If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support
style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Think about it: Directed Thor, a Disney property which was good and successful. Has a bit more a polished theater background, and can bring gravitas to the movie. Also, was a Shakespearean actor, which many of the actors in the original trilogy had started as.
I'd like to see someone like Nicolas Refn get a shot, even though he doesn't have a background in explosion pron. What made the original trilogy good is that was, at heart, a character driven plot ... well, at least Episode IV and V.
Come on, everyone is overlooking the obvious director, Edgar Wright. He's a Star Wars fanboy and you know it would be at the very least, entertaining as all out.
Also, what about Frank Darabont or David Fincher? Both were rumored to be directing prequels, and if I remember correctly, didn't Darabont write one of the first scripts for Episode I?
All because Winona Ryder was (at hour 11:59) too "ill" to film (but not too "ill" to almost immediately begin shooting Edward Scissorhands with her then-lifemate J. Depp.)
Personally, I think she made the right choice. (And, apparently she didn't piss off Big Papa Coppola as she did his Dracula film as a mea culpa.)
I don't know, if you replace Sophia with Winona, GF III would have been up there with the first two. That's how bad Sophia was in that role. She managed to make a potential top 100 film completely forgettable and regrettable.
![[TotalFark]](http://img.fark.net/images/2003/totalfark.gif "[TotalFark]"){kind=small}
