If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(LA Times)   If you have to screw up the facts in a debate, try not to screw up on gun control. Especially if you're the leader of the God, Guns and More Guns party   (latimes.com) divider line 18
    More: Fail, automatic weapon, semiautomatic firearms, federal assault weapons ban, arms industries, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives  
•       •       •

4300 clicks; posted to Politics » on 17 Oct 2012 at 10:38 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-10-17 10:54:43 AM
3 votes:
Obama: But I also share your belief that weapons that were designed for soldiers in war theaters don't belong on our streets. And so what I'm trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence generally. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced. But part of it is also looking at other sources of the violence. Because frankly, in my home town of Chicago, there's an awful lot of violence and they're not using AK-47s. They're using cheap hand guns.

Finally someone said this out loud.
2012-10-17 11:00:27 AM
2 votes:
If the NRA isn't just a wing of the GOP at this point, without any principles at all, they are sure trying hard to look like it.

Since being elected, Obama hasn't lifted a finger to change any gun laws, and has actively worked to shoot down any anti-gun legislative proposal from within his own party.

Romney, on the other hand, has a strong record on gun-control legislation, which might even help him with moderate voters, except that he tries to run away from it as fast as possible. If the NRA was really non-partisan, I would think that Obama would have received their endorsement in this cycle, which leads me to conclude that the NRA doesn't give a damn about the 2nd amendment, and are only a branch of the GOP.
2012-10-17 10:49:22 AM
2 votes:
i.imgur.com

He's single ladies, and by marring him and having his children, you might just save the lives of dozens of people.
2012-10-17 09:13:53 AM
2 votes:

Diogenes: So was he saying their ban in his state was cool because opposing sides cooperated? If so, WTF does that have to do with core issue and whether there should be such restrictions?

I'm not arguing one side or the other. I just want to know what the hell Romney was saying (or wasn't, as the case may be).


He was saying whatever he thought would benefit him the most at the time. And he's tried to use the bipartisanship of the Mass Legislature during his tenure as Governor to say something he supported was good, but other people supporting the same thing aren't

It's how RomneyCare was a bipartisan free market solution to a health insurance problem, but National RomneyCare ObamaCare was a hyper partisan take over of health insurance.
2012-10-17 09:10:29 AM
2 votes:
That was pretty bad - another example of reflexive lying on Romney's part. But what really had me scratching my head was the part about Massachusetts and how whatever the hell they had there was the result of bipartisanship and pro- and anti-gun cooperation.

So was he saying their ban in his state was cool because opposing sides cooperated? If so, WTF does that have to do with core issue and whether there should be such restrictions?

I'm not arguing one side or the other. I just want to know what the hell Romney was saying (or wasn't, as the case may be).
2012-10-17 01:57:15 PM
1 votes:
According to their own rules and bylaws, the NRA should be support the incumbent-President.

It's not a grey area, it's pretty black & white.
2012-10-17 11:48:17 AM
1 votes:

GranoblasticMan: globalwarmingpraiser: Because having better home lives is proven to reduce violence.

So what can either candidate do to improve home lives? I still don't understand what your point is.


Well, not offer them support services like food stamps or other "welfare" programs. Because if I know anything about creating better homes lives, all you need to do is pile on crippling financial worry and the home life just improves dramatically.
2012-10-17 11:45:54 AM
1 votes:

thurstonxhowell: globalwarmingpraiser: Actual science that says children with a two parent household do better. OMG ROMNEY WANTS WOMEN ABUSED.

I'd like to debate the merits of his statement, but I have been brainwashed by my parents' divorce and, as such, will be spending the rest of the day choking infants.


My mom got divorced two times so now I have non-stop gay sex in front of whole some families being supported by welfare and only breaking for brunch

Anything to destroy American families.
2012-10-17 11:33:52 AM
1 votes:

globalwarmingpraiser: Because having better home lives is proven to reduce violence.


So is being born white.
2012-10-17 11:31:31 AM
1 votes:

globalwarmingpraiser: Because having better home lives is proven to reduce violence.


So is being raised by lesbians. Why didn't he bring that up?
2012-10-17 11:05:55 AM
1 votes:

globalwarmingpraiser: thurstonxhowell: Guns don't kill people, children of women who leave abusive men kill people. Stay with him no matter what, ladies.

Link

Link

Actual science that says children with a two parent household do better. OMG ROMNEY WANTS WOMEN ABUSED. This is what makes people like me afraid Romney is going to win big. Guess what, Obama admitted he wants to ban scary looking rifle's. He then admitted they really aren't the problem. Guns that poor people can afford are that problem.


Did you actually read what you linked? It specifically mentions calm two parent households. So yeah staying in an abusive relationship "for the children" is bullshait.
2012-10-17 11:04:38 AM
1 votes:

CokeBear: Since being elected, Obama hasn't lifted a finger to change any gun laws


Actually, that's not correct.

He's enacted legislation increasing gun rights. But don't tell the derpers if you don't find people holding their hands over their ears to be a pretty sight.
2012-10-17 11:04:10 AM
1 votes:
The bolded portion below are the last words of the exchange in the Fox transcript. Italicized you will find the portion they omitted from their transcript. Underlined is where they pick back up again.

