If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CBC)   NHL player$ and owner$ not $peaking the $ame language   (cbc.ca) divider line 39
    More: Followup, NHLPA, NHL, Donald Fehr, Eric Staal, Jarome Iginla, NHL players, Gary Bettman, Sidney Crosby  
•       •       •

1060 clicks; posted to Sports » on 19 Oct 2012 at 11:51 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-10-19 03:50:07 PM
4 votes:
Its hard to understand anyone taking the owners side on things.

Owners (-7 years): You will take 57% and like it! No other offers!
Players(-7 years): OK, we cave :(

Owners (now): That 57% deal sucks! Take 50%, and a bunch of other crap!!! No more offers!!! Ignore our record profits!
Players: OK, we will work it down to 50%, but we need to work on how we get there and also on various other parts of the deal.
Owners: NEGOTIATING IN BAD FAITH! NEGOTIATING IN BAD FAITH! YOU ARE HOLDING UP THE GAMES!!!



And at the end of the day, we pay to watch the players, not the owners. I'd rather the players get paid than the owners. sorry.
2012-10-19 12:12:52 PM
4 votes:
If the owners really wanted the whole league of 30 teams to thrive they would put in place a system where the gate receipts (minus the luxury boxes) is split 60/40 like in the NFL. NHL currently has gate receipts going to the home team 100% and of course some teams will make money while others will lose money if the cap is set based on the whole league HRR.

This is another example of greedy owners not being able to control themselves with the contracts that they offer and want the players to take another pay cut after the 2005 CBA which Bettman himself said that it was the deal needed to move NHL forward.

Fact of the matter is that the players' 3rd proposal of yesterday did have a 50/50 split of HRR starting this season as long as all existing contracts were to be paid in full. Owners don't want that after spending the past few offseasons offering 10+years deals worth close to or over 100 mil each.
2012-10-19 12:07:39 PM
4 votes:
Fark the owners, after that deadspin article its obvious there won't be a season
2012-10-19 01:51:34 PM
3 votes:

GavinTheAlmighty: Whiny rich people who get paid to play a game for huge amounts of money complaining about whiny reach people who get paid to play around with a sports team for huge amounts of money.

Rich people problems. Shut up and play the game.


Maybe the owners shouldn't plead poverty after reaping record revenue and handing out giant contracts
2012-10-19 01:39:17 PM
3 votes:

sedric: call me when its over.. I want my hockey same as everyone, but really both sides are being dicks, although i kind of find myself siding with the players, maybe cause i play the sport rather than own a team.

Soon enough the AHL games will be on the tube and although the talent is less its still pro hockey.

Question does gary Bettman ever get a photo taken where you do NOT want to punch his farkin teeth out??

[www.sportsnet.ca image 640x360]

[storage.canoe.ca image 346x520]

[1.bp.blogspot.com image 550x404]


The day the Bettman steps down/is removed as commissioner will be a national holiday in Canada.
2012-10-19 12:59:48 PM
3 votes:

LineNoise: ddam: KarlMaldensNose: What kills me is that Bettman and company spent about as long as it takes for me to put out a decent dump to reject 3 different offers from the NHLPA. Bettman and company must have some other-worldly speed reading skills.

NHL owners do not want to guarantee that 100% of contracts on the books will be paid. Any proposal that has that in it is automatically turned down.

I though the 3rd proposal from the NHLPA is the fairest to both sides. 50/50 split as of this season, cap set at 59 mil with adjustments that only 87% of existing contracts count towards cap while the team is responsible to pay the whole amount.

But you get nowhere near 50% with that even over the course of the whole deal. The number ended up being about the same as it is today for most of the length of it. Keep in mind you have guys with huge 10+ year contracts out there.

Is the owners deal perfect? of course not. But it is a pretty decent starting point. The players pretty much ignored that.


You are at 50/50 from now on. Contracts on the books have to be paid because they have been signed already. The players are against any rollback on existing contracts and for good reason... they rolled back contracts 25% a few years ago.

The teams wanted those 10+year contracts because they wanted to circumvent the salary cap. The teams offered the contracts, not the players.

