. If not, just admit your jesus isn't perfect and start examining things a little deeper.


got you hook baited?
 
2012-11-14 04:44:49 PM  

bradkanus: It's hilarious to see the left defend a guy who is one story #4 about Benghazi and flailing about in his own press conference trying to redirect the nation's attention from his fark up and his staff's fark up.

Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU. If you're fine with that, great. If not, just admit your jesus isn't perfect and start examining things a little deeper.


Aww, who's a precious little dimwit? You are! Yes you are, you're a GOOOOD little dimwit! Here's a Scooby Snack.
 
2012-11-14 04:45:18 PM  

Spaz-master: Rwa2play: bikerific: "Mr. President, don't think for one minute I don't hold you ultimately responsible for Benghazi. I think you failed as commander in chief before, during and after the attack," Graham said in a statement released by his office.


What an absolute asshole. Wow.

I guess Graham gonna gets to know about the woodshed real close and personal...and often.

The woodshed will be the media damage to right and left.


More accurately, the media damage to the Washington press corps. You know, the same group that was blind to Bush about Iraq and ONLY started questioning his motives when McClellan wrote the tell all book.

You know, that group of assholes.
 
2012-11-14 04:45:58 PM  

Corvus: bradkanus: if "taking them to the woodshed" means "asking someone to blame me for someone else's mistake and requesting a chat about it" then I've been wrong about that phrase for a while

Sorry what mistake did she make actually?

"As that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that, as you know, in the wake of the revolution in Libya are quite common and accessible. And it then evolved from there," she told ABC.

Isn't that what happened?


There was no protest in Benghazi. That's the Republicans big 'gotcha!'.
 
2012-11-14 04:46:04 PM  

bikerific: It is pretty gutsy to bring up Rice on the offensive like this.

The safe, non-controversial course of action would have been to just quietly not bring Rice up as potential nominee for anything. They knew that bringing her up would provide a venue for attacks regarding Benghazi, and they are are taking it head-on.


I think they are basically daring the republicans to impeach Obama. Heck, they may want the republicans to do it, to try.

I admit I kind of want to see them try, too. Obama would CRUSH them in the media.
 
2012-11-14 04:47:50 PM  
The GOP is still (poorly) IRL trolling with the Benghazi hullabaloo?

'Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Get some new material, kk. Boring me. It's so last news cycle. Gosh.
 
2012-11-14 04:48:27 PM  

Corvus: bradkanus: Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU.

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.


choke on this ashole

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-told-cbs-hours-after-benghazi-a t tack-that-he-had-suspicion-that-event-was-pre-planned-so-why-did-the-s tory-change/


http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Have you not watched the news. Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell, so that makes him a liar.
 
2012-11-14 04:49:12 PM  
Does this confrontational style signal that the Senate is going to reform the filibuster rules, reducing the need for marginals like McCain and Graham?
 
2012-11-14 04:50:47 PM  

bradkanus: It's hilarious to see the left defend a guy who is one story #4 about Benghazi and flailing about in his own press conference trying to redirect the nation's attention from his fark up and his staff's fark up.

Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU. If you're fine with that, great. If not, just admit your jesus isn't perfect and start examining things a little deeper.


is the big deal here still over whether Obama said it was an act of terror because of the video or whether Obama said it was an attack by terrorists using the film protests as cover?

'cause that is stupid if so...I've heard this stuff over and over from the RW and still can't figure out what exactly you're all fired up about.

there's a reason this didn't catch on as a big scandal. Hint: it's the same reason Mitt didn't go after it Weeners debate. It's not the scandal you wish it was, it's just a tragedy, and most people realize what you and the Fox brigade is doing here.
 
2012-11-14 04:51:20 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU.

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

choke on this ashole

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-told-cbs-hours-after-benghazi-a t tack-that-he-had-suspicion-that-event-was-pre-planned-so-why-did-the-s tory-change/


http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Have you not watched the news. Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell, so that makes him a liar.


Sorry:

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

Can't you even do this?

You don't even know what you are talking about. Show me the quote not give me more BS links. You are repeating talking points you haven't even checked.
 
