If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Digital Spy)   Natalie Portman isn't doing Thor 2 by choice; apparently, she was forced into getting paid an outrageous salary for a few minutes of screentime   (digitalspy.com) divider line 93
    More: Followup, Natalie Portman, Stellan Skarsgard, Thor, Kat Dennings, Tom Hiddleston, Christopher Eccleston, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Idris Elba  
•       •       •

9664 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 23 Oct 2012 at 2:55 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



93 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-10-22 11:57:13 PM
So she had to *gasp* honor a legal contract between consenting adults that's been upheld in good faith?

Poor woman!
 
2012-10-23 01:01:49 AM
She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.
 
2012-10-23 02:28:14 AM
They've had three Bruce Banners (okay two, if you're just counting the Avenger-verse), two LTC James Rhodes, and they're probably going to get a bigger star to play Thanos in "Avengers 2." I doubt a different Jane Foster would even be an issue.
 
2012-10-23 02:33:33 AM
"They backed a DUMP TRUCK full of money to my house! I'm not made of stone!"
 
2012-10-23 03:04:18 AM
Just put in a scene where Kat Dennings finally removes 9 of the 10 sweaters she was wearing in Thor. Then have Thor look right in the camera.
 
2012-10-23 03:06:16 AM
They should've let her go. I adore Ms. Portman, but her character was farking useless in Thor. I was ecstatic to see her photo in The Avengers for the sole purpose of promising that she wouldn't appear for real.
 
2012-10-23 03:09:00 AM
I've seen an advance script. About fifteen minutes in they just loop this
 
2012-10-23 03:12:12 AM

Mr. Coffee Nerves: I've seen an advance script. About fifteen minutes in they just loop this


I'd go see it
 
2012-10-23 03:22:26 AM

Juansmith: They should've let her go. I adore Ms. Portman, but her character was farking useless in Thor. I was ecstatic to see her photo in The Avengers for the sole purpose of promising that she wouldn't appear for real.


Yeah, pretty much the least convincing scientist in cinema history apart from Denise Richards as "Christmas Jones". How much of it is the character and how much the actor is an exercise for the viewer, but I suspect anyone remembering her impression of an oaken plank in Star Wars and a plywood spacer in V For Vendetta is going to favor the latter no matter how sad the writing was.

//She's attractive enough, sure, but it's not like Hollywood isn't full of attractive women with more actual acting talent. I imagine at least one of them is pouring coffee at the cafe where this crime against cinema is going to be written.
 
2012-10-23 03:24:26 AM

steve_lou: Just put in a scene where Kat Dennings finally removes 9 of the 10 sweaters she was wearing in Thor. Then have Thor look right in the camera.


This a million times.

What kind of idiot casts Kat Dennings in his movie and then covers her up with heaps of bulky clothing. You know it's not because Kat Dennings is afraid to show her bewbs (bless her heart, which I hear is located someplace under that massive rack).

My guess is that this derp-head:

upload.wikimedia.org

Was afraid she'd look like a bag of ground beef next to this:

cache.sharenxs.com

Also... bewbs.
 
mhd
2012-10-23 03:42:14 AM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.


Anymore? Natalie "Anakin, you're breaking my heart" Portman? When did she ever own a "therious thespian" card?
 
2012-10-23 03:53:56 AM

mhd: The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Anymore? Natalie "Anakin, you're breaking my heart" Portman? When did she ever own a "therious thespian" card?


The Professional.
Black Swan.

And arguably a couple others.
 
2012-10-23 03:57:57 AM

Evil_John:
The Professional.
Black Swan.


I don't think you get credit for successfully pulling off a role that literally consists of only "look like a pre-teen" when you actually are a pre-teen.

I'll give you Black Swan, I guess, because even though I wasn't impressed most of the critics were, so I assume that one was a matter of taste, or rather lack of distaste for blatant pandering oscar-bait schlock.

//I so rarely get to pull out the movie nerd hat around here, wheeeee.
 
2012-10-23 04:02:19 AM

Jim_Callahan: Juansmith: They should've let her go. I adore Ms. Portman, but her character was farking useless in Thor. I was ecstatic to see her photo in The Avengers for the sole purpose of promising that she wouldn't appear for real.

Yeah, pretty much the least convincing scientist in cinema history apart from Denise Richards as "Christmas Jones".


