Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Raw Story)   "Four presidents in the last century have won 50 percent of the vote twice: Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Reagan, and Obama"   (rawstory.com) divider line 113
    More: Spiffy, Bill Kristol, obama, GOP  
•       •       •

2453 clicks; posted to Politics » on 11 Nov 2012 at 3:25 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



113 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-11-11 01:11:54 PM  
...ouch.
 
2012-11-11 02:19:09 PM  
So...socialism?
 
2012-11-11 02:36:34 PM  
I didnt realize the 1968 popular vote was so close.
 
2012-11-11 02:38:50 PM  
Bill Kristol saying sensible things...maybe it is the End Times.
 
2012-11-11 02:49:01 PM  
Oh, like any of them really became anything as presidents.
 
2012-11-11 03:27:07 PM  
So, conservatives then?
 
2012-11-11 03:28:24 PM  
Is this one of those gloating things that gets on the conservatives' nerves?
 
2012-11-11 03:28:43 PM  
So basically, Obama is liked by everyone except those who watch Fox News?
 
2012-11-11 03:28:47 PM  
This is bad news........for Taft.
 
2012-11-11 03:28:49 PM  

Don't Troll Me Bro!: So, three conservatives and Reagan?


FTFM
 
2012-11-11 03:30:42 PM  
And that's almost half!
 
2012-11-11 03:31:40 PM  
So those guys didn't have mandates either, then.
 
2012-11-11 03:34:25 PM  
The Obama White House has announced that Butt Hurt will be fully covered under Obamacare.
 
2012-11-11 03:34:42 PM  
This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.

I think he knows this now, so he's deliberately advocating the opposite of what he wants to happen in hopes of being wrong about it.
 
2012-11-11 03:35:15 PM  
That stinking commie Eisenhower and his damned Nazi-collectivist INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM! DAMN HIM!
 
2012-11-11 03:36:42 PM  
They'll just keep doing what they've been doing. Republicans will win the house in 2014 because there isn't a figurehead on the ballot in the democrat party to bring people to the polls. The GOP might win the senate too because it's the same people up for election that won when Obama first won, again no figure head to draw people to the polls.

If the dems have any chance of winning a majority in the house, they must have control of the state legislatures when the 2020 census comes out AND liberals must control the supreme court before another epic fail like citizens united gets decided.
 
2012-11-11 03:39:33 PM  

Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.

I think he knows this now, so he's deliberately advocating the opposite of what he wants to happen in hopes of being wrong about it.


But if he's doing it intentionally, maybe he'll end up being wrong about being wrong.
 
2012-11-11 03:40:15 PM  
Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?
 
2012-11-11 03:40:28 PM  

Britney Spear's Speculum: they must have control of the state legislatures when the 2020 census comes


Just to add to this point, the Tea Party's sole purpose was to rally people to the polls in 2010 so that state legislatures could be controlled by republicans when the census came out thus ensuring easier control of the house for republicans.
 
2012-11-11 03:41:08 PM  
Not a particular surprise. Wilson, Nixon and Clinton all had a significant third party candidate splitting the vote in one or both of their races. W Bush in 2000 was a special case. The others were only elected once.
 
2012-11-11 03:42:15 PM  

Abner Doon: But if he's doing it intentionally, maybe he'll end up being wrong about being wrong.


I'm sure he's been wrong about that before.
 
2012-11-11 03:44:11 PM  

Britney Spear's Speculum: Republicans will win the house in 2014 because there isn't a figurehead on the ballot in the democrat party to bring people to the polls. The GOP might win the senate too because it's the same people up for election that won when Obama first won, again no figure head to draw people to the polls.


Just so we're clear, even with the "clear figurehead" of Obama in the 2012 election the House is still solidly Republican. The Howard Dean-era "50-state strategy" has been abandoned for a "winnable congressional district" strategy and this is the result. Obama and the DNC essentially ceded the states he was unlikely to win, focusing instead on just the swing states. While this might have been good from the perspective of winning the presidency, we lost a lot of house races that could have potentially been tipped back to blue.
 
2012-11-11 03:46:13 PM  

quartercomma: Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?


He likes twice.
 
2012-11-11 03:47:25 PM  

ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Oh, like any of them really became anything as presidents.


www.wearysloth.com 

"I wouldn't worry, Chicago's not a big political strategy town."
 
2012-11-11 03:47:32 PM  

Lenny_da_Hog: Is this one of those gloating things that gets on the conservatives' nerves?


Well I certainly hope so.
 
