If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yorkton This Week)   Actual headline: "Man convicted of drinking and sleeping." Fark: He blew a 0.22 BAC - that must have been three or four Canadian Beers, eh?   (yorktonthisweek.com) divider line 3
    More: Weird, criminal code, Supreme Court of Canada, reasonable doubt  
•       •       •

5367 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Oct 2012 at 4:28 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-10-25 02:44:03 PM
3 votes:
How is this new news? You can be arrested for drunk driving while simply walking to your car or sleeping on the hood. Or if you're in the car and your keys are in the glove box. It happens all the time. It sends a message that you might as well go for it and try to make it home because what's the difference?
2012-10-25 05:05:43 PM
1 votes:

Honest Bender: Lumpmoose: Lessons in jury nullification need to be taught in high school.

Lessons in criminal justice need to be taught in high school. You don't get a jury trial for a DUI conviction.

Your profile says you live in CA, where a quick Google tells me you can get a jury for a DUI trial. I haven't heard of anywhere you -can't- have a jury trial for DUI, especially if there is a chance you can end up in jail.
You have to request a jury trial, but that is your right.
2012-10-25 02:10:08 PM
1 votes:
Justice system: "Hey look, this guy wasn't actually driving drunk but the law is stupidly written enough that we can still book him despite the intent of the law!"

Lessons in jury nullification need to be taught in high school.
 
Displayed 3 of 3 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report