Which is funny considering she is one of the few actors with a Erdős-Bacon number, worked as Alan Dershowitz's research assistant and has two journal publications.
 
2012-10-23 04:04:06 AM
Seen weeping behind the wheel of her dump truck full of money.
 
2012-10-23 04:09:10 AM

Carth: Which is funny considering she is one of the few actors with a Erdős-Bacon number, worked as Alan Dershowitz's research assistant and has two journal publications.


That is the source of some of my frustration, yes. One would expect the combination of professional (assumably method) actor and experience in the physical sciences to result in a well-acted portrayal of a competent scientist, instead of a terrible impression of an actor of the quality one would expect from an incompetent scientist.

//Though technically everyone that's published anything has an Erdos number, that's actually pretty much the joke there. It's not a scientific credential, it's a network theory reference.
 
2012-10-23 04:25:03 AM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.


You have to admit there was one hell of a redeeming feature about that movie:

i2.kym-cdn.com

And to boot you didn't even have to buy a ticket to see it, they showed it off in the trailers!
 
2012-10-23 04:30:51 AM
contractual agreement you signed does not equal dump truck full of money. it means show up and perform as you were paid to do or deal with our building full of jew lawyers expecting a check from you.

brad pitt making ridiculous commercial for $7 million, now THATS dump truck full of money.
 
2012-10-23 04:41:03 AM

Mr. Coffee Nerves: I've seen an advance script. About fifteen minutes in they just loop this


Are those new?
 
2012-10-23 05:00:48 AM
"Thor" was my least favorite of the "Avengers" movies, but damn if it doesn't get better in a second viewing. Acting, especially by Tom Hiddleston and Anthony Hopkins, was both narmy and very subtle at times. Loki is easily one of the more complex vilains in comic book movies.
 
2012-10-23 05:18:25 AM

Doctor Jan Itor: Mr. Coffee Nerves: I've seen an advance script. About fifteen minutes in they just loop this

Are those new?


Those are courtesy of the best FX people Terrence Malick could find, FSM bless him.
 
2012-10-23 05:22:58 AM

Iczer: The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.

You have to admit there was one hell of a redeeming feature about that movie:

[i2.kym-cdn.com image 300x287]

And to boot you didn't even have to buy a ticket to see it, they showed it off in the trailers!


thought the saying that wasn't her ass shown in the movie but a stunt double?
 
2012-10-23 05:48:10 AM

BeerBear: Iczer: The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.

You have to admit there was one hell of a redeeming feature about that movie:

[i2.kym-cdn.com image 300x287]

And to boot you didn't even have to buy a ticket to see it, they showed it off in the trailers!

thought the saying that wasn't her ass shown in the movie but a stunt double?


I'm only 63% sure of what you just said so I'm answering based on my own interpretation, but no. It cuts away from her, then cuts back to her body double, face turned away from the camera, jumping into the lake. The shots in question are pure Portman.
 
2012-10-23 06:32:56 AM

Iczer: The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.

You have to admit there was one hell of a redeeming feature about that movie:

[i2.kym-cdn.com image 300x287]

And to boot you didn't even have to buy a ticket to see it, they showed it off in the trailers!


i.imgur.com
 
2012-10-23 07:07:14 AM

TwistedFark: My guess is that this derp-head:

[upload.wikimedia.org image 220x330]

Was afraid she'd look like a bag of ground beef next to this:

[cache.sharenxs.com image 398x600]

Also... bewbs.


She looks really nice, but did she have to screw up her lips with collagen? It's pretty frelling obvious in that picture.
 
2012-10-23 07:07:31 AM

BeerBear: Iczer: The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.

You have to admit there was one hell of a redeeming feature about that movie:

[i2.kym-cdn.com image 300x287]

And to boot you didn't even have to buy a ticket to see it, they showed it off in the trailers!

thought the saying that wasn't her ass shown in the movie but a stunt double?


If you want to see Natalie Portman's ass in all its glory (and there can be no doubt that it is her ass), go and look for the short film "Hotel Chevalier", the prelude to "The Darjeeling Limited". She's got a real hot sex scene with Jason Schwartzamn in it, but thankfully, she's the only one showing skin.

And enjoy it, too. She said that the reviews of the shorts focused so much on the nude scene, overshadowing all the rest, that she decided she won't do them anymore.
 
2012-10-23 07:47:11 AM

RockofAges: I'm not one to complain but there wasn't much goin on in that scene (will admit I just looked it up).