2012-11-11 03:48:04 PM  

Gordon Bennett: Not a particular surprise. Wilson, Nixon and Clinton all had a significant third party candidate splitting the vote in one or both of their races. W Bush in 2000 was a special case. The others were only elected once.


Or, in Ford's case, never elected to the office at all.
 
2012-11-11 03:48:08 PM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: quartercomma: Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?

He likes twice.


You said "twice" rape.
 
2012-11-11 03:48:10 PM  

Gordon Bennett: Not a particular surprise. Wilson, Nixon and Clinton all had a significant third party candidate splitting the vote in one or both of their races. W Bush in 2000 was a special case. The others were only elected once.


Kinda circular logic tho. There's *always* third party candidates. They only become "significant" when they get more votes. The variable of 3rd party choices is fairly constant, however, I'm pretty sure Obama would have broke 50% no matter who the third party choices were, and that's probably true for Reagan, FDR, and Eisenhower as well.
 
2012-11-11 03:48:57 PM  
...and Reagan is the only empty-suit moron in the whole bunch. But at least he proved why you should never vote for some Hollywood actor to fill the highest office in the land.
 
2012-11-11 03:50:47 PM  
Looks like Kristol needs to be added to The List, if he hasn't been already.
 
2012-11-11 03:50:58 PM  

thamike: The All-Powerful Atheismo: quartercomma: Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?

He likes twice.

You said "twice" rape.


I doubleplusgood rape.
 
2012-11-11 03:51:33 PM  
Depending on which Roosevelt, Ike's probably my favorite on the list.
 
2012-11-11 03:52:26 PM  

Gordon Bennett: Not a particular surprise. Wilson, Nixon and Clinton all had a significant third party candidate splitting the vote in one or both of their races. W Bush in 2000 was a special case. The others were only elected once.


And do you think that it was completely random that those races had significant third party competition and the others didn't?
 
2012-11-11 03:54:26 PM  

Abner Doon: Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.

I think he knows this now, so he's deliberately advocating the opposite of what he wants to happen in hopes of being wrong about it.

But if he's doing it intentionally, maybe he'll end up being wrong about being wrong.



He's going to Britta Britta-ing.
Way to pull an Abed.
 
2012-11-11 03:54:48 PM  

Smelly McUgly: ...and Reagan is the only empty-suit moron in the whole bunch. But at least he proved why you should never vote for some Hollywood actor to fill the highest office in the land.


I'd like to think 1984 was done more as an Orwell tribute than actual democracy.
 
2012-11-11 03:56:13 PM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: thamike: The All-Powerful Atheismo: quartercomma: Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?

He likes twice.

You said "twice" rape.

I doubleplusgoodlegitimate rape.


FTFGOP
 
2012-11-11 03:57:04 PM  

Loaded Six String: Depending on which Roosevelt, Ike's probably my favorite on the list.


Franklin. Teddy was actually only elected president once (he took office when William McKinley was assassinated).
 
182
2012-11-11 03:57:30 PM  

DamnYankees: I didnt realize the 1968 popular vote was so close.


liberals shot themselves in the foot with all the anti-war protesting at the DNC convention. image if nixon was never elected.....we wouldn't have had a carter.
 
2012-11-11 03:59:08 PM  

ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Smelly McUgly: ...and Reagan is the only empty-suit moron in the whole bunch. But at least he proved why you should never vote for some Hollywood actor to fill the highest office in the land.

I'd like to think 1984 was done more as an Orwell tribute than actual democracy.


I was born in '82. Even as a young child, I could tell that the '80s were a screwed-up time to be alive, even if I didn't know that it was the unholy duo of Reagan and Thatcher that were determined to make everything terrible.
 
2012-11-11 03:59:21 PM  

Loaded Six String: Depending on which Roosevelt, Ike's probably my favorite on the list.


From the Headline: last century

Unless 2012 - 1904
 
2012-11-11 04:00:53 PM  

clkeagle: Loaded Six String: Depending on which Roosevelt, Ike's probably my favorite on the list.

From the Headline: last century

Unless 2012 - 1904

is less than a hundred, I think it's pretty clear which president.

/yes, I screwed up a post while trying to mock someone else. I produce my own shadenfreude.
 
2012-11-11 04:01:54 PM  

Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.

I think he knows this now, so he's deliberately advocating the opposite of what he wants to happen in hopes of being wrong about it.


But he encouraged McCain to pick Palin as his running mate. So he's got that going for him.
 
