If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Sun)   "While we appreciate Megan Fox's concern for her image, we find it hard to believe that a woman who spent two Transformers movies bent over with her breasts pressed together could have her reputation damaged by a blatantly satirical website"   (thesun.co.uk) divider line 44
    More: Amusing, Megan Fox, nude photography, cease and desist letter, bustier, Transformers, Sharper Image  
•       •       •

10798 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 25 Oct 2012 at 5:23 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



44 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-10-24 11:22:45 PM  
 
2012-10-25 12:15:45 AM  
Without the tits, no one would care about the talentless Miss Toethumbs, so she really should STFU and be glad people are still paying attention to her.

I mean, it's not like her acting will get her any fans.
 
2012-10-25 12:39:29 AM  
I need to see more pics as evidence before I reach a...verdict.
 
2012-10-25 01:20:30 AM  
Didn't she already have topless photos released from Jennifer's body?

megan fox poponut mag
 
2012-10-25 01:41:50 AM  

FirstNationalBastard: Without the tits, no one would care about the talentless Miss Toethumbs, so she really should STFU and be glad people are still paying attention to her.

I mean, it's not like her acting will get her any fans.


I've never understood why people go so nuts over her. There is something completely unattractive about her face, and decent bodies are a dime a dozen among shiatty wanna-be actresses.
 
2012-10-25 05:30:30 AM  
She does seem to have a rather dangerously large ego.
 
2012-10-25 06:39:19 AM  

FirstNationalBastard: Without the tits, no one would care about the talentless Miss Toethumbs, so she really should STFU and be glad people are still paying attention to her.


Yes. Because she is an attention whore, she has no right to complain when other entities attempt to tarnish or make money off her image without her consent. After all, she started it all by being an attention whore.
 
2012-10-25 06:42:16 AM  

IlGreven: FirstNationalBastard: Without the tits, no one would care about the talentless Miss Toethumbs, so she really should STFU and be glad people are still paying attention to her.

Yes. Because she is an attention whore, she has no right to complain when other entities attempt to tarnish or make money off her image without her consent. After all, she started it all by being an attention whore.


And just in case no one got the sarcasm, you could say the same thing about that 15-year-old girl who committed suicide.
 
2012-10-25 06:54:29 AM  
the 15 year old, flashed her tits in private to one dude. Megan Fox does it on giant screen's across the nation for millions to see. She's in the public eye, she's a celeb, so it kinda just works out that way.

Not entirely sure what happened with the whole 15 year old girl case though to be honest.
 
2012-10-25 06:55:53 AM  
Didn't something like this go to court some years ago and the judge ruled that because no money was made from the pic and the website noted that all the pics were fake, then the case had no grounds?
 
2012-10-25 06:56:05 AM  
Aren't there whole web sites dedicated to nothing but fake celebrity nudes? As in, pretty much every hot female celebrity in the world?
 
2012-10-25 07:07:55 AM  
The owners of that site are kind of dancing on the "well she was dressed like a whore so it's her fault" line of thinking. It's funny though that she's upset over a Photoshop, but she may have a case to at least have them take it down. Doubt she could sue them since they didn't do it for monetary reasons.

ImNotFatImFluffy: Not entirely sure what happened with the whole 15 year old girl case though to be honest.


Really? You didn't know she killed herself over that?
 
2012-10-25 07:36:21 AM  

Tat'dGreaser: Doubt she could sue them since they didn't do it for monetary reasons


wat?
 
2012-10-25 07:44:10 AM  
The difference is she chose to be a part of those awful movies. She didn't chose a picture of her to be shopped with a picture of a naked person.

But, realistically, given what little I know of the law in these matters, she has no real case. And knowing a little history about celebs trying to keep things under wraps, the primary effect of her asking for it to be taken down is that now more people will be made aware of it than would have if she hadn't said anything.
 
2012-10-25 07:55:18 AM  

Tat'dGreaser: The owners of that site are kind of dancing on the "well she was dressed like a whore so it's her fault" line of thinking. It's funny though that she's upset over a Photoshop, but she may have a case to at least have them take it down. Doubt she could sue them since they didn't do it for monetary reasons.

ImNotFatImFluffy: Not entirely sure what happened with the whole 15 year old girl case though to be honest.

Really? You didn't know she killed herself over that?


It's a commercial website. Unless they marked on the picture that ITS A FAKE!!!111 then she probably has a case from people rehosting and circulating the photo (a common, predictable occurance on the net) damaging her reputation.