Have you seen Spartacus on Starz? If you're a man, that's required viewing.


To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.
 
2012-10-23 08:00:55 AM

padraig: RockofAges: I'm not one to complain but there wasn't much goin on in that scene (will admit I just looked it up).

Have you seen Spartacus on Starz? If you're a man, that's required viewing.

To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.


Watch for the nude, stay for the gore.
 
2012-10-23 08:04:05 AM

padraig: To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.


That must suck to be asexual.
 
2012-10-23 08:07:03 AM

DeathByGeekSquad: padraig: RockofAges: I'm not one to complain but there wasn't much goin on in that scene (will admit I just looked it up).

Have you seen Spartacus on Starz? If you're a man, that's required viewing.

To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.

Watch for the nude, stay for the gore.


I like the dialogue...

Also the Jeoffrey-slapping.
 
2012-10-23 08:16:57 AM

RockofAges: Haven't done the GoT thing yet, still finishing Spartacus.

Honestly it would be hard to beat the first season of that show. It's easily the most macho thing I've ever seen on TV, which I like personally.


I loved the first season but couldn't watch season 2. It was just too sad that they switched out Spartacus because the lead actor died of cancer.
 
2012-10-23 08:18:19 AM

Jim_Callahan: Evil_John:
The Professional.
Black Swan.

I don't think you get credit for successfully pulling off a role that literally consists of only "look like a pre-teen" when you actually are a pre-teen.

I'll give you Black Swan, I guess, because even though I wasn't impressed most of the critics were, so I assume that one was a matter of taste, or rather lack of distaste for blatant pandering oscar-bait schlock.

//I so rarely get to pull out the movie nerd hat around here, wheeeee.


Black Swan was totally one of those movies where it was good while you were watching it but as soon as it is over and you have time to think it makes no sense (she managed to do a whole performance like that?) . It was just like the other movie from the same director Requiem for a Dream (New York City ran out of heroin?).
 
2012-10-23 08:19:06 AM
i522.photobucket.com

Knew a little something about that.
 
2012-10-23 08:23:07 AM

Tat'dGreaser: padraig: To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.

That must suck to be asexual.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA !

Me ? Asexual ?

That's a good one, skippy.

RockofAges: While nudity isn't the sole purpose of most given pieces of entertainment, it's fairly puritanical in my view to consider healthy sexuality and arousal of the sexual sense in the television medium to be "for hormoney teenagers".

Why segregate your sexuality into liminal / threshold events, like a self-contained urge? I allow myself to enjoy the thoughts of all my pleasures (food, writing, music, gaming, the outdoors, and yes, sex) throughout the day. When it's presented well (and not necessarily "tastefully", but more like "effectively") it's enjoyable.


My point was that, in "Games Of Thrones", I feel pandered to. GoT has a lot of scene scenes that are significant and relevant to the plot. I think about the incest scenes, for instance, or how the way Daenerys tamed her Dothraki husband is shown by her managing to transform their intercourses from quasi-rape to more consensual affairs (reminded me a lot of "Quest for fire", actually). But afterward, there are a lot of completely unnecessary sex scenes, like when the bordello owner (don't remember the name) does a long treaty about the politics of Westeroos while two girls are having a lesbian sex scene.
 
2012-10-23 08:23:56 AM

Evil_John: mhd: The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Anymore? Natalie "Anakin, you're breaking my heart" Portman? When did she ever own a "therious thespian" card?

The Professional.
Black Swan.

And arguably a couple others.


She was good (but miscast) in Hesher.
 
2012-10-23 08:38:05 AM
She is pretty much the worst thing in 90% of her movies. Eye candy and nothing more.
 
2012-10-23 08:55:09 AM
Eh. Kill her off, then hook Thor up with Sif. Problem solved.
 
2012-10-23 08:55:39 AM
She'll make more money in a couple months doing something she doesn't want than I will make in a lifetime of doing what I don't want to do.

Hey Natalie, trade places?
 
2012-10-23 09:04:54 AM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.


Your Highness was farking fantastic.

/So was Black Swan. I'd like to make a Mila out of her Kunis
 
2012-10-23 09:09:06 AM

doglover: So she had to *gasp* honor a legal contract between consenting adults that's been upheld in good faith?

Poor woman!


This.

We can close this thread now.
 
