mikaloyd: So this is now a thread about I AM RIGHT's sexuality and blowing kids?Funny how that always happens.
Sunrazor: And to be fair, as annoying as I find IAmRight, from what I gather he attempted to give us the choice that you get in the game Would You Rather and naturally some had to take that as advocating NAMBLA-esque activities.
IAmRight: Also, let's not act like he was just smoking pot. He was with a group of guys distributing it.
rufus-t-firefly: Well, smoking pot is preferable to distribution.
you are a puppet: I believe it's "Honey Bunch".
Sunrazor: And to be fair, as annoying as I find IAmRight, from what I gather he attempted to give us the choice that you get in the game Would You Rather and naturally some had to take that as advocating NAMBLA-esque activities. All I can say is lighten up, Francis.
mikaloyd: Look he also went into a full blown (sic) diatribe about how in other cultures and other times the whole Sandusky thing would be perfectly normal.Its more than just a game of would you rather here its a long term advocacy.
IAmRight: mikaloyd: funktilious_j: what you said was "Getting blown by Sandusky is way better than having him fark you in the ass".Its a NAMBLA talking pointRemember, because two things are both disgusting, we can't possibly be realistic and rational and admit "I'd rather get blown than f*cked in the ass, regardless of situation." It's critical in all situations to shut down any grey area or thought. Must just shout anyone down who doesn't say "GREATEST ATROCITY OF ALL TIME" and accuse them of sh*t like supporting Sandusky.Straight from the closet homosexual Republican playbook who, rather than discuss issues regarding sexuality, simply shout "NO THAT'S EVIL AND TERRIBLE AND ANYONE WHO THINKS ABOUT IT SHOULD FEEL ASHAMED."
IAmRight: Also, let's not act like he was just smoking pot. He was with a group of guys distributing it. They just picked the guy who never really played much for LSU to pin that on. Seriously, it went "nationally known starter" - lightest charge, "starter" - medium charge, "backup" - yeah, you're the distributor. We have to charge someone./it IS possible that the backup safety was in charge, but that'd be a hell of a coincidence
rugman11: My guess is that it was the "distributor's" apartment. That would make the most sense anyway.
IAmRight: I'm not saying we SHOULD accept pedophilia, and rape in any case is never okay. BUT we shouldn't act as though it's only monsters that are deviant. That, by its nature, prevents self-examination and reflection, doesn't allow for scientific inquiry - it's the same type of broad-brush painting that the Catholic Church used for so many centuries to try to prevent an increase in knowledge. If we try to understand more about why people might do this, then we have a better chance of preventing it in the future - certainly much more so than just saying "well, clearly he's a horrific monster simply because I personally can't imagine doing such things."
Smackledorfer: No, someone saying we shouldn't accept a child too young to make a decision about something sexual (and I say child, leave the 14 year old grey area for another discussion) is not at all similar to a Church being against science.
Smackledorfer: How the fark did a thread that should be focused on mocking someone too stupid to set the bong down in favor of a promising career wind up with me reading the quoted post, exactly?
IAmRight: I didn't take into account personal trolls that would drag in unrelated sh*t because it's easier than thinking.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jun 22 2017 08:30:11
Runtime: 0.228 sec (228 ms)