If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Talking Points Memo)   Pew study confirms liberal claim that media coverage of Obama* overwhelmingly negative   (2012.talkingpointsmemo.com) divider line 5
    More: Obvious, Pew Research Center, obama, Project for Excellence in Journalism, reporters, Talking Points Memo, local governments  
•       •       •

2212 clicks; posted to Politics » on 02 Nov 2012 at 12:18 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-11-02 01:10:45 PM
2 votes:
You have to understand, the people who think Obama is the worst president ever VOTED FOR GEORGE W. BUSH TWICE. So that's about all you need to know about that.
2012-11-02 03:03:53 PM
1 votes:

Citrate1007: For people looking through the filter of hate.....anything that isn't claiming he is evil is a lie.


static.someecards.com 

Yep.
2012-11-02 12:26:39 PM
1 votes:

Freudian_slipknot: Wait, how are they defining "negative"?

I mean, are we talking attacks on character? On actions?

Or merely saying "We checked the statement he said and it was false"?


It sounded like there was a huge hole in their methodology if they're ranking something like "Struggling Obama's Job Numbers Not Cutting It" with "Romney Is Blatantly Lying About Everything." It needs to be split along the lines of justifiable negative coverage. If one of them punched a baby in the mouth, that's the sort of negative coverage that should happen.
2012-11-02 12:23:33 PM
1 votes:
For people looking through the filter of hate.....anything that isn't claiming he is evil is a lie.
2012-11-02 10:27:56 AM
1 votes:
Wait, how are they defining "negative"?

I mean, are we talking attacks on character? On actions?

Or merely saying "We checked the statement he said and it was false"?

Because the former is negative, but it's not journalistic and I doubt it happened much off the op ed pages. Are you even counting the op ed pages?

The latter? That's actually how neutral journalism works. Just the facts, ma'am.

But, then again, stories like this one that present absolutely nothing of substance just goes to show that, positive or negative, journalism is a farking joke in this country.
 
Displayed 5 of 5 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report