2012-10-23 09:17:11 AM

Nurglitch: DeathByGeekSquad: padraig: RockofAges: I'm not one to complain but there wasn't much goin on in that scene (will admit I just looked it up).

Have you seen Spartacus on Starz? If you're a man, that's required viewing.

To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.

Watch for the nude, stay for the gore.

I like the dialogue...

Also the Jeoffrey-slapping.


Joffrey would get decapitated and neck farked on Spartacus.
 
2012-10-23 09:18:12 AM
thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com

/hot
 
2012-10-23 09:19:44 AM

BeerBear: Iczer: The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.

You have to admit there was one hell of a redeeming feature about that movie:

[i2.kym-cdn.com image 300x287]

And to boot you didn't even have to buy a ticket to see it, they showed it off in the trailers!

thought the saying that wasn't her ass shown in the movie but a stunt double?


Still nice, though.
 
2012-10-23 09:21:16 AM

Sweet Chin Music: Eh. Kill her off, then hook Thor up with Sif. Problem solved.


That's the idea. Well not to kill Jane Foster off...but to hook up Thor and Sif.

As much as I like Natalie Portman, I felt she was the weak link in Thor. And yeah, they sure did do their best to cover up Kat's massive jugs.
 
2012-10-23 09:26:58 AM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.


if she is, I can scrape a couple of bucks together and see what I can get.
 
2012-10-23 09:29:13 AM

spelletrader: [thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com image 594x334]

/hot


MY GOD, THERE IS A GIANT BEHIND NATALIE!

RUN NATALIE! RUUUUUN!!!
 
2012-10-23 09:33:32 AM
Natalie Portman, despite being quite intelligent, strikes me as feeling oh-so-above-it-all. I frankly don't consider her to be a very good actress, with the exception of those roles where she plays a precocious child (where the bar is much lower). It's almost as those she got lots of praise for her acting skills when she was twelve, and then just kinda figured "I'm good, I don't need to get any better" and has been stuck at that level every since.

I also hold her partially responsible for some of the flaws of the Star Wars prequels. I recall and interview where she said something to the effect of "It's so HARD to act in front of a green screen," and I thought to myself, "Lady, you literally get paid to play make-believe. Use your gorram imagination. You don't see Ewan MacGregor complaining."
 
2012-10-23 09:34:11 AM

Tat'dGreaser: padraig: To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.

That must suck to be asexual.


It would suck more to be French.
 
2012-10-23 09:53:58 AM
Thor was one of the worst movies I've seen in years. There were no interesting characters and no character development whatsoever, except for when "sympathetic Thor" abruptly replaced "arrogant Thor" between scenes because he was chastised for dropping a cup of coffee. I don't think any casting could have made that movie interesting.
 
2012-10-23 09:55:55 AM

lamecomedian: I also hold her partially responsible for some of the flaws of the Star Wars prequels. I recall and interview where she said something to the effect of "It's so HARD to act in front of a green screen," and I thought to myself, "Lady, you literally get paid to play make-believe. Use your gorram imagination. You don't see Ewan MacGregor complaining."


eh, I can see where it would be hard to act when there's not really anything to respond to; to say nothing of awful dialogue as well. No actor really came out of those prequels looking good.

I do otherwise agree with your assessment of her; though I think she's a fairly decent actress that tends to be hit or miss in her movie choices. You can definitely tell when she's chosen a role solely for the paycheck.
 
2012-10-23 10:15:10 AM
They should replace her with Mila Kunis.

lamecomedian: I also hold her partially responsible for some of the flaws of the Star Wars prequels. I recall and interview where she said something to the effect of "It's so HARD to act in front of a green screen," and I thought to myself, "Lady, you literally get paid to play make-believe. Use your gorram imagination. You don't see Ewan MacGregor complaining."


You can tell the real thespians in those films (like McGregor or Ian McDiarmid) because they do a good job despite both the green screens and a director who doesn't actually care what kind of performance they give.
 
2012-10-23 10:26:25 AM

padraig:

If you want to see Natalie Portman's ass in all its glory (and there can be no doubt that it is her ass), go and look for the short film "Hotel Chevalier", the prelude to "The Darjeeling Limited". She's got a real hot sex scene with Jason Schwartzamn in it, but thankfully, she's the only one showing skin.


It was a real scene, I'll give you that. But there was no sex and it was tepid at best.
 
