If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   Speaker John Boehner said in an interview Thursday that he is the 'most reasonable person in Washington'   (politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com) divider line 12
    More: Sad, Boehner, House Speaker  
•       •       •

487 clicks; posted to Politics » on 09 Nov 2012 at 12:31 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-11-09 02:01:13 AM
4 votes:
In other news, a deadly virus killed off 99.9999% of the people in Washington D.C.
2012-11-09 12:55:01 PM
3 votes:

TIKIMAN87: Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.


What's the point of making soldiers wear camoflage? It's not the Predator's invisibility field, you can still see them.
What's the point of making my car payment this month? It's not enough to pay off the whole loan.
What's the point of asking that blonde from accounting out? She's not going to let me do anything on the first date.
What's the point of responding to a troll? One reply pointing out his idiocy isn't going to make him better.
2012-11-09 07:38:04 AM
3 votes:

Bontesla: This is an example of how we lost the debt ceiling debate. The Democrats should have united under the same message:
1). Boehner would classify Donald Trump as a small business.
2). Boehner thinks the American people are ignorant.
3). We think you're smart enough to catch Boehner's dishonesty.
4). Under our plan, the avg. Small business owner would get x amount BACK.
5). We want to return the tax levels to the Clinton area in which Americans were more successful than previous decades.

If every Democrat ran with this script - and started an offensive line - we would have a better shot.


and then the media coverage starts.

Wolf: Boehner has been accused of dishonesty. was he dishonest?

Pundit 1: Of course he was!
Pundit 2: Obama raped a baby

Wolf: I'm afraid we're going to have to leave it there. Up next, we read your tweets!
2012-11-09 01:55:44 PM
1 votes:

TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Yes, it was Obama who caused that, and totally not Romney and the "47% percent" comment. The sky is neat here in your world. Orange is an awesome color for clouds

OMG Romney stated a FACT about this country.

Obama has run for president on nothing more than tax the rich and letting people suck the tits of the government.

I won't insult real trolls by calling you one, but I know you're just trying to get replies from people. Here's another green arrow for you. Hope this helps

Don't be a dildo.

Wait, you're coming in here, vomiting lies all over the thread, but I'm the dildo? Truly, yours is a dizzying intellect

I told no lie ya ding dong gooch!

Uh yea, the "banks being forced to give loans" is a lie, and a very poorly thought out and illogical one at that.

It's historical fact you anal bead.


Just because someone on the internet said it, doesn't make it true, you know that right? Like if I were to say that TIKIMAN87 has had sex with someone that he wasn't directly related to, that doesn't make it true
2012-11-09 01:53:04 PM
1 votes:

Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Yes, it was Obama who caused that, and totally not Romney and the "47% percent" comment. The sky is neat here in your world. Orange is an awesome color for clouds

OMG Romney stated a FACT about this country.

Obama has run for president on nothing more than tax the rich and letting people suck the tits of the government.

I won't insult real trolls by calling you one, but I know you're just trying to get replies from people. Here's another green arrow for you. Hope this helps

Don't be a dildo.

Wait, you're coming in here, vomiting lies all over the thread, but I'm the dildo? Truly, yours is a dizzying intellect

I told no lie ya ding dong gooch!

Uh yea, the "banks being forced to give loans" is a lie, and a very poorly thought out and illogical one at that.


It's historical fact you anal bead.
2012-11-09 01:52:29 PM
1 votes:

udhq: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

What's the argument for making the tax cuts permanent? They were supposed to create jobs, but they did the opposite. They were supposed to spur growth, but instead they were just a vehicle for the rich to remove wealth from circulating within the economy.

They weren't paid for when they were passed. Think about that: we borrowed money from our children and from the Chinese in order to fund this massive regressive system of handouts. They are the single biggest line-item in American budgetary history, and the primary source of the deficits and debt we have today, and that's an objective fact that can't really be debated.


And in the early to mid 2000's when uneployment was under 4% after the tax cuts were passed it created millions of jobs. Then the democrats waged their little "war on poverty" crap and farked it up for the country. Their system of free hand outs doesn't work, but it does get them elected....
2012-11-09 01:46:46 PM
1 votes:

TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.


What's the argument for making the tax cuts permanent? They were supposed to create jobs, but they did the opposite. They were supposed to spur growth, but instead they were just a vehicle for the rich to remove wealth from circulating within the economy.

They weren't paid for when they were passed. Think about that: we borrowed money from our children and from the Chinese in order to fund this massive regressive system of handouts. They are the single biggest line-item in American budgetary history, and the primary source of the deficits and debt we have today, and that's an objective fact that can't really be debated.
2012-11-09 12:37:07 PM
1 votes:

log_jammin: "I've made it clear to the president, and I think I laid out yesterday - raising taxes on small business people is the wrong prescription, based on where the economy is," Boehner said Thursday.

I would love to see a quote where Obama said "raising taxes on small business people is the RIGHT prescription, based on where the economy is".

or anywhere where any democrats suggested we should raise taxes on "small business people".


An increased tax on incomes above 250k would be a tax on small businesses. Sure, only on 3% of them, because 97% of small businesses make less than 250k, but who's counting? Details and context are liberal ploys, after all.  It's technically correct, which quite frankly is better than usual for the Party of Lies.
2012-11-09 12:36:32 PM
1 votes:
'most reasonable www.parrot.comperson in Washington"
2012-11-09 12:34:51 PM
1 votes:
With all the abuse and misuse of the 'Ironic' tag, here's a perfect opportunity and subby missed it.
2012-11-09 11:16:22 AM
1 votes:
If there were three people in Washington, and the other two were Eric Cantor and Mitch McConnell, yeah, this would be accurate.
2012-11-09 05:38:54 AM
1 votes:
Is the sad tag for the fact that no one said "Shut up Boner, you cock"?
 
Displayed 12 of 12 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report