If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   GOP Congressman attacking Obama for lack of embassy security on whether he and his fellow Republicans voted to cut funding for embassy security: "Absolutely"   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 69
    More: Fail, Jason Chaffetz, President Obama, GOP, human beings, Republican, United States Ambassador to Libya, diplomatic missions of Iran, Soledad O'Brien  
•       •       •

10316 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Oct 2012 at 8:01 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-10-10 06:54:32 PM
11 votes:
Being in Congress must be really awesome.

As Jon Stewart once said, "you get the fun of breaking shiat and the joy of complaining the shiat you just broke doesn't work."
2012-10-10 06:50:19 PM
10 votes:
Nobody cares. The Republicans could vote to fund live kitten eating, and the only ones who will take flak for it are the Democrats. The Republicans can say or do anything -- anything -- and it won't affect them.
2012-10-10 07:14:23 PM
6 votes:

thismomentinblackhistory: Why is this?


Because the media has been successfully cowed by bullshiat cries of bias and the Democrats are afraid to play hardball. Hardball to them being pointing out that the opposing party is rampant with hateful lying dickweasels.
2012-10-10 08:26:15 PM
4 votes:

GORDON: Yeah, because we know Obama never spends money that he doesn't have Congress doesn't authorize.


FTFY
2012-10-10 08:24:27 PM
4 votes:

Summercat: What the fark. Seriously.


Indeed. So much.

Hey, America, here's your "should I vote" litmus test.

If you've ever called in a vote to American Idol, Dancing With the Stars, or watched Honey Boo Boo... consider yourself too damn stupid, your voting rights revoked.

Grown ups will take care of you.
2012-10-10 07:38:28 PM
4 votes:
Hillary Clinton needs to show up at the House and tear this guy 12 new assholes.
2012-10-10 07:21:13 PM
4 votes:
If you support these people, you are a worthless sack.
2012-10-10 06:59:05 PM
4 votes:
These people just amaze me in how shameless they are. They don't seem to care if they lie even if it is known widely (except the hard core ideologues who either know it and don't care or are too deep into the ideology to acknowledge reality or the low info voters [to whom the lies and hypocrisy are really aimed as they won't pay attention long enough to learn that the statements are lies]). They don't seem to care if their hypocrisy is outrageous.

"Yeah, I know I'm a lying hypocrite. Whadda ya gonna do about it?" Democrats and media: *crickets chirping*
2012-10-10 08:17:52 PM
3 votes:
We have more than 6,000 contractors, a private army there, for President Obama, in Baghdad.

So, still managed to blame Obama. I'm sure Chaffetz and Issa voted against President Obama's plan to invade Iraq in 2003.

fark you, GOP assholes.
2012-10-10 08:11:37 PM
3 votes:

Via Infinito: Being in Congress must be really awesome.

As Jon Stewart once said, "you get the fun of breaking shiat and the joy of complaining the shiat you just broke doesn't work."


Eternal 5 year old brats.
2012-10-10 07:08:58 PM
3 votes:
Christ, what an asshole

/the new GOP slogan
2012-10-10 05:29:09 PM
3 votes:
saw that this morning. what an asshole. these guys have no legs to stand on.
2012-10-10 08:47:01 PM
2 votes:

Lt. Cheese Weasel: CygnusDarius: And yet, Romney has a chance of winning.

/Americans
//You need to up your ante

To what my dear friend? Your own countries issues make ours seem like low level noise sometimes. Why don't you up your ante and get a government that isn't bought by drug cartels?


We're on it.

www.latinorebels.com

We're freakin' on it.
2012-10-10 08:43:00 PM
2 votes:

SquiggsIN: Anyone dumb enough to vote for Democrats or Republicans at this point should be shot.

They are both fine with taking public money to enrich the elite regardless of which party they are donating to. It's a joke that people think they are mutually exclusive. They agree on turning public wealth (taxes) into private wealth (kickbacks to their richest donors). They agree on policing the public and diminishing civil liberties under the guise of national security.

