If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WTKR)   Watch is returned to retired Navy sailor 53 years after it was stolen. You read this in Christopher Walken's voice   (wtkr.com) divider line 30
    More: Spiffy, navy, sailors, Navy sailor, Icing on the Cake  
•       •       •

4059 clicks; posted to Main » on 23 Oct 2012 at 11:42 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



30 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-10-23 07:51:38 AM  
Smokin' cigarettes and watchin' Captain Kangarooo...
 
2012-10-23 09:35:34 AM  
Damn you, subs.
 
2012-10-23 11:45:10 AM  
Walken tag! Dammit! Blown opportunity.
 
2012-10-23 11:45:57 AM  
Just be careful not to leave it on the kangaroo on the nightstand next to the bed next time you leave.
 
2012-10-23 11:47:05 AM  
Was it an uncomfortable hunk of metal?
 
2012-10-23 11:47:08 AM  
cdn.counter-currents.com

Up. His. Ass.
 
2012-10-23 11:49:07 AM  
So the sailor who lost the watch goes by "Ed"?

What a miserably edited bag of eels.
 
2012-10-23 11:50:36 AM  
Great monologue? Or greatest monologue?
 
2012-10-23 11:51:52 AM  
If it was stuck up the returner's butthole, did it take a licking and keep on ticking?
 
2012-10-23 11:51:59 AM  
By placing the article "A" at the beginning of the sentence, you would've kept some Farkers from reading and re-reading the word "Watch" as a verb. Thumbs way DOWN, stinko-patzo!
 
2012-10-23 11:52:53 AM  
Was it burned to a crisp or bloody as hell?
 
2012-10-23 11:53:37 AM  

Parallax


Walken tag! Dammit! Blown opportunity.


I thought the Walken tag (along with the Wheaton tag) had been retired from general use.

Anyway, glad the guy got his watch back.
 
2012-10-23 12:07:15 PM  
why does it have to be a farking video. Why can't I just read a short story and see a nice pic of the watch. Jesus!


I know it ridiculous to rant about it
 
2012-10-23 12:10:29 PM  

Sir Digby


why does it have to be a farking video. Why can't I just read a short story and see a nice pic of the watch. Jesus!


I know it ridiculous to rant about it


Especially when you're too clueless to scroll down the page to see all the words BELOW the video.
 
2012-10-23 12:13:33 PM  
I added to the end of that sentence in his voice "but what he really needed, was more cowbell."
 
2012-10-23 12:15:02 PM  
link fails for this mobile browser, i do not have a login for wordpress
 
2012-10-23 12:17:59 PM  
Believe it or not I actually did read that in Walken voice in my head before I even got to the part about Christopher Walken

My default narrator in my head voice is James Earl Jones.
 
2012-10-23 12:27:04 PM  

Englebert Slaptyback: Sir Digby

why does it have to be a farking video. Why can't I just read a short story and see a nice pic of the watch. Jesus!


I know it ridiculous to rant about it


Especially when you're too clueless to scroll down the page to see all the words BELOW the video.


I did scroll down the page, but I didn't see a pic. That was my point. I saw the words. And I know how to read them. But why is it so hard to just throw a pic of the watch on the page? I'm a watch guy, I was interested. But not enough to watch a video. And like I said, I know it is ridiculous to complain about it.
 
2012-10-23 12:31:30 PM  

Englebert Slaptyback: I thought the Walken tag (along with the Wheaton tag) had been retired from general use.


I knew they are very seldom used, but I didn't know they had actually been retired.

I just checked the link submission form. Wheaton tag is available, Walken isn't. Mod only tag now, like the Repeat tag?
 
2012-10-23 12:46:27 PM  
You read this in Christopher Walken's voice

wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net

Wolfy burns.
 
2012-10-23 01:13:53 PM  

Sir Digby: Englebert Slaptyback: Sir Digby

why does it have to be a farking video. Why can't I just read a short story and see a nice pic of the watch. Jesus!


I know it ridiculous to rant about it


Especially when you're too clueless to scroll down the page to see all the words BELOW the video.

I did scroll down the page, but I didn't see a pic. That was my point. I saw the words. And I know how to read them. But why is it so hard to just throw a pic of the watch on the page? I'm a watch guy, I was interested. But not enough to watch a video. And like I said, I know it is ridiculous to complain about it.


"I'm a watch guy".

Rule 34. Takes all types....
 
2012-10-23 01:19:51 PM  
Watch! Is returned. To retired Navy sailor. 53 years! After it was stolen. You. Read this. In Christopher Walken's! Voice.
 
2012-10-23 01:31:17 PM  
+1 Subby.
 
2012-10-23 02:36:26 PM  
Actually, subs, I read it in Jay Mohr's Christopher Walken impression voice

/I bet he didn't let any slope heads get their greasy hands on the watch
 
2012-10-23 02:47:56 PM  
One of the sneaky funny parts of that monologue is that the boy's father died of dysentery -- with the watch up his ass. 

//nice
 
2012-10-23 02:59:36 PM  
Did he have to crash the Honda too?
 
2012-10-23 03:54:44 PM  

abfalter: Sir Digby: Englebert Slaptyback: Sir Digby


"I'm a watch guy".

Rule 34. Takes all types....


Now that's funny. Thanks for reminding me it's just the internet...
 
2012-10-23 04:34:09 PM  
Another day, another WTKR link from boring old Snorefolk. Who the f*k are you, anyway, Subby?
 
2012-10-23 05:33:31 PM  
+1 subby, you get one internet beer.

professorgoodales.net
 
2012-10-23 07:30:15 PM  
It would have been returned many years sooner, but they had to start calling every Ed on the Internet.
And who the fark is Mark? Do I have to search the Internet to find out?
 
Displayed 30 of 30 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report