Regarding the 15 year old stuff dude Fark hates women. You know that, you've been in the trenches here as long as I have, and goddamn do some of these chucklefarks hate women. And basically everyone who isn't an ablebodied white man.
 
2012-10-25 08:00:25 AM  

Alphax: Aren't there whole web sites dedicated to nothing but fake celebrity nudes? As in, pretty much every hot female celebrity in the world?


CelebDefamer.com for one. NSFW Really Bad Photoshop.
 
2012-10-25 08:13:22 AM  

Bored Horde: It's a commercial website. Unless they marked on the picture that ITS A FAKE!!!111 then she probably has a case from people rehosting and circulating the photo (a common, predictable occurance on the net) damaging her reputation.


That's what I'm thinking as well. She'll probably win and they'll have to take it down.

Regarding the 15 year old stuff dude Fark hates women. You know that, you've been in the trenches here as long as I have, and goddamn do some of these chucklefarks hate women. And basically everyone who isn't an ablebodied white man.

Yea yea, I keep forgetting about that!
 
2012-10-25 08:22:16 AM  

ZMugg: Alphax: Aren't there whole web sites dedicated to nothing but fake celebrity nudes? As in, pretty much every hot female celebrity in the world?

CelebDefamer.com for one. NSFW Really Bad Photoshop.


Famousboard.com too. Also very NSFW.
 
2012-10-25 08:27:09 AM  

IlGreven: FirstNationalBastard: Without the tits, no one would care about the talentless Miss Toethumbs, so she really should STFU and be glad people are still paying attention to her.

Yes. Because she is an attention whore, she has no right to complain when other entities attempt to tarnish or make money off her image without her consent. After all, she started it all by being an attention whore.


What you did there, I think I see it. And to be honest, I agree. The site's claims are technically true as far as they go, but they're classic victim-blame: however racy some of her previous roles might have been, they do not excuse this site's behavior.
 
2012-10-25 08:38:18 AM  

GAT_00: FirstNationalBastard: Without the tits, no one would care about the talentless Miss Toethumbs, so she really should STFU and be glad people are still paying attention to her.

I mean, it's not like her acting will get her any fans.

I've never understood why people go so nuts over her. There is something completely unattractive about her face, and decent bodies are a dime a dozen among shiatty wanna-be actresses.


It's something about that half-smile thing she's got going, people go nuts over it. I don't really understand it either, but I wonder if it's not just a primal thing, makes her look like she's in heat or something.
 
2012-10-25 08:43:30 AM  
in case anyone asks...here is the original...

drgullo.com
 
2012-10-25 09:48:12 AM  
I have this thread two toe thumbs up!

i996.photobucket.com

Is this the one girl that Farkers can agree she is way overrated?
 
2012-10-25 09:49:46 AM  

Tanukis_Parachute: in case anyone asks...here is the original...

[drgullo.com image 400x500]


You win one free internet.
 
2012-10-25 09:50:33 AM  
It's her image. That's how she makes her living, just like any other of the countless Hollywood "stars". When sleazyjerks.com puts up fake naked images of her they're damaging her image and she has every right to sue.

The fact she has been in states of semi undress in her movies doesn't matter. They didn't post that, they posted fake images of her to try to leech off her image for clicks on their sad website. Bet I'd be suing if some losers posted my head on someone else's body to try to profit off me.

Unless they put my head on like Matt McCaughnehey's body or something. And if my image was worth anything.
 
2012-10-25 10:10:39 AM  
What's this about a 15 year old girl now?
 
2012-10-25 10:14:12 AM  
Tell me that I'm not the only one who has yet to really notice, nor probably ever will notice, Megan Fox's thumbs.

Her hands don't look like flippers, so I really don't give a hoot. Looks wise, she's fairly attractive. It's her personality that's a bit iffy. Sometimes she seems well grounded. Other times, it's "WTF?" Central.
 
2012-10-25 10:19:50 AM  
They certainly didn't caputre her good side in this photo
i.imgur.com
 
2012-10-25 10:23:24 AM  

js34603: It's her image. That's how she makes her living, just like any other of the countless Hollywood "stars". When sleazyjerks.com puts up fake naked images of her they're damaging her image and she has every right to sue.

The fact she has been in states of semi undress in her movies doesn't matter. They didn't post that, they posted fake images of her to try to leech off her image for clicks on their sad website. Bet I'd be suing if some losers posted my head on someone else's body to try to profit off me.

