If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Boston.com)   CLint Eastwood stars in a new TV ad supporting Romney. Meanwhile his co-star, The Chair, continues to be frozen out by the campaign   (boston.com) divider line 37
    More: Interesting, Clint Eastwood, TV ad, Dirty Harry  
•       •       •

316 clicks; posted to Politics » on 24 Oct 2012 at 10:51 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



37 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-10-24 10:52:52 AM  
CLever ad.
 
2012-10-24 10:54:01 AM  
CLETVRMTC.....I don't get it.
 
2012-10-24 10:56:02 AM  
I wonder how much they paid him for that.

I know he was whining earlier on that his chair yellin' gig at the ConCon was done for chump change.

Hope he soaked them good this time.

/Depleted war chest is depleted.
 
2012-10-24 10:56:07 AM  
It has viewers 4' from the edge of their chairs.
 
2012-10-24 10:57:48 AM  
Did Hoveround make a cameo appearance?
 
2012-10-24 10:59:37 AM  
i258.photobucket.com
 
2012-10-24 10:59:38 AM  
That performance was actually The Chair's break out role, so now it does high-concept art films instead of whoring itself out for cheap coke like Lindsey Lohan.
 
2012-10-24 11:00:58 AM  
rich out of touch geezer supports rich out of touch almost geezer.
 
2012-10-24 11:04:28 AM  
Is the endorsement going to be more strong than "I think maybe it might be time for someone else?"
 
2012-10-24 11:08:29 AM  
Eastwood and The Chair, coming this fall on ABC. Check your local listings for show times.
 
2012-10-24 11:14:20 AM  

Headso: rich out of touch geezer supports rich out of touch almost geezer.


first, he's a libertarian.
second, he's right in that if president obama is reelected, the republicans and tea party are probably going to double down on their self destructiveness and the country probably won't be able to survive that.
 
2012-10-24 11:16:50 AM  

not5am: Headso: rich out of touch geezer supports rich out of touch almost geezer.

first, he's a libertarian.
second, he's right in that if president obama is reelected, the republicans and tea party are probably going to double down on their self destructiveness and the country probably won't be able to survive that.


As opposed to 4-8 more years of Bush V2.0?
 
2012-10-24 11:19:49 AM  
Afterwards, the rejected applicants for the co-star role were invited to the White House for a meeting with the President:
i3.kym-cdn.com
 
2012-10-24 11:20:32 AM  
not5am: Headso: rich out of touch geezer supports rich out of touch almost geezer.
- - -

first, he's a libertarian.
second, he's right in that if president obama is reelected, the republicans and tea party are probably going to double down on their self destructiveness and the country probably won't be able to survive that.


Do you think the country would survive what a President Romney would have in store? If his record as Governor of Massachusetts is anything to go by, the answer is a resounding HELL NO. Hedso called it right.
 
2012-10-24 11:22:02 AM  

not5am: first, he's a libertarian.


Lots of republicans have been calling themselves that since W to save face. Meanwhile, this libertarian was speaking at the RNC because he is just so not a republican, you guys.
 
2012-10-24 11:23:03 AM  
to add, just look at rape for example. they started off by trying to redefine rape, then said you don't get pregnant if its real rape, then say girls rape easy (although i understand it's just him not phrasing it well), and now it was god's will if you get pregnant from rape. all of this in just the past few months!


/new rape record?
//x2
 
2012-10-24 11:23:12 AM  

not5am: second, he's right in that if president obama is reelected, the republicans and tea party are probably going to double down on their self destructiveness and the country probably won't be able to survive that.


Yes, I hear negotiating with terrorists and giving in to their demands is often a smart tactic.
 
2012-10-24 11:23:55 AM  

not5am: first, he's a libertarian.


I should have said "really out of touch geezer" I guess...
 
2012-10-24 11:24:29 AM  

not5am: the republicans and tea party are probably going to double down on their self destructiveness and the country probably won't be able to survive that.


Thats extortion, you know.
 
2012-10-24 11:25:19 AM  

log_jammin: Eastwood and The Chair, coming this fall on ABC. Check your local listings for show times.


Where have you been?

/threadjack over.
 
Bf+
2012-10-24 11:26:58 AM  

YodaBlues: CLETVRMTC.....I don't get it.

