If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NYPost)   Ho-Hos, Oh No: Union workers at Hostess Brands' plant in Lenexa, Kan., walked off the job yesterday, kicking off a potentially crippling strike that could force the company to liquidate   (nypost.com) divider line 112
    More: Obvious, Hostess Brands, Lenexa  
•       •       •

6076 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Nov 2012 at 11:26 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



112 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-11-10 11:28:45 AM
That's what unions do; shut down companies.
 
2012-11-10 11:30:16 AM
Would it be too much to ask the NY Post to tell us the origin of this conflict?
 
2012-11-10 11:30:18 AM
My favorite part of the article was the insane level of detail the journalist went into explaining the reasons why the workers are striking.

/in before the middle class bashing, anti-union, Koch Brothers inspired rants
 
2012-11-10 11:30:46 AM
Hey everybody, let's go on strike forcing the company out of business then we won't ever have to go to work agin. Yay!!!
 
2012-11-10 11:31:07 AM
They should fire them all, hire replacements, and not deal with any unions.
 
2012-11-10 11:31:12 AM

Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.


Yep. For absolutely no reason whatsoever. It never has anything to do with the policies of people running the company, it's those darn unions!
 
2012-11-10 11:31:37 AM

Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies make sure workers don't get trampled over by greed from the top.


Fixed that for everyone.

/I'm out before this gets messy.
 
2012-11-10 11:31:45 AM
img.photobucket.com
 
2012-11-10 11:31:57 AM
That's good news they should shut it down it will be a good example of what can happen to any company taking advantage of a situation.
 
2012-11-10 11:32:07 AM
wellbye.jpeg
 
2012-11-10 11:33:48 AM
Company is bankrupt but an 8 percent cut is too much.
 
2012-11-10 11:34:16 AM
Just because, I'm going to apply rule 34 to this thread...

Hostess Cream Filling.
 
2012-11-10 11:35:06 AM
Dieting. If I could get away with it, I'd commit any number of acts of violence for some Hostess' chocolate cupcakes, which are fortunately not available where I live.

/ Sobs
// Sad sugarless slashies
 
2012-11-10 11:35:25 AM
I was wondering how the company could get obliterated by a strike, but then I noticed that they were already bankrupt. I certainly believe that labor could be a significant factor in that but seriously, journalists, could any detail whatsoever be gleaned from either party before going to print?
 
2012-11-10 11:35:27 AM

LordJiro: Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.

Yep. For absolutely no reason whatsoever. It never has anything to do with the policies of people running the company, it's those darn unions!


The policy is; if you don't like it here, go somewhere else.
 
2012-11-10 11:36:07 AM
When the CEOs and the board of directors start driving Ford Festivas, then I'll feel bad for the company.

" Hostess Brands announced last week it would roll back the pay raises it gave top managers in July 2011 prior to the company's filing for Chapter 11 this past January. While it was boosting managers' pay, Hostess eliminated its 401(k) match for rank-and-file workers and laid off 10 percent of the workforce, according the New York Post."

So they screwed the workers and gave themselves raises. So now you have a workforce that is bitter and has low morale. hmmm...I wonder why they are going under
 
2012-11-10 11:36:11 AM
hanaalireza.files.wordpress.com 

YUM?
 
2012-11-10 11:38:33 AM
Next month's headline: doctors shocked to see a 15% drop in heart disease.
 
2012-11-10 11:39:19 AM
So who all here has unionized their purchasing? Let me guess, while you support the idea of a struggle... you're just not going to switch your busienss to one that uses union labor.
 
2012-11-10 11:39:31 AM
Sounds like the bosses should negotiate quickly then.
 
2012-11-10 11:39:57 AM
Let the strikers eat cake!
 
2012-11-10 11:40:29 AM

LordJiro: Yep. For absolutely no reason whatsoever. It never has anything to do with the policies of people running the company, it's those darn unions!


Perhaps the union could just buy a controlling interest in the company and run it as they see fit. Problem solved.
 
2012-11-10 11:41:02 AM

organizmx: My favorite part of the article was the insane level of detail the journalist went into explaining the reasons why the workers are striking.

/in before the middle class bashing, anti-union, Koch Brothers inspired rants


I can ensure you that the Cock Brothers don't inspire me in slightest, and I am very pro-middle class, but am anti-union. So, your perception is not reality. So sorry.
 
2012-11-10 11:41:43 AM

Gunderson: When the CEOs and the board of directors start driving Ford Festivas, then I'll feel bad for the company.

" Hostess Brands announced last week it would roll back the pay raises it gave top managers in July 2011 prior to the company's filing for Chapter 11 this past January. While it was boosting managers' pay, Hostess eliminated its 401(k) match for rank-and-file workers and laid off 10 percent of the workforce, according the New York Post."

So they screwed the workers and gave themselves raises. So now you have a workforce that is bitter and has low morale. hmmm...I wonder why they are going under



Dude, didn't you get the "Unions are evil and we want the rich to get richer and workers should be thankful they're getting any scraps at all because we're racing China to the bottom" memo?
 
2012-11-10 11:42:18 AM
Damned unions! Holding America's Ho-Ho's hostage!
 
2012-11-10 11:43:15 AM

Dancin_In_Anson: LordJiro: Yep. For absolutely no reason whatsoever. It never has anything to do with the policies of people running the company, it's those darn unions!

Perhaps the union could just buy a controlling interest in the company and run it as they see fit. Problem solved.


Or they can just avail themselves of their rights and do what they're doing now.
 
2012-11-10 11:43:19 AM
At the company my Mom works for one of the plants kept going on strike and/or threating to go on strike for the last couple years over pay/benifits. Company finally just shut the plant down because they didn't want to deal with it anymore and everyone lost their jobs. So congratulations. Now instead of having a job with both decent pay and benifits, (Mom said it was 15-20 ish an hour + insurance)you now all have NO job and NO benifits. Of course the union tried to reverse it's position after the company announced it was closing the plant but then it was already too late.
 
2012-11-10 11:43:56 AM
Union defenders are so hilarious. They ask business to pay more for workers but often go bargain hunting for goods. Vote to buy only union made if you dare. That means flying American airlines over southwest. Stop being hypocrites.
 
2012-11-10 11:44:41 AM
I haven't had a Twinkie in years.
 
2012-11-10 11:45:26 AM
Cream filled Ho Ho?

cdn.inquisitr.com
 
2012-11-10 11:45:56 AM
Formerly Data Processing Financial and General Corporation, one of the big bankes.
 
2012-11-10 11:46:10 AM

MyRandomName: Union defenders are so hilarious. They ask business to pay more for workers but often go bargain hunting for goods. Vote to buy only union made if you dare. That means flying American airlines over southwest. Stop being hypocrites.


I deeply wish that union supporters would do such. But they seriously can't be bothered.
 
2012-11-10 11:49:27 AM
Looks like Little Debbie brand will end up with a bigger market share soon.
 
2012-11-10 11:50:01 AM
" Hostess Brands announced last week it would roll back the pay raises it gave top managers in July 2011 prior to the company's filing for Chapter 11 this past January. While it was boosting managers' pay, Hostess eliminated its 401(k) match for rank-and-file workers and laid off 10 percent of the workforce, according the New York Post."

Stop second guessing the job creators in our great society.

Unions should stop using class warfare to break companies.

/Seriously hostess, the premier creamy snack-cake goodness company. Although I miss the aluminium foil on the ho-ho's.
 
2012-11-10 11:50:52 AM

HotWingConspiracy: Or they can just avail themselves of their rights and do what they're doing now.


Yes, but they run the risk of management pulling the plug on the whole operation. Let's not forget that the company is in banko. They could probably get a pretty good deal on it. Then they can jack wages and benefits as high as they want and lead the company into the future!
 
2012-11-10 11:50:55 AM

Deep Contact: LordJiro: Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.

Yep. For absolutely no reason whatsoever. It never has anything to do with the policies of people running the company, it's those darn unions!

The policy is; if you don't like it here, go somewhere else.


That's the whole point of unions.

In a nation where there is even 1% unemployment, assuming the government doesn't care for the unemployed, at a certain point, no matter how badly workers are treated, and how low the wages are, "Somewhere Else" equates to "starve" or "DIAF."

The only way to get employers to consider the needs of the workers is to refuse to work when they aren't being considered. But that doesn't work if there is another guy (or immigrant) who has been out of work for the last half year and is willing to debase himself even further to survive.

The whole supposed concept of this country is that there is some kind of upward mobility for those willing to work at it.

But if you can't get the wages (or time off) to invest in an education or your own business (or if your business is shut down by the government as unliscenced, etc.), if there's no real chance of raises or promotion, if your health is endangered by the work, and you don't get proper coverage, etc. etc. that concept isn't worth a damn.

Is every move by every union a good one? No. Of course not. There wouldn't be jokes about union breaks and wages and such if they were.

But unions would've never come into existence if employers could be trusted to give a damn.

/Not in a union
//Could join one now for $3,000
///Don't have it
////Would only keep me from working
//"Right-to-work" State
//Slashies
 
2012-11-10 11:54:04 AM
And right after marijuana is made legal in 2 states, how unfortunate.
 