2012-11-14 04:51:42 PM  

Corvus: bradkanus: if "taking them to the woodshed" means "asking someone to blame me for someone else's mistake and requesting a chat about it" then I've been wrong about that phrase for a while

Sorry what mistake did she make actually?

"As that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that, as you know, in the wake of the revolution in Libya are quite common and accessible. And it then evolved from there," she told ABC.

Isn't that what happened?


As far as I can tell, something else is supposed to have happened that wasn't reported by the President either as a terrorist attack or not as a terrorist attack but which either was or wasn't a terrorist attack and should or shouldn't have been called one sooner (or later) than it was. Evidently talking about something based on what you know at the time and not what you're going to know in the future before you talk about it is bad; and you should only discuss things in light of what you're going to know instead of what you actually do know.
 
2012-11-14 04:52:07 PM  

mjohnson71: culebra: Second Term Barack gives no quarter. Noted.

This could get real interesting if Obama spends the next 4 years with the restrictor plates off. It will be wonderfully entertaining if "playing-it-safe-trying-to-get-re elected" Obama is dead and "fark-you-I-Have-political-capital" Obama is the new normal.


That would be quite awesome.
 
2012-11-14 04:52:38 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU.

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

choke on this ashole

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-told-cbs-hours-after-benghazi-a t tack-that-he-had-suspicion-that-event-was-pre-planned-so-why-did-the-s tory-change/


http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Have you not watched the news. Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell, so that makes him a liar.


Did I say give me links to more talking points and derp?

No I didn't. You seem to not even know what you are talking about all you have is what right wingers told you.

KIND OF LIKE WHEN THEY TOLD YOU ROMNEY WAS GOING TO WIN TUESDAY!!!


/yes I went there.
 
2012-11-14 04:53:07 PM  

Rwa2play: Still mad about last Tuesday?


He's named Brad K. Anus. He's always mad.
 
2012-11-14 04:53:45 PM  

unexplained bacon: bradkanus: It's hilarious to see the left defend a guy who is one story #4 about Benghazi and flailing about in his own press conference trying to redirect the nation's attention from his fark up and his staff's fark up.

Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU. If you're fine with that, great. If not, just admit your jesus isn't perfect and start examining things a little deeper.

is the big deal here still over whether Obama said it was an act of terror because of the video or whether Obama said it was an attack by terrorists using the film protests as cover?

'cause that is stupid if so...I've heard this stuff over and over from the RW and still can't figure out what exactly you're all fired up about.

there's a reason this didn't catch on as a big scandal. Hint: it's the same reason Mitt didn't go after it Weeners debate. It's not the scandal you wish it was, it's just a tragedy, and most people realize what you and the Fox brigade is doing here.


Didn't catch on as a scandal? He had to field a question about it in a press conference where his staff controls who gets picked to ask a question!!!! Do you not read the newspaper? This is still huge.

MItt didn't say anything in the debate because he farked up and jumped the gun when the story broke and didnt' want the president to beat him over the head with it. But you wouldn't know that because you don't read much, do you?
 
2012-11-14 04:53:52 PM  

bradkanus: Have you not watched the news. Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell, so that makes him a liar.



Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell? really...sure you aren't skewing that a bit?

/ok, I get it, you're a troll.
//have fun
 
2012-11-14 04:54:13 PM  

Gyrfalcon: As far as I can tell, something else is supposed to have happened that wasn't reported by the President either as a terrorist attack or not as a terrorist attack but which either was or wasn't a terrorist attack and should or shouldn't have been called one sooner (or later) than it was. Evidently talking about something based on what you know at the time and not what you're going to know in the future before you talk about it is bad; and you should only discuss things in light of what you're going to know instead of what you actually do know.


Exactly. The "Obama is lying" it Obama didn't say "I know for 100% it's a terrorist attack!!" before they have any evidence. A lot like how Bush attacked Iraq because they knew it was behind 9/11.
 
2012-11-14 04:54:33 PM  

Corvus: bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU.

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

choke on this ashole

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-told-cbs-hours-after-benghazi-a t tack-that-he-had-suspicion-that-event-was-pre-planned-so-why-did-the-s tory-change/


http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Have you not watched the news. Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell, so that makes him a liar.

Sorry:

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

Can't you even do this?

