If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Toronto Sun) Weeners Eins, zwei, snippa   (torontosun.com) divider line 79
    More: Weeners  
•       •       •

7150 clicks; posted to Main » on 11 Oct 2012 at 2:33 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



79 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-10-11 03:40:53 PM  
Circumcision thread! In before it's cut off!
 
2012-10-11 03:42:27 PM  

zippolight2002: So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis


No change in functionality? Don't cut guys need to use lube to jerk off? Suckers! Think of all the money we intact guys save never needing to buy lube!
 
2012-10-11 03:43:12 PM  
Cutting tissue off infant genitalia to prevent unlikely health problems arising years if not decades later.

Seems legit.
 
2012-10-11 03:51:05 PM  

RobSeace: zippolight2002: So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis

No change in functionality? Don't cut guys need to use lube to jerk off? Suckers! Think of all the money we intact guys save never needing to buy lube!


Touche. Not only money, but lube is a pain in the ass to clean up.

/intentional
 
2012-10-11 03:55:39 PM  

12349876: zippolight2002: 12349876: zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.

What about tonsils and appendixes? Don't need those. Let's ditch them at birth so the baby won't remember and there's no future health problems.

Now I think you're trollin.

It's a slippery slope argument. Where do we stop? Let's go ahead and fix hook noses at birth too. Why should circumcision be the only "appearance" thing that should be done at birth without consent?


What do they do with pseudo-tails?
 
2012-10-11 03:56:13 PM  

pedobearapproved: Kazan: We don't allow people to do the same thing to girls for religious (or other reasons), we shouldn't be allowing this to be done to little boys.

A) "health benefits" - dubious at best... more easily attained by showering and wearing condoms. 'studies' that support this shown to have methodological flaws and cannot be replicated in first world countries
B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too
E) "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER

i could drop a few pages of data on this subject right now.. but last time i did it didn't get anywhere anyway.

i'm out of this thread now. FLAME ON

a) Male and female circumcision are not equivalents
b) Anger won't make your foreskin grow back.


Assault and murder are also not equivalents. They are both still wrong, however.
 
2012-10-11 04:08:01 PM  
not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.
 
2012-10-11 04:09:08 PM  

Heamer: What did the leper say to the hooker?

Keep the tip.


So this obstetrician is retiring after being in practice for 50 years. As the old doctor is cleaning out his office, he comes across this huge jar of formaldehyde containing the foreskin of all the little boys he's circumcised during his lengthy career.

Being the sentimental & frugal type, the old doctor decides to take this massive jar of foreskin to his tailor to fashion something out of it as a keepsake for his many years in practice.

Upon delivering the jar of foreskin, his tailor asks, "What would you like for me to make, Doc?"
The old doctor replies, "Oh, I don't know. Surprise me."
The tailor says, "No problem. I'll have something for you in a weeks time."

A week passes and the old doctor goes back to the tailor and asks, "So, what did you make for me?"
The tailor places a wallet on the counter, to which the old doctor queries, "I brought you that enormous jar of foreskin last week and all you made out of if was a wallet?"
"Relax" says the tailor, "If you rub on it for a little bit, it turns into a briefcase!"

www.nubblies.net
I'm here all week!
 
2012-10-11 04:18:03 PM  

VonEvilstein: Assault and murder are also not equivalents. They are both still wrong, however.


don't even try to explain to them the similarities between the two.. then you start getting just mind numbingly stupid levels of "NUUHHH UHUHHH!" type shiat.
 
2012-10-11 04:20:20 PM  

Marcintosh: not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.


Actually, they do exist. And plenty of men restore their foreskin, some surgically, some not.
 
2012-10-11 04:31:39 PM  

zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.



The point is that you'd have nothing to compare it to. You can still hear without ears, dummy. It was a joke. I thought you'd see past that.
Anyway, so if you do something to you body that doesn't change the fucntionality, it's ok?

Alright, maybe your folks should have scissored your nipples off as a baby. Derp.
 
2012-10-11 04:32:34 PM  

thunderbird8804: Dr. John Harvey Kellogg recommended circumcision of boys caught masturbating, writing: "A remedy for masturbation which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering anesthetic, as the pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment." (this guy is largely responsible for its prevalence in the US)


He wasn't the first.

Long before Kellogg was even born, in the 1830s or 40s, there was a French physician by the name Claude François Lallemand who wrote about the dangers of seminal losses (sometimes called "spermattorhea") and the need to prevent masturbation by extreme measures such as circumcision. Supposedly his work was translated into various languages, and disregarded by everyone except a few doctors in England who subsequently influenced doctors in the USA. Here's a Link and another Link, and there have been various references in books written about male sexuality.
 
2012-10-11 04:35:15 PM  

Marcintosh: not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.


You'd be surprised if you Google the term "prosthetic foreskin" - they exist, but can't be anything like a real one. There is such a thing as foreskin restoration, though.
 
2012-10-11 04:42:31 PM  

AmytheIntactivist: Kazan..."F) Straight girls and gay guys agree . . . cut cock tastes better."

which one are you commenting as?

I'm a straight girl and my intact husband is the cleanest and most enjoyable man I've been with.
My mother says the same thing about my father, also intact.


www.miataturbo.net
 
2012-10-11 04:44:20 PM  

Kazan: We don't allow people to do the same thing to girls for religious (or other reasons), we shouldn't be allowing this to be done to little boys.

A) "health benefits" - dubious at best... more easily attained by showering and wearing condoms. 'studies' that support this shown to have methodological flaws and cannot be replicated in first world countries
B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too
E) "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER

i could drop a few pages of data on this subject right now.. but last time i did it didn't get anywhere anyway.

i'm out of this thread now. FLAME ON


I agree it's a stupid practice, but it's in no analogous to what's commonly termed "female circumcision". The male version is simply a stupid practice for religious or (supposed) sanitary reasons; the female version is an attempt to eliminate female enjoyment of the sex act, which goes well beyond the realm of the stupid into what can only be seen as downright evil.
 
2012-10-11 04:52:48 PM  

cyberspacedout: Marcintosh: not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.

You'd be surprised if you Google the term "prosthetic foreskin" - they exist, but can't be anything like a real one. There is such a thing as foreskin restoration, though.


Your damned right I'd be surprised. I got 99 problems but needing surgery on my johnson aint one of 'em. I'd have to be awake with my hand on a pistol for the whole thing. And as far as a prosthesis goes, it can just keep going.
Some guys never get over it I 'spose.

Man on the moon, foreskin restoration but no cure for cancer
 
2012-10-11 05:01:16 PM  

GungFu: Alright, maybe your folks should have scissored your nipples off as a baby. Derp.


Straight girls and gay guys agree . . . smooth pecs taste better.

/o_O
 
2012-10-11 05:20:59 PM  
Whoa, weeners tag.
I haven't seen that in ages.
We miss you, friend. You created much merriment back in the day.
 
2012-10-11 05:26:39 PM  
All the butt hurt in this thread is Delicious.

//but but but being circumsized decreases sex drive
//my wife/girlfriend/boyfriend says he only likes uncut! Also they said its the perfect size!
 
2012-10-11 05:36:38 PM  

Marcintosh: cyberspacedout: Marcintosh: not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.

You'd be surprised if you Google the term "prosthetic foreskin" - they exist, but can't be anything like a real one. There is such a thing as foreskin restoration, though.

Your damned right I'd be surprised. I got 99 problems but needing surgery on my johnson aint one of 'em. I'd have to be awake with my hand on a pistol for the whole thing. And as far as a prosthesis goes, it can just keep going.
Some guys never get over it I 'spose.

Man on the moon, foreskin restoration but no cure for cancer


Yeah, from the description and the few people I've chatted with who had it done surgically, it sounds ill-advised. Most people who do it have done so without surgery by just pulling on the skin a lot. That's a bit of an oversimplification of how to do it, but it works.

But I agree, wouldn't want surgery on the dick. The first time it happened was bad enough.
 
2012-10-11 05:40:58 PM  
God, I accidentally frost bit the lower 9 inches off my penis one day when it was -52 out. I cant imagine someone willingly taking even the foreskin off after that.
 
2012-10-11 05:45:37 PM  
GungFu
Knobloch


Oh, c'mon! Might as well used Mike Hunt, Roger Datass or Gene Masseth.


Well, considering that "Loch" is German for "hole"...


/"Knobloch" actually sounds like an older spelling of "Knoblauch" (German for "garlic")
// Magrat Garlick unavailablr for comment
 
2012-10-11 05:58:53 PM  
Why is everyone here so worried what other people are doing with their own children's genitals? Mind your own business. Worry about your kids pecker and I'll worry about mine.

/thread started with loud DERP and hasn't stopped
 
2012-10-11 06:01:46 PM  
I love how people use the argument of saying cut guys from birth can't appreciate the difference. Oh, and un-circumcised guys can? What, did you have it put back on? farkin' self-righteous dicks. Penis.
 
2012-10-11 06:05:25 PM  

trippdogg: I agree it's a stupid practice, but it's in no analogous to what's commonly termed "female circumcision". The male version is simply a stupid practice for religious or (supposed) sanitary reasons; the female version is an attempt to eliminate female enjoyment of the sex act, which goes well beyond the realm of the stupid into what can only be seen as downright evil.


circumcision of males removes 66% of the erogenous nerves of the human penis.

i can cite that if you want.
 
2012-10-11 06:44:26 PM  
There are strange things done
in the midnight sun
by the men
who mohel for gold.
 
2012-10-11 06:52:40 PM  
Circumcising girls still not okay.
 
2012-10-11 09:54:00 PM  

sleep lack: Whar is boobies link to balance the cosmos?



What does this look like to you, 2003? That ship sailed long ago.
 
2012-10-12 11:51:49 AM  
Foreskin Man, Helfen Sie uns!
 
Displayed 29 of 79 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report