2012-11-11 04:02:00 PM  

St_Francis_P: So...socialism?



if we could jes git rid of all dem soczialst, we'd have freedom!
 
2012-11-11 04:02:12 PM  

quartercomma: Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?


No...four times, which doesn't count by GOP math.

Oh wait...that IS "twice twice".
 
2012-11-11 04:03:04 PM  

HotIgneous Intruder: The Obama White House has announced that Butt Hurt will be fully covered under Obamacare.


Damn.
Colonoscopies are expensive and invasive procedures... not sure I like this
 
2012-11-11 04:03:34 PM  

Lionel Mandrake: But he's teh MOSTEST DIVISIVE PREZ EVAR!!1!

[little_girl_upskirt.gif]

NOBODY I KNOW VOTED FOR HIM!! FRAUD!!11!


3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-11-11 04:04:20 PM  
You buried the lead Subby!

'You know what? It won't kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires.' It really won't, I don't think." - Bill Kristol

/mind blown
 
2012-11-11 04:05:28 PM  
I think that is obviously definitive proof of widespread, rampant voter fraud. We all know that no real American would have voted for that socialist sheriff who is near. 0bummer probably had closer to 10% in actual, legal votes. The rest was due to Acorn registering cartoon characters and dead people and then having them vote numerous times. The Soros-controlled liberal media will never report it though, they just call the election for the Kenyan usurper and expect us to believe it, and most of you sheeple just buy it. Not me! I know the truth! Save us, Fox News!!!!
 
2012-11-11 04:06:51 PM  

Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.


Dick Morris? I think he does it on purpose, though.
 
2012-11-11 04:07:16 PM  

clkeagle: Loaded Six String: Depending on which Roosevelt, Ike's probably my favorite on the list.

From the Headline: last century

Unless 2012 - 1904


Teddy Roosevelt was only elected once as President. His first administration was McKinley's. In the 1912 election, he split the Republican vote with Taft, and Wilson was elected. So he wouldn't have qualified for this achievement anyway.
 
2012-11-11 04:09:42 PM  

tdpatriots12: Teddy Roosevelt was only elected once as President. His first administration was McKinley's. In the 1912 election, he split the Republican vote with Taft, and Wilson was elected. So he wouldn't have qualified for this achievement anyway.


Right. I was thinking "presidential ticket," but then we'd have to count Garner, Nixon, Bush, and Biden on the list.
 
2012-11-11 04:11:24 PM  
i'll never forgive the americans who voted bedtime for bonzo into office. i live in fear that one day a different large group of morans will vote ashton kutcher into office.
 
2012-11-11 04:12:13 PM  

St_Francis_P: Bill Kristol saying sensible things...maybe it is the End Times.


I thought I woke up in parallel universe this morning.
 
2012-11-11 04:12:53 PM  
For anyone who is curious, this is the full list of Presidents who have won over 50% of the popular vote at least twice:

George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, William McKinley, Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama
 
2012-11-11 04:15:58 PM  

Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.



Dick Morris says hi.
 
2012-11-11 04:16:27 PM  
Ok, listen people. We have GOT to stop telling the GOP why they lost this election. While it is true that they have spent the last 8 years in a political echo chamber - making up facts willy-nilly to conform to their own world views - it isn't until recently that those in power in the GOP actually started believing their own BS. The fact is, unpleasant as they may be, they are not stupid - their base is stupid but not them. We cannot let them learn from their mistakes. So, from now on when asked your opinion on why they got totally shellacked, plead ignorance. Say something like "Gee, boss, I don't know why you lost. Your policies and ideas are brilliant. You really should have won. It must have been a glitch in the Matrix or something, Boss." Got it? We can't afford for them to learn and adapt. They are too dangerous to teach.
 
2012-11-11 04:16:28 PM  

tdpatriots12: For anyone who is curious, this is the full list of Presidents who have won over 50% of the popular vote at least twice:

George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, William McKinley, Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama


That is quite the list.
 
2012-11-11 04:17:52 PM  

tdpatriots12: For anyone who is curious, this is the full list of Presidents who have won over 50% of the popular vote at least twice:

George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, William McKinley, Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama


Not a stiff in the bunch, with the possible excepton of Grant.
 
2012-11-11 04:19:34 PM  

Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.

I think he knows this now, so he's deliberately advocating the opposite of what he wants to happen in hopes of being wrong about it.


Blind squirrel, nut, etc.
 
2012-11-11 04:20:24 PM  

Abner Doon: Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.

I think he knows this now, so he's deliberately advocating the opposite of what he wants to happen in hopes of being wrong about it.