D and R are like 2 ends of a teeter totter. the people furthest from the center scream the loudest and jump up and down just to keep the majority of people near the middle off balance and confused. And it works for all you sheep who think either party has your best interests in mind.


pull.imgfave.netdna-cdn.com

/It's hard to make this point without coming across as so damn smug
2012-10-10 08:28:16 PM
2 votes:
thismomentinblackhistory
Why is this?

Because Big Money has convinced a critical mass of people that a representative government can do no good, and that if we destroy it, a golden age of liberty and freedom will ensue.
2012-10-10 08:22:08 PM
2 votes:
We're ignoring that the request was to bring the security detail to about five, and there were five security personnel present at the time of the attack, right?
2012-10-10 08:10:17 PM
2 votes:
Well at least we're all still comfortable making political hay out of American deaths when it's convenient to our interests.
2012-10-10 07:18:51 PM
2 votes:

James F. Campbell: thismomentinblackhistory: James F. Campbell: Nobody cares. The Republicans could vote to fund live kitten eating, and the only ones who will take flak for it are the Democrats. The Republicans can say or do anything -- anything -- and it won't affect them.

Why is this?

Because people will say to the Democrats, "Why didn't you stop them?!" And the Democrats will get the blame.


And because every major media entity is either owned by the GOP or too scared to do anything but repeat their lies for fear of losing market share. Why they think you lose viewers by telling the truth, I have no idea.
2012-10-10 07:14:26 PM
2 votes:

thismomentinblackhistory: James F. Campbell: Nobody cares. The Republicans could vote to fund live kitten eating, and the only ones who will take flak for it are the Democrats. The Republicans can say or do anything -- anything -- and it won't affect them.

Why is this?


Because people will say to the Democrats, "Why didn't you stop them?!" And the Democrats will get the blame.
2012-10-11 02:36:14 AM
1 votes:

muck4doo: Democrat thinking:

Dems: We got 100 billion this year for this program. We now want 200 Billion.
Reps: No. We will give you 120 billion
Dems: OMFG! They cut the program by 80 billion dollars! That's 40%! Republicans cut the program by 40%! OMFG!!!!

Democrats have been playing that game for decades. As they long as they have enough tards to swallow the crap they will keep it going.



Republican logic: All spending every year should stay the same, there's absolutely no reason why even 20 billion more than last year is not enough to cover everything, because, magic.
2012-10-11 02:11:58 AM
1 votes:

intelligent comment below: SquiggsIN: Again, R's and D's agree on some things. like growing gov, oppressing liberties, and ignoring whichever parts of the constitution are inconvenient at the time. They have people so wound up on the unsolvable issues that no one seems to notice. Abortion will never have consensus, gay rights will never have consensus, etc... we focus on these because the media is paid to keep up the firestorm to distract us from the areas in which R and D are colluding to rob the public and enrich themselves while treating citizens as a doormat or worse. Our incarceration rate is through the roof and we can't pay our own bills. We have issues that could be solved if we'd start focusing on problems that MIGHT be able to be solved.


No, both sides are not equally bad. Stop pretending that



The Republicans and Democrats are more alike than unalike. Yes, there are distinct differences in the parties' political platforms. It all looks very clear on paper. But for one who has studied the actions and accomplishments of the two major political parties over my lifetime, I have become disillusioned to the point where I cannot accept anything a politician says at his/her word. I place high value on a person's character, particularly on honesty and trustworthiness. I demand that in the person that I vote to represent me. I want a straight-talker, who will tell me what I need to hear, no matter whether I will like what I hear.

To my jaundiced eye and mind, the primary goal of the two major parties is not to pursue and promote the betterment of the country and the people who live in it, but to remain in power. The parties feign ill will toward one another on many an issue, preying on people's base emotions to divide them, influence them, and to cultivate support to one base or the other. It is a game of give-and-take that is re-enacted every election period. Yet the two major parties will come together and present an united front, whenever threatened by the emergence of a third political party.

