If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Toronto Sun) Weeners Eins, zwei, snippa   (torontosun.com) divider line 79
    More: Weeners  
•       •       •

7132 clicks; posted to Main » on 11 Oct 2012 at 2:33 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



79 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-10-11 12:41:02 PM
We don't allow people to do the same thing to girls for religious (or other reasons), we shouldn't be allowing this to be done to little boys.

A) "health benefits" - dubious at best... more easily attained by showering and wearing condoms. 'studies' that support this shown to have methodological flaws and cannot be replicated in first world countries
B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too
E) "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER

i could drop a few pages of data on this subject right now.. but last time i did it didn't get anywhere anyway.

i'm out of this thread now. FLAME ON
 
2012-10-11 02:35:57 PM
Don't forget to leave a tip for the rabbi.
 
2012-10-11 02:35:57 PM
Yeah this thread should be about as fun as getting the tip of your dick cut off
 
2012-10-11 02:36:18 PM
Farking Nazi's I tell ya!
 
2012-10-11 02:36:30 PM
And here we go!!!

POPCORN FOR ALL!!!!

www.nasa.gov
 
2012-10-11 02:37:18 PM
Whar is boobies link to balance the cosmos?
 
2012-10-11 02:37:22 PM
causing outrage among Muslims and Jews.
img src="http://www.google.com/url?source=imglanding&ct=img&q=http://theme llowjihadi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/The-Peaceful-Tolerance-of-ou r-Pakistani-Friends.jpg&sa=X&ei=tRF3UKL6N8SW0QGZ6YDYDg&ved=0CAkQ8wc&us g=AFQjCNFE-H27M-7voGaZnTL2WGT_SiVT7g">

FORESKINS!!
 
2012-10-11 02:37:23 PM
Penis!
 
2012-10-11 02:37:39 PM
Done in one.

It's somehow horrifying when it's done on girls, yet it's OK to do it on boys?
 
2012-10-11 02:38:16 PM

Kazan: We don't allow people to do the same thing to girls for religious (or other reasons), we shouldn't be allowing this to be done to little boys.

A) "health benefits" - dubious at best... more easily attained by showering and wearing condoms. 'studies' that support this shown to have methodological flaws and cannot be replicated in first world countries
B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too
E) "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER

i could drop a few pages of data on this subject right now.. but last time i did it didn't get anywhere anyway.

i'm out of this thread now. FLAME ON


covered all my arguments as well.
 
2012-10-11 02:38:42 PM

Kazan: "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER


Who wants to smurf a shower with me?
 
2012-10-11 02:38:50 PM
I get that ding dongs are supposed to be that way in nature so it's cool if you have it an all, but please PLEASE clean the damn thing out before going out to the club.
 
2012-10-11 02:40:06 PM
Circumcision thread?

Circumcision thread!
 
2012-10-11 02:40:21 PM
Guys should be able to be circumcised if they want to, when they are old enough to decide. I've been with both and they both got the job done; I couldn't care what they look like as long as they are clean and bigger than a baby carrot.
 
2012-10-11 02:40:29 PM

flyinghouse99: I get that ding dongs are supposed to be that way in nature so it's cool if you have it an all, but please PLEASE clean the damn thing out before going out to the club.


Who the fark doesn't?.

/It's called common sense!
 
2012-10-11 02:41:05 PM
FTFA: "It was very important that our government reacted so quickly and responsibly. The proposal is balanced and suitable for lifting the legal uncertainty," said Charlotte Knobloch, a German Jewish leader. 


Oh, c'mon! Might as well used Mike Hunt, Roger Datass or Gene Masseth.
 
2012-10-11 02:41:27 PM
Girls are disfigured and mutilated to prevent them from enjoying sex. Boys are mutilated for cleanliness.

/personality counts
 
2012-10-11 02:42:42 PM

GungFu: FTFA: "It was very important that our government reacted so quickly and responsibly. The proposal is balanced and suitable for lifting the legal uncertainty," said Charlotte Knobloch, a German Jewish leader. 