2012-10-23 10:26:50 AM
One Thor was enough. Fine, you made it so you could get him in The Avengers, but you can stop now. Save him for the Avengers sequel.

Was I the only one who watched it and thought that they were watching Masters of the Universe, minus Billy Barty?
 
2012-10-23 10:33:15 AM
Forget Thor for a moment, check out this Iron Man 3 trailer
 
2012-10-23 10:35:03 AM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.


That was a good movie and I agree.
 
2012-10-23 10:50:28 AM

The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Tho, I am glad to see she is willing to debase herself for money.


And Phantom Menace.
Fark you, kid.
Do the job you're paid to and signed up for.
Entertain me or leave Hollywood but don't give us this "forced" to.
*I'M* forced to go to work because I need the money.
 
2012-10-23 10:53:35 AM

texdent: Forget Thor for a moment, check out this Iron Man 3 trailer


Interesting.
 
2012-10-23 10:57:50 AM

padraig: But afterward, there are a lot of completely unnecessary sex scenes, like when the bordello owner (don't remember the name) does a long treaty about the politics of Westeroos while two girls are having a lesbian sex scene.


Yeah, that one was dumb. Hot, but dumb. I actually to had to watch a second (or was it seventh?) time without actually looking at the screen so I could focus on what was being said. But to be honest, beyond that much-derided scene, there hans't been much in the way of unnecessary sex. Sure, there have been scenes networks would have found a way to film without nudity, but only to their detriment (Theon and the saltwife, Renly & Margaery, Joffrey & the whores & the sceptre, Tyrion & Shae, Littlefinger in the whorehouse).

So, yeah, I even guess HBO (the pinnacle of adult cable) sometimes falls prey to the 'show ALL of the tits!' trope, but not as often as one might think.
 
2012-10-23 11:01:43 AM

KrispyKritter: contractual agreement you signed does not equal dump truck full of money. it means show up and perform as you were paid to do or deal with our building full of jew lawyers expecting a check from you.

brad pitt making ridiculous commercial for $7 million, now THATS dump truck full of money.


I think your point would have been better made without the antisemitism, particularly in regards to a discussion about a Jewish actor.
 
2012-10-23 11:03:20 AM

padraig: RockofAges: I'm not one to complain but there wasn't much goin on in that scene (will admit I just looked it up).

Have you seen Spartacus on Starz? If you're a man, that's required viewing.

To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.


Odd. Maybe it's because I'm a jaded American, but I find porn to be nowhere near as sexy as nudity in things like Spartacus or GoT.
 
2012-10-23 11:06:25 AM

FeedTheCollapse: lamecomedian: I also hold her partially responsible for some of the flaws of the Star Wars prequels. I recall and interview where she said something to the effect of "It's so HARD to act in front of a green screen," and I thought to myself, "Lady, you literally get paid to play make-believe. Use your gorram imagination. You don't see Ewan MacGregor complaining."

eh, I can see where it would be hard to act when there's not really anything to respond to; to say nothing of awful dialogue as well. No actor really came out of those prequels looking good.

I do otherwise agree with your assessment of her; though I think she's a fairly decent actress that tends to be hit or miss in her movie choices. You can definitely tell when she's chosen a role solely for the paycheck.


Carrie Fisher did a pretty decent job and sometimes I have to remind myself that the dialogue in the OT wasn't as great as I think.
 
2012-10-23 11:09:16 AM

meanmutton: padraig: RockofAges: I'm not one to complain but there wasn't much goin on in that scene (will admit I just looked it up).

Have you seen Spartacus on Starz? If you're a man, that's required viewing.

To be frank, I've never watched a movie, or a series, because there is nude scenes in it. If I want sexual content, I schtup by girlfiend, or watch porn. Maybe I'm jaded because, as a 9-yo French boy, I could see daily girls stripping to their thongs on national TV, but I don't need to be treated as a hormoney teenager every hour of the day. For instance, I think that there is too much sex in Game of Thrones.

Odd. Maybe it's because I'm a jaded American, but I find porn to be nowhere near as sexy as nudity in things like Spartacus or GoT.


Probably because of the sorting algorhythm: If they can act, they are in mainstream movies. If they are hot but can't act, they are in B-movies(Andy Sidaris action porns) if they are reasonably hot, they are in porn. If they aren't even hot, they are in degrading low rent porn.
 
2012-10-23 11:36:34 AM
Natalie Portman is garbage anyhow.