And until the league puts in sharing of the gates receipts I refuse to believe their rethoric that they care about all 30 teams.
2012-10-19 05:46:58 PM
2 votes:
I'm pretty sure Bettman just hates Hockey in general, he needs a good cross check where there is a boarding penalty.
2012-10-19 03:18:02 PM
2 votes:
Nick Kypreos made a good point on Hockey Central at Noon today. Bettman has a lot of pressure on this negotiation because it's all about clawing back money from the mistake he made in 2004. Goodenow offered the NHL a flat 45.9 frozen salary cap . No escalation with revenues. Bettman turned it down because he wanted the salary cap number to start with a 3 (ended up at $39 million dollar salary cap) with the salary cap to rise with revenues. That mistake cost the owners over $1 billion dollars. This is all about grabbing back some of that money.
2012-10-19 02:26:22 PM
2 votes:

Flappyhead: Sure, if you consider the players agreeing to 50/50 then caving to everything else a decent starting point. Another Farker(raise your hand if you're here) made the same observation when the NHL released that number earlier this week but left out the rest.


There are a few of us who pointed out immediately that the NHL's release of the "50-50" split without any other details was nothing more than a PR move. It seems to have had the desired impact on some fans who can't move past it.
2012-10-19 02:24:18 PM
2 votes:

LineNoise:

Is the owners deal perfect? of course not. But it is a pretty decent starting point. The players pretty much ignored that.


Sure, if you consider the players agreeing to 50/50 then caving to everything else a decent starting point. Another Farker(raise your hand if you're here) made the same observation when the NHL released that number earlier this week but left out the rest. The owners want to cut the giant contracts they signed, limit contract terms(entry, arbitration and UFA), tinker with arbitration and raise the age of free agency. On top of that they still aren't talking about genuine revenue sharing. Again, this wasn't a starting point, it was a PR move.
2012-10-19 02:15:59 PM
2 votes:
Dammit...

I've already resigned myself to following the P-Bruins this season. I like the AHL ,but, well, you know...


And as far as this Bruins' fan is concerned, Jeremy Jacobs can go fark himself.
2012-10-19 01:06:58 PM
2 votes:

LineNoise: ddam: KarlMaldensNose: What kills me is that Bettman and company spent about as long as it takes for me to put out a decent dump to reject 3 different offers from the NHLPA. Bettman and company must have some other-worldly speed reading skills.

NHL owners do not want to guarantee that 100% of contracts on the books will be paid. Any proposal that has that in it is automatically turned down.

I though the 3rd proposal from the NHLPA is the fairest to both sides. 50/50 split as of this season, cap set at 59 mil with adjustments that only 87% of existing contracts count towards cap while the team is responsible to pay the whole amount.

But you get nowhere near 50% with that even over the course of the whole deal. The number ended up being about the same as it is today for most of the length of it. Keep in mind you have guys with huge 10+ year contracts out there.

Is the owners deal perfect? of course not. But it is a pretty decent starting point. The players pretty much ignored that.


And who's fault are those 10 year plus contracts? The owners shouldn't get to sign these huge deals and then say "Um hey, you know all that money we promised you? Yeah, we're not gonna pay you that. Is that ok?" It is laughable to me that Craig Leopold, the guy in Minnesota who earlier in the off season paid 2 guys about 200 million dollars, was at this meeting saying "We can't do this anymore. Please save us from ourselves." The owners did this to themselves and once again want the players to bail them out.
2012-10-19 12:42:47 PM
2 votes:

KarlMaldensNose: What kills me is that Bettman and company spent about as long as it takes for me to put out a decent dump to reject 3 different offers from the NHLPA. Bettman and company must have some other-worldly speed reading skills.


NHL owners do not want to guarantee that 100% of contracts on the books will be paid. Any proposal that has that in it is automatically turned down.

I though the 3rd proposal from the NHLPA is the fairest to both sides. 50/50 split as of this season, cap set at 59 mil with adjustments that only 87% of existing contracts count towards cap while the team is responsible to pay the whole amount.
2012-10-19 12:25:10 PM
2 votes:

WhiskeySticks: Asshole, all of them.


Agreed. Here's to the NHL, SUCKING MY DICK

iconicphotos.files.wordpress.com
2012-10-19 12:14:53 PM
2 votes:

Your Zionist Leader: This incarnation of the NHL has already lost me. Nuke it from orbit, go back to the original 12 or so teams and try again. Deal with these issues up front and come up with some workarounds for when labor deals do expire. And for FSM's sake, don't hire anyone from the NBA for any management jobs


So shut down Edmonton, bring back Oakland?

