If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   CNN boss sends email to staff, reminding them to cover for disgraced Candy Crowley   (dustinstockton.com) divider line 306
    More: Followup, Candy Crowley, CNN, garbage bins, Michelle Obama, Rose Garden, political corruption, Dan Rather  
•       •       •

3546 clicks; posted to Politics » on 19 Oct 2012 at 9:09 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



306 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-10-19 04:50:29 PM

GoldSpider: If Obama said something that wasn't true, and she defended it, then why shouldn't she be panned for it?


What Obama said was true. Romney just picked the wrong line of attack trying to insist Obama didn't say that. He could have talked about what Susan Rice saying, instead he fell into a trap. That's how fault, not Candy Crowley's.
 
2012-10-19 06:59:21 PM

goodbomb: What Obama said was true. Romney just picked the wrong line of attack trying to insist Obama didn't say that. He could have talked about what Susan Rice saying, instead he fell into a trap. That's how fault, not Candy Crowley's.


Yeah, Romney had multiple lines of attack that could have been effective, but he either misremembered the talking point, or a credulous staff member (maybe John Bolton) gave him bad intel.

Even funnier were the attempts to carry water for him afterwards.

/Acts of terror are very different than terrorist acts!
//Obama waited 14 days 4 minutes to admit this was terrorism, which is too long
 
2012-10-19 08:39:22 PM
Admins: Stop greenlighting your own blogs. We already know Fark's editorial stances.
 
2012-10-19 09:19:56 PM
So if I have this straight, its ok for employers to threaten to fire employees who don't vote for Romney but when CNN tells its employers to not attack the debate moderator its somehow an outrage?
 
2012-10-20 02:52:52 PM

Lou Brown: But because I believe (regardless of partisan bias) that the moderator should not attempt to fact check a debate in real-time due to the difficulties of doing so in a totally fair and unbiased manner


I have just the opposite view. That real time fact check was one of the most real moments in presidential debate history. It makes me want more real time fact checking, not less.
 
2012-10-20 07:22:32 PM
Another whiny rightist blog.
 
Displayed 6 of 306 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report