2012-11-10 11:54:29 AM

MyRandomName: Union defenders are so hilarious. They ask business to pay more for workers but often go bargain hunting for goods. Vote to buy only union made if you dare. That means flying American airlines over southwest. Stop being hypocrites.


Southwest is one of the most heavily unionized companies in the industry.
 
2012-11-10 11:55:23 AM

clevernamehere: Deep Contact: LordJiro: Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.

Yep. For absolutely no reason whatsoever. It never has anything to do with the policies of people running the company, it's those darn unions!

The policy is; if you don't like it here, go somewhere else.

That's the whole point of unions.

In a nation where there is even 1% unemployment, assuming the government doesn't care for the unemployed, at a certain point, no matter how badly workers are treated, and how low the wages are, "Somewhere Else" equates to "starve" or "DIAF."

The only way to get employers to consider the needs of the workers is to refuse to work when they aren't being considered. But that doesn't work if there is another guy (or immigrant) who has been out of work for the last half year and is willing to debase himself even further to survive.

The whole supposed concept of this country is that there is some kind of upward mobility for those willing to work at it.

But if you can't get the wages (or time off) to invest in an education or your own business (or if your business is shut down by the government as unliscenced, etc.), if there's no real chance of raises or promotion, if your health is endangered by the work, and you don't get proper coverage, etc. etc. that concept isn't worth a damn.

Is every move by every union a good one? No. Of course not. There wouldn't be jokes about union breaks and wages and such if they were.

But unions would've never come into existence if employers could be trusted to give a damn.

/Not in a union
//Could join one now for $3,000
///Don't have it
////Would only keep me from working
//"Right-to-work" State
//Slashies


www.jjthreads.com
 
2012-11-10 12:01:58 PM
No Twinkies!?!?!?!

/who put !? on opposite corners of the keyboard?!
 
2012-11-10 12:03:18 PM
oops. Also:

Liquid Hostess? MMM....
 
2012-11-10 12:05:55 PM

Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.


My dad's union strike eventually cost him his job. The local couldn't reach an agreement with their employer. The strike lasted so long that the union pulled their support and all the local workers were eventually laid off. I partly attribute my parents' divorce to this.
 
2012-11-10 12:06:20 PM

WelldeadLink: who put !? on opposite corners of the keyboard?!


www.sabotagetimes.com
 
2012-11-10 12:07:29 PM
If the owners were smart they'd license the name and likeness to Little Debbie, fire all the workers and make a $0.002 cent royalty on each twinkie sold.
 
2012-11-10 12:08:20 PM

WelldeadLink: No Twinkies!?!?!?!

/who put !? on opposite corners of the keyboard?!


I did. And I sincerely apologize.
 
2012-11-10 12:09:03 PM
Taking cues from the playbook of the machinists at Eastern Airlines may not be in your best interests.

/Just sayin
 
2012-11-10 12:09:05 PM

WelldeadLink: /who put !? on opposite corners of the keyboard?!


Mind = Blown.
 
2012-11-10 12:12:17 PM
I think we are all missing the point here...
I want to see the woman that can fill the t-shirt with the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers & Grain Millers International Union emblem on the front.

/ Teenaged Annette times about nine?
// Went to website - they cheated and made it fine print - I guess I would have to stand very very close to read that.
 
2012-11-10 12:13:21 PM

clevernamehere: Deep Contact: LordJiro: Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.

Yep. For absolutely no reason whatsoever. It never has anything to do with the policies of people running the company, it's those darn unions!

The policy is; if you don't like it here, go somewhere else.

That's the whole point of unions.

In a nation where there is even 1% unemployment, assuming the government doesn't care for the unemployed, at a certain point, no matter how badly workers are treated, and how low the wages are, "Somewhere Else" equates to "starve" or "DIAF."

The only way to get employers to consider the needs of the workers is to refuse to work when they aren't being considered. But that doesn't work if there is another guy (or immigrant) who has been out of work for the last half year and is willing to debase himself even further to survive.

The whole supposed concept of this country is that there is some kind of upward mobility for those willing to work at it.

But if you can't get the wages (or time off) to invest in an education or your own business (or if your business is shut down by the government as unliscenced, etc.), if there's no real chance of raises or promotion, if your health is endangered by the work, and you don't get proper coverage, etc. etc. that concept isn't worth a damn.

Is every move by every union a good one? No. Of course not. There wouldn't be jokes about union breaks and wages and such if they were.

But unions would've never come into existence if employers could be trusted to give a damn.

/Not in a union
//Could join one now for $3,000
///Don't have it
////Would only keep me from working
//"Right-to-work" State
//Slashies


Of course, if there are more open jobs than available workers, then the balance of power shifts as businesses have to compete for the available labor, driving up wages and benefits.

