Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(American Thinker)   The election was likely stolen. And whatever Barack Obama is presently, I don't believe he will be a legitimate president come January 20   (americanthinker.com) divider line 113
    More: Sad, obama, Ohio Secretary of State, Jon Husted, The Columbus Dispatch, voting ages, Marion Barry, Years Ago, Ohio River  
•       •       •

3630 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Nov 2012 at 8:51 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



113 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-13 08:46:52 AM  
I wonder if this much butthurt can be seen from orbit?
 
2012-11-13 08:48:33 AM  
t3.gstatic.com
 
2012-11-13 08:52:08 AM  
I'm guessing his reasoning is "because I feel that way." Didn't work out so well with the election. Don't think "feelings" will c=work out well here either.
 
2012-11-13 08:53:43 AM  
Wow...who took a dump in his punchbowl?
 
2012-11-13 08:53:55 AM  
Merkin
Stinker
 
2012-11-13 08:53:55 AM  
And whatever Barack Obama is presently...

Wait, you forgot what "socialist" is code for? Gabby Johnson, get down off the roof for a second.
 
2012-11-13 08:54:09 AM  
Joke's on the writer, Inauguration is January 21st!
 
2012-11-13 08:55:14 AM  
Why would Obama wait until his second term to start shenanigans? It's built into his programming or something?
 
2012-11-13 08:56:35 AM  
Messiah... Drink!
 
2012-11-13 08:57:43 AM  
It's like the took a pre-election Reddit thread and just did a Find/ReplaceAll for Obama/Romney.
 
2012-11-13 08:57:47 AM  
"faux marriage"?
 
2012-11-13 08:58:02 AM  
This story has legs. Seriously.
 
2012-11-13 08:58:24 AM  

cameroncrazy1984: Why would Obama wait until his second term to start shenanigans? It's built into his programming or something?


upload.wikimedia.org

He's obviously the Manchurian Candidate. Better keep these away from him.
 
2012-11-13 08:58:43 AM  
This seems to be the consensus in the rest of the derposphere. I wonder what the GOP is cooking up when they are trying so hard to rally the 'tards?
 
2012-11-13 08:59:02 AM  
The controlled demolition of the WTC on 9/11 pales in comparison to this vast conspiracy. Mass election fraud across multiple states and not a trace of evidence.

Obviously the Illuminati and Reptilians had to cooperate to pull this off.
 
2012-11-13 08:59:58 AM  

cameroncrazy1984: Why would Obama wait until his second term to start shenanigans? It's built into his programming or something?


That's one of the easiest logical corners you can back conservatives into - if Obama is such a tyrant why would he submit himself to a re-election campaign at all? If he is this despot that's going to send you to a FEMA concentration camp, take your guns and force you to take it up the butt...why would he go through a second election? That's awfully Democratic for an alleged despot.
 
2012-11-13 09:00:14 AM  

SilentStrider: I wonder if this much butthurt can be seen from orbit?


We're in supernova territory, my friend. The butthurt will be seen billions of years from now in the far reaches of the universe long after our solar system has been destroyed by the death of the sun.
 
2012-11-13 09:00:24 AM  
Lemme guess, lots of butthurt and false accusations of wide spread voter fraud?

\no clicky 'murican tinker
 
2012-11-13 09:00:26 AM  

Moosecakes: I'm guessing his reasoning is "because I feel that way." Didn't work out so well with the election. Don't think "feelings" will c=work out well here either.


stillrealtome.jpg
 
2012-11-13 09:00:54 AM  
As the 2012 election approached, conservative enthusiasm grew. Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums.

WAT

/I can't believe I clicked that link
 
2012-11-13 09:00:57 AM  
Do these traitors laugh over drinks while inventing lies that corrupt the political process? They should be sued for destroying the brand value of both 'American' and 'Thinker'.
 
2012-11-13 09:01:05 AM  
First I've heard about voter fraud from the Dems. You'd think it would be brought up faster than a week later. You know like the voter fraud the GOP did.
 
2012-11-13 09:01:48 AM  
"Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums."


Well, I can see this has been thoroughly researched. Someone needs to open an investigation.
 
2012-11-13 09:02:09 AM  
"Mommy, the mean black man stoled the 'lection!"
i.imgur.com
 
2012-11-13 09:03:23 AM  
The chances of this election having been stolen are well over 90 per tato.
 
2012-11-13 09:03:32 AM  
If you're still mad about Eisenhower integrating the military you should probably just move.

Likewise, school integration, blacks being allowed to vote, color television, your gay kids moving in with me when you kicked them out, Jesus having Mediterranean features, Bob Dylan going electric...

Hey, remember when Dubya hugged Rosa Parks? Didn't that make your blood boil?
 
2012-11-13 09:03:44 AM  

WSUCanuck: Joke's on the writer, Inauguration is January 21st!


Jokes on the writer for writing the article, or breathing for that matter, but technically, 21st is just the formal ceremony. Due to being on a Sunday (I think there is this special rule if 20th is Sunday), he will be sworn in on the 20th in a private session, and 21st will be the public ceremony for it.
 
2012-11-13 09:04:18 AM  

theknuckler_33: SilentStrider: I wonder if this much butthurt can be seen from orbit?

We're in supernova territory, my friend. The butthurt will be seen billions of years from now in the far reaches of the universe long after our solar system has been destroyed by the death of the sun.


Intelligent life on other worlds will see the butthurt and know that there is life here. But, they will decide that they don't want to meet such petulant crybabies.
 
2012-11-13 09:04:47 AM  

DROxINxTHExWIND: "Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums."


Well, I can see this has been thoroughly researched. Someone needs to open an investigation.


He's using Noonan math. I hear yard signery is another important metric when speculating on the presidency.
 
2012-11-13 09:06:07 AM  
I get the feeling that this article was written before the election with blanks in place of the state/party/candidate. Then sold to the crazy rag of whoever lost to be filled in and posted.

I think I read it after 2004 with all the names reversed.
 
2012-11-13 09:06:22 AM  
"despite our country's inexorable leftist slide..."

Ok, you lost me.
 
2012-11-13 09:07:13 AM  
These idiots haven't believed he was a legitimate president for the past 4 years. Why would they change their opinion now?

I would honestly be surprised if the Republican House doesn't react the same way they did when Clinton was re-elected, and start impeachment proceedings over some trumped-up offense.

There are no sorer losers on the planet than Republicans. When Democrats lose (2000, 2004) they get depressed, make idle threats to move to Canada, and then figure out how they can adjust their message, positions, and organization to do better in the future. When Republicans lose, they throw a temper-tantrum that any 3-year-old would envy, and then double-down on the same extremist derp that caused moderate voters to reject them in the first place.
 
2012-11-13 09:07:40 AM  
You mean that the people who ignored all signs to the contrary and deluded themselves into thinking Willard stood a snowball's chance in hell of becoming president are still in denial? Who'd have guessed?
 
2012-11-13 09:07:47 AM  
As the 2012 election approached, conservative enthusiasm grew. Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums.

Romney's massive rally in Ford Field was a huge success. Every seat set aside for the event was taken!

3.bp.blogspot.com

Meanwhile, in Ohio, Obama had dozens of empty seats two hours before his campaign rally was set to start.

www.breitbart.com
 
2012-11-13 09:08:07 AM  

HotWingConspiracy: DROxINxTHExWIND: "Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums."


Well, I can see this has been thoroughly researched. Someone needs to open an investigation.

He's using Noonan math. I hear yard signery is another important metric when speculating on the presidency.


Farking Peggy Noonan. I loathe her.
 
2012-11-13 09:08:08 AM  
Some people just can't admit they're wrong. They will never ever admit it.
 
2012-11-13 09:08:12 AM  

SilentStrider: I wonder if this much butthurt can be seen from orbit?


Only when you orbit Uranus
 
2012-11-13 09:10:47 AM  
TFA: As the 2012 election approached, conservative enthusiasm grew. Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums.