But if he's doing it intentionally, maybe he'll end up being wrong about being wrong.


Ah but if he's doing it intentionally, then he's still "wrong", it's just that his opinion is still wrong rather than his stated opinion.
 
2012-11-11 04:25:32 PM  
In other news, Bill Kristol to be excommunicated.

sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net
 
2012-11-11 04:31:37 PM  

HotIgneous Intruder: The Obama White House has announced that Butt Hurt will be fully covered under Obamacare.


So he IS trying to bankrupt our great nation! I KNEW IT!

/Wharrgarbl!
 
2012-11-11 04:33:20 PM  

St_Francis_P: Bill Kristol saying sensible things...maybe it is the End Times.

 
2012-11-11 04:34:22 PM  

Stone Meadow: quartercomma: Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?

No...four times, which doesn't count by GOP math.

Oh wait...that IS "twice twice".


He won a majority of the popular vote in back to back elections, 3 times.
 
2012-11-11 04:36:33 PM  

MFAWG: Not a stiff in the bunch, with the possible excepton of Grant.


Lush, not a stiff.

And McKinley's not all that impressive, at this range.
 
2012-11-11 04:39:34 PM  

HotIgneous Intruder: That stinking commie Eisenhower


I hear he fought a war against good conservative white people..
 
2012-11-11 04:46:08 PM  

tdpatriots12: clkeagle: Loaded Six String: Depending on which Roosevelt, Ike's probably my favorite on the list.

From the Headline: last century

Unless 2012 - 1904

Teddy Roosevelt was only elected once as President. His first administration was McKinley's. In the 1912 election, he split the Republican vote with Taft, and Wilson was elected. So he wouldn't have qualified for this achievement anyway.


That's always blown my mind, that America voted against a man as great as Teddy Roosevelt. Maybe he wasn't the godly figure then he's grown to today, but it really shows how pathetically attached we are to the two-party system.

KrispyKritter: i'll never forgive the americans who voted bedtime for bonzo into office. i live in fear that one day a different large group of morans will vote ashton kutcher into office.


I giggled at this, and then realized in advance this could happen, I apologize in advance for my generation if we do this.
 
2012-11-11 04:46:46 PM  

Lenny_da_Hog: Is this one of those gloating things that gets on the conservatives' nerves?


Who farking cares?
 
2012-11-11 04:50:09 PM  

tdpatriots12: For anyone who is curious, this is the full list of Presidents who have won over 50% of the popular vote at least twice:

George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, William McKinley, Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama


It is pretty tough to include the first four on that list. A large proportion of the population never had an opportunity to vote for or against them as many states had electors chosen by the state legislatures without an election. Jackson is the first where I would pay attention to the popular, with only 2 of 23 state legislatures selecting electors in his first election and 1 in the second.

Though, as he was unopposed, Washington definitely would have received over 50%.
 
2012-11-11 04:56:44 PM  

ThatGuyFromTheInternet: That's always blown my mind, that America voted against a man as great as Teddy Roosevelt. Maybe he wasn't the godly figure then he's grown to today, but it really shows how pathetically attached we are to the two-party system.


Well, it was more:

Republican Conservatives (Taft) vs. Republican Progressives (Roosevelt) vs. Democratic Progressives (Wilson)

While Roosevelt won more votes than Taft, the progressive wing of the Republican party died in 1912. When the GOP returned to power, it was with the "return to normalcy" conservatism that embraced the open-season capitalism of the 1890s. This is the economic policy that Obama was referring to in the third (?) debate when he said Mitt Romney wanted to return to the economic policies of the 1920s.

But yeah, Roosevelt. He was shot before a rally during the 1912 election and gave the speech anyway.
 
2012-11-11 04:57:18 PM  

Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.



broken clocks...
 
2012-11-11 05:09:18 PM  

ThatGuyFromTheInternet: tdpatriots12: clkeagle: Loaded Six String: Depending on which Roosevelt, Ike's probably my favorite on the list.

From the Headline: last century

Unless 2012 - 1904

Teddy Roosevelt was only elected once as President. His first administration was McKinley's. In the 1912 election, he split the Republican vote with Taft, and Wilson was elected. So he wouldn't have qualified for this achievement anyway.

That's always blown my mind, that America voted against a man as great as Teddy Roosevelt. Maybe he wasn't the godly figure then he's grown to today, but it really shows how pathetically attached we are to the two-party system.