So, without unions, if you are a worker with shiatty prospects, you should quit, and then systematically murder everyone who takes your old job until no one will work there, so you can swoop back in and take it at a higher wage.

(On a macro scale, all workers should go all Battle Royale on each other until there aren't enough left to do all the work.)
 
2012-11-10 12:13:40 PM
If Hostess didn't use lard in their products, I might still buy them on occasion.
 
2012-11-10 12:15:19 PM
Not a problem, it's the new cycle of American business. Hostess workers strike, Hostess goes broke and liquidates, Bain or similar company buys the company for pennies on the dollar and sells it to Bimbo or one of the other big bakers. Bimbo builds a huge bakery in a right to work state and pays workers 1/2 what the union cost and Twinkies/cupcakes are available again at slightly higher cost.
 
2012-11-10 12:16:42 PM
Does anyone eat Hostess any more? When every grocery store chain, heck, even larger gas station like 7-11, Wah-Wah or Sheets has their own cupcakes, cakes and other pastries fresh from the local bakeries, does anyone turn to Hostess any more for their snacks?
 
2012-11-10 12:18:19 PM
Unions are useless and management can always be trusted to do what's right by their workers. Just ask those coal miners that got laid off after the election
 
2012-11-10 12:19:24 PM
I used to work at a printing company near KC that produced promotional material for this plant. This plant had been struggling with money for years. Yet, even in the midst of all their money woes, they would still order lavish, 5-color spreads of all their materials. From tiny coupons to full page ads, everything was full color. It was an incredible waste of money for them since most of those easily could have been reproduced as 4-color prints without any appreciable loss of quality.

At the same time, they kept telling their workers that money wasn't available for raises. I'm not surprised to hear the workers walking off their jobs.
 
2012-11-10 12:20:35 PM
Damn it we just legalized weed here.
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2012-11-10 12:21:31 PM

Jegred2: They should fire them all, hire replacements, and not deal with any unions.


Or try not farking their employees over?
 
2012-11-10 12:24:59 PM

WelldeadLink: No Twinkies!?!?!?!

/who put !? on opposite corners of the keyboard?!


And nobody put the interrobang on the keyboard‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽
 
2012-11-10 12:25:25 PM

JimmyTheHutt: Would it be too much to ask the NY Post to tell us the origin of this conflict?


I do pull for Wonder Bread and as I understand it, a few years ago Wonder Bread/Hostess was buying up regional snack food and bread companies and taking over those areas. But when you buy a company, you acquire that companies debt and responsibilities, including meeting retirement benefits of employees.

Eventually it got to the point that they were paying more to retired employees who never worked a day for Wonder Bread/ Hostess than they were to current employes. Eventually the company found itself over 9 million in debt and they filled for bankruptcy.

During the bankruptcy hearings, they asked the judge to allow them to buy out the retirement packages of the never-were employees and the judge agreed. Almost all the retires were union workers and that pissed off all current Union workers. Many of their drivers quit that week and more have been quitting since. Last Wednesday, my local distribution center had more trucks than drivers.

Stores like Wal Mart are not going to put up with having no product on the shelf. Not only are you losing sales of Twinkies and Cupcakes, you could be selling some other snack food in its place. And worse, the customer may go elsewhere to get their Zingger fix and start buying things at another store that they would have bought at yours.

I expect the brands to survive; Twinkies, Ding Dongs, and the little bags of donuts are too well known not for some other company to buy, but the Company over all seems doomed.
 
amo [TotalFark]
2012-11-10 12:28:46 PM

HowlingPook: Not a problem, it's the new cycle of American business. Hostess workers strike, Hostess goes broke and liquidates, Bain or similar company buys the company for pennies on the dollar and sells it to Bimbo or one of the other big bakers. Bimbo builds a huge bakery in a right to work state and pays workers 1/2 what the union cost and Twinkies/cupcakes are available again at slightly higher cost.


Kansas is a right to work state.
 
2012-11-10 12:34:31 PM
But Ho-Ho-Hostess is too big to fail!
 
2012-11-10 12:38:03 PM
And I thought it would take a zombie apocalypse before we ever ran out of Twinkies.
 
2012-11-10 12:41:18 PM

SundaesChild: I haven't had a Twinkie in years.


Me neither, and that was before my workout regimen. I remember not tasting any "cream" like i did as a kid, reluctantly finishing it, and wanting to go on a killing spree...
/I'm sure they changed their formula that DID make them last forever...
//a few months ago,a store had a special on the chocolate pies...
/// i couldn't finish it, even warmed...
////tl;dr good riddance...
 
