If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(BBC)   Rain cancels Battle of Hastings. This is not a repeat from 1066   (bbc.co.uk) divider line 69
    More: Amusing, Battle of Hastings, English Heritage, William the Conqueror  
•       •       •

4119 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Oct 2012 at 8:59 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



69 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-10-15 08:03:20 AM  
A quick change of clothes and they could have done Agincourt.
 
2012-10-15 08:38:59 AM  
(Gives the two finger salute to the weather)
 
2012-10-15 08:42:52 AM  
One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers
 
2012-10-15 08:45:40 AM  

cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers


And yet, civil war re-enactments are very popular in the South.
 
2012-10-15 08:48:27 AM  

Cythraul: cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers

And yet, civil war re-enactments are very popular in the South.


Ahh, this is true.

That puts it in perspective for me.
 
2012-10-15 09:05:39 AM  
You know who else canceled historical reenactments?

/Godwinsoned
 
2012-10-15 09:06:05 AM  
[c-geek-story-b]

I was lucky enough to get ticket #1066 from our bug tracking system. I, of course, close the ticket with "Like William before me, 1066 passes into the history books as a victorious battle".

nobody got it.

:(

[/c-geek-story-b]
 
2012-10-15 09:06:44 AM  

Cythraul: cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers

And yet, civil war re-enactments are very popular in the South.


Well... At this point, just think of how mixed the blood of the Britons and Normans must be, after 946 years. It'd be impossible to find a purely British person, I'd imagine.

At least down South you can still find people without a drop of Yankee blood in them.
 
2012-10-15 09:07:18 AM  

cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers


You know the Normans stayed so at least for some their forefathers were the winners
 
2012-10-15 09:09:00 AM  

cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers


I don't know about that. I bet most of the people involved here have *some* Norman ancestry.
 
2012-10-15 09:15:48 AM  

FriarReb98: Cythraul: cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers

And yet, civil war re-enactments are very popular in the South.

Well... At this point, just think of how mixed the blood of the Britons and Normans must be, after 946 years. It'd be impossible to find a purely British person, I'd imagine.

At least down South you can still find people without a drop of Yankee blood in them.


'Yankee blood' - that's funny. And I'd think it'd be a bit difficult to start buttoning down a definitive 'British' bloodline. Or any bloodline, for that matter. Well, most, anyway. The more isolated a genetic stock, the easier that would probably be. As for countries in Europe, they've invaded, settled, and raped each other so much, you can really only start genetically categorizing regions of Europe.

I've read where geneticists say otherwise, but I have yet to read exactly how they go about determining how someone has a certain amount of 'British' genetics.
 
2012-10-15 09:16:53 AM  

cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers


I'd bet a good percentage of the people there have Norman heritage, or mixed, or part of the orignal peoples conquered by the Anglo-Saxons.
 
2012-10-15 09:17:13 AM  

Cythraul: I've read where geneticists say otherwise, but I have yet to read exactly how they go about determining how someone has a certain amount of 'British' genetics.


Dental records?

/yea, cheap shot
 
2012-10-15 09:22:10 AM  
Hastings was fairly important. It directed England towards the heart of europe, rather than scandanavia.
 
2012-10-15 09:25:34 AM  
All right......Hastings!
 
2012-10-15 09:26:43 AM  

Therion: A quick change of clothes and they could have done Agincourt.


You sound like a guy named Henry, who is legend to have drunk a Fifth on St. Crispin's day.
 
2012-10-15 09:28:42 AM  

Therion: A quick change of clothes and they could have done Agincourt.


But they would have needed a lot more horses.
 
2012-10-15 09:28:47 AM  

Therion: A quick change of clothes and they could have done Agincourt.


Came for this
 
2012-10-15 09:29:21 AM  

cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers


They're the product of the conquest so of course they would be celebrating it.
 
2012-10-15 09:30:20 AM  
It would have been brilliant if they issued bumbershoots instead.
 
2012-10-15 09:32:08 AM  
It's my life goal to live until the 1000th anniversary of the Battle of Hastings. I'll be pretty dang old by then.
 
2012-10-15 09:39:46 AM  
I'll be 101.
 
2012-10-15 09:41:19 AM  

Lady Beryl Ersatz-Wendigo: It's my life goal to live until the 1000th anniversary of the Battle of Hastings. I'll be pretty dang old by then.


So... Fark Party for the 1000th anniversary then?
 