You don't even know what you are talking about. Show me the quote not give me more BS links. You are repeating talking points you haven't even checked.


The president's staff has given four stories at his direction. He lied.
 
2012-11-14 04:55:04 PM  
We're going to have to watch several months of petty, transparently disingenuous impeachment hearings on this. It's all the GOP has to work with at this point. Naturally, they'll overreach.

I guess the Right Wing has to have something on which to focus their blithering indignation at getting their assess handed to them on election day. It might as well be this.
 
2012-11-14 04:55:43 PM  

bradkanus: Didn't catch on as a scandal? He had to field a question about it in a press conference where his staff controls who gets picked to ask a question!!!! Do you not read the newspaper? This is still huge.

MItt didn't say anything in the debate because he farked up and jumped the gun when the story broke and didnt' want the president to beat him over the head with it. But you wouldn't know that because you don't read much, do you?


Then why do you not even now what was said? Why is your "proof" talking points from right wing sites? Can't you think for yourself? Why can't you show us what went wrong instead of just linking to talking points?

You seem to not understand what you are mad at because you seem unable to explain it.
 
2012-11-14 04:56:52 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU.

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

choke on this ashole

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-told-cbs-hours-after-benghazi-a t tack-that-he-had-suspicion-that-event-was-pre-planned-so-why-did-the-s tory-change/


http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Have you not watched the news. Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell, so that makes him a liar.

Sorry:

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

Can't you even do this?

You don't even know what you are talking about. Show me the quote not give me more BS links. You are repeating talking points you haven't even checked.

The president's staff has given four stories at his direction. He lied.


SO GIVE US THE EXACT QUOTE WERE HE LIED THEN?

I have asked you this multiple times already and so far you are unable to do it. Obviously you have no idea what you are talking about and are just repeating talking points.
 
2012-11-14 04:57:05 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU.

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

choke on this ashole

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-told-cbs-hours-after-benghazi-a t tack-that-he-had-suspicion-that-event-was-pre-planned-so-why-did-the-s tory-change/

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Have you not watched the news. Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell, so that makes him a liar.


LMAO...

riddlethos.com

How about a more legitmate news source there binky? You know, a news outlet that didn't swear up and down that Romney was going to win in a landslide.
 
2012-11-14 04:57:24 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU.

Then give us the exact quote he lied about.

choke on this ashole

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-told-cbs-hours-after-benghazi-a t tack-that-he-had-suspicion-that-event-was-pre-planned-so-why-did-the-s tory-change/


http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Have you not watched the news. Obama said come after him for the lies he had his officials tell, so that makes him a liar.


right.... because opinions never change when facts are presented and suspicions are admissible in a court of law (as oppose.

pull your head out of your ass!
 
2012-11-14 04:58:11 PM  

bradkanus: The president's staff has given four stories at his direction. He lied.


Give us these quotes then!!! Stop pretending because you or other right wing nut jobs said it it make it true.

That didn't work for the election did it? They said it was going to be a Romney landslide so why should we take their word on this?
 
2012-11-14 04:58:58 PM  

Corvus: bradkanus: Didn't catch on as a scandal? He had to field a question about it in a press conference where his staff controls who gets picked to ask a question!!!! Do you not read the newspaper? This is still huge.

MItt didn't say anything in the debate because he farked up and jumped the gun when the story broke and didnt' want the president to beat him over the head with it. But you wouldn't know that because you don't read much, do you?

Then why do you not even now what was said? Why is your "proof" talking points from right wing sites? Can't you think for yourself? Why can't you show us what went wrong instead of just linking to talking points?

You seem to not understand what you are mad at because you seem unable to explain it.


You're obviously not going to follow the previous links that lay out what happened so I'll give you another one.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Just let me know if you can't read and I'll leave you alone. I mean, you have a guy who is claiming credit for all of his employees fark ups today and therefore admitting he is the source of them and now you don't want to let him own his mistakes.

If you're that dumb, I can't help you.
 
2012-11-14 04:59:33 PM  

bradkanus: The president's staff has given four stories at his direction. He lied.


How are we supposed to discuss this matter if you don't even know the quotes you are talking about?
 
2012-11-14 05:00:57 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Didn't catch on as a scandal? He had to field a question about it in a press conference where his staff controls who gets picked to ask a question!!!! Do you not read the newspaper? This is still huge.

MItt didn't say anything in the debate because he farked up and jumped the gun when the story broke and didnt' want the president to beat him over the head with it. But you wouldn't know that because you don't read much, do you?

Then why do you not even now what was said? Why is your "proof" talking points from right wing sites? Can't you think for yourself? Why can't you show us what went wrong instead of just linking to talking points?

You seem to not understand what you are mad at because you seem unable to explain it.

You're obviously not going to follow the previous links that lay out what happened so I'll give you another one.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Just let me know if you can't read and I'll leave you alone. I mean, you have a guy who is claiming credit for all of his employees fark ups today and therefore admitting he is the source of them and now you don't want to let him own his mistakes.

If you're that dumb, I can't help you.


Why can't you cut and paste the exact quotes you are talking about instead of giving us links to talking points?


DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT KNOW OF THESE QUOTES YOU ARE REFERRING TO?


Why can't you quote them? Why can't you make you own argument? Why do you need others to think for you?
 
2012-11-14 05:01:10 PM  

freetomato: I wish the has-been shell of a once-decent man that is McCain would just STFU - about everything from now on. Every time I hear him speak I can only think "thanks a bunch for foisting that loathsome hillbilly and her spawn on America, asshole".


I can always tell in threads such as this one who is too young to remember the Keating Five. McCain has always demonstrated rather flexible ethics.
 
2012-11-14 05:01:34 PM  

Corvus: bradkanus: The president's staff has given four stories at his direction. He lied.

Give us these quotes then!!! Stop pretending because you or other right wing nut jobs said it it make it true.

That didn't work for the election did it? They said it was going to be a Romney landslide so why should we take their word on this?


who is "they" when they said Romney was going to win, and what does that have to do with me? I live in Virginia - I could see it was over for Romney in September. You obvioulsy watch way too much Fox and get your news form Drudge, because nobody I read had Romney winning at all.
 
2012-11-14 05:01:50 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Didn't catch on as a scandal? He had to field a question about it in a press conference where his staff controls who gets picked to ask a question!!!! Do you not read the newspaper? This is still huge.

MItt didn't say anything in the debate because he farked up and jumped the gun when the story broke and didnt' want the president to beat him over the head with it. But you wouldn't know that because you don't read much, do you?

Then why do you not even now what was said? Why is your "proof" talking points from right wing sites? Can't you think for yourself? Why can't you show us what went wrong instead of just linking to talking points?

You seem to not understand what you are mad at because you seem unable to explain it.

You're obviously not going to follow the previous links that lay out what happened so I'll give you another one.

http://http://hotair.com//archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin -changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Just let me know if you can't read and I'll leave you alone. I mean, you have a guy who is claiming credit for all of his employees fark ups today and therefore admitting he is the source of them and now you don't want to let him own his mistakes.

If you're that dumb, I can't help you.


You know what I just pointed out in bold print? A news source that isn't worth wiping my ass with.

When you can retort me with a news source that isn't so full of crap, then I'll listen to you.
 
2012-11-14 05:01:53 PM  
see libs you cant even listen to someone linking hot air articles without getting mad

maybe if they are so wrong you can clearly break down and explain at every 'wrong' point whats wrong about it with citations

either that or your dishonest

and fat
 
2012-11-14 05:02:20 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Didn't catch on as a scandal? He had to field a question about it in a press conference where his staff controls who gets picked to ask a question!!!! Do you not read the newspaper? This is still huge.

MItt didn't say anything in the debate because he farked up and jumped the gun when the story broke and didnt' want the president to beat him over the head with it. But you wouldn't know that because you don't read much, do you?

Then why do you not even now what was said? Why is your "proof" talking points from right wing sites? Can't you think for yourself? Why can't you show us what went wrong instead of just linking to talking points?

You seem to not understand what you are mad at because you seem unable to explain it.

You're obviously not going to follow the previous links that lay out what happened so I'll give you another one.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Just let me know if you can't read and I'll leave you alone. I mean, you have a guy who is claiming credit for all of his employees fark ups today and therefore admitting he is the source of them and now you don't want to let him own his mistakes.