2012-11-10 12:42:59 PM

Brick-House: Hey everybody, let's go on strike forcing the company out of business then we won't ever have to go to work agin. Yay!!!


always an asshole, good job
 
2012-11-10 12:47:26 PM
shop.tastykake.com
Artery clogging goodness delivered right to your door!
 
2012-11-10 12:52:07 PM
Uh-oh. They have my go-to day-old shop.

They're in the business of making an unhealthy product. The market has become health conscious. If they treated their workers fairly, the union would not be a problem. They have big problems, but their skilled workforce is an asset.

Remember, the middle class is a by-product of unions. When unions are gone, the middle class is gone.
 
2012-11-10 12:55:08 PM
media.tumblr.com
 
2012-11-10 12:58:46 PM
When do the Chinese take over the snack food industry for America?
 
2012-11-10 01:00:29 PM
Why would anyone want to own or start a business where the employees set the rules? I guess I did not build that right?
 
2012-11-10 01:08:42 PM
There's a reason why unions don't start their own companies.
 
2012-11-10 01:16:40 PM
Way to go union t hugs. You're complaining about an 8% pay cut. So you go on strike. Now you've got yourself aa 100% pay cut for the duration of the strike. Also since the company is in bad financial shape, you will have no jobs to go bakc to.
 
2012-11-10 01:16:43 PM

Psylent1:

I expect the brands to survive; Twinkies, Ding Dongs, and the little bags of donuts are too well known not for some other company to buy, but the Company over all seems doomed.


Exactly.

Some company will buy the brands and the recipes, and Twinkies will keep going.
 
2012-11-10 01:18:50 PM
 
2012-11-10 01:35:35 PM

Jegred2: They should fire them all, hire replacements, and not deal with any unions.


Outsourcing to some third-world country with no labor laws. Like Hershey moved their operations to MEXICO.

Now you know why you get a case of the trots every time you heat a Hershey bar.
 
2012-11-10 01:40:02 PM

Lee Jackson Beauregard: The other side of this story

In the union's own words


Things start making more sense when you get the other side's story:

""Our members reviewed the analysis of this company's business plan provided by a highly respected financial analyst retained by the company which showed the plan had little or no chance of succeeding in saving the business but would provide the investors with a windfall. Our members know that this is a company that is controlled by Wall Street private equity and hedge fund firms, whose sole objective is to maximize their own returns, not rebuild the company for the long haul," Hurt stated."
 
2012-11-10 01:42:54 PM

Gunderson: When the CEOs and the board of directors start driving Ford Festivas, then I'll feel bad for the company.

" Hostess Brands announced last week it would roll back the pay raises it gave top managers in July 2011 prior to the company's filing for Chapter 11 this past January. While it was boosting managers' pay, Hostess eliminated its 401(k) match for rank-and-file workers and laid off 10 percent of the workforce, according the New York Post."

So they screwed the workers and gave themselves raises. So now you have a workforce that is bitter and has low morale. hmmm...I wonder why they are going under


This continues to fall on deaf ears. The middle and upper management class of worker has enjoyed a good 16 years of wage increases while the average worker's wages have remained static all while the CEOs have been understanding less and less about how to run a sustainable business. And the people who support this income disparity are truly assheads

Fark em
 
2012-11-10 01:55:35 PM
Honestly, when you are the largest seller of baked goods in the wealthiest nation on Earth and you're not able to avoid bankruptcy, that's total farking mismanagement of the company. You can blame unions or competitors or low-carb dieters or whatever, but at the end of the day, you had more than enough opportunity for success and you failed anyway.
 
2012-11-10 02:05:37 PM

GBmanNC: Lee Jackson Beauregard: The other side of this story

In the union's own words

Things start making more sense when you get the other side's story:

""Our members reviewed the analysis of this company's business plan provided by a highly respected financial analyst retained by the company which showed the plan had little or no chance of succeeding in saving the business but would provide the investors with a windfall. Our members know that this is a company that is controlled by Wall Street private equity and hedge fund firms, whose sole objective is to maximize their own returns, not rebuild the company for the long haul," Hurt stated."


Sum Dum Gai: Honestly, when you are the largest seller of baked goods in the wealthiest nation on Earth and you're not able to avoid bankruptcy, that's total farking mismanagement of the company. You can blame unions or competitors or low-carb dieters or whatever, but at the end of the day, you had more than enough opportunity for success and you failed anyway.


Workers figure out the game was rigged and stopped playing.
 
2012-11-10 02:14:41 PM

mekki: Does anyone eat Hostess any more? When every grocery store chain, heck, even larger gas station like 7-11, Wah-Wah or Sheets has their own cupcakes, cakes and other pastries fresh from the local bakeries, does anyone turn to Hostess any more for their snacks?


I'm waiting for Chocodiles to come back into mass distribution. No, I don't want to order them online. I want to make impulse purchases of them at the grocery store.
 
2012-11-10 02:16:13 PM
Lee Jackson Beauregard

The other side of this story
In the union's own words


Way to shut down a thread. What am supposed to do now? Go outside?
 
2012-11-10 02:17:30 PM

Peter von Nostrand: Unions are useless and management can always be trusted to do what's right by their workers. Just ask those coal miners that got laid off after the election


The coal miners got laid off because of new EPA regulations that were designed, per Obama's promise to make it too expensive to use coal, to put coal companies out of business. Have you followed energy stocks since the election? And the coal miners that got laid off after the election - is that in addition to the 9000 in Ohio that were laid off before the election?
 
2012-11-10 02:17:50 PM

Brick-House: Just because, I'm going to apply rule 34 to this thread...

Hostess Cream Filling.


Close as I could come, surprisingly.

www.google.ca
 
2012-11-10 02:25:32 PM
What a bunch of Bimbos.

/too subtle?
 
2012-11-10 02:44:29 PM

surrealbowl: Company is bankrupt but an 8 percent cut is too much.


if payroll is bankrupting the company, then something's gone terribly wrong somewhere

8% is a pretty major pay cut for people who are probably only making 30K per year and many of whom are almost certainly living paycheck-to-paycheck
 
2012-11-10 02:51:56 PM
From Wikipedia:
In January 2012, Twinkie manufacturer Hostess filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.[3] Twinkie sales for the year ended December 25, 2011 were 36 million packages, down almost 2% from a year earlier.[3] Hostess said customers have migrated to healthier foods.[3] Hostess hopes to avoid liquidation and attract new investors to remain in business.[3]

Hostess isn't some little, regional company that makes potato chips. You can't swing a cat in any supermarket, grocery store or gas station in this country without hitting some product made by Hostess, so they aren't having ANY problems getting their products to market. If a company with this kind of market saturation is losing money, it's because it's being mismanaged. They could start saving money right now by firing their board of directors because I'm calling bullshiat right now on the "customers migrated to healthier foods" excuse.
 
2012-11-10 03:02:44 PM

TV's Vinnie: What a bunch of Bimbos.

/too subtle?


3.bp.blogspot.com

Nah.
 
2012-11-10 03:34:44 PM

Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.


Good.
If they're not compensating properly they should be shut down.
Unions are just the free market/free association at work.
 
2012-11-10 03:38:03 PM

Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.


lightningwolf.files.wordpress.com

Yeah! Corporations are entitled to executive bonuses and free labor.
 
2012-11-10 03:38:09 PM

SDRR: am anti-union.


Great job on being against free speech, organization and association.
Enjoy losing the 8 hour workday and everything else those lazy leeches won for us.
 
2012-11-10 03:40:39 PM

GORDON: When do the Chinese take over the snack food industry for America?


Chocolatey Melamine Bars FTW!
 
2012-11-10 03:43:55 PM

HowlingPook: Not a problem, it's the new cycle of American business. Hostess workers strike, Hostess goes broke and liquidates, Bain or similar company buys the company for pennies on the dollar and sells it to Bimbo or one of the other big bakers. Bimbo builds a huge bakery in a right to work state and pays workers 1/2 what the union cost and Twinkies/cupcakes are available again at slightly higher cost.


I'm curious as to the actual wages paid to pump sugar cream into twinkies and whether I'd think its a fair wage or not.

Not every job is worth $20hr.
 
2012-11-10 03:46:09 PM

swangoatman: Why would anyone want to own or start a business where the employees set the rules? I guess I did not build that right?


No. You most likely built it on the labor of your employees, without which you could not have your business. Thanks for showing your love of freedom and democracy though.

paygun: There's a reason why unions don't start their own companies.


I guess there's no such thing as workers co-ops.
 
2012-11-10 03:48:15 PM

jaybeezey: I'm curious as to the actual wages paid to pump sugar cream into twinkies and whether I'd think its a fair wage or not.

Not every job is worth $20hr.


If you ask me, they should pay for the opportunity.

/giggity.
 
2012-11-10 05:37:32 PM
files.myopera.com

Ho-oh demands Ho-Hos.
 
2012-11-10 06:03:52 PM
There's a little more information about what is prompting the strike in this article.

Here's a quote FTNFA that makes it a little easier to understand the reasoning behind the strike:

Union spokesman Frank Hurt said, "The contract calls for extreme wage and benefit cuts which amount to 27-32 percent overall, with an 8 percent wage reduction imposed immediately. The company unilaterally ceased making contributions, required by their union contracts, to the workers' pensions in July 2011. Hostess has also imposed draconian cuts in health benefits and eliminated the eight-hour workday."