The NHL has no worries about the fans. How many fans who cheered Boston, Chicago or LA recently, had vowed they were done with the NHL in 04-05. Most came back. All that matters these days is how good the local team is.
2012-10-19 07:56:35 PM
1 votes:
I'm all for both sides making money. But this is farking ridiculous. They lost a season and are in danger of losing another. Does anyone other than die-hard fans (myself included) consider them a "major" sport anymore?

/still have NHL package
//watching past seasons to get my fix
///farging icehole owners and players
////obligatory slashies
2012-10-19 07:55:34 PM
1 votes:

Foxxinnia: [img.badposts.org image 700x600]
Hockey's days are numbered.


Aside from the fact that that table doesn't even attempt to tell the reader what it is measuring - I assume it relates to national television viewership in the US somehow - it does not show that hockey's days are numbered.

For one, I wonder if that chart includes regional television coverage. And for two, hockey is less reliant on Americacentric thinking than anything else on that list. The truth is, hockey is a niche sport in the US outside of the northeast. There's no reason why that should worry anybody. Especially when it is so big in so many other regions.
2012-10-19 07:17:04 PM
1 votes:
Won't admit to past mistakes? saying how they are being run into the ground amongst record profits? Expecting others to cover for their losses after bad business decisions?

Hmm, i wonder how many NHL owners are republicans???
2012-10-19 06:43:41 PM
1 votes:

soopey: Cpt. Dbag Jeff, I asked you in the other thread what one thing the owners wanted that they did not get in the 2005 CBA and you never answered. So what didn't they get?


I'm not sure what the point of the question is. Since that deal was signed, the Canadian Dollar has appreciated in value over 20%, the US had a massive economic melt down and the other big pro leagues have moved to giving their players less than a 50% share. By and large, the NHL's position is pretty obvious: they want to bring the players' share more in line with everyone else, close loopholes that were not anticipated in 2005 and make the league more profitable.


Delawheredad - I am curious to know where you think the "big Canadian money" is going to come from for the rival league. I am also curious to know where this big money expects to play games. Because I can tell you right now that Rogers Centre, the Saddledome, MTS Centre, Air Canada Centre, Scotiabank Place and the Molson Centre are all out. Not to mention every arena in the states controlled by an NHL owner, namely MSG, Philly, Pittsburgh.
2012-10-19 06:29:51 PM
1 votes:

poisonedpawn78: In the end. The relevance of Euro hockey is taking away some of the juice the NHL once had. If the players REALLY wanted to win this, they could all go to Europe and let the NHL big swinging dicks float in the wind. It wont be too long losing 2 billion a year before the owners ditch Buttman and beg the players to come back with a sweet deal.


I said it before... if the NHL isn't interested in playing, they should relinquish the Stanley Cup. Perhaps we need a playoff system between the smaller leagues...
2012-10-19 06:10:46 PM
1 votes:

Delawheredad: The owners want total control. Bettman has them convinced that they can outlast the players that they will voluntarily return to serf status. Of course he is a moron but being a moron is a requirement to be a major league sports commissioner.

--No Hockey this year. probably none next year. Rival league with Canadian money starts up in 2014 and the NFL loses all of its potential players. Bettman is canned and and a smaller more competitive NHL rises in his wake.


And you think Bettman is a moron?
2012-10-19 06:06:15 PM
1 votes:
The owners want total control. Bettman has them convinced that they can outlast the players that they will voluntarily return to serf status. Of course he is a moron but being a moron is a requirement to be a major league sports commissioner.

--No Hockey this year. probably none next year. Rival league with Canadian money starts up in 2014 and the NFL loses all of its potential players. Bettman is canned and and a smaller more competitive NHL rises in his wake.
2012-10-19 03:58:40 PM
1 votes:
From the 2005 CBA. Section 50.4

The Players' Share shall be determined as follows:

(A) For the 2005-06 League Year, the Players' Share shall be fifty-four (54) percent of Actual HRR.

(B) For any League Year (other than the 2005-06 League Year) for which Actual HRR is below $2.2 billion, the Players' Share shall be fifty-four (54) percent of Actual HRR for such League Year.

(C) For any League Year (other than the 2005-06 League Year) for which Actual HRR is equal to or exceeds $2.2 billion, but is below $2.4 billion, the Players' Share shall be a percentage between fifty-five (55) and fifty-six (56) percent of Actual HRR, as adjusted pursuant to subsection (ii) below, for such League Year.