Oh, c'mon! Might as well used Mike Hunt, Roger Datass or Gene Masseth.



Does not approve...
4.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-10-11 02:42:42 PM

Haplo127x: Guys should be able to be circumcised if they want to, when they are old enough to decide. I've been with both and they both got the job done; I couldn't care what they look like as long as they are clean and bigger than a baby carrot.


Let me get my atomic stethoscope to measure it, brb.
 
2012-10-11 02:42:55 PM

Kazan: We don't allow people to do the same thing to girls for religious (or other reasons), we shouldn't be allowing this to be done to little boys.

A) "health benefits" - dubious at best... more easily attained by showering and wearing condoms. 'studies' that support this shown to have methodological flaws and cannot be replicated in first world countries
B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too
E) "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER

i could drop a few pages of data on this subject right now.. but last time i did it didn't get anywhere anyway.

i'm out of this thread now. FLAME ON


a) Male and female circumcision are not equivalents
b) Anger won't make your foreskin grow back.
 
2012-10-11 02:43:05 PM
I like my snipped ding-a-ling!
 
2012-10-11 02:43:14 PM
I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.
 
2012-10-11 02:43:41 PM

BlackPete: Done in one.

It's somehow horrifying when it's done on girls, yet it's OK to do it on boys?


Never done to me...in hindsight...I wish it had been.

When it's done to little girls, it's done to essentially remove an erogenous zone. Removing the foreskin isn't the thing, not even close.
 
2012-10-11 02:44:22 PM
circumcision; a jew pedifile's rationalization, in his own words  

/pedifile
//it's from Youtube, what do you expect?
 
2012-10-11 02:44:27 PM
What did the leper say to the hooker?

Keep the tip.
 
2012-10-11 02:45:02 PM
Ahh... been a while since our last one. Let me just pop out a few of the goodies to get this ball rolling:

Royal Delux II

I'm the moyle
 
2012-10-11 02:45:22 PM
Haplo127x: I couldn't care what they look like as long as they are clean and bigger than a baby carrot.

I shower daily, so I've got that going for me.
 
2012-10-11 02:45:36 PM

zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.



Me too!


(...would we be just as happy if we'd grown up uncut?)
 
2012-10-11 02:46:10 PM

Kazan: We don't allow people to do the same thing to girls for religious (or other reasons), we shouldn't be allowing this to be done to little boys.

A) "health benefits" - dubious at best... more easily attained by showering and wearing condoms. 'studies' that support this shown to have methodological flaws and cannot be replicated in first world countries
B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too
E) "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER

i could drop a few pages of data on this subject right now.. but last time i did it didn't get anywhere anyway.

i'm out of this thread now. FLAME ON



F) Straight girls and gay guys agree . . . cut cock tastes better.



/ just sayin'
 
2012-10-11 02:49:01 PM

zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.



Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?
 
2012-10-11 02:53:32 PM

Haplo127x: Guys should be able to be circumcised if they want to, when they are old enough to decide. I've been with both and they both got the job done; I couldn't care what they look like as long as they are clean and bigger than a baby carrot.


[howyoudoin.jpg]
 
2012-10-11 02:53:34 PM

GungFu: FTFA: "It was very important that our government reacted so quickly and responsibly. The proposal is balanced and suitable for lifting the legal uncertainty," said Charlotte Knobloch, a German Jewish leader. 


Oh, c'mon! Might as well used Mike Hunt, Roger Datass or Gene Masseth.


Sounds like the German government were the actual knob blockers in this case.
 
2012-10-11 02:53:49 PM

GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?


So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.
 
2012-10-11 02:55:13 PM

Embden.Meyerhof: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Me too!


(...would we be just as happy if we'd grown up uncut?)


I have a feeling we wouldn't care. Unless we had some sort of sexual problem, or dysfunction. Then we'd think the other way was better and complain loudly.

/I'm looking at you circumcision complainers.
 
2012-10-11 02:56:07 PM
I don't call it Circumcision, I call it avoiding the fark out of phimosis. don't GIS that either.
 
2012-10-11 02:56:28 PM

Kazan: B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too


Main difference, and why we're disgusted by female genital mutilation while not as much with circumcision, is that FGM causes long-term pain to the female, while circumcision does not do the same for the male*.

*I can't personally attest to this, however.
 
2012-10-11 02:56:37 PM

zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.


What about tonsils and appendixes? Don't need those. Let's ditch them at birth so the baby won't remember and there's no future health problems.
 
2012-10-11 02:57:33 PM

12349876: zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.

What about tonsils and appendixes? Don't need those. Let's ditch them at birth so the baby won't remember and there's no future health problems.


Now I think you're trollin.
 
2012-10-11 03:00:14 PM

zippolight2002: 12349876: zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.

What about tonsils and appendixes? Don't need those. Let's ditch them at birth so the baby won't remember and there's no future health problems.

Now I think you're trollin.


It's a slippery slope argument. Where do we stop? Let's go ahead and fix hook noses at birth too. Why should circumcision be the only "appearance" thing that should be done at birth without consent?
 
2012-10-11 03:02:56 PM

12349876: zippolight2002: 12349876: zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.

What about tonsils and appendixes? Don't need those. Let's ditch them at birth so the baby won't remember and there's no future health problems.

Now I think you're trollin.

It's a slippery slope argument. Where do we stop? Let's go ahead and fix hook noses at birth too. Why should circumcision be the only "appearance" thing that should be done at birth without consent?


Because it's not major surgery, like fixing a hooked nose, and taking out appendix's?
 
2012-10-11 03:04:00 PM

12349876: zippolight2002: 12349876: zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.

What about tonsils and appendixes? Don't need those. Let's ditch them at birth so the baby won't remember and there's no future health problems.

Now I think you're trollin.

It's a slippery slope argument. Where do we stop? Let's go ahead and fix hook noses at birth too. Why should circumcision be the only "appearance" thing that should be done at birth without consent?


actually you're the one using the slippery slope fallacy.
 
2012-10-11 03:05:52 PM

12349876: zippolight2002: 12349876: zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.

What about tonsils and appendixes? Don't need those. Let's ditch them at birth so the baby won't remember and there's no future health problems.

Now I think you're trollin.

It's a slippery slope argument. Where do we stop? Let's go ahead and fix hook noses at birth too. Why should circumcision be the only "appearance" thing that should be done at birth without consent?


And, in a few years...
 
2012-10-11 03:07:49 PM
Sigh. I remember when fark had actual weeners links.
 
2012-10-11 03:10:03 PM
Approves:

static2.businessinsider.com
 
2012-10-11 03:10:39 PM

Jiro Dreams Of McRibs: Girls are disfigured and mutilated to prevent them from enjoying sex. Boys are mutilated for cleanliness to prevent them from enjoying sex.

/personality counts


Dr. John Harvey Kellogg recommended circumcision of boys caught masturbating, writing: "A remedy for masturbation which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering anesthetic, as the pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment." (this guy is largely responsible for its prevalence in the US)

"Similarly with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for it is, in my opinion, the wish to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible." (from Maimonides, largely responsible for its continued popularity among Jews)
 
2012-10-11 03:14:24 PM

Arkanaut: Kazan: B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too

Main difference, and why we're disgusted by female genital mutilation while not as much with circumcision, is that FGM causes long-term pain to the female, while circumcision does not do the same for the male*.

*I can't personally attest to this, however.


as a guy who knows a woman who was FGM'ed...

let me call bullshiat on her behalf.
 
2012-10-11 03:18:01 PM
Just a little off the top please.
 
2012-10-11 03:23:56 PM
Can I give my baby a tattoo to make it look better? No? Then why can I chop bits off of it?
 
2012-10-11 03:31:27 PM

AmytheIntactivist: Kazan..."F) Straight girls and gay guys agree . . . cut cock tastes better."

which one are you commenting as?

I'm a straight girl and my intact husband is the cleanest and most enjoyable man I've been with.
My mother says the same thing about my father, also intact.


EWWW, you talk to your mother about her giving your father head?
EWWWWWWWWW!!!!!
 
2012-10-11 03:36:00 PM

pedobearapproved: AmytheIntactivist: Kazan..."F) Straight girls and gay guys agree . . . cut cock tastes better."

which one are you commenting as?

I'm a straight girl and my intact husband is the cleanest and most enjoyable man I've been with.
My mother says the same thing about my father, also intact.

EWWW, you talk to your mother about her giving your father head?
EWWWWWWWWW!!!!!


Um, yea, it's come up before. Part of being a mature adult is being able to talk about sex with your friends. My mother is my friend. She's also the one that taught me that the human body is nothing to be ashamed of and we shouldn't go altering ourselves (much less our children) to please others.
 
2012-10-11 03:40:53 PM
Circumcision thread! In before it's cut off!
 
2012-10-11 03:42:27 PM

zippolight2002: So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis


No change in functionality? Don't cut guys need to use lube to jerk off? Suckers! Think of all the money we intact guys save never needing to buy lube!
 
2012-10-11 03:43:12 PM
Cutting tissue off infant genitalia to prevent unlikely health problems arising years if not decades later.

Seems legit.
 
2012-10-11 03:51:05 PM

RobSeace: zippolight2002: So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis

No change in functionality? Don't cut guys need to use lube to jerk off? Suckers! Think of all the money we intact guys save never needing to buy lube!


Touche. Not only money, but lube is a pain in the ass to clean up.

/intentional
 
2012-10-11 03:55:39 PM

12349876: zippolight2002: 12349876: zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.

What about tonsils and appendixes? Don't need those. Let's ditch them at birth so the baby won't remember and there's no future health problems.

Now I think you're trollin.

It's a slippery slope argument. Where do we stop? Let's go ahead and fix hook noses at birth too. Why should circumcision be the only "appearance" thing that should be done at birth without consent?


What do they do with pseudo-tails?
 
2012-10-11 03:56:13 PM

pedobearapproved: Kazan: We don't allow people to do the same thing to girls for religious (or other reasons), we shouldn't be allowing this to be done to little boys.

A) "health benefits" - dubious at best... more easily attained by showering and wearing condoms. 'studies' that support this shown to have methodological flaws and cannot be replicated in first world countries
B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too
E) "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER

i could drop a few pages of data on this subject right now.. but last time i did it didn't get anywhere anyway.

i'm out of this thread now. FLAME ON

a) Male and female circumcision are not equivalents
b) Anger won't make your foreskin grow back.


Assault and murder are also not equivalents. They are both still wrong, however.
 
2012-10-11 04:08:01 PM
not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.
 
2012-10-11 04:09:08 PM

Heamer: What did the leper say to the hooker?

Keep the tip.


So this obstetrician is retiring after being in practice for 50 years. As the old doctor is cleaning out his office, he comes across this huge jar of formaldehyde containing the foreskin of all the little boys he's circumcised during his lengthy career.

Being the sentimental & frugal type, the old doctor decides to take this massive jar of foreskin to his tailor to fashion something out of it as a keepsake for his many years in practice.

Upon delivering the jar of foreskin, his tailor asks, "What would you like for me to make, Doc?"
The old doctor replies, "Oh, I don't know. Surprise me."
The tailor says, "No problem. I'll have something for you in a weeks time."

A week passes and the old doctor goes back to the tailor and asks, "So, what did you make for me?"
The tailor places a wallet on the counter, to which the old doctor queries, "I brought you that enormous jar of foreskin last week and all you made out of if was a wallet?"
"Relax" says the tailor, "If you rub on it for a little bit, it turns into a briefcase!"

www.nubblies.net
I'm here all week!
 
2012-10-11 04:18:03 PM

VonEvilstein: Assault and murder are also not equivalents. They are both still wrong, however.


don't even try to explain to them the similarities between the two.. then you start getting just mind numbingly stupid levels of "NUUHHH UHUHHH!" type shiat.
 
2012-10-11 04:20:20 PM

Marcintosh: not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.


Actually, they do exist. And plenty of men restore their foreskin, some surgically, some not.
 
2012-10-11 04:31:39 PM

zippolight2002: GungFu: zippolight2002: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is.


Then again, (if snipped as a baby) you've never had a foreskin long enough to appreciate the difference. So rationale is as invalid as Nic Cage's birdhair.

It's like if you had your ears sliced off at birth. To which on Fark you'd most likely write: I'm quite happy that I'm cut. Not sure what the big deal is. Sorry, what?

So the look (which is key, as it doesn't change the functionality) of your penis, is just as vital as having ears? That analogy makes no sense.



The point is that you'd have nothing to compare it to. You can still hear without ears, dummy. It was a joke. I thought you'd see past that.
Anyway, so if you do something to you body that doesn't change the fucntionality, it's ok?

Alright, maybe your folks should have scissored your nipples off as a baby. Derp.
 
2012-10-11 04:32:34 PM

thunderbird8804: Dr. John Harvey Kellogg recommended circumcision of boys caught masturbating, writing: "A remedy for masturbation which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering anesthetic, as the pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment." (this guy is largely responsible for its prevalence in the US)


He wasn't the first.

Long before Kellogg was even born, in the 1830s or 40s, there was a French physician by the name Claude François Lallemand who wrote about the dangers of seminal losses (sometimes called "spermattorhea") and the need to prevent masturbation by extreme measures such as circumcision. Supposedly his work was translated into various languages, and disregarded by everyone except a few doctors in England who subsequently influenced doctors in the USA. Here's a Link and another Link, and there have been various references in books written about male sexuality.
 
2012-10-11 04:35:15 PM

Marcintosh: not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.


You'd be surprised if you Google the term "prosthetic foreskin" - they exist, but can't be anything like a real one. There is such a thing as foreskin restoration, though.
 
2012-10-11 04:42:31 PM

AmytheIntactivist: Kazan..."F) Straight girls and gay guys agree . . . cut cock tastes better."

which one are you commenting as?

I'm a straight girl and my intact husband is the cleanest and most enjoyable man I've been with.
My mother says the same thing about my father, also intact.


www.miataturbo.net
 
2012-10-11 04:44:20 PM

Kazan: We don't allow people to do the same thing to girls for religious (or other reasons), we shouldn't be allowing this to be done to little boys.

A) "health benefits" - dubious at best... more easily attained by showering and wearing condoms. 'studies' that support this shown to have methodological flaws and cannot be replicated in first world countries
B) "tradition" = bs. FGM was tradition too
C) "religion" = bs. FGM was religious too
D) "i prefer cut ones in appearance!" - some guys prefer girls without labia too
E) "but but but smegma!" - it's called A SHOWER

i could drop a few pages of data on this subject right now.. but last time i did it didn't get anywhere anyway.

i'm out of this thread now. FLAME ON


I agree it's a stupid practice, but it's in no analogous to what's commonly termed "female circumcision". The male version is simply a stupid practice for religious or (supposed) sanitary reasons; the female version is an attempt to eliminate female enjoyment of the sex act, which goes well beyond the realm of the stupid into what can only be seen as downright evil.
 
2012-10-11 04:52:48 PM

cyberspacedout: Marcintosh: not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.

You'd be surprised if you Google the term "prosthetic foreskin" - they exist, but can't be anything like a real one. There is such a thing as foreskin restoration, though.


Your damned right I'd be surprised. I got 99 problems but needing surgery on my johnson aint one of 'em. I'd have to be awake with my hand on a pistol for the whole thing. And as far as a prosthesis goes, it can just keep going.
Some guys never get over it I 'spose.

Man on the moon, foreskin restoration but no cure for cancer
 
2012-10-11 05:01:16 PM

GungFu: Alright, maybe your folks should have scissored your nipples off as a baby. Derp.


Straight girls and gay guys agree . . . smooth pecs taste better.

/o_O
 
2012-10-11 05:20:59 PM
Whoa, weeners tag.
I haven't seen that in ages.
We miss you, friend. You created much merriment back in the day.
 
2012-10-11 05:26:39 PM
All the butt hurt in this thread is Delicious.

//but but but being circumsized decreases sex drive
//my wife/girlfriend/boyfriend says he only likes uncut! Also they said its the perfect size!
 
2012-10-11 05:36:38 PM

Marcintosh: cyberspacedout: Marcintosh: not to over state the obvious buuuut, by the time you're old enough to read this, it's too late. No prosthetic foreskin exists so far as I know. . .

but if you want to prattle on about one thing and another don't let me stand in the way.

All my dogs are spayed or neutered too, so I got that goin' for me.

You'd be surprised if you Google the term "prosthetic foreskin" - they exist, but can't be anything like a real one. There is such a thing as foreskin restoration, though.

Your damned right I'd be surprised. I got 99 problems but needing surgery on my johnson aint one of 'em. I'd have to be awake with my hand on a pistol for the whole thing. And as far as a prosthesis goes, it can just keep going.
Some guys never get over it I 'spose.

Man on the moon, foreskin restoration but no cure for cancer


Yeah, from the description and the few people I've chatted with who had it done surgically, it sounds ill-advised. Most people who do it have done so without surgery by just pulling on the skin a lot. That's a bit of an oversimplification of how to do it, but it works.

But I agree, wouldn't want surgery on the dick. The first time it happened was bad enough.
 
2012-10-11 05:40:58 PM
God, I accidentally frost bit the lower 9 inches off my penis one day when it was -52 out. I cant imagine someone willingly taking even the foreskin off after that.
 
2012-10-11 05:45:37 PM
GungFu
Knobloch


Oh, c'mon! Might as well used Mike Hunt, Roger Datass or Gene Masseth.


Well, considering that "Loch" is German for "hole"...


/"Knobloch" actually sounds like an older spelling of "Knoblauch" (German for "garlic")
// Magrat Garlick unavailablr for comment
 
2012-10-11 05:58:53 PM
Why is everyone here so worried what other people are doing with their own children's genitals? Mind your own business. Worry about your kids pecker and I'll worry about mine.

/thread started with loud DERP and hasn't stopped
 
2012-10-11 06:01:46 PM
I love how people use the argument of saying cut guys from birth can't appreciate the difference. Oh, and un-circumcised guys can? What, did you have it put back on? farkin' self-righteous dicks. Penis.
 
2012-10-11 06:05:25 PM

trippdogg: I agree it's a stupid practice, but it's in no analogous to what's commonly termed "female circumcision". The male version is simply a stupid practice for religious or (supposed) sanitary reasons; the female version is an attempt to eliminate female enjoyment of the sex act, which goes well beyond the realm of the stupid into what can only be seen as downright evil.


circumcision of males removes 66% of the erogenous nerves of the human penis.

i can cite that if you want.
 
2012-10-11 06:44:26 PM
There are strange things done
in the midnight sun
by the men
who mohel for gold.
 
2012-10-11 06:52:40 PM
Circumcising girls still not okay.
 
2012-10-11 09:54:00 PM

sleep lack: Whar is boobies link to balance the cosmos?



What does this look like to you, 2003? That ship sailed long ago.
 
2012-10-12 11:51:49 AM
Foreskin Man, Helfen Sie uns!
 
Displayed 79 of 79 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report