If you're that dumb, I can't help you.


Ok fine: lets take your link:

"The unrest that we've seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims, find offensive," Carney said.

So you are saying there was NO protest around that region you believe that is a lie?
 
2012-11-14 05:02:35 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: The president's staff has given four stories at his direction. He lied.

Give us these quotes then!!! Stop pretending because you or other right wing nut jobs said it it make it true.

That didn't work for the election did it? They said it was going to be a Romney landslide so why should we take their word on this?

who is "they" when they said Romney was going to win, and what does that have to do with me? I live in Virginia - I could see it was over for Romney in September. You obvioulsy watch way too much Fox and get your news form Drudge, because nobody I read had Romney winning at all.


Evasion noted; try harder 'bro.
 
2012-11-14 05:03:46 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: The president's staff has given four stories at his direction. He lied.

Give us these quotes then!!! Stop pretending because you or other right wing nut jobs said it it make it true.

That didn't work for the election did it? They said it was going to be a Romney landslide so why should we take their word on this?

who is "they" when they said Romney was going to win, and what does that have to do with me? I live in Virginia - I could see it was over for Romney in September. You obvioulsy watch way too much Fox and get your news form Drudge, because nobody I read had Romney winning at all.


Ok I am taking one of your quotes from that link then:


"The unrest that we've seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims, find offensive," Carney said.

Is that a lie? Yes or No?

Was their unrest in the region because of the video YES or NO?
 
2012-11-14 05:03:50 PM  
B...b...b...but Romney said "Bipartisanship!!1!" Whar is bipartisanship? Whar?
 
2012-11-14 05:03:56 PM  
Congress is Article I and the president is Article II. There's a reason for this.
 
2012-11-14 05:04:09 PM  

Corvus: bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Didn't catch on as a scandal? He had to field a question about it in a press conference where his staff controls who gets picked to ask a question!!!! Do you not read the newspaper? This is still huge.

MItt didn't say anything in the debate because he farked up and jumped the gun when the story broke and didnt' want the president to beat him over the head with it. But you wouldn't know that because you don't read much, do you?

Then why do you not even now what was said? Why is your "proof" talking points from right wing sites? Can't you think for yourself? Why can't you show us what went wrong instead of just linking to talking points?

who does this guy speak for again?

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney became the first official to back away from the earlier declaration that the Benghazi assault was a "complex attack" by extremists. Instead, Carney told reporters, authorities "have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack."

Can you read that?
You seem to not understand what you are mad at because you seem unable to explain it.

You're obviously not going to follow the previous links that lay out what happened so I'll give you another one.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Just let me know if you can't read and I'll leave you alone. I mean, you have a guy who is claiming credit for all of his employees fark ups today and therefore admitting he is the source of them and now you don't want to let him own his mistakes.

If you're that dumb, I can't help you.

Why can't you cut and paste the exact quotes you are talking about instead of giving us links to talking points?


DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT KNOW OF THESE QUOTES YOU ARE REFERRING TO?

Why can't you quote them? Why can't you make you own argument? Why do you need others to think for you?


So you are saying that
 
2012-11-14 05:04:42 PM  

bradkanus: It's hilarious to see the left defend a guy who is one story #4 about Benghazi and flailing about in his own press conference trying to redirect the nation's attention from his fark up and his staff's fark up.

Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU. If you're fine with that, great. If not, just admit your jesus isn't perfect and start examining things a little deeper.


You are so adorable. *pinches cheeks*

Where have you been? Must have been a tough couple weeks for a conservative living in Washington D.C. Did you see the fireworks?
 
2012-11-14 05:06:06 PM  

bradkanus: The president's staff has given four stories at his direction. He lied.


Romney should have went after Obama on that during the debates or something.
 
2012-11-14 05:06:08 PM  

jigger: Congress is Article I and the president is Article II. There's a reason for this.


lol 0bama is chapter 11

Corvus: Was their unrest in the region because of the video


no their unrest was in the region because they lived there
 
2012-11-14 05:06:30 PM  

bradkanus: who is "they" when they said Romney was going to win, and what does that have to do with me? I live in Virginia - I could see it was over for Romney in September. You obvioulsy watch way too much Fox and get your news form Drudge, because nobody I read had Romney winning at all.


