Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Right Wing Watch)   Through the looking glass: Pat Robertson reviews 50 Shades of Grey   ( divider line
    More: Weird, NOM  
•       •       •

9377 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Nov 2012 at 5:49 PM (5 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2012-11-09 04:31:50 PM  
6 votes:
As tempted as I am to watch that, I think I'll just go stare directly into the sun instead.
2012-11-09 04:31:46 PM  
5 votes:
There is nothing in that headline that makes me even remotely want to click it.

Crappy excuse for a person: check.

Crappy excuse for BDSM erotica: check.

Crappy excuse for an article: check.

Saborlas passing this up to see if there are any new recipes in this weeks food thread: double check!
2012-11-09 04:44:39 PM  
4 votes:
He probably only saw blank pages

/he can only see black and white, no grey
2012-11-09 06:01:41 PM  
3 votes:
50 Shades of Grey is quickly becoming as irritating to me as Ronald McDonald flogging gourmet coffee.
2012-11-09 07:01:39 PM  
2 votes:
FTA: Robertson said he is shocked that "Fifty Shades of Grey" is so successful since its author is "a little housewifey-type that doesn't look like some glamour queen."

So, so many things wrong with this statement. I guess Robertson isn't aware that women enjoy sex, no matter what they look like?
2012-11-09 06:31:53 PM  
2 votes:

Jon iz teh kewl: 256 shades of gray (VGA monochrome)

That would be a great title for a geeky parody
2012-11-09 06:00:06 PM  
2 votes:
256 shades of gray (VGA monochrome)
2012-11-10 12:43:45 AM  
1 vote:

Matthew Keene: Pat Robertson year 3000

[ image 320x240]

Don't insult Quark like that.
2012-11-09 11:32:14 PM  
1 vote:
#5F5F5F, #606060, #616161, #626262, #636363, #646464, #656565, #666666, #676767, #686868, #696969, #6A6A6A, #6B6B6B, #6C6C6C, #6D6D6D, #6E6E6E, #6F6F6F, #707070, #717171, #727272, #737373, #747474, #757575, #767676, #777777, #787878, #797979, #7A7A7A, #7B7B7B, #7C7C7C, #7D7D7D, #7E7E7E, #7F7F7F, #808080, #818181, #828282, #838383, #848484, #858585, #868686, #878787, #888888, #898989, #8A8A8A, #8B8B8B, #8C8C8C, #8D8D8D, #8E8E8E, #8F8F8F, #909090.

I dunno, that looks pretty boring to me.
2012-11-09 06:59:20 PM  
1 vote:
Why should I care what a prudish impotent old man thinks about sex?
2012-11-09 06:52:04 PM  
1 vote:
I... I don't think I can handle any more. No RTFA, no RTFT... I just can't do it.
2012-11-09 06:43:49 PM  
1 vote:
Who's the perfect person to review a young woman's erotic novel? An 82-year old Baptist bigot.
2012-11-09 06:30:45 PM  
1 vote:
Well, that was creepy.

Also, I have serious doubts about the veracity of his proclamation that "30% of women are involved in pornogracy".
2012-11-09 04:46:49 PM  
1 vote:

MaudlinMutantMollusk: He probably only saw blank pages

/he can only see black and white, no grey

+1 internets to you good sir!
2012-11-09 04:33:12 PM  
1 vote:
"involved in pornogracy"

2012-11-09 03:52:58 PM  
1 vote:
My god, its full of STARS!
Displayed 16 of 16 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.