If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(UPI)   Janitor falls for the old Vaseline on the stairs prank   (upi.com) divider line 30
    More: Asinine, Vaseline, washing up, handrails  
•       •       •

12164 clicks; posted to Main » on 04 Nov 2012 at 11:44 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



30 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-11-04 09:31:11 AM
Perpetrators gave him the slip.
 
2012-11-04 11:49:08 AM
Scotland, you say?

Grease me up, Woman!

img.photobucket.com
 
2012-11-04 11:51:39 AM
Soap in the toilet tank? Huh, wonder what that does.

Thanks UPI!
 
2012-11-04 11:59:03 AM
I've got their disciplinary files right here. Who dropped a whole truckload of fizzies into the swim meet? Who delivered the medical school cadavers to the alumni dinner? Every Halloween, the trees are filled with underwear. Every spring, the toilets explode.

//Dean Wormer
 
2012-11-04 11:59:56 AM
Hm. Kids these days have come a long way from flushing cherry bombs down the crapper and blowing the floor up and plumbing open in some other part of the school.

Good ol' days of high explosives and fast feet.
 
2012-11-04 12:03:13 PM
when i was in 8th grade nasty old Miss Tintle broke her leg. this was in the days of the plaster cast. days before she was going to have the cast removed, this kid Mike took her out on the wide double staircase that went from the cafeteria/auditorium wing to the 7th/8th grade wing. as much of a dick move as that was, no one told on Mike. the kids really hated Miss Tintle.
 
2012-11-04 12:08:31 PM
This whole article is mirth at it finest! What kind of school is that? Clown College? :D
 
2012-11-04 12:10:02 PM
They should pay her and they should take the money out of the budget for all things related to entertainment (sports, festivals, and the like) for the school district.
 
2012-11-04 12:12:28 PM

BahdaBoom: Who dropped a whole truckload of fizzies into the swim meet? Who delivered the medical school cadavers to the alumni dinner? Every Halloween, the trees are filled with underwear. Every spring, the toilets explode.


www.pivisuals.com

We dooo, we dooooooo!
 
2012-11-04 12:27:48 PM
At least it wasn't the ol' banana up the tailpipe...
 
2012-11-04 12:31:09 PM

KrispyKritter: this kid Mike took her out


chosis.coldfusionvideo.com

?
 
2012-11-04 12:34:18 PM
"In the years preceding the said accident, leaving sixth year pupils have thrown eggs and tomato ketchup at the school, placed sardines in lockers, left dirty nappies in the school, left fish in the library, put washing up liquid down the toilets and black boot polish on seats," the suit says.

No flaming bags of poop?
 
2012-11-04 12:40:32 PM
having been told there was Vaseline on the handrail she failed to check the stairs? sucks to be her.
 
2012-11-04 12:41:38 PM
She's the janitor, should have kept the stairs cleaner.
 
2012-11-04 12:52:13 PM

Nrokreffefp: She's the janitor, should have kept the stairs cleaner.


images1.wikia.nocookie.net

Cleaning's an art. My mop is my paintbrush.
 
2012-11-04 01:02:08 PM
If she sued in an American court, the lawyer would be asking millions. Under the British legal system, it is very difficult to obtain astronomical sums in a judgement (although the two systems even up substantially on appeal.

$80,000 is a very reasonable price to pay for:

* risk of loss of life
* risk of loss of limbs
* risk of loss of mobility, i.e., the victim being left in a coma, brain damage, paraplegia, complete and permanen loss of limbs, bowel control, etc.
* risk of loss of employability with lose of employment, income, pensions, etc.
* loss of property
* physical pain of a chronic or perpetual nature (i.e., a broken leg or arm that never heals)
* additional emotional, physical and other destriss
* knock-on costs to the school, other students, the community, the family of the victim, etc.

I really think that as the unfortunate person who has to clean up after these "pranks" (baby shiat? how much is that worth to you?) she really deserves much better from the school, the community, the parents and pranksters.

Lavish apologies, a lot more money and some punishment to discourage potentially fatal pranking would be in order.

I like randomjsa's thinking: take the money out of extra-cirricular activities. Inform the parents that if they want their precious snowflakes to have gym, drama, field trips, the annual trip to France, etc., that they'll just have to work a little bit harder because the school no longer has the budget to support luxuries and extras.