(D) For any League Year (other than the 2005-06 League Year) for which Actual HRR is equal to or exceeds $2.4 billion, but is below $2.7 billion, the Players' Share shall be a percentage between fifty-six (56) and fifty-seven (57) percent of Actual HRR, as adjusted pursuant to subsection (ii) below, for such League Year.194

(E) For any League Year (other than the 2005-06 League Year) for which Actual HRR is equal to or exceeds $2.7 billion, the Players' Share shall be fifty-seven (57) percent of Actual HRR for such League Year.

Link (it's a PDF, sorry. It is on the NHL.com website.)
2012-10-19 03:26:59 PM
1 votes:
As a hockey fan, I'm enjoying the lockout. I'm watching way more hockey then I would be if he NHL was playing. KHL, AHL, and CHL are really good. Even the DEL is entertaining once you get past the players looking like the front quarter panel of a NASCAR. I don't understand all these fake hockey fans biatching that "there's no hockey". There's shiatloads of it. You obviously have an internet connection so use it to watch some hockey or STFU.
2012-10-19 02:45:23 PM
1 votes:

Yanks_RSJ: Flappyhead: Sure, if you consider the players agreeing to 50/50 then caving to everything else a decent starting point. Another Farker(raise your hand if you're here) made the same observation when the NHL released that number earlier this week but left out the rest.

There are a few of us who pointed out immediately that the NHL's release of the "50-50" split without any other details was nothing more than a PR move. It seems to have had the desired impact on some fans who can't move past it.


Now we all know Donald Fehr's Fark handle.
2012-10-19 02:43:19 PM
1 votes:
NHL has officially canceled all games through Nov 1st. Still says they can get in a 82 game season if a contract is signed by thursday.
2012-10-19 02:16:24 PM
1 votes:
The only reaction a fan of hockey should have, in my opinion, is not to care. Take that time and money you would have devoted to NHL fandom and put it somewhere else, you'll probably be just as happy.

You can't, and don't have to, let these people (owners & players) jerk you around. Holds true for all these pro sports that exist only as entertainment.
2012-10-19 01:57:45 PM
1 votes:

Anderson's Pooper: mjohnson71: February and March are going to suck without hockey.

You forgot April, May and June.


This. College hockey goes into late March and early April. After that it's bleak.
2012-10-19 01:27:29 PM
1 votes:
The last lockout around the power was nearly entirely in the NHLs hands.

however this time around I feel like the power isnt entirely the same anymore. The dynamic has shifted with a much larger opportunity for top flight players to take up roots in the KHL, Swiss/Fin/Swede/German leagues.

Especially with the money starting to catch up to the gap between euro hockey pay and NHL hockey pay, the top flight players while losing some, are not losing all of their opportunity. The time right now is RIPE for the players to tell the NHL to go fark themselves. Yeah it sort of leaves the bottom third of the NHL hanging in the wind but i think most of those guys know that even with a full time NHL going the situation for their careers is pretty much the same. On a game by game basis for the most part.

In the end. The relevance of Euro hockey is taking away some of the juice the NHL once had. If the players REALLY wanted to win this, they could all go to Europe and let the NHL big swinging dicks float in the wind. It wont be too long losing 2 billion a year before the owners ditch Buttman and beg the players to come back with a sweet deal.

The amazing thing is that the NHL owners appear to be willing to let Buttman play chicken with 2 billion in revenue for the sake of saving 2-3 franchises that are losing 20-40 million a year. in a worst case scenario thats 6% of revenue.
2012-10-19 01:22:27 PM
1 votes:
People, people, people...

This is all posturing. Even some NHL execs are saying that privately to reporters. Clearly, they're not on the same page yet, the owners and the union. But they're not as far apart as it may seem. The 2 sides are in agreement on the split of money, for once! It's just how to get there that's the worry.

Yes, the players want to get paid in full. And they should want that. Who is on the negotiating team for the owners? The owner of the Minnesota Wild- who signed off on giving 2 players 13 year, $98 million deals just a few months ago. And now he wants to tell them "no, you can't have all that money." Give me a farking break!

If I'm the players, I go in and say "we'll take a 10% rollback on all contracts. BUT the 10% goes into a bank account and is still paid to each player within 5 years after the player's career ends." Because the owners shouldn't be bailed out on their own stupidity, but that would still meet the goals of lowering the cap and getting to a 50-50 split.
2012-10-19 01:20:12 PM
1 votes:

KarlMaldensNose: LineNoise: ddam: KarlMaldensNose: What kills me is that Bettman and company spent about as long as it takes for me to put out a decent dump to reject 3 different offers from the NHLPA. Bettman and company must have some other-worldly speed reading skills.

