malaktaus: It was a fad and it has mostly run its course. She may write more books, but will anyone read them?
King Something: taxandspend: MurphyMurphy: It won't end until the next fad starts.As long as she can make money off this she will. As would I. No matter how detestable it is.You mean like Hunger Games?Honestly, I was thinking more along the lines of Fifty Shades Of Grey.It has the same target audience as Twilight - horny, middle-aged soccer moms who wish they had enough money and/or a pool in their backyard so they could hire a poolboy, and whose husbands are either shacking up with their secretaries, spending unusual amounts of time at the gym or less satisfying in the sack than a chiquita banana. Those women will grab the better of those two novels along with an eggplant and a box of tissues.
taxandspend: MurphyMurphy: It won't end until the next fad starts.As long as she can make money off this she will. As would I. No matter how detestable it is.You mean like Hunger Games?
zerkalo: So? Just more books I won't like read[stoplikingwhatIdont.jpg]
timswar: Of course there are more stories for the a Twilight universe. They aren't had to think about. Jake's eventual incarceration for indecent liberties with a minor, Edward and Bella's realization that adolescent love might not be enough to build a presumably eternal relationship./I'm sure there are others but that's all I know of the plot from the links posted on Fark.//Fark = Cliff's Notes for pop culture.
Want more stories with less ads? Try
It's what the cool kids are doing.It's also how we pay the bills.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 18 2017 04:15:45
Runtime: 0.282 sec (282 ms)