$80,000 is not just compensation for what this woman went through, let alone the risks that might easily have materialized if her neck had hit the edge of a step at a slightly different angle through pure chance.

As a neurotic introvert I really do not like the humour of neurotic extroverts (pranksters, sadists, bullies). And I note that they really do not like it when you turn the tables. Their property is sacrosanct, the destruction of yours is just a good joke, and so forth, from petty things to life and safety and health at the other end.

And pranks reach the other end of the scale all too easily and too often.

My sympathies are entirely with the janitor. They have to put up with both literal and figurative shiat because they are in a menial position. But they are humans and they have the same rights moral, legal, political, social and economic, as any human from the Queen or Pope or President on down.

A pity that she won't be getting American rates--when the lawyer gets millions, even the client may pocket a reasonable sum.

Hazing at my first university was pulling back when I was a freshman because the sophmores had recently led the freshmen into the marshes--dangerous places even for those who live and work there, and had come back one or two short.

Pranks should be well-thought out and essentially harmless, otherwise they are assaults on life, limb and property and should be treated with great seriousness. I like a clever prank as well as anybody, but even those can cost too much.
 
2012-11-04 01:04:17 PM

cwick: At least it wasn't the ol' banana up the tailpipe...


Late supper.
 
2012-11-04 01:05:36 PM

ElLoco: Hm. Kids these days have come a long way from flushing cherry bombs down the crapper and blowing the floor up and plumbing open in some other part of the school.

Good ol' days of high explosives and fast feet.


The Irish know best how to assplode a toilet
 
2012-11-04 01:25:27 PM

brantgoose: If she sued in an American court, the lawyer would be asking millions. Under the British legal system, it is very difficult to obtain astronomical sums in a judgement (although the two systems even up substantially on appeal.

$80,000 is a very reasonable price to pay for:

* risk of loss of life
* risk of loss of limbs
* risk of loss of mobility, i.e., the victim being left in a coma, brain damage, paraplegia, complete and permanen loss of limbs, bowel control, etc.
* risk of loss of employability with lose of employment, income, pensions, etc.
* loss of property
* physical pain of a chronic or perpetual nature (i.e., a broken leg or arm that never heals)
* additional emotional, physical and other destriss
* knock-on costs to the school, other students, the community, the family of the victim, etc.

I really think that as the unfortunate person who has to clean up after these "pranks" (baby shiat? how much is that worth to you?) she really deserves much better from the school, the community, the parents and pranksters.

Lavish apologies, a lot more money and some punishment to discourage potentially fatal pranking would be in order.

I like randomjsa's thinking: take the money out of extra-cirricular activities. Inform the parents that if they want their precious snowflakes to have gym, drama, field trips, the annual trip to France, etc., that they'll just have to work a little bit harder because the school no longer has the budget to support luxuries and extras.

$80,000 is not just compensation for what this woman went through, let alone the risks that might easily have materialized if her neck had hit the edge of a step at a slightly different angle through pure chance.

As a neurotic introvert I really do not like the humour of neurotic extroverts (pranksters, sadists, bullies). And I note that they really do not like it when you turn the tables. Their property is sacrosanct, the destruction of yours is just a good joke, and so forth, from petty things to life ...


Well, choose your poison. The British penalties are so small that a property owner or employer wouldn't give a shiat about dangerous conditions that would be expensive to remedy.

No, Britain chose to "fix" the situation with a notorious "Health And Safety" group, which makes up its own rules. They're frequently divorced from reality and downright neurotic.

The overall architecture of the US civil penalty "jackpot justice" system isn't half bad. Insurance companies lay out rules based on what's actually a problem that will strike the insurance company in the pocketbook, not hypothetical problems envisioned by bureaucrats seeking to add completed initiatives to their job record.

Of course there's plenty of fraud and nuisance lawsuits in this system, but again, choose your poison. Health and Safety bureaucrats are MORE likely to come over and dictate absurd rules that will actually mess with your daily life for no material reason. They love micromanagement and keep writing a huge yet ever-expanding body of completely arbitrary, yet legally binding, rules.

