ProfessorOhki: Znuh: Meanwhile, rigged machine?http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/11/06/machine-turns-vote-for-obama-into-one- f or-romney/Never seen a miscalibrated CRT touchscreen before? You know, where the cursor is offset from the touchpoint by a constant distance? I mean, it's certainly possible that it's legitimate manipulation, but the fact that he didn't poke Stein to see if it selected Obama, etc. I've got a hard time putting any stock in it.Besides, if you could mess with the machine on that level, why SHOW the voter you're tampering with their vote?
ProfessorOhki: http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/11/06/machine-turns-vote-for-obama-into-one- f or-romney/
PsyLord: Why isn't this shiat secure yet? I mean we have ATM's and lottery machines that seem to be pretty damn secure.
serial_crusher: Dinki: You implant a microprocessor or some other electronic device into the voting machine, and that lets you control the voting and turn cheating on and off.Stopped reading right there.Pretty much. This isn't a "voting machines are easily hackable" thing. This is a physical access issue. Keep shiat locked up properly and it's not a problem.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: May 29 2017 22:22:29
Runtime: 0.250 sec (250 ms)