Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Telegraph)   Exactly how much photoshopping are you allowed to do in a photography contest before the judges disqualify you for 'too much' photoshopping?   (telegraph.co.uk) divider line 160
    More: Amusing  
•       •       •

24138 clicks; posted to Main » on 05 Nov 2012 at 2:49 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



160 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-05 08:38:32 PM  

pkellmey: manimal2878: pkellmey: Any photo manipulation is too much 'shopping. Force straight RAW submissions and the problem goes away.

This. Or have an explicit list of what is allowed to be done to an image like exposure or cropping, but require that a RAW image is always provided for comparison.

Good suggestion. I would even give a separate award for best post-production work so people recognize the difference between the art of photography and the art of post-production. They are both art, but should not be considered the same category.


Most photo contests should require people to also submit the originals. For one, it would allow the audience to see just how much an average shot could be improved in the absence of perfect dramatic lighting and such, with the judicious application of processing skills. A post-processing contest like that might even require intermediate shots and a basic description of the manipulations, and have at least one award on the merits of the tutorials.

Admiring art is fine, but inspiring and teaching budding photographers is a very worthwhile talent.
 
2012-11-05 08:59:50 PM  

Sio: As my dad is always telling me, it's not the camera that makes the photo, it's the person who takes it. He particularly likes to tell me that when I'm drooling over his Mark III...


This is definitely not true for night or high-contrast shots. Even with manual control, a lousy camera will either give you total darkness, a sea of grain, or a motion blur, if it even focuses at all. (So will lousy film, so it's not exactly a new problem.) It can be overcome, but results always have that quality that makes you feel like you could have done better.
 
2012-11-05 09:11:43 PM  
i47.tinypic.com
 
2012-11-05 10:02:55 PM  
farm4.staticflickr.com
 
2012-11-06 12:33:14 AM  

Haliburton Cummings: The Byrne photo is just better...


If you photoshop it, it's no longer a "photo", it's "digital art".

This is a photography contest, not a digital art contest.
 
2012-11-06 12:51:06 AM  

if_i_really_have_to: Haliburton Cummings: The Byrne photo is just better...

If you photoshop it, it's no longer a "photo", it's "digital art".

This is a photography contest, not a digital art contest.


What is it if you modify it in the darkroom?
 
Sio
2012-11-06 01:53:46 AM  

foxyshadis: Sio: As my dad is always telling me, it's not the camera that makes the photo, it's the person who takes it. He particularly likes to tell me that when I'm drooling over his Mark III...

This is definitely not true for night or high-contrast shots. Even with manual control, a lousy camera will either give you total darkness, a sea of grain, or a motion blur, if it even focuses at all. (So will lousy film, so it's not exactly a new problem.) It can be overcome, but results always have that quality that makes you feel like you could have done better.


Well yeah, I mean if you have an old as dirt camera that severely limits your controls over shutter speed and aperture and take a photo in the same spot at the same time as a much more adept camera, even if it's slightly older as well, the differences will be pronounced. I see that when I'm taking test shots of something using two different cameras, especially when I get them into editing software. I'm only just scratching the surface in learning the hobby, so I take a lot of test shots comparing settings with my various cameras...

However, you can hand fifteen different people the exact same camera with the exact same settings and send them all to take shots of the exact same thing, you will get shots that look like a three year old took them, and you will get shots you want to hang on your wall. And of course, everything in between. Sometimes the three year old took the shot you want to hang on your wall... but that's another thread...
 
2012-11-07 12:23:47 AM  

profplump: If you want to have a "waiting for good lighting conditions contest" go ahead. I'm sure there are some people who love the idea. But you don't get to redefine "photography".


Part of landscape photography IS waiting for good lighting or weather conditions. Part of photojournalism is being in the right place at the right time.

But it's only one part. Post-processing of both the negative (or the raw file) and the print are essential portions of the creative process. Darkroom work (whether chemical or digital) is what separates the good photographer from the average photographer.
 
2012-11-07 02:51:59 AM  

farker99: I used to be a 'wet' photographer. Icky liquids and getting the timing right was a pita.

Now I'm a digital photographer. I live by the following: If I could do it wet, then it is OK to do in PS. 1 Negative, 1 Print. Ansel did this, and his saying was "The negative is the score, the print is the performance". I've seen the original negative displayed with 8 different prints next to it. Each print was cropped, dodged, lightened or otherwise different from the others. No 2 were the same.

What was done with this photo to modify it went beyond simple digital darkroom manipulation and into the realm of digital art. That wasn't the contest and from what I read about it the DQ was justified.


add to this the fact that x number of people could go to the same site and shoot the same subject and you'ld have x number of entirely different photographs.

but, yeah, essentially THIS
 
2012-11-07 03:06:31 AM  

Worldwalker: (even "how long do I develop this?)


hell. how long do i expose this?

3.bp.blogspot.com
 
Displayed 10 of 160 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report