2012-10-15 09:43:03 AM  
www.madmumblings.com
 
2012-10-15 09:45:51 AM  
Hastings used its little gray cells
 
2012-10-15 09:46:58 AM  
Harfleur == Seahawks win over the Packers
Agincourt == Seahawks win over the Patriots

Granted the two aren't exactly the same, mainly Henry Vth won both of those in away battles.
 
2012-10-15 09:47:46 AM  
My Norman ancestors fought in Hastings in 1066, so I'm getting a kick out of this reenactment.
 
2012-10-15 09:50:26 AM  
thenewcomer.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-10-15 09:51:37 AM  
My Ancestor was the original King of England who was defeated at the Battle of Hastings in 1066 ;- ))
 
2012-10-15 09:54:47 AM  

Lady Beryl Ersatz-Wendigo: It's my life goal to live until the 1000th anniversary of the Battle of Hastings. I'll be pretty dang old by then.


I've decided that I want to see the next millennium.
 
2012-10-15 09:56:44 AM  

StarFyre: My Ancestor was the original King of England who was defeated at the Battle of Hastings in 1066 ;- ))


I didn't vote for him
 
2012-10-15 10:09:18 AM  

StarFyre: My Ancestor was the original King of England who was defeated at the Battle of Hastings in 1066 ;- ))


So you're related to the man who caused all this needless bloodshed? Mazel tov.

Actually..deciding the English royalty by way of tournament bracket should become SOP.

(2) Godwinson V (3) Hardrada
(1) William - bye (due to actual blood familial relation)

(1) William v. (2) Godwinson

Wonder what the bracket would look like once the crown needs to be passed again.
 
2012-10-15 10:09:48 AM  
I guess some things never change. Rich guys starting wars and peons celebrating them for generations.

/William's net worth: $229.5 Billion (inflation adjusted)
//Learned that just yesterday, here on fark
 
2012-10-15 10:10:04 AM  
If Harold had won the Battle of Hastings then most likely there wouldn't have been the need for the Magna Carta. In Anglo-Saxon society women had basic rights, even the right to divorce if their man could not satisfy them - true. The Normans were horrible caretakers of England.
 
2012-10-15 10:13:50 AM  

Therion: A quick change of clothes and they could have done Agincourt.


Well played. You received an 'A' for the course. Remember though that the armor worn by Norman knights wasn't nearly as encumbering as that worn by French knights centuries later, so it's more than a simple change of clothes.

FriarReb98: Cythraul: cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers

And yet, civil war re-enactments are very popular in the South.

Well... At this point, just think of how mixed the blood of the Britons and Normans must be, after 946 years. It'd be impossible to find a purely British person, I'd imagine.

At least down South you can still find people without a drop of Yankee blood in them.


I think perhaps there's probably more than a few "pure Southerns" who's great great grandma's weren't as virginal and/or unwilling as you suspect....Yankee cavalry turned up in the darndest places, as did children nine months or so later. Naturally great, great grandpa Jedidiah wondered why his beautiful wife gave birth a month or so early, but then he was just glad to be home from the war and he never was good at math.
 
2012-10-15 10:14:02 AM  
I am actually a descendant of William the Conqueror. Found that out while doing geneological research back in high school.

Turns out he's my great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, grandfather. (That is 34 Greats).
 
2012-10-15 10:19:19 AM  

cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers


It's so far in the past that both sides are their ancestors now. 300 years before that, it was Danish Vikings settling in on the East side of the island, or just leaving their genes in a few Saxon women. The "English" are mutts, if a WASP is being racist, you have a free pass to laugh in his or her face.

/Anglo-American, so even more muttish than regular Anglo Saxons
 
2012-10-15 10:21:02 AM  
I would have been King of England just like you until I took an an arrow to the eye
 
2012-10-15 10:21:37 AM  
ALso I can tell who has played Crusader Kings games by reading this thread >:)
 
2012-10-15 10:22:11 AM  
Normans surrender?
 
2012-10-15 10:35:36 AM  

FriarReb98: Cythraul: cman: One would think that these folk would not be celebrating the conquest of their forefathers

And yet, civil war re-enactments are very popular in the South.

Well... At this point, just think of how mixed the blood of the Britons and Normans must be, after 946 years. It'd be impossible to find a purely British person, I'd imagine.

At least down South you can still find people without a drop of Yankee blood in them.


