Is the sad tag for the fact that no one said "Shut up Boner, you cock"?

log_jammin: "I've made it clear to the president, and I think I laid out yesterday - raising taxes on small business people is the wrong prescription, based on where the economy is," Boehner said Thursday.

I would love to see a quote where Obama said "raising taxes on small business people is the RIGHT prescription, based on where the economy is".

or anywhere where any democrats suggested we should raise taxes on "small business people".

This is an example of how we lost the debt ceiling debate. The Democrats should have united under the same message:
1). Boehner would classify Donald Trump as a small business.
2). Boehner thinks the American people are ignorant.
3). We think you're smart enough to catch Boehner's dishonesty.
4). Under our plan, the avg. Small business owner would get x amount BACK.
5). We want to return the tax levels to the Clinton area in which Americans were more successful than previous decades.

If every Democrat ran with this script - and started an offensive line - we would have a better shot.

Bontesla: log_jammin: "I've made it clear to the president, and I think I laid out yesterday - raising taxes on small business people is the wrong prescription, based on where the economy is," Boehner said Thursday.

I would love to see a quote where Obama said "raising taxes on small business people is the RIGHT prescription, based on where the economy is".

or anywhere where any democrats suggested we should raise taxes on "small business people".

This is an example of how we lost the debt ceiling debate. The Democrats should have united under the same message:
1). Boehner would classify Donald Trump as a small business.
2). Boehner thinks the American people are ignorant.
3). We think you're smart enough to catch Boehner's dishonesty.
4). Under our plan, the avg. Small business owner would get x amount BACK.
5). We want to return the tax levels to the Clinton area in which Americans were more successful than previous decades.

If every Democrat ran with this script - and started an offensive line - we would have a better shot.

I've often wondered why the Democrats roll over and never call the Republicans on their dishonesty. It's like think they don't want to denigrate their opponents, and have respect for them, while the Republicans are drawing penises on their heads and mailing it to the entire state.

With all the abuse and misuse of the 'Ironic' tag, here's a perfect opportunity and subby missed it.

log_jammin: "I've made it clear to the president, and I think I laid out yesterday - raising taxes on small business people is the wrong prescription, based on where the economy is," Boehner said Thursday.

I would love to see a quote where Obama said "raising taxes on small business people is the RIGHT prescription, based on where the economy is".

or anywhere where any democrats suggested we should raise taxes on "small business people".

Of course, Boehner's dictionary's definition of "small business people" has a picture the Koch brothers beside it.

Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

'most reasonable person in Washington"

log_jammin: "I've made it clear to the president, and I think I laid out yesterday - raising taxes on small business people is the wrong prescription, based on where the economy is," Boehner said Thursday.

I would love to see a quote where Obama said "raising taxes on small business people is the RIGHT prescription, based on where the economy is".

or anywhere where any democrats suggested we should raise taxes on "small business people".

An increased tax on incomes above 250k would be a tax on small businesses. Sure, only on 3% of them, because 97% of small businesses make less than 250k, but who's counting? Details and context are liberal ploys, after all.  It's technically correct, which quite frankly is better than usual for the Party of Lies.

Obviously, auto-correct must have changed "orange" to "reasonable."

TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

Did he say it with a straight face? Like, did he make it all the way through without so much as a smile? If so, kudos

wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Slaxl: I've often wondered why the Democrats roll over and never call the Republicans on their dishonesty. It's like think they don't want to denigrate their opponents, and have respect for them, while the Republicans are drawing penises on their heads and mailing it to the entire state.

Or it could be that they are just as culpable as the Republicans and they all have their fingers in the same pie? Now, I don't believe that 100%, but sometimes I'm dumbfounded why some Republicans don't get called out on their BS. Sometimes the only rational explanation is that the Dems are covering their own asses.

I don't think it's because Democrats are nice and Republicans are mean. I think it's because they're all guilty of something one way or another.

I'm not a cynic, really. ;)

TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

This is a good example of a true fiscal conservative and his deep, deep concern for the deficit.

TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Yes, it was Obama who caused that, and totally not Romney and the "47% percent" comment. The sky is neat here in your world. Orange is an awesome color for clouds

TIKIMAN87

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

So, just continue to pursue a course of action that won't happen and "will it into fact" by repeating it ad nauseum?
The tax cuts weren't intended as a permanent move. The recession has extended their stay, but really, you can't keep them and reduce deficit spending. There has to be equilibrium, or at least an attempt at it.
Legislators represent the needs of real people. Let them get back to doing their job instead of some petty game of one-uppance.

He's the least rigid Boehner in Washington.

TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

"Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems"

What's the point of putting that cancer patient through more chemo? It's not enough to completely eradicate the cancer, so why bother?

"Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it"

Stupid is as stupid does.

You sound that stupid

TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Obama divided the country?

Dems hate rich people?

Raising taxes won't solve the deficit?

Go on....you're precious.

I'm gonna go with no. Does no work for you?

Republicans really don't want wealthy people's taxes to go up. Debts, deficits, and vast income inequality? Who cares! Protect Donald Trump, Mitt Romney, hollywood actors, and professional sports players!

iaazathot: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Derp! No, that didn't work. Why would we continue the same failed policies that crashed our economy in the first place? Are you retarded or do you just play the part on the internet?

You mean the policies that liberals forced banks to give home loans to poor people with no way of paying them back causing the housing bubble and crash?

Yup those.

Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Yes, it was Obama who caused that, and totally not Romney and the "47% percent" comment. The sky is neat here in your world. Orange is an awesome color for clouds

OMG Romney stated a FACT about this country.

Obama has run for president on nothing more than tax the rich and letting people suck the tits of the government.

TIKIMAN87: iaazathot: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Derp! No, that didn't work. Why would we continue the same failed policies that crashed our economy in the first place? Are you retarded or do you just play the part on the internet?

You mean the policies that liberals forced banks to give home loans to poor people with no way of paying them back causing the housing bubble and crash?

Yup those.

I'm a little confused as to where this whole "banks forcing people to take home loans" came from. I have worked in the banking industry for years and I'm quite certain this never happened. Where is your source for this misinformation? Or are you just making crap up again?

TIKIMAN87: iaazathot: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Derp! No, that didn't work. Why would we continue the same failed policies that crashed our economy in the first place? Are you retarded or do you just play the part on the internet?

You mean the policies that liberals forced banks to give home loans to poor people with no way of paying them back causing the housing bubble and crash?

Yup those.

LMAO. Go read a book, man. Learn some accurate f*cking history and not the partisan shiat you wallow in daily.

TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Yes, it was Obama who caused that, and totally not Romney and the "47% percent" comment. The sky is neat here in your world. Orange is an awesome color for clouds

OMG Romney stated a FACT about this country.

Obama has run for president on nothing more than tax the rich and letting people suck the tits of the government.

I won't insult real trolls by calling you one, but I know you're just trying to get replies from people. Here's another green arrow for you. Hope this helps

Speaker John Boehner said in an interview Thursday that he is the 'most reasonable orange colored person in Washington'

Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Yes, it was Obama who caused that, and totally not Romney and the "47% percent" comment. The sky is neat here in your world. Orange is an awesome color for clouds

OMG Romney stated a FACT about this country.

Obama has run for president on nothing more than tax the rich and letting people suck the tits of the government.

I won't insult real trolls by calling you one, but I know you're just trying to get replies from people. Here's another green arrow for you. Hope this helps

Don't be a dildo.

TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: Your Zionist Leader: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Yes, it was Obama who caused that, and totally not Romney and the "47% percent" comment. The sky is neat here in your world. Orange is an awesome color for clouds

OMG Romney stated a FACT about this country.

Obama has run for president on nothing more than tax the rich and letting people suck the tits of the government.

I won't insult real trolls by calling you one, but I know you're just trying to get replies from people. Here's another green arrow for you. Hope this helps

Don't be a dildo.

Wait, you're coming in here, vomiting lies all over the thread, but I'm the dildo? Truly, yours is a dizzying intellect

TIKIMAN87: iaazathot: TIKIMAN87: wotthefark: TIKIMAN87: Borhner doesn't need to give Obama anything.

He should take a stand at extending the tax cuts for good and if Obama doesn't like he he can let them expre then it will be on his hands.

And then when the economy recovers they'll say see I told you so?

No.

Obama already won by dividing the country and making people hate the rich. Whats the point of making them pay more taxes? Its not enough to solve any of the countries financial problems.

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent and be done with it.

Derp! No, that didn't work. Why would we continue the same failed policies that crashed our economy in the first place? Are you retarded or do you just play the part on the internet?

You mean the policies that liberals forced banks to give home loans to poor people with no way of paying them back causing the housing bubble and crash?

Yup those.

Home builders, realtors and others are preparing to fight a Bush administration plan that would require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase financing of homes for low-income people, a home builder group said Thursday. From 2004.
Link

Real liberals

Your Zionist Leader:
I'm a little confused as to where this whole "banks forcing people to take home loans" came from. I have worked in the banking industry for years and I'm quite certain this never happened. Where is your source for this misinformation? Or are you just making crap up vomiting up long debunked republican talking points again?

That's more like it.

"Speaker John Boehner said in an interview Thursday that he is the 'most reasonable person in Washington"

Bullshiat!