If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(American Thinker)   Who cares what the Left thinks? So what if they have a majority in the Senate or the Presidency?   (americanthinker.com) divider line 28
    More: Dumbass, Senate, Majority Leader Reid, Erskine Bowles, Social Security Reform, Budget Control Act, farm bills, Biden, presidents  
•       •       •

2962 clicks; posted to Politics » on 14 Nov 2012 at 8:30 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-11-14 09:12:39 AM
7 votes:

Nurglitch: kumanoki: Jackson Herring: [i.imgur.com image 240x243]

Please stop this. Don't do this anymore.

It's disrespectful to the atheletes and to children with special needs.

THIS. As a third, it's sinking down to the level of Coulter.


thirded, if we can't get political correctness on the politics tab where can we get it? now excuse me while I make a joke about extreme poverty in Africa. 
i46.tinypic.com
2012-11-14 08:16:40 AM
5 votes:
Stage Three: Barganing
2012-11-14 08:36:13 AM
4 votes:
i595.photobucket.com

Op op op op, oppan butthurt style.
2012-11-14 09:15:52 AM
3 votes:

Jiro Dreams Of McRibs: oligarchy


You misspelled "oligarhy".

/pet peave
2012-11-14 09:10:05 AM
2 votes:
i1151.photobucket.com
Wait! I think she's getting tired and slowing down!
2012-11-14 09:09:13 AM
2 votes:

kumanoki: Jackson Herring: [i.imgur.com image 240x243]

Please stop this. Don't do this anymore.

It's disrespectful to the atheletes and to children with special needs.


At least he's not posting pictures from the hurdles event.
2012-11-14 08:33:32 AM
2 votes:
www.meh.ro
2012-11-14 08:25:03 AM
2 votes:
"Just because your side won a decisive election, don't think this means you get to control the legislative agenda!"
2012-11-14 08:14:39 AM
2 votes:
i.imgur.com
2012-11-14 06:31:32 PM
1 votes:
FTA: "They should ignore what the media says and what the polls say, even if it looks like voters will cost the GOP the House in 2014 and the presidency in 2016."

That sounds like a brilliant plan. Please, proceed.
2012-11-14 05:16:31 PM
1 votes:

winterbraid: As someone who was a Democratic-Republican back in the 1800s


John McCain is that you?

Geotpf: I know what you mean-Reagan was really big on making gay marriage legal and not firing government union members.


Obama did it but he wasn't "big" on it either. So are you really going to tell me that Democrats haven't moved further to the right in the last thirty years?
2012-11-14 04:05:45 PM
1 votes:

I alone am best: So let me get this right.

Obama win = mandate
Republicans win house = do what Obama says just because you want to still have a job in 2015.


FTFY
2012-11-14 01:31:18 PM
1 votes:

Fart_Machine: As someone who was a Republican back in the 80s the conservative candidate did win. What you call Democrats today would have been considered Republicans over thirty years ago. It's just that the GOP has thrown itself over the cliff.


I know what you mean-Reagan was really big on making gay marriage legal and not firing government union members.
2012-11-14 11:19:05 AM
1 votes:

Blue_Blazer: These days it's victory gay sex while smoking a bong with some Latinos while having an abortion all underneath a banner of Nate Silver, Hallowed be thy Name.


I'll be in my bunk.
2012-11-14 11:16:09 AM
1 votes:

clowncar on fire: You won due to: a lackluster candidate and over confidence on our part, and of course, having a more populist message to run on. Having a exceptionally loud extremis on our side certainly didn't hurt your cause.


So other than having policies which the American people didn't like, a terrible strategy, and bad candidates at all levels, things went pretty well?
2012-11-14 11:15:27 AM
1 votes:

clowncar on fire: Blue_Blazer: clowncar on fire: Citrate1007: Lets continue to destroy the economy out of spite!!!

"And while we're at it, let's lay all our failure on Bush's doorstep for the next four years".

I don't think you'll find that happening as much in the future- partly out of damage control, partly out of the realization that this tactic has resulted in fail and in part, due to the realization that we cannot continue on with business as usual. With the last four years we had a little wiggle room and could afford a little colateral damage in effort to shift the political tide in the conservative's favor. We now know this is not the case, and we also know four more years of similar obstructionism will be the death of us all. While four more years of enforcing the sluggish expectations of a lame duck POTUS is possible, I firmly believe that there will a more centrist shift on the part of the conservatives, especially in areas where we believe can walk away with some dignity still intact.