THey were Saxons before that. Once Norman and Saxon culture mixed you got English culture
 
2012-10-15 11:16:49 AM  
ah, the Battle of Hastings. i was there, man. it was hardcore.

hastings is HQed in amarillo, tx. in the day they had 2 stores there. when someone firebombed the lesser of the two, using the night video drop, that was awesome.

and they deserve anything they got.

in the Great Whitehats vs. Punks battle of Amarillo, the noble Brian Deneke (seriously, google him. it's fascinating) was felled by an alpha Whitehat. John Marmaduke, the King of Hastings, funded the Whitehat's defense, and the murderer got an amazingly light sentence for the incredibly brutal hate crime he committed.

soon after, Hastings clerks were known to be giving away huge moneys of free merchandise to anyone sympathetic to the cause. walk thru a register with $200 in CDs and a $1 candy bar, and that purchase cost you $1. 'cause fark John Marmaduke.

ah, the Battle of Hastings...

s19.postimage.org
 
2012-10-15 11:21:34 AM  

Silverstaff: I am actually a descendant of William the Conqueror. Found that out while doing geneological research back in high school.

Turns out he's my great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, grandfather. (That is 34 Greats).


He wasn't that great
 
2012-10-15 11:27:26 AM  
Rain makes things pretty dangerous.

You wouldn't want anyone to put an eye out.
 
2012-10-15 11:30:35 AM  

Rusty Shackleford: Rain makes things pretty dangerous.

You wouldn't want anyone to put an eye out.


You can't tell me what to do. It's like you don't even know me.
 
2012-10-15 11:31:55 AM  

Silverstaff: I am actually a descendant of William the Conqueror. Found that out while doing geneological research back in high school.

Turns out he's my great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, grandfather. (That is 34 Greats).


If you go back 11 generations pretty much everyone is related to everyone. If you have to go back 34 generations to find a famous relative then your family is not as good as the average...
 
2012-10-15 11:34:05 AM  
Also, does anyone else know what sort of wood the shields were made out of? (I know the guy that probably made the shields in the image in TFA, the round ones anyway)
 
2012-10-15 11:43:41 AM  

dready zim: Also, does anyone else know what sort of wood the shields were made out of? (I know the guy that probably made the shields in the image in TFA, the round ones anyway)


Dead?
 
2012-10-15 11:49:39 AM  

Gyrth: If Harold had won the Battle of Hastings then most likely there wouldn't have been the need for the Magna Carta. In Anglo-Saxon society women had basic rights, even the right to divorce if their man could not satisfy them - true. The Normans were horrible caretakers of England.


"What ifs?" love them... :-)

No Norman conquest of England -> no Norman invasions of Ireland, Scotland, Wales.

The Normans instead turn south in search of conquest, systematically dismantling the Byzantine Empire. By 1185 they besiege and take Constantinople and establish a state there--Bohemond I is crowned Emperor. The resulting Norman Dynasty ruled the Empire until 1918, and combined the administrative machinery of the Byzantines, and Arabs with their own conceptions of feudal law and order to forge a unique government. Under this state, there was great religious freedom, and alongside the Norman nobles existed a meritocratic bureaucracy of Jews, Muslims, and Christians. The Normans reexpands the Empire eastward, taking Anatolia and expanding to the borders of Armenia, later turning south to take with is now Syria, Lebanon, and Cyprus. It was from Cyprus that many of the later Crusades were launched into the Holy Land by western European nobles, and the Norman Byzantine rulers managed to successfully steer these nobles toward Arab conquest and away from their own lands. In the west, they were able to strengthen the hold of the Empire on the Balkans. It was however in their wars with the Ottoman Turks (early 1300s to mid-1400s that the Normans had their finest hour, successfully turning back the Otttomans through a series of brutal wars, culminating the victory of Robert VIII over Murad II in 1444 at the Battle of Alexandretta.

And so on... ;-)
 
2012-10-15 11:52:44 AM  

HenryFnord: dready zim: Also, does anyone else know what sort of wood the shields were made out of? (I know the guy that probably made the shields in the image in TFA, the round ones anyway)

Dead?


Possibly not (but most likely). Using greenwood then allowing it to dry in place can form joints which naturally stay in place without glue.

It`s plywood. When I saw the guy making the shields I said "Why are you using modern plywood, isn`t that all modern and cheating?" and was told that plywood has been in use for over 2000 years and used for shields for well over 1000 years...

check out the date for `first use of plywood`
 
Displayed 50 of 69 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report