If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Chicago Sun-Times)   Only in Chicago can you get a federal bribery conviction overturned because you accepted too small of a bribe   (suntimes.com) divider line 6
    More: Asinine, Chicago, Gary Bauer, appeals court, technicality, building codes, bribes, convictions, conviction overturned  
•       •       •

5903 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 Oct 2012 at 8:42 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-10-12 09:50:41 AM
2 votes:
Whew -- it's a good thing there's no one from Chicago with any real power in American politics.
2012-10-12 09:11:37 AM
2 votes:
It's OK, submitter. Some people are stupid. You're just one of them.
2012-10-12 09:15:17 AM
1 votes:
Justices ruled that Owens should not have been convicted because prosecutors didn't prove the bribes he took were worth more than $5,000, as the law requires.

Dumb requirement, but if that's what law, he should never have been convicted for two $600 bribes. I don't like the government enforcing criminal laws that don't exist when the crime occurred.
2012-10-12 09:07:41 AM
1 votes:

Nickster79: Slaxl: So what's the minimum illegal bribe level? Is it cumulative? Can you promise someone $600 a day bribe until they've had $50,000 from you?

Someone needs to make a chart.


The law they prosecuted him under sets the amount at $5000. If he didn't accept at least that much, then he didn't violate that particular law. If there is another law that sets a lower amount, then they should have prosecuted him under that one.
2012-10-12 08:55:43 AM
1 votes:
cdn.visiontoamerica.org
2012-10-12 08:45:53 AM
1 votes:
Owens' attorney Michael Nash declared his client "delighted" with the ruling. He rejected the idea that Owens got off on a technicality, adding "it was because he was not guilty."

Oh God this is the best part. "Sure, he took $600 and we said as much in court and on the record. But he didn't get off on a technicality, he's not guilty!"
 
Displayed 6 of 6 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report