Had she not honored the role, I'd maybe bother seeing the movie.

Considering she's returning... nope.
 
2012-10-23 12:06:00 PM

Zombie Eater: One Thor was enough. Fine, you made it so you could get him in The Avengers, but you can stop now. Save him for the Avengers sequel.

NO.

Was I the only one who watched it and thought that they were watching Masters of the Universe, minus Billy Barty?

YES.

 
2012-10-23 12:10:22 PM
I wonder what the formula is for how much money you can take to do laughable work and still be considered legitimate?
 
2012-10-23 12:11:06 PM

you have pee hands: Thor was one of the worst movies I've seen in years. There were no interesting characters and no character development whatsoever, except for when "sympathetic Thor" abruptly replaced "arrogant Thor" between scenes because he was chastised for dropping a cup of coffee. I don't think any casting could have made that movie interesting.


There was one interesting character. He just happened to be the central antagonist of the Avengers as well.

Thor is a tough transition to modern media just because he's an ancient, pagan god. What I hated is they couldn't commit to Thor being a god, they had to pull the, "It's not magic, it's technology!" card. The comics have no issues showing magical characters next to scientific ones. Thor's abilities are magic, so let them stay that way.
 
2012-10-23 12:12:33 PM
I love it when a backlash comes together ... NTTAWWT.
 
2012-10-23 12:20:20 PM
padraig: My point was that, in "Games Of Thrones",

For what it's worth, every sex scene in the TV show involving Littlefinger or Joffrey was neither in the books (or even hinted at) nor was it in character. I think HBO is trying to make some weird allegory that King's Landing is Cinemax, and The Wall is HBO, and the Others are Honey Boo Boo.
 
2012-10-23 12:21:52 PM

Omis: She is pretty much the worst thing in 90% of her movies. Eye candy and nothing more.


Natalie Portman phoned it in for Thor, I don't expect her to have any more respect for the material if she's given another chance. Give the role to someone who wants it.
/"Hold me like you did on the shores of Lake Naboo, Thor!"
 
2012-10-23 12:24:17 PM

verbaltoxin:
Thor is a tough transition to modern media just because he's an ancient, pagan god. What I hated is they couldn't commit to Thor being a god, they had to pull the, "It's not magic, it's technology!" card.


But.. gritty realism!
 
2012-10-23 12:26:50 PM

verbaltoxin: The comics have no issues showing magical characters next to scientific ones.


Hopefully this won't sound like too much nerd-buckle, every Marvel character-based movie since the first Spider-Man is heavily influenced by what's called Marvel Ultimate. It's basically a modernized re-imagining of the characters, published as a separate line they started in 2000.
 
2012-10-23 12:31:03 PM

lamecomedian: You don't see Ewan MacGregor complaining


Now that's someone I'd like to see in more of these comic films if I'm going to have to watch them.

/graphic novel widow
 
2012-10-23 12:31:31 PM

Loomy: padraig: But afterward, there are a lot of completely unnecessary sex scenes, like when the bordello owner (don't remember the name) does a long treaty about the politics of Westeroos while two girls are having a lesbian sex scene.

Yeah, that one was dumb. Hot, but dumb. I actually to had to watch a second (or was it seventh?) time without actually looking at the screen so I could focus on what was being said. But to be honest, beyond that much-derided scene, there hans't been much in the way of unnecessary sex. Sure, there have been scenes networks would have found a way to film without nudity, but only to their detriment (Theon and the saltwife, Renly & Margaery, Joffrey & the whores & the sceptre, Tyrion & Shae, Littlefinger in the whorehouse).

So, yeah, I even guess HBO (the pinnacle of adult cable) sometimes falls prey to the 'show ALL of the tits!' trope, but not as often as one might think.


It wasn't completely dumb, it was a Ros scene. Any time she's there it is to facilitate what, in the books, would have been an internal monologue or history. On the screen, they just tell her while she gets naked.

Theon, Littlefinger, Pycelle..
 
2012-10-23 12:33:29 PM
What they need to do is have Kat Dennings come out as the real Jane Foster. Natalee Portman was just her body guard so that she could run around unabated and be safe. Problem solved. 

Or better yet, just switch them and say nothing.
 
2012-10-23 12:36:37 PM

Evil_John: mhd: The Stealth Hippopotamus: She was in "Your Highness". She doesn't get to take the high road anymore.