KrispyKritter: i'll never forgive the americans who voted bedtime for bonzo into office. i live in fear that one day a different large group of morans will vote ashton kutcher into office.

I giggled at this, and then realized in advance this could happen, I apologize in advance for my generation if we do this.


Teddy got purged because he wasn't conservative enough.

Seriously, that's why he lost his (second?) reelection bid and why he had to run under the Bull Moose Party.


/in related news, a black man named Hussein who was raised by a single mom managed to not only run for President and win (twice), but he won with over fifty percent of the popular vote (both times) and got over 330 electoral votes out of 538 (both times)
 
2012-11-11 05:11:33 PM  

Shaggy_C: Just so we're clear, even with the "clear figurehead" of Obama in the 2012 election the House is still solidly Republican.


Despite Democrats winning the popular vote in the House elections.

Hooray for gerrymandering!!!
 
2012-11-11 05:12:31 PM  

King Something: Teddy got purged because he wasn't conservative enough.

Seriously, that's why he lost his (second?) reelection bid and why he had to run under the Bull Moose Party.


Kinda sorta. He left the Presidency to his chosen successor (Taft) who ended up being not progressive enough. Then he challenged Taft in the primary, seen as something of a betrayal to The Party, if not principles - and it caused a civil war in the GOP.

That said, the Roosevelt/Taft relationship really ought to be made into a movie or TV miniseries at some point.
 
2012-11-11 05:17:17 PM  

Don't Troll Me Bro!: Lionel Mandrake: But he's teh MOSTEST DIVISIVE PREZ EVAR!!1!

[little_girl_upskirt.gif]

NOBODY I KNOW VOTED FOR HIM!! FRAUD!!11!

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 400x600]


www.deviantart.com
 
2012-11-11 05:19:00 PM  

maddogdelta: I hear he fought a war against good conservative white people..


Yeah but FDR took the cake when it came to fighting wars against conservative white people.
 
2012-11-11 05:39:26 PM  

Aaron Haynes: Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position, which is interesting because Bill Kristol is never right about anything.

Ever.

No, seriously. I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him. Every prediction, every claim, every assertion he makes is always wrong.

Dick Morris? I think he does it on purpose, though.


Yeah, Dick Morris is a good old-fashioned wingnut farmer. It's a strong growth industry.
 
2012-11-11 05:43:09 PM  

dywed88: Stone Meadow: quartercomma: Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?

No...four times, which doesn't count by GOP math.

Oh wait...that IS "twice twice".

He won a majority of the popular vote in back to back elections, 3 times.


Which is pretty amazing, as the American public was sick and tired of the war by '44. Still, they gave him the job again before more or less taking it out on Harry Truman. Good thing for Harry we had the bomb, as I question his will to invade Japan.
 
2012-11-11 05:50:58 PM  
The only reason Clinton didn't achieve that is because of Ross Perot.
 
2012-11-11 05:54:44 PM  

theknuckler_33: The only reason Clinton didn't achieve that is because of Ross Perot.


Yeah, but that's like saying "The only reason he didn't get 50% of the vote is because not enough people voted for him."
 
2012-11-11 05:57:48 PM  
Republicans decided they wanted to be the party of rich, white males and southern racists who think Leave it Beaver is a documentary.

You made your bed now thats it burning around you don't cry.
 
2012-11-11 06:01:18 PM  
This is weirding me out...GOP talking heads are being sort of reasonable?

I hope this ushers in some kind of change in tactics from the party as a whole. These elections proved that divide and conquer does not work anymore...
 
2012-11-11 06:02:12 PM  

dywed88: Stone Meadow: quartercomma: Didn't FDR win 50% twice twice?

No...four times, which doesn't count by GOP math.

Oh wait...that IS "twice twice".

He won a majority of the popular vote in back to back elections, 3 times.


He also won three times in a row twice and four times in a row once.

And farking defeated Hitler, Imperial Japan, Republican obstructionism, and the Great Depression. From a wheelchair.

Reagan saved us from commies only a day's drive from Harlingen, TX, so he's clearly the better man in every way.
 
2012-11-11 06:04:15 PM  

dywed88: tdpatriots12: For anyone who is curious, this is the full list of Presidents who have won over 50% of the popular vote at least twice:

George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, William McKinley, Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama

It is pretty tough to include the first four on that list. A large proportion of the population never had an opportunity to vote for or against them as many states had electors chosen by the state legislatures without an election. Jackson is the first where I would pay attention to the popular, with only 2 of 23 state legislatures selecting electors in his first election and 1 in the second.

