rugman11: ShamWowofDamocles: rugman11: coolio mack: Just further proof that preseason polls and All American teams are silly. No poll should be made, and the word Heisman shouldn't be spoken until halfway through the conference season when teams are about 7 or 8 total games in.I've never really understood this point. The polls are all designed for discussion anyway, except for the final poll of the season. So why wait until week 8? Why not just have one poll at the end of the season that's used for the BCS/AP champions. I don't get what advantage waiting until seven or eight weeks gains.Pre-season polls are a HUGE advantage to those teams fortunate enough to be ranked in them. And the higher the pre-season rank, the bigger the advantage. If you started off in the pre-season poll and lose....you don't drop out of that poll very easily. If you start off NOT on the pre-season poll, you need to work harder to claw your way onto that poll. Take USC for example. Pre-season #1, three losses later, they are still ranked. Or take Oregon (full disclosure - I'm a Duck). Because their pre-season rank was so high, it was much easier for them to get to number 2 in the polls. And unless they lose....it is very unlikely they will ever fall out of that #2 slot.Now pretend we didn't have a pre-season poll and that the first rankings came out at the end of week 6 (or whenever all AQ schools have played 6 games). Now rankings reflect a body of work and you don't get 1-loss teams artificially ranked higher than unbeaten teams just because they started off higher in a poll created long before the first snap of the season.But if the whole "body of work" is your argument, why not wait until the end of the season? What did we really know about Oregon and Alabama in week 6? Both teams had spent the first month crushing mediocre teams. Oregon's best win was against Arizona (ranked 28 according to Sagarin), but they still had games left against teams number 9, 15, 16, 18, and eit ...
ghall3: coolio mack: The Heisman thing is arguably worse, because you got a guy like Kenjon Barner who only get to play half the game most weeks because their team is so overpowering on offense....I'm not saying that they shouldn't be pulling him after a half because it is absolutely the right thing to do but I bet his season stats will get looked at as "not enough yards, TDs etc." because he does get reduced playing time.
coolio mack: The Heisman thing is arguably worse, because you got a guy like Kenjon Barner who
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Aug 18 2017 07:31:34
Runtime: 0.224 sec (224 ms)