Anymore? Natalie "Anakin, you're breaking my heart" Portman? When did she ever own a "therious thespian" card?

The Professional.
Black Swan.

And arguably a couple others.


DOOD SHE GOT FAMOUS ON THE STAWAR PREEKWEL MEMBER DIS media.nj.com
 
2012-10-23 12:43:44 PM
Natalie Portman was the worst actress in Thor. I was more convinced that Chris Hemsworth was the god of thunder from another planet than I was convinced Natalie Portman was a scientist.
 
2012-10-23 12:49:52 PM

verbaltoxin: There was one interesting character. He just happened to be the central antagonist of the Avengers as well.

Thor is a tough transition to modern media just because he's an ancient, pagan god. What I hated is they couldn't commit to Thor being a god, they had to pull the, "It's not magic, it's technology!" card. The comics have no issues showing magical characters next to scientific ones. Thor's abilities are magic, so let them stay that way.


Loki was alright, though he didn't seem as smart to me as it seemed like he was supposed to. I've heard Avengers is a lot better even from people who didn't like Thor but I haven't gotten around to watching it yet.

Kurmudgeon: Natalie Portman phoned it in for Thor, I don't expect her to have any more respect for the material if she's given another chance. Give the role to someone who wants it.
/"Hold me like you did on the shores of Lake Naboo, Thor!"


I don't know how much control actors have over the script, but she really didn't have much to work with. They said right in the movie that she was acting more like a storm chaser than a scientist, and I'm not sure it was supposed to be a self-aware 4th wall breaking joke. Her character existed basically only to fall in love with Thor and he was pretty one dimensional.
 
2012-10-23 01:14:18 PM

you have pee hands: verbaltoxin: There was one interesting character. He just happened to be the central antagonist of the Avengers as well.

Thor is a tough transition to modern media just because he's an ancient, pagan god. What I hated is they couldn't commit to Thor being a god, they had to pull the, "It's not magic, it's technology!" card. The comics have no issues showing magical characters next to scientific ones. Thor's abilities are magic, so let them stay that way.

Loki was alright, though he didn't seem as smart to me as it seemed like he was supposed to. I've heard Avengers is a lot better even from people who didn't like Thor but I haven't gotten around to watching it yet.

Kurmudgeon: Natalie Portman phoned it in for Thor, I don't expect her to have any more respect for the material if she's given another chance. Give the role to someone who wants it.
/"Hold me like you did on the shores of Lake Naboo, Thor!"

I don't know how much control actors have over the script, but she really didn't have much to work with. They said right in the movie that she was acting more like a storm chaser than a scientist, and I'm not sure it was supposed to be a self-aware 4th wall breaking joke. Her character existed basically only to fall in love with Thor and he was pretty one dimensional.


Well when you consider Thanos gave Loki the mind gem, and got him out of near death or whatever it was at the end of Thor, it's safe to say Loki is indeed not as smart as he thinks he is. Loki, even in the lore though, is not super-genius smart. He's a trickster god, so deceit, treachery, lies, manipulation and illusions are his wheelhouse.
 
2012-10-23 01:18:00 PM
She's not doing it by choice? She chose to sign the multi-picture contract, didn't she? Then yes, she did choose to do the movie.
 
2012-10-23 01:53:05 PM

RockofAges: Have you seen Spartacus on Starz? If you're a man, that's required viewing.


Just skip forward to Lucy Lawless getting fingered by hot chicks, fap, be done with it.

Overrated show is overrated.
 
Skr
2012-10-23 02:24:59 PM
Should have just gotten Keira Knightley to take her place.
 
2012-10-23 04:46:16 PM

mechgreg: Jim_Callahan: Evil_John:
The Professional.
Black Swan.

I don't think you get credit for successfully pulling off a role that literally consists of only "look like a pre-teen" when you actually are a pre-teen.

I'll give you Black Swan, I guess, because even though I wasn't impressed most of the critics were, so I assume that one was a matter of taste, or rather lack of distaste for blatant pandering oscar-bait schlock.

//I so rarely get to pull out the movie nerd hat around here, wheeeee.

Black Swan was totally one of those movies where it was good while you were watching it but as soon as it is over and you have time to think it makes no sense (she managed to do a whole performance like that?) . It was just like the other movie from the same director Requiem for a Dream (New York City ran out of heroin?).


Absolutely. There are two possible theories as to exactly what happened in the end of Black Swan, and neither one of them makes a lick of sense.