Though, as he was unopposed, Washington definitely would have received over 50%.


You're right, but I was trying to be comprehensive. We can't really compare the electoral politics of pre-Jackson to something we'd recognize today. Starting with Jackson it's still a really short list.
 
2012-11-11 06:04:43 PM  

Ishkur: This is the second time in recent memory that Bill Kristol has advocated something counter-intuitive to the GOP's position


farm6.staticflickr.com
 
2012-11-11 06:05:12 PM  

Aaron Haynes: theknuckler_33: The only reason Clinton didn't achieve that is because of Ross Perot.

Yeah, but that's like saying "The only reason he didn't get 50% of the vote is because not enough people voted for him."


Only if you want to obscure the fact that they were two elections where a statistically significant percentage of votes went to someone other than the two major candidates.
 
2012-11-11 06:06:48 PM  
"Really? The Republican Party is going to fall on its sword to defend a bunch of millionaires, half of whom voted Democratic and half of them live in Hollywood?"

Yeah, seems a bit silly, don't it?

Who said this again?

Who?

The actor?

No?

Bill "My crystal Ball is always broken" Kristol said this?

[scanners.gif]

Did Bill just learn he has inoperable brain cancer or has the 7th seal finally crumbled into dust? 

/Just asking questions.
 
2012-11-11 06:06:54 PM  

Aaron Haynes: theknuckler_33: The only reason Clinton didn't achieve that is because of Ross Perot.

Yeah, but that's like saying "The only reason he didn't get 50% of the vote is because not enough people voted for him."


1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-11-11 06:08:39 PM  

theknuckler_33: Only if you want to obscure the fact that they were two elections where a statistically significant percentage of votes went to someone other than the two major candidates.


Would a major third party candidate had run for office at all had there been a major party candidate that had the broad appeal capable of securing greater than 50% of the vote in the first place?

Maybe, maybe not. The point isn't that there's some magical line that exists and Obama crossed it, only that there are only a few ways to measure a candidate's electoral mandate - and as flawed and open to criticism as any of them may be, securing over 50% of the popular vote (in addition to a solid electoral college victory) is about the best measurement we've got.

As Kristol said, elections have consequences, even ones where a candidate doesn't receive 50% of the vote. But Obama did, twice, and that's important.
 
2012-11-11 06:09:48 PM  
A century being 17 presidents (since 1912).

Statistically, not terribly impressive, honestly. Not all that many ran twice to begin with:

Roosevelt (elected thrice)
Truman (Two terms, but the first term he took over when Roosevelt Died, so elected once)
Johnson (Two terms, the first wasn't elected, was remainder of Kennedy's term)
Nixon (Two terms, i guess didn't win the popular vote both times if TFA is right)
Reagan (Elected twice, two terms)
Clinton (Elected Twice, two terms)
Bush 2 (Elected Twice, two terms)
Obama (Elected twice, two terms)

So "four presidents in the last century have won fifty percent of the vote" is actually "four presidents of the six that actually ran and won twice most recently also won the popular vote twice".

Nooooooot really news, there. (Yeah, yeah, I know, FARK and all that.)
 
2012-11-11 06:13:26 PM  
So if I've got two Obamas, a Reagan, three Eisenhowers, and three Roosevelts, I have....
$2,503.30
 
2012-11-11 06:16:36 PM  

tdpatriots12: theknuckler_33: Only if you want to obscure the fact that they were two elections where a statistically significant percentage of votes went to someone other than the two major candidates.

Would a major third party candidate had run for office at all had there been a major party candidate that had the broad appeal capable of securing greater than 50% of the vote in the first place?

Maybe, maybe not. The point isn't that there's some magical line that exists and Obama crossed it, only that there are only a few ways to measure a candidate's electoral mandate - and as flawed and open to criticism as any of them may be, securing over 50% of the popular vote (in addition to a solid electoral college victory) is about the best measurement we've got.

As Kristol said, elections have consequences, even ones where a candidate doesn't receive 50% of the vote. But Obama did, twice, and that's important.


I didn't actually read TFA. Hell, Clinton was just a hair shy of 50% in 1996 even with Perot getting over 8% of the national vote. He would have needed less than 30% of Perot's vote count in 1992 to get over 50%, Perot got almost 19% of the vote in '92! and Clinton STILL got 43%. By any objective measure, Clinton won in landslides in both of his elections... bigger even than Obama, so I think he is at least worthy of an "asterisk" when talking about measuring candidate electoral 'mandate'.
 