Yeah, but most of the people at Romney's events were pixels.

img651.imageshack.us
 
2012-11-13 09:11:27 AM  
I don't know what to believe. That not one person in Cleveland voted for Romney or the election was rigged. So difficult to figure out.
 
2012-11-13 09:11:33 AM  
This thread needs the wow wow dog
 
2012-11-13 09:12:33 AM  
movieactors.com
What was I supposed to do - call him for cheating better than me, in front of the others?
 
2012-11-13 09:13:18 AM  

mayIFark: WSUCanuck: Joke's on the writer, Inauguration is January 21st!

Jokes on the writer for writing the article, or breathing for that matter, but technically, 21st is just the formal ceremony. Due to being on a Sunday (I think there is this special rule if 20th is Sunday), he will be sworn in on the 20th in a private session, and 21st will be the public ceremony for it.


That makes perfect sense, why hold the inauguration on a weekend when you can do it on a Monday and mess with everyone's commute in DC!
 
2012-11-13 09:14:11 AM  
Well, sounds like we need to completely overhaul our election process at the federal level, from the richest districts to the poorest, let's ensure that all American voters are voting on the latest, high-tech equipment, equipped with verifiable paper ballots so we can double check all votes cast, if needed, and run random checks, as a matter of course. Let's pay and train our poll workers so that they are able to operate all those high-tech machines, smoothly and quickly. Let's make sure all election equipment has been verified by independent experts to be unhackable. I'm sure the Republicans will be totally on board with that, right?
 
2012-11-13 09:15:00 AM  
sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net
 
2012-11-13 09:16:10 AM  

RyogaM: Well, sounds like we need to completely overhaul our election process at the federal level, from the richest districts to the poorest, let's ensure that all American voters are voting on the latest, high-tech equipment, equipped with verifiable paper ballots so we can double check all votes cast, if needed, and run random checks, as a matter of course. Let's pay and train our poll workers so that they are able to operate all those high-tech machines, smoothly and quickly. Let's make sure all election equipment has been verified by independent experts to be unhackable. I'm sure the Republicans will be totally on board with that, right?


Throw in a side of a new TSA type department to "keep the peace" and I guarantee they will go for it.
 
2012-11-13 09:17:01 AM  
img651.imageshack.us

holy shiat! the place is about to collapse on all those people!
 
2012-11-13 09:18:02 AM  
HAHA, he links to an article stating that there were 0 votes for Romney in 59 districts as a point of fraud. Article he linked to was pretty decent, they actually visited dozens of homes listed as Republican in those districts (there were literally only a dozen homes registered as Republican). Each one either had moved away or stated they voted for Obama.
 
2012-11-13 09:18:05 AM  

Doc Daneeka: TFA: As the 2012 election approached, conservative enthusiasm grew. Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums.

Yeah, but most of the people at Romney's events were pixels.

[img651.imageshack.us image 750x368]


Do not confuse a poorly constructed attempt to create a panaromic image with a poor attempt at image fakery.
 
2012-11-13 09:19:27 AM  

badhatharry: I don't know what to believe. That not one person in Cleveland voted for Romney or the election was rigged. So difficult to figure out.


I would ask for a citation, but I don't really have the time to indulge in some time cube guy, infowars, annunaki fantasy.
 
2012-11-13 09:19:57 AM  

RyogaM: Well, sounds like we need to completely overhaul our election process at the federal level, from the richest districts to the poorest, let's ensure that all American voters are voting on the latest, high-tech equipment, equipped with verifiable paper ballots so we can double check all votes cast, if needed, and run random checks, as a matter of course. Let's pay and train our poll workers so that they are able to operate all those high-tech machines, smoothly and quickly. Let's make sure all election equipment has been verified by independent experts to be unhackable. I'm sure the Republicans will be totally on board with that, right?


Republicans will support such a measure, so long as the legislation allows for a staggered deployment, allows for initial deployment in Republican leaning areas, and can be repealed before the deployment has completed.
 
Displayed 50 of 113 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report