Members of the BCTGM Local 334 said this is the second time they have been asked to reduce their wages and can't afford to keep doing so."


That's tough -- you've already accepted a wage cut, and they come back and want another cut of around 25% overall, with 8% out of your pocket effective immediately? That has to be a hard pill to choke down without a fight. Especially when it appears that the CEO was voted a 240% salary increase in July 2011, along with substantial salary increases for the rest of the C-team.  

(Sorry for the Daily Kos link -- found it in the WSJ, but can't link there, so had to hurry and find something else!)
 
2012-11-10 06:50:44 PM
Several people in this thread have pointed out that for Hostess to be losing money, they must be seriousloy mismanaged. If that's the case, they deserve to go bankrupt. Then another company can buy the assets and fill our shelves with Twinkies again.
 
2012-11-10 06:56:11 PM

Snarfangel: If that's the case, they deserve to go bankrupt.


dada.warped.comi2.listal.com

They went bankrupt. Twice.
 
2012-11-10 07:07:59 PM

LordOfThePings: Snarfangel: If that's the case, they deserve to go bankrupt.

[dada.warped.com image 411x230][i2.listal.com image 422x230]

They went bankrupt. Twice.


I meant Chapter 7. Corporate death penalty, none of that restructuring nonsense.
 
2012-11-10 07:39:21 PM
As someone who has Hostess/Wonder products currently on my shelves in my store, I got a fairly unbiased opinion from, believe it or not, my Wonder rep about this not long ago. If you really want to know what's killing their business, it's two things: healthy foods and price. People aren't buying their products like they used to. And they won't pay more for it either. Go back and look over the last ten years. You won't see much of an increase in prices at the store. But Hostess/Wonder has seen huge increases in the price of raw supplies. And the retailers are pressuring them heavy to keep the price down. ALOT. To the point that they are damn near running a loss on it. So with little to no margin on the product, and a decrease in sales, coupled with ever increasing health/pension costs, the I see them headed for one kind of end: liquidation. They need to get away from the pension, but the union will never let that happen.
 
2012-11-10 07:53:49 PM

Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.


You keep on believing that. I hope your power doesn't go out. I hope you don't need police for anything. I hope you don't ever have to call the fire department.

They're all so bad, wanting enough money to actually raise a family for their full time labor... the nerve!
 
2012-11-10 08:05:10 PM
and when the place does shut down they should deny everyone of these dbags unemployment since they basically quit their jobs . screw them . whining over 8 cents on the dollar when so many cant get work paying them even half of their old salary's . aholes .....

still looking for work
 
2012-11-10 08:39:54 PM
You know that we do not live like brothers. You know that the world is full of strife and war, of misery, injustice, and wrong, of crime, poverty, and oppression.

Why is it that way then?

It is because, though we all have the same aim in life, our interests are different. It is this that makes all the trouble in the world.
Just think it over yourself.

Suppose you want to get a pair of shoes or a hat. You go into the store and you try to buy what you need as reasonably and cheaply as you can. That is your interest. But the store-keeper's interest is to sell it to you as dearly as he can, because then his profit will be greater. That is because everything in the life we live is built on making a profit, one way or another. We live in a system of profit-making.

Now, it is plain that if we have to make profits out of each other, then our interests cannot be the same. They must be different and often even opposed to each other.

In every country you will find people who live by making a profit out of others. Those who make the biggest profits are rich. Those who cannot make profits are poor. The only people who cannot make any profits are the workers. You can therefore understand that the interests of the workers cannot be the same as the interests of the other people. That is why you will find in every country several classes of people with entirely different interests.
Everywhere you will find:

(1) a comparatively small class of persons who make big profits and who are very rich, such as bankers, great manufacturers and land owners - people who have much capital and who are therefore called capitalists. These belong to the capitalist class;

(2) a class of more or less well-to-do people, consisting of business men and their agents, real estate men, speculators, and professional men, such as doctors, lawyers, inventors, and so on. This is the middle class or the bourgeoisie.
(3) great numbers of workingmen employed in various industries- in mills and mines, in factories and shops, in transport and on the land. This is the working class, also called the proletariat.

The bourgeoisie and the capitalists really belong to the same capitalistic class.