NHL owners do not want to guarantee that 100% of contracts on the books will be paid. Any proposal that has that in it is automatically turned down.

I though the 3rd proposal from the NHLPA is the fairest to both sides. 50/50 split as of this season, cap set at 59 mil with adjustments that only 87% of existing contracts count towards cap while the team is responsible to pay the whole amount.

But you get nowhere near 50% with that even over the course of the whole deal. The number ended up being about the same as it is today for most of the length of it. Keep in mind you have guys with huge 10+ year contracts out there.

Is the owners deal perfect? of course not. But it is a pretty decent starting point. The players pretty much ignored that.

And who's fault are those 10 year plus contracts? The owners shouldn't get to sign these huge deals and then say "Um hey, you know all that money we promised you? Yeah, we're not gonna pay you that. Is that ok?" It is laughable to me that Craig Leopold, the guy in Minnesota who earlier in the off season paid 2 guys about 200 million dollars, was at this meeting saying "We can't do this anymore. Please save us from ourselves." The owners did this to themselves and once again want the players to bail them out.


Sounds to me the answer is to let the owners reduce the current contracts by whatever percentage they want, but give any player who's contract is altered the ability to walk away as a UFA. IF the owners don't want to pay them, fine, but they should be allowed to quit and find work elsewhere instead of taking a pay cut with no recourse. I know damn well if my boss came to me and said "Abmoraz, you know you are a valued employee here, but we can't afford to keep paying you at the current rate. We need you to take a 25% pay cut" that I would be knocking on our competitor's door seeing if they were willing to pay a "valued employee" what he thought he was worth.

Contracts work both ways.
2012-10-19 01:19:35 PM
1 votes:

Hyperbolic Hyperbole: Football season is not long enough to sustain my sports needs


February and March are going to suck without hockey.
2012-10-19 01:16:45 PM
1 votes:
Football season is not long enough to sustain my sports needs
2012-10-19 01:13:00 PM
1 votes:

wooden_badger: For anyone thinking this will end soon, remember these two key points.

1. The owners have already destroyed one season. They seem to be perfectly willing to do it again, especially with Jeremy Jacobs as the chair of the Board of Governors.
2. The players union selected Donald (screw the World Series) Fehr as their Executive Director.


Some men just want to watch the world burn.
2012-10-19 01:09:36 PM
1 votes:
Witness the magic of the Bettman and stand agape in awe:

"[We're] going to get a deal done" - Gary Bettman to some dude, October 18, 2012, approximately 2:15 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

"We were done in an hour today because there was really nothing there." - Gary Bettman to reporters, October 18, 2012, 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.


Taken from the Puck Daddy article.. Link
2012-10-19 01:07:54 PM
1 votes:

KarlMaldensNose: The owners did this to themselves and once again want the players to bail them out.


Yeah, but they offered a deal that had a big "50-50" on the cover page, so skip over all the other details and just pretend they're the good guys here.
2012-10-19 12:18:03 PM
1 votes:

Decillion: Your Zionist Leader: This incarnation of the NHL has already lost me. Nuke it from orbit, go back to the original 12 or so teams and try again. Deal with these issues up front and come up with some workarounds for when labor deals do expire. And for FSM's sake, don't hire anyone from the NBA for any management jobs

So shut down Edmonton, bring back Oakland?

The NHL has no worries about the fans. How many fans who cheered Boston, Chicago or LA recently, had vowed they were done with the NHL in 04-05. Most came back. All that matters these days is how good the local team is.


Within reason of course. And I don't know about it this time, a good number of casual fans are still gone from before and now they're chipping away at the die hards. Of course hockey in places like Detroit, Montreal, Boston, etc will carry on business as usual. The teams more on the fringe will be the ones hit, and in the end, in my opinion, they will have to deal with contraction over relocation because they've just done too much damage to the product.
2012-10-19 11:58:47 AM
1 votes:
For anyone thinking this will end soon, remember these two key points.

1. The owners have already destroyed one season. They seem to be perfectly willing to do it again, especially with Jeremy Jacobs as the chair of the Board of Governors.
2. The players union selected Donald (screw the World Series) Fehr as their Executive Director.
2012-10-19 11:54:21 AM
1 votes:
And not a fark was given for the fourth place sports league.
 
Displayed 39 of 39 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report