2012-11-11 06:17:34 PM  
For your argument to really have a point, you could only really discount people who never had a chance to run for a second term.

Presidents that were elected once and then defeated in re-election - or opted not to run, such as Johnson - automatically have less of an electoral mandate than Obama by comparison because they lost.
 
2012-11-11 06:23:38 PM  

Jim_Callahan: A century being 17 presidents (since 1912).

Statistically, not terribly impressive, honestly. Not all that many ran twice to begin with:

Roosevelt (elected thrice)
Truman (Two terms, but the first term he took over when Roosevelt Died, so elected once)
Johnson (Two terms, the first wasn't elected, was remainder of Kennedy's term)
Nixon (Two terms, i guess didn't win the popular vote both times if TFA is right)
Reagan (Elected twice, two terms)
Clinton (Elected Twice, two terms)
Bush 2 (Elected Twice, two terms)
Obama (Elected twice, two terms)

So "four presidents in the last century have won fifty percent of the vote" is actually "four presidents of the six that actually ran and won twice most recently also won the popular vote twice".

Nooooooot really news, there. (Yeah, yeah, I know, FARK and all that.)


Well, you left out Eisenhower, to 4 of the 7.

BTW, Reagan got 50.7% of the vote in 1980 despite a pretty historic landslide. why? third party candidate.

Also, Nixon won the popular vote, just didn't get 50% both times (because third party candidate his first win).
 
2012-11-11 06:23:47 PM  
I think his point was more about... how to put this... proving a negative? In a sense?

It's hard to argue that Obama won in some kind of close-call squeaker when you can make the statement he did about the exclusivity of the >50% x2 club and be factually correct. He doesn't have to go on to prove that this is some kind of uniquely emphatic mandate to demonstrate that you cannot pretend he didn't win convincingly. That's what I got out of it, at least.
 
2012-11-11 06:44:26 PM  

abb3w: MFAWG: Not a stiff in the bunch, with the possible excepton of Grant.

Lush, not a stiff.

And McKinley's not all that impressive, at this range.


www.igorb.com

How close do you need to be?
 
2012-11-11 07:29:36 PM  

Ishkur: I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him.


Two words:

Aaron Haynes: Dick Morris? I think he does it on purpose, though.


Crap. Beaten to that one.
 
2012-11-11 07:32:36 PM  

HotIgneous Intruder: That stinking commie Eisenhower and his damned Nazi-collectivist INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM! DAMN HIM!


Scenario: For generations, schools were always private and only serving those who could afford them. If a negro child from the forest needed an answer to an emergency math problem, there was a very basic form available to him in the Emergency Math Hut. But he only received that one solved problem, and not the knowledge needed to prevent future math emergencies.

Some president comes along in 2008 and suggests that maybe, just maybe, that education be freely available to all citizens.

What do you think the GOP/Tea reaction would be?

ZOMG SOCIALISM INDOCTRINATION WHAAAAAAAAAARHURK
 
2012-11-11 08:19:34 PM  

tdpatriots12: For anyone who is curious, this is the full list of Presidents who have won over 50% of the popular vote at least twice:

George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, William McKinley, Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama



That is a surprisingly small list. Well, about 4 per century I guess.
 
2012-11-11 08:22:15 PM  

Thats No Moose: Ishkur: I have never seen a pundit, journalist, critic or political commentator that is more habitually wrong than him.

Two words:

Aaron Haynes: Dick Morris? I think he does it on purpose, though.

Crap. Beaten to that one.



Jim Kramer (CNBC). Whatever investment he recommends, do the opposite.
 
2012-11-11 08:49:01 PM  
Suck it GOP!!!
 
2012-11-11 08:53:55 PM  

HotIgneous Intruder: That stinking commie Eisenhower and his damned Nazi-collectivist INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM! DAMN HIM!


Dude, seriously. Good Highway System or Best Damn Highway System.

I've road-tripped plenty, but not as much as my produce and goods have, and we all enjoy the benefit.

We need WPA 2.0.
 
2012-11-11 08:56:04 PM  

thamike: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Oh, like any of them really became anything as presidents.

[www.wearysloth.com image 320x240] 

"I wouldn't worry, Chicago's not a big political strategy town."


Hey Mike, it's Brian... I gifted you TF. I know you from back in the day... will you at least say hi to me, bro?
 
2012-11-12 12:31:06 AM  

skykid: Dick Morris


Yeah, but the difference is Dick Morris is a partisan hack who panders to the GOP base like the Iraqi Information Minister.