Well the site you just linked DID!!!!!


Michael Barone's prediction: Romney 315, Obama 223


So which is it? Are they trustworthy or not?
 
2012-11-14 05:06:39 PM  
GOP/Smirking Romney: We demand to know what happened right now!
White House: We think it may have been related to the thing that happened next door. The investigation is ongoing.
GOP/SR: How dare you not know every detail immediately? Conspiracy!
Post-election WH: STFU! Adults are speaking.
 
2012-11-14 05:07:15 PM  

bradkanus: It's hilarious to see the left defend a guy who is one story #4 about Benghazi and flailing about in his own press conference trying to redirect the nation's attention from his fark up and his staff's fark up.

Be partisan all you want, but the guy lied to YOU. If you're fine with that, great. If not, just admit your jesus isn't perfect and start examining things a little deeper.


Did you run out of Preparation-H? Used it all Tuesday night, I bet.
 
2012-11-14 05:07:15 PM  
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-st ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

how about Canadian press?

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50601
 
2012-11-14 05:07:46 PM  
So, since he doesn't have to worry about re-election now, he can call out their grandstanding a little more forcefully.
 
2012-11-14 05:08:10 PM  

bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Corvus: bradkanus: Didn't catch on as a scandal? He had to field a question about it in a press conference where his staff controls who gets picked to ask a question!!!! Do you not read the newspaper? This is still huge.

MItt didn't say anything in the debate because he farked up and jumped the gun when the story broke and didnt' want the president to beat him over the head with it. But you wouldn't know that because you don't read much, do you?

Then why do you not even now what was said? Why is your "proof" talking points from right wing sites? Can't you think for yourself? Why can't you show us what went wrong instead of just linking to talking points?

who does this guy speak for again?

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney became the first official to back away from the earlier declaration that the Benghazi assault was a "complex attack" by extremists. Instead, Carney told reporters, authorities "have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack."

Can you read that?
You seem to not understand what you are mad at because you seem unable to explain it.

You're obviously not going to follow the previous links that lay out what happened so I'll give you another one.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

Just let me know if you can't read and I'll leave you alone. I mean, you have a guy who is claiming credit for all of his employees fark ups today and therefore admitting he is the source of them and now you don't want to let him own his mistakes.

If you're that dumb, I can't help you.

Why can't you cut and paste the exact quotes you are talking about instead of giving us links to talking points?


DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT KNOW OF THESE QUOTES YOU ARE REFERRING TO?

Why can't you quote them? Why can't you make you own argument? Why do you need others to think for you?

So you are saying that


Well why can't you back up your opinion with facts? I ask you for facts and you give me links to talking points. You seem to not even be able to support your own opinion with the facts why you think they are correct. Why do you think that is?

It's because you opinion is not based on facts it's based on what you want to believe.
 
2012-11-14 05:08:14 PM  

Corvus: bradkanus: who is "they" when they said Romney was going to win, and what does that have to do with me? I live in Virginia - I could see it was over for Romney in September. You obvioulsy watch way too much Fox and get your news form Drudge, because nobody I read had Romney winning at all.

Well the site you just linked DID!!!!!


Michael Barone's prediction: Romney 315, Obama 223

So which is it? Are they trustworthy or not?


I love how he tries to evade it...but it's like stepping right into the path of a Claymore when your trying to evade the pressure-sensitive mine.
 
2012-11-14 05:09:26 PM  

bradkanus: http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

how about Canadian press?

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50601


I don't understand why don't you know what the quotes are?
 
2012-11-14 05:10:02 PM  

bradkanus: http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

how about Canadian press?

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50601


I just pointed out from your link a statement that was true. So you must be wrong.
 
2012-11-14 05:10:05 PM  

bradkanus: http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/19/mcclatchy-obama-admin-changed-s t ory-on-benghazi-to-blame-video-3-days-after-attack/

how about Canadian press?

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50601


Oh you mean that bastion of conservative press in Canada? That one?

Y-you do know your BS can be countered with just a few clicks on a keyboard and a search engine right?
 
Displayed 50 of 250 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report