Unless they put my head on like Matt McCaughnehey's body or something. And if my image was worth anything.


Yep. Plus, California's right to publicity and invasion of privacy laws are pretty protective of celebs, for obvious reasons.

What surprises me is that their legal staff recommended them to try that "blatantly satirical" response. I mean, seriously? You think that's a valid reply? Cripes.
 
2012-10-25 10:25:15 AM  
Megan gave the pictures two thumbs down.
 
2012-10-25 10:39:13 AM  
As long as she isn't doing this because another Transformers movie is coming out..
 
2012-10-25 10:42:30 AM  
SHARPER IMAGE ad campaign? I don't care how much you love or hate her, but rock bottom is Sharper Image.
 
2012-10-25 10:55:08 AM  
She has a pretty face but I otherwise never understood the attraction to her. There are prettier girls out there, imho.
 
2012-10-25 11:05:30 AM  
Is it a USA based site? Then it protected satire. Ty Larry Flynt
 
2012-10-25 12:10:30 PM  
The Sun apparently runs malicious code on your browser that re-opens itself after you close the window.
 
2012-10-25 12:11:47 PM  
Wow, I didn't know Studman69 had so many alts.

Avert your eyes from the hideous creature! Protect your delicate sensibilities!

www.elle.si
 
2012-10-25 12:21:58 PM  

jayhawk88: GAT_00: FirstNationalBastard: Without the tits, no one would care about the talentless Miss Toethumbs, so she really should STFU and be glad people are still paying attention to her.

I mean, it's not like her acting will get her any fans.

I've never understood why people go so nuts over her. There is something completely unattractive about her face, and decent bodies are a dime a dozen among shiatty wanna-be actresses.

It's something about that half-smile thing she's got going, people go nuts over it. I don't really understand it either, but I wonder if it's not just a primal thing, makes her look like she's in heat or something.


For me, it's because she looks like she could suck the chrome off a tail pipe...and you know that's how she got to where she is.
 
2012-10-25 12:57:29 PM  

jaytkay: Wow, I didn't know Studman69 had so many alts.

Avert your eyes from the hideous creature! Protect your delicate sensibilities!

[www.elle.si image 320x480]


+1. You can say many unkind things about her acting and public personality, but she's insanely hot. Don't get the hate. I wish I could find the thread, but there was a comment about how some Farkers would slice off their limbs to sniff Judi Dench's panties or lick Christina Hendrick's shoes, but somehow MF is ugly? Wow.
 
2012-10-25 01:52:43 PM  

yeegrek: jaytkay: Wow, I didn't know Studman69 had so many alts.

Avert your eyes from the hideous creature! Protect your delicate sensibilities!

[www.elle.si image 320x480]

+1. You can say many unkind things about her acting and public personality, but she's insanely hot. Don't get the hate. I wish I could find the thread, but there was a comment about how some Farkers would slice off their limbs to sniff Judi Dench's panties or lick Christina Hendrick's shoes, but somehow MF is ugly? Wow.


There's nothing wrong with her body, but I like faces a lot and there is something offputting about her face to me.
 
kab
2012-10-25 02:01:03 PM  

Lollipop165: She has a pretty face but I otherwise never understood the attraction to her. There are prettier girls out there, imho.


The same can be said for pretty much every famous model, every chick that lands on any '100 hottest women' list, etc.

Then again, this IS fark, a site filled with flawless, yet curiously anonymous male specimens, who look at thumbs before anything else as a sign of attractiveness.
 
2012-10-25 04:26:58 PM  

Alphax: Aren't there whole web sites dedicated to nothing but fake celebrity nudes? As in, pretty much every hot female celebrity in the world?


And don't forget the Danny Divito sites.
 
2012-10-25 05:58:07 PM  
So just because she's famous she doesn't deserve any privacy or not to be demeaned in this manner

/quit showing your male privilege.
 
2012-10-25 07:09:53 PM  
Who cares about thumbs? She's smoking hot.
 
2012-10-25 07:50:24 PM  
42 Comments and all I read is blah, blah, BLARG, blah and find no NSFW link to the mentioned photo. Imma packing to Reddit
 
2012-10-25 08:31:14 PM  
Megan has stripped down to sexy stockings and a bustier in a new advertising campaign for electronics company Sharper Image.

Sharper Image is still around?
 
Displayed 44 of 44 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report