 
2012-10-24 11:27:06 AM  

Epoch_Zero: Afterwards, the rejected applicants for the co-star role were invited to the White House for a meeting with the President:
[i3.kym-cdn.com image 680x453]


That's a lot of blah chairs.
 
2012-10-24 11:29:07 AM  

James F. Campbell: Epoch_Zero: Afterwards, the rejected applicants for the co-star role were invited to the White House for a meeting with the President:
[i3.kym-cdn.com image 680x453]

That's a lot of blah chairs.


Well, he only cares about blah chairs. He paid all their mortgages and gave them all phones with money taken from hardworking white love seats.
 
2012-10-24 11:29:22 AM  
Can't really blame 'em for going there again. I mean, the first go-round was such a rousing success.
 
2012-10-24 11:30:16 AM  

MorrisBird: log_jammin: Eastwood and The Chair, coming this fall on ABC. Check your local listings for show times.

Where have you been?

/threadjack over.


Unplugged, lost a bunch of weight, stopped smoking,started working out, and hopefully became less angry and more jokey again.
 
2012-10-24 11:34:00 AM  
treknews.net

He's stained, rested and ready.
 
2012-10-24 11:34:24 AM  

not5am: second, he's right in that if president obama is reelected, the republicans and tea party are probably going to double down on their self destructiveness and the country probably won't be able to survive that.


Vote Republican, they're farking crazy. Who knows what they'll do if they don't win?
 
2012-10-24 11:35:21 AM  
Subby's headline made me think CLInT Eastwood.

/got nothing else
 
2012-10-24 11:38:03 AM  

Girl From The North Country: Subby's headline made me think CLInT Eastwood.

/got nothing else


i3.kym-cdn.com

/somewhat related
 
2012-10-24 11:38:39 AM  

urbangirl: Can't really blame 'em for going there again. I mean, the first go-round was such a rousing success.


That's the GOP way: If it didn't work, you obviously didn't do it enough!

Cutting taxes didn't grow the economy or create jobs? Cut taxes some more! Eliminating regulations didn't get the banking institutions to behave? Deregulate further! Wars haven't ended terrorism? Start more wars!

If brute force isn't working you're just not using enough!
=Smidge=
 
2012-10-24 11:39:29 AM  

Epoch_Zero: Girl From The North Country: Subby's headline made me think CLInT Eastwood.

/got nothing else



/somewhat related


Lulz
 
2012-10-24 11:42:42 AM  

thurstonxhowell: not5am: second, he's right in that if president obama is reelected, the republicans and tea party are probably going to double down on their self destructiveness and the country probably won't be able to survive that.

Vote Republican, they're farking crazy. Who knows what they'll do if they don't win?


www2.indystar.com
 
2012-10-24 11:44:42 AM  

Epoch_Zero: Lots of republicans have been calling themselves that since W to save face. Meanwhile, this libertarian was speaking at the RNC because he is just so not a republican, you guys.


blast, you got me good. the RNC never has libertarians attend/speak. a libertarian wouldn't even run for the republican nomination for president.
 
2012-10-24 11:53:29 AM  

not5am: Epoch_Zero: Lots of republicans have been calling themselves that since W to save face. Meanwhile, this libertarian was speaking at the RNC because he is just so not a republican, you guys.

blast, you got me good. the RNC never has libertarians attend/speak. a libertarian wouldn't even run for the republican nomination for president.


Right - Libertarians are Republicans. What's your point?
 
2012-10-24 12:02:35 PM  

Epoch_Zero: Right - Libertarians are Republicans. What's your point?


libertarians are the suckerfish of national parties.
 
2012-10-24 12:03:45 PM  

not5am: Epoch_Zero: Right - Libertarians are Republicans. What's your point?

libertarians are the suckerfish of national parties.


Who consistently vote, caucus with, and run as Republicans.
 
2012-10-24 12:09:14 PM  

Epoch_Zero: not5am: Epoch_Zero: Right - Libertarians are Republicans. What's your point?

libertarians are the suckerfish of national parties.

Who consistently vote, caucus with, and run as Republicans.


Nu-UH! Both Gary Johnson and Bob Barr (the last two LP presidential nominations) are FORMER Republicans. FORMER. That means they no longer believe in smaller government, with tax cuts and the freedom to choose which company owns your soul for all.

// libertarians are the "other/misc" category of national politics, sadly
// because the word means something other than "not a registered R (or D)"
// and there are even other third parties
// or you could be "Independent"
 
Displayed 37 of 37 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report