LEARN MORE AT
http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/alexander-berkman-what-is-comm u nist-anarchism#toc3
 
2012-11-10 09:26:37 PM

jwmc1971: and when the place does shut down they should deny everyone of these dbags unemployment since they basically quit their jobs . screw them . whining over 8 cents on the dollar when so many cant get work paying them even half of their old salary's . aholes .....

still looking for work


So, if you're making $8.00 an hour, glad to be making a hair over minimum wage, and your boss suddenly wants to dock your pay to $7.36 an hour, despite no dropoff in quality from you, you're not going to be a little cheesed off?

Particularly when there is a CEO of that company who probably got a signing bonus, a yearly bonus (despite the company's flagging profit margin), and when he gets fired, will get another bonus in the form of a golden parachute? While the shareholders get dividends or increased stock prices?

Or let's say you're lucky enough to be making $40,000 a year, say, as a teacher. You learn that this year you'll be making $36,800, when you had budgeted out your year on that $40,000. Maybe you had just bought a house expecting you'd have that extra $3,000.

Or heck - let's say you're a professional athlete making 10 Million this year. You'll be paying a lot of taxes and your agent gets his cut, but you're still rich as all Fark - you're not going to be mad if someone suddenly takes $80,000 from you, right? No, you wouldn't care about that.

/pennies on the dollar
//psssht
 
2012-11-11 02:51:03 AM
Fark unions. The UCFW recently failed in their pathetic attempt to take over my workplace; a community owned food coop, one of the highest grossing in the country. Fark you local 555, it was a hoot making you all look like fools. You lost a third of your assets last year, down to just a little over a mil......oh how sad

so sorry
http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120825/NEWS/2 0 8250310

if you're a daily show fan, watch what a/this union can do with 250K of your dues....
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-september-20-2010/working-stiff e d
 
2012-11-11 08:31:11 AM

firefly212: Deep Contact: That's what unions do; shut down companies.

You keep on believing that. I hope your power doesn't go out. I hope you don't need police for anything. I hope you don't ever have to call the fire department.

They're all so bad, wanting enough money to actually raise a family for their full time labor... the nerve!


Supply and demand. If 300 qualified individuals want 1 opening, the wage should be adjusted accordingly.
 
2012-11-11 12:10:25 PM

Deep Contact: Supply and demand. If 300 qualified individuals want 1 opening, the wage should be adjusted accordingly.


Why does supply and demand only apply to the rank and fir but not the expects who gave themselves a 240-300% raise?
 
2012-11-11 12:11:19 PM
*execs.

Frikking autocorrect.
 
2012-11-11 01:14:06 PM

lohphat: Deep Contact: Supply and demand. If 300 qualified individuals want 1 opening, the wage should be adjusted accordingly.

Why does supply and demand only apply to the rank and fir but not the expects who gave themselves a 240-300% raise?


It does, but there are maybe 3 qualified to get 1 job.
 
2012-11-11 03:10:26 PM

Deep Contact: lohphat: Deep Contact: Supply and demand. If 300 qualified individuals want 1 opening, the wage should be adjusted accordingly.

Why does supply and demand only apply to the rank and fir but not the expects who gave themselves a 240-300% raise?

It does, but there are maybe 3 qualified to get 1 job.


No it doesn't there are thousands of criminals ready to raid the company coffers dry. It's not a hard skillset to hire for.
 
2012-11-11 05:22:22 PM

m2313: swangoatman: Why would anyone want to own or start a business where the employees set the rules? I guess I did not build that right?

No. You most likely built it on the labor of your employees, without which you could not have your business. Thanks for showing your love of freedom and democracy though.

.

Well they were paid the agreed upon wage and benefit package, When did they become the RISK taker of owning the business would be my question. They don't. Oh they worry like all about losing their jobs. OH that's right THEIR jobs.....the owner of the business has a lot more invested. When you grow up and own your own business, then you may comment on how it feels to have someone extort you out of more and more of it,
 
2012-11-11 07:40:16 PM

lohphat: Deep Contact: lohphat: Deep Contact: Supply and demand. If 300 qualified individuals want 1 opening, the wage should be adjusted accordingly.

Why does supply and demand only apply to the rank and fir but not the expects who gave themselves a 240-300% raise?

It does, but there are maybe 3 qualified to get 1 job.

No it doesn't there are thousands of criminals ready to raid the company coffers dry. It's not a hard skillset to hire for.


You have to be the right kind of criminal. Went to the right schools, excepted into certain frats and clubs. Like to play golf and have really hot wife.
 
2012-11-12 12:05:35 AM

GORDON: When do the Chinese take over the snack food industry for America?


Actually, it's the Mexicans who've been buying up baking and snack food companies. Read up on what Bimbo has been up to in the last decade.
 
2012-11-12 10:28:49 PM

SundaesChild: I haven't had a Twinkie in years.


FTFY
 
Displayed 112 of 112 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report