ROMNEY: ...certain guns illegal. We, of course, don't want to have automatic weapons, and that's already
illegal in this country to have automatic weapons. What I believe is
we have to do, as the president mentioned towards the end of his
remarks there, which is to make enormous efforts to enforce the gun
laws that we have, and to change the culture of violence that we have.

And you ask how - how are we going to do that? And there are a
number of things. He mentioned good schools. I totally agree. We
were able to drive our schools to be number one in the nation in my
state. And I believe if we do a better job in education, we'll -
we'll give people the - the hope and opportunity they deserve and
perhaps less violence from that. But let me mention another thing.
And that is parents. We need moms and dads, helping to raise kids.
Wherever possible the - the benefit of having two parents in the
home, and that's not always possible. A lot of great single moms,
single dads. But gosh to tell our kids that before they have babies,
they ought to think about getting married to someone, that's a great
idea.

Because if there's a two parent family, the prospect of living in
poverty goes down dramatically. The opportunities that the child will
- will be able to achieve increase dramatically. So we can make
changes in the way our culture works to help bring people away from
violence and give them opportunity, and bring them in the American
system. The - the greatest failure we've had with regards to - to
gun violence in some respects is what - what is known as Fast and
Furious. Which was a program under this administration, and how it
worked exactly I think we don't know precisely, where thousands of
automatic, and AK-47 type weapons were - were given to people that
ultimately gave them to - to drug lords.

They used those weapons against - against their own citizens and
killed Americans with them. And this was a - this was a program of
the government. For what purpose it was put in place, I can't
imagine. But it's one of the great tragedies related to violence in
our society which has occurred during this administration. Which I
think the American people would like to understand fully, it's been
investigated to a degree, but - but the administration has carried
out executive privilege to prevent all of the information from coming
out.

I'd like to understand who it was that did this, what the idea
was behind it, why it led to the violence, thousands of guns going to
Mexican drug lords.
OBAMA: Candy?

CROWLEY: Governor, Governor, if I could, the question was about
these assault weapons that once were once banned and are no longer
banned.

I know that you signed an assault weapons ban when you were in
Massachusetts, obviously, with this question, you no longer do support
that. Why is that, given the kind of violence that we see sometimes
with these mass killings? Why is it that you have changed your mind?

ROMNEY: Well, Candy, actually, in my state, the pro-gun folks
and the anti-gun folks came together and put together a piece of
legislation. And it's referred to as an assault weapon ban, but it
had, at the signing of the bill, both the pro-gun and the anti-gun
people came together, because it provided opportunities for both that
both wanted.

There were hunting opportunities, for instance, that haven't
previously been available and so forth, so it was a mutually agreed-
upon piece of legislation. That's what we need more of, Candy. What
we have right now in Washington is a place that's gridlocked.

CROWLEY: So I could - if you could get people to agree to it,
you would be for it?

ROMNEY: We have -

OBAMA: Candy?

ROMNEY: - we haven't had the leadership in Washington to work
on a bipartisan basis. I was able to do that in my state and bring
these two together.

CROWLEY: Quickly, Mr. President.

OBAMA: The - first of all, I think Governor Romney was for an
assault weapons ban before he was against it. And he said that the
reason he changed his mind was, in part, because he was seeking the
endorsement of the National Rifle Association. So that's on the
record.

But I think that one area we agree on is the important of parents
and the importance of schools, because I do believe that if our young
people have opportunity, then they are less likely to engage in these
kinds of violent acts. We're not going to eliminate everybody who is
mentally disturbed and we have got to make sure they don't get
weapons.


OBAMA: because I do believe that if our young people have
opportunity, then they're less likely to engage in these kind of
violent acts. 
2012-10-17 10:59:30 AM
1 votes:

Calmamity: I'm a gun enthusiast, so if it weren't for all the racism, sexism and homophobia written in to the Republican platform and the fact that trickle-down economic policies have been an unquestionable disaster for the country, I could almost think about not voting for Obama


Considering Romney has enacted legislation restricting gun rights and Obama's only legislation regarding guns has been to expand rights, I've got to ask... wha?
2012-10-17 10:52:57 AM
1 votes:
I'm a gun enthusiast, so if it weren't for all the racism, sexism and homophobia written in to the Republican platform and the fact that trickle-down economic policies have been an unquestionable disaster for the country, I could almost think about not voting for Obama.

You guys get rid of all that other stuff and you got yourself a single-issue voter right here.
2012-10-17 10:46:02 AM
1 votes:
2012-10-17 09:29:15 AM
1 votes:

Diogenes: If it were anyone but Romney, I'd claim you're not making any sense.


One of the best parts about Romney's campaign is that my occasionally nonsensical stream of consciousness usually work. So I appreciate him for that to some degree.
2012-10-17 09:04:07 AM
1 votes:
3.bp.blogspot.com

"Gun Grabbers like MItt Romney are notoriously ignorant about firearms and laws relating to firearms"
 
Displayed 18 of 18 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report