Regarding extremis "news sources". Keep in mind these are the individual thought of the far extremes of both sides, not the voice of the majority. The media- as well as the liberal party-- has done an excellent job at marginalizing and downplaying the voice of extreme liberal belief while at the same time allowing for the creation of iconic representatives out of voices and deeds coming from the extreme right. I short, we played right into your hands by failing not to allow our extremist right to do the talking for us.

You say liberal party, I did not realize the Greens took control. Oh and it is this fantasy liberal party that is to blame for "the creation of iconic representatives out of voices and deeds coming from the extreme right."

In other words, you are still in denial, and nothing is the responsibility of the radical right.

OK, then. You're nit-picking here. By "liberal", I'm generalizing as "not conservative". If you'ld prefer The Left or Democrats, so be it. We can both safely agree that the conservatives (republicans/right)did not win the POTUS and the senate- the "other guys" did. Are we happy now?

I never placed the blame on the "left" for our inability to muzzle our rightist extremis- we won't credit you there for our mistakes. On the other hand, hats off to the left for downplaying their extremis and not allowing them to become the voice of the democratic party. Regarding the media: they were only too happy to bring our more "colorful" personalities to the forefront portraying them as the true voice of the republican party.

You won due to: a lackluster candidate and over confidence on our part, and of course, having a more populist message to run on. Having a exceptionally loud extremis on our side certainly didn't hurt your cause.

So loosen up those panties, shake out the sand, and go have yourself another victory beer.


These days it's victory gay sex while smoking a bong with some Latinos while having an abortion all underneath a banner of Nate Silver, Hallowed be thy Name.
2012-11-14 11:14:56 AM
1 votes:

Seriously, you have to greenlight EVERYTHING they post? Every day? Often TWICE a day?

Copyright © 1999 - 2012 Fark, Inc | An American Thinker Partner
2012-11-14 10:25:18 AM
1 votes:

born_yesterday: No way anybody would take on the burden of THAT pre-existing condition.


I'm glad you asked!

The five stages of denial will not change if you are currently enrolled on the fourth or fifth steps -our vouchers will go into effect for those on step three or the previous two steps.
2012-11-14 10:15:44 AM
1 votes:

jayhawk88: Is anyone tracking the right's 5 Stages of Grief progress? Are we still in Denial?


Budget cuts have removed the last two steps.

However, we can still provide the first three steps and a voucher that allows you to purchase the final two steps on your own, according to your needs, on the Free Market™.
2012-11-14 09:20:15 AM
1 votes:

un4gvn666: Jiro Dreams Of McRibs: oligarchy

You misspelled "oligarhy".

/pet peave


cubiyanqui.files.wordpress.com

"Fartbongo bin Muslin al Hadj stole mah 'C'."
2012-11-14 09:13:44 AM
1 votes:

jayhawk88: Is anyone tracking the right's 5 Stages of Grief progress? Are we still in Denial?


They've moved on to "Complete rejection of reality and rational thought".
2012-11-14 09:04:15 AM
1 votes:
Lets continue to destroy the economy out of spite!!!
2012-11-14 09:01:46 AM
1 votes:

rumpelstiltskin: It's a message from Paul Revere! It must be important!


ecx.images-amazon.com

You mean the keyboardist for Paul Revere & the Raiders? What's he doing writing for AT?

/i guess kicks DO keep getting harder to find
2012-11-14 08:59:58 AM
1 votes:

rumpelstiltskin: It's a message from Paul Revere! It must be important!


TO ARMS! TO ARMS!

THE NI66ER IS COMING! THE Ni66ER IS COMING!

i.imgur.com
2012-11-14 08:51:59 AM
1 votes:

rumpelstiltskin: It's a message from Paul Revere! It must be important!


It says, "I'm drunk at the tavern, could you pick me up?"
2012-11-14 08:50:20 AM
1 votes:
It would help this country to have a fiscally conservative counter-balance to the Democratic party. The shame is that the Republicans have gone so off the deep end that they have lost all credibility.

Thinking about it, given the events of the Reagan/Bush years, it would also have helped to have a fiscally conservative counter-balance to the Republican party.
2012-11-14 08:45:42 AM
1 votes:
Paul Revere... even American Thinker's audience is ashamed to be associated with American Thinker.

/ I'm pretty sure most AT articles submitted to Fark are written by Farkers who submit their own shiat
2012-11-14 08:45:20 AM
1 votes:
I like reading these stories alongside the ones about how the GOP is moderating and has a grand vision for expanding the party.

At some point they'll have to calculate that abandoning their current base is the only path forward, but they just aren't there yet.
 
Displayed 28 of 28 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report