Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Socialist)   The left have convinced themselves of fiction that Obama is the only chance they have for real social change. Of course, BSABSVR, so vote Obama anyways   (socialistworker.org) divider line 11
    More: Obvious, obama, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, SDS, Wall Street protests, fictions, Lyndon B. Johnson, historiographies  
•       •       •

1096 clicks; posted to Politics » on 29 Oct 2012 at 8:14 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-10-29 08:23:34 AM  
3 votes:

Cythraul: And what kind of 'social change' is the 'Right' offering us, Subby?


Feudalism is a kind of social change.
2012-10-29 08:21:21 AM  
3 votes:

GAT_00: Really? Because there's a reason I'm voting for Jill Stein.


Because you want a Romney presidency but aren't self loathing enough to actually vote for him?
2012-10-29 08:03:23 AM  
3 votes:
The word is anyway. Or do denie that, Subby?
2012-10-29 10:34:10 AM  
1 votes:

runwiz: Many liberal Democrats are disappointed in Obama but this disappointment is totally their fault. They've have created an Obama of their own mind and imagination; an Obama that doesn't really exist. He was the vehicle of their hopes but only in their minds. In reality he never was an engine for real change. He is just Republican-lite; the leader of the other corporate party. Neither of the 2 major parties really represents the working man nor do they stand for fair distribution of the wealth of our nation. An Obama reelection will only at best be marginally better than a Romney victory and could be worse.


I think this one should have gotten more bites. It's got the buzz words. The falsehoods should provoke outrage and defense of Obama, yet it's not over the top.

But, nobody went for it, so you score no points.
2012-10-29 10:16:55 AM  
1 votes:

HST's Dead Carcass: The last October Surprise will be Romney coming out in Blackface and telling everyone: Both sides are Black, so vote republican!


cdn.uproxx.com

"I'd give a million notes for a box full of votes for my Rommmmmney!!1!"

/Both sides are black but we're lighter skinned so vote Republican!
2012-10-29 09:52:14 AM  
1 votes:
Appropriate in so many threads today:

www.bitlogic.com
2012-10-29 09:16:13 AM  
1 votes:

PonceAlyosha: cman: PonceAlyosha: Philip Francis Queeg: The election of Romney will bring real social change.

The destruction of the social safety net, the further empowerment of the wealthy and corporations and the destruction of the middle class is significant social change.

And the criminalization of homosexuality.

Yeah, that aint happening at all. You are full of it if you think that way. Romney is an asshole flip-flopping idiot but outlawing homosexuality is not possible

He promised to amend the constitution to make it impossible for people of the same sex to get married. And that is only day one.


Banning gay marriage is not outlawing homosexual relations. Sure it is a stupid hateful thing to do indeed, but Romney wouldn't dare to even submit that much. Romney is a politician who says a lot of shiat to get elected. However, he is pretty damn moderate in many respects. If Romney became President he would not submit such a constitutional amendment. I could see Santorum doing it, but not Romney.
2012-10-29 08:34:35 AM  
1 votes:

Girl From The North Country: The word is anyway. Or do denie that, Subby?


Oh god! Now it's spreading to other threads!

i623.photobucket.com
vpb [TotalFark]
2012-10-29 08:34:15 AM  
1 votes:

GAT_00: Really? Because there's a reason I'm voting for Jill Stein.


Exercise?
2012-10-29 08:22:14 AM  
1 votes:

mat catastrophe: GAT_00: Really? Because there's a reason I'm voting for Jill Stein.

Because you want to encourage third parties to keep wasting their time, money, and effort on national elections they cannot win (and even if they did, would find themselves powerless to effect any change) instead of focusing on local elections first and building up a base of support in communities that would, in the short term, have a greater effect on your day-to-day life than who the President is and, in the long term, lead to the actual possibility of national gains?


BUT ROMENY == OBAMA!!!
2012-10-29 08:18:01 AM  
1 votes:
It was my understanding that everyone had heard that the bird is the word.
 
Displayed 11 of 11 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report