Insurance companies are competitive. They actually don't want to dick around with a workplace more than necessary. But they will be damn specific on how flammables are stored, how the aisles work, what type of surface the floor is, how spill response works, when and where safety equipment is required, and who is responsible for making sure that equipment is used.
 
2012-11-04 01:37:04 PM
I really wish Don Martin was still around to illustrate what happened.
 
2012-11-04 01:58:42 PM

brantgoose: As a neurotic introvert I really do not like the humour of neurotic extroverts (pranksters, sadists, bullies). And I note that they really do not like it when you turn the tables. Their property is sacrosanct, the destruction of yours is just a good joke, and so forth, from petty things to life and safety and health at the other end.


This is what I can never wrap my head around. How can someone think it's funny to destroy something or hurt someone? As you said it's not so funny if someone tries to retaliate and suddenly it's a personal insult to them. I just don't get why they think mindless destruction is ok. Something is really wrong if they can't emphasize with others at all, it's like the makings of a sociopath.
 
2012-11-04 01:59:32 PM

BahdaBoom: I've got their disciplinary files right here. Who dropped a whole truckload of fizzies into the swim meet? Who delivered the medical school cadavers to the alumni dinner? Every Halloween, the trees are filled with underwear. Every spring, the toilets explode.

//Dean Wormer


ROBOT HOUSE!!!
 
2012-11-04 02:02:09 PM

Oznog: ElLoco: Hm. Kids these days have come a long way from flushing cherry bombs down the crapper and blowing the floor up and plumbing open in some other part of the school.

Good ol' days of high explosives and fast feet.

The Irish know best how to assplode a toilet


It's the Irish. They are good at assploding stuff.
 
2012-11-04 02:04:40 PM

pyrotek85: brantgoose: As a neurotic introvert I really do not like the humour of neurotic extroverts (pranksters, sadists, bullies). And I note that they really do not like it when you turn the tables. Their property is sacrosanct, the destruction of yours is just a good joke, and so forth, from petty things to life and safety and health at the other end.

This is what I can never wrap my head around. How can someone think it's funny to destroy something or hurt someone? As you said it's not so funny if someone tries to retaliate and suddenly it's a personal insult to them. I just don't get why they think mindless destruction is ok. Something is really wrong if they can't emphasize with others at all, it's like the makings of a sociopath.


More like Sadistic Personality Disorder.
 
2012-11-04 02:17:16 PM
There are pranks and there are pranks. This is not one.
 
2012-11-04 02:18:52 PM

brantgoose: If she sued in an American court, the lawyer would be asking millions. Under the British legal system, it is very difficult to obtain astronomical sums in a judgement (although the two systems even up substantially on appeal.

$80,000 is a very reasonable price to pay for:

* risk of loss of life
* risk of loss of limbs...


You sound fat.
 
2012-11-04 04:08:11 PM

randomjsa: They should pay her and they should take the money out of the budget for all things related to entertainment (sports, festivals, and the like) for the school district.


Seconded.
 
2012-11-04 04:56:25 PM
I've never heard of vaseline on the stairs, but I have heard of butter on the floor outside the shower. Both seem like an excellent way to kill someone. Or at least involuntary-manslaughter someone.
 
2012-11-04 05:13:48 PM

Ed Finnerty: I really wish Don Martin was still around to illustrate what happened.


Sir, you just made a mouthful of New Holland's Dragon's Milk brew get spewed from my nose.

I am a better woman for it.

/would love to know the Don Martin sound for that
 
2012-11-04 05:17:37 PM

LoneWolf343: pyrotek85: brantgoose: As a neurotic introvert I really do not like the humour of neurotic extroverts (pranksters, sadists, bullies). And I note that they really do not like it when you turn the tables. Their property is sacrosanct, the destruction of yours is just a good joke, and so forth, from petty things to life and safety and health at the other end.

This is what I can never wrap my head around. How can someone think it's funny to destroy something or hurt someone? As you said it's not so funny if someone tries to retaliate and suddenly it's a personal insult to them. I just don't get why they think mindless destruction is ok. Something is really wrong if they can't emphasize with others at all, it's like the makings of a sociopath.

More like Sadistic Personality Disorder.


school children. you're talking about very young humans that are still learning wrong from right. lighten up, Francis's
 
Displayed 30 of 30 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report