Bill Kristol appears level-headed, sane, tolerant and willing to compromise, and he's a nice guy and fun to talk to (he's been on the Daily Show show several times and he just laughs it off whenever Jon schools him)... he leans right, but not always. It's just that whatever he predicts or claims or backs or favors, it's always wrong. Even when it's a non-partisan thing. He doesn't do it for political schillery, he's trying to rationally work out what will happen next and it's always way off the mark.

It's the most uncanny record of fail I've ever seen in a pundit.
 
2012-11-12 12:32:02 AM  

Shaggy_C: Britney Spear's Speculum: Republicans will win the house in 2014 because there isn't a figurehead on the ballot in the democrat party to bring people to the polls. The GOP might win the senate too because it's the same people up for election that won when Obama first won, again no figure head to draw people to the polls.

Just so we're clear, even with the "clear figurehead" of Obama in the 2012 election the House is still solidly Republican. The Howard Dean-era "50-state strategy" has been abandoned for a "winnable congressional district" strategy and this is the result. Obama and the DNC essentially ceded the states he was unlikely to win, focusing instead on just the swing states. While this might have been good from the perspective of winning the presidency, we lost a lot of house races that could have potentially been tipped back to blue.


Huh? On the 2010 map, Democrats would have a majority in the House. Say happy redistricting, everyone!

Seriously, gerrymandering works, that's why they do it. More people voted for the Democratic candidate in House races than the Republican one this year. The House will have a massive systemic bias towards Republicans for the next decade.
 
2012-11-12 05:29:41 AM  

brianbankerus: thamike: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Oh, like any of them really became anything as presidents.

[www.wearysloth.com image 320x240] 

"I wouldn't worry, Chicago's not a big political strategy town."

Hey Mike, it's Brian... I gifted you TF. I know you from back in the day... will you at least say hi to me, bro?


Hey dude! Here, have a bonano>

t3.gstatic.com
 
2012-11-12 05:35:50 AM  

thamike: brianbankerus: thamike: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: Oh, like any of them really became anything as presidents.

[www.wearysloth.com image 320x240] 

"I wouldn't worry, Chicago's not a big political strategy town."

Hey Mike, it's Brian... I gifted you TF. I know you from back in the day... will you at least say hi to me, bro?

Hey dude! Here, have a bonano>

[t3.gstatic.com image 275x183]


Um, okay... sorry to impose, I guess. Just miss you bro, but whatever.
 
2012-11-12 06:00:11 AM  

brianbankerus: Um, okay... sorry to impose, I guess. Just miss you bro, but whatever.


What?
 
2012-11-12 06:03:04 AM  
Oh, do you think I'm Mike? Like, Mike Mike?
 
2012-11-12 06:04:31 AM  

thamike: Oh, do you think I'm Mike? Like, Mike Mike?


I think you are ThaMike. I gifted you Total Fark. I know you from back when you ran your website. I'm Brian from Glossy News... 'member me?
 
2012-11-12 11:37:42 AM  
So...yeah...I guess Republicans are going to have to abandon their "Obama is Carter 2.0" schtick.

Too bad. So sad.
 
2012-11-12 05:42:32 PM  

brianbankerus: thamike: Oh, do you think I'm Mike? Like, Mike Mike?

I think you are ThaMike. I gifted you Total Fark. I know you from back when you ran your website. I'm Brian from Glossy News... 'member me?


I'm not Mike. I inherited the account and by the time he was officially done with it (raising a family, working hard), I already had established a favorites list and more or less a persona and didn't feel like switching names. Basically if you have communicated with this handle in the last 7 years or so, it's been me. Thanks for the TF, all the same though. Let me know if I can return the favor some time. What was your handle on ThaMike? We probably know each other from there anyway. Or if you wrote for Faux-Newz at all, you definitely know me.

/I'll pass on a message to him if you like
 
2012-11-13 01:49:32 AM  

thamike: I'm not Mike. I inherited the account and by the time he was officially done with it (raising a family, working hard), I already had established a favorites list and more or less a persona and didn't feel like switching names. Basically if you have communicated with this handle in the last 7 years or so, it's been me. Thanks for the TF, all the same though. Let me know if I can return the favor some time. What was your handle on ThaMike? We probably know each other from there anyway. Or if you wrote for Faux-Newz at all, you definitely know me.


Huh. Well there ya go. I never wrote for Faux News so I might not know you. Well, glad you like TF. It's way better. Regular Farkers just don't get it.
 
Displayed 113 of 113 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report