WHOOP WHOOP WHOOP SPOILER ALERT WHOOP WHOOP SPOILER ALERT

So, either she was seriously injured and bleeding all over the place during the final performance, in which case she wouldn't have been physically able to perform and there would be blood all over her clothes and the stage and everybody would have noticed from the beginning, or she imagined everything and there was no need for the shocked screams and stuff at the end.

The way you do a vague ending like this is you make two equally possible endings, not two equally impossible endings. One of the worst finales of a major motion picture in years.
 
2012-10-23 05:21:03 PM
sorry subby, all I could see in that headline was:

Natalie Portman is blah, blah, blah forced blah, blah, blah outrageous blah, blah few minutes blah, blah. 

I came.
 
2012-10-23 05:39:33 PM

spelletrader: [thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com image 594x334]

/hot


I would have never guessed they'd let you into a football game with a positron glider.
 
2012-10-23 06:07:24 PM

steve_lou: For what it's worth, every sex scene in the TV show involving Littlefinger or Joffrey was neither in the books (or even hinted at) nor was it in character. I think HBO is trying to make some weird allegory that King's Landing is Cinemax, and The Wall is HBO, and the Others are Honey Boo Boo.


Golf clap. One new keyboard good sir
 
2012-10-23 07:44:28 PM
Just replace her, she's not crucial to the movie. The actress, I mean.
 
2012-10-24 12:34:43 AM
Honestly, I've always thought she was gorgeous, but this is starting to remind me of the crap she pulled with Star Wars. After the first film she was trying to get out of her contract. I always wondered if it was because she came across as a terrible actress in the first one and she didn't want to keep looking terrible or if she decided to make herself worse for the following 2 in protest. She's really hit or miss for me. Sometimes I think she's decent, sometimes she's plain horrible. Either way, she's got a lovely face, but that's not going to last forever. I guess she'll always have her Harvard education and millions of dollars to fall back on once that's gone...
 
2012-10-24 01:48:28 AM
I liked Thor, aside from some slow bits in the middle, around when Thor and Selvig go drinking.

Just come back, I want to see her get to meet his parents, and see what Christopher Ecclestion does with his role.
 
2012-10-24 01:59:02 AM

Second Try: Just replace her, she's not crucial to the movie. The actress, I mean.


Pretty much. As others said, she was the worst part of the movie. At no point did she seem invested in the role, it was watching Natalie Portman performing lines. Even Anthony Hopkins, hammy and not in half the movie, somewhat made you forget he was Anthony Hopkins. Does the second movie even need a big name for legitimacy, after Avengers was so huge?
 
2012-10-24 07:15:07 AM
I found her very believable in Thor. If I was some mythical God with the power to travel across dimensions, I would definitely come to Earth to take her for a spin.
 
2012-10-24 08:00:59 AM

elvindeath: I found her very believable in Thor. If I was some mythical God with the power to travel across dimensions, I would definitely come to Earth to take her for a spin.


They'd better consumate that relationship VERY carefully, so she's not reduced to a bloody smear.
 
2012-10-24 10:05:01 AM
Second Try: Just replace her, she's not crucial to the movie. The actress, I mean.

Duck_of_Doom: Pretty much. As others said, she was the worst part of the movie. At no point did she seem invested in the role, it was watching Natalie Portman performing lines. Even Anthony Hopkins, hammy and not in half the movie, somewhat made you forget he was Anthony Hopkins. Does the second movie even need a big name for legitimacy, after Avengers was so huge?


I'm not sure if it was Portman not being invested in the role (didn't believe her as a scientist for a second) or there just wasn't much chemistry between her and Chris Hemsworth, but their scenes did drain some of the momentum/energy that the movie had up to that point.

Thor 2 would benefit much more having Jane Foster played by a different actress who really wants the part as oppose to an academy award-winner who obviously prefers to be elsewhere.
 
2012-10-24 01:49:38 PM

RockofAges: Jim from Saint Paul: RockofAges: Have you seen Spartacus on Starz? If you're a man, that's required viewing.

Just skip forward to Lucy Lawless getting fingered by hot chicks, fap, be done with it.

Overrated show is overrated.

It's not going to win any "high brow" awards but it's easily the manliest show to hit TV, evar.

As Saint Burgundy said: Agree to disagree.


www.yourememberthat.com
 
Displayed 93 of 93 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report