Judge Napolitano delivers a monologue " What If " on his Freedom Watch show (Fox Business News), which I find insightful and inquisitive. Review the video for yourself on YouTube. The monologue expresses how I feel about our government more eloquently than I ever could: Link

In closing, my own little words of wisdom: Spend time and effort promoting and explaining your own position or goals, versus only disparaging those of the opposition. Where possible, frame your critique of another's position or goals in a constructive manner, so people can gain insight from your argument. Acknowledge and respect a difference of opinion. Avoid forms of slander (e.g. name-calling ); this is a sign of immaturity.

Finally, go out and vote for the person that you wish to represent you. Make a choice for which you can be proud. Make a stand. The country cannot improve if its citizens settle for the "lesser of two evils".
2012-10-11 01:24:32 AM
1 votes:

Business as usual in GOPville / Teabagistan

3.bp.blogspot.com
2012-10-11 01:02:12 AM
1 votes:
HowDareYouCallMeAHoser

How's that? How so? Regarding what? Thanks for contributing.

Regarding what? Making posts and ludicrous statements regarding things about which you know exactly nothing. You're not State Department, you're not security, and you sure as hell don't have a military background. Yet you mouth off about what the Obama administration "should have known" or what our "defense budget" should have bought us, or what the people knew or didn't know at the time, in the immediate aftermath, or now.

That's what being a dick is.

People who are not dicks ask questions. People who are not dicks try to understand and become educated on a subject. People who are not dicks draw parallels between what they have experienced and try to draw reasonable conclusions about the unbelievable complexity of the real world.

You do none of these things. You are a dick.
2012-10-11 12:49:01 AM
1 votes:
As well as the blatant hypocrisy, I'm also enjoying hearing the same people who said:

"Obama had nothing to do with killing Osama, he can;t take any credit for it."

now saying:

"Obama is personally responsible for not providing enough security to the embassy, the blame is entirely his"

And thinking we won't notice...
2012-10-11 12:27:28 AM
1 votes:

udhq: So clear this one up: How exactly was it politically beneficial for Obama to put out the "protest" line? It seems that, given that the narrative was "Obama is apologizing for freedom of speech", the terror attack would have been preferable.


THIS
2012-10-11 12:25:42 AM
1 votes:
HowDareYouCallMeAHoser

It's quite obvious that you do not have a farking clue what you are talking about. What a dick.
2012-10-11 12:23:56 AM
1 votes:
It's not so much that I disagree with his positions, it's that I can't figure out what his positions are.

buddysblog.typepad.com
2012-10-10 11:35:03 PM
1 votes:
The problem with runaway military spending is that eventually, you run out of other people's money.
2012-10-10 11:13:09 PM
1 votes:

basham: ridiculous non sequiturs?


Actually, it would be great if the democrats would actually kick the shiat out of people sometimes. There's nothing wrong with it. They don't need to be milquetoasts, it's just the current style.

Be right, have facts and be a witty jerk about it.

/ if Obama pulled a 6 minute rant out and slammed every ( well, six minutes worth of ) mistruth that had come out of Romneys mouth one after another with hard facts, the entire US would adore him for it, friend and enemy alike. We love nothing more than watching someone get take down a peg.
2012-10-10 10:50:37 PM
1 votes:

Lt. Cheese Weasel: udhq: Even if Obama did everything you claim, the only person who botched Benghazi worse than him was Romney. That's a fact.

Mitt Romney is a private citizen. You do know that, right?


No, he isn't. He is a presidential candidate who gets briefed by the CIA daily and has Secret Service protection.
2012-10-10 10:33:14 PM
1 votes:

Lt. Cheese Weasel: I'm counting on it. Facts are clear. Truth wills out. He went to Vegas while our Ambassador and 3 others were being murdered and our consulate was over run. They were warned. They ignored it. This is Obama's 'My Pet Goat.' Reap what you sow. Spin it 100x, won't matter. The Swing states already have moved. The only demographic left supporting this brainless boob will be blacks on the government tit in Detroit and Chicago before the election gets here. Hurry November.


Fennel-crusted sea bass served with a raspberry reduction over polenta and mixed greens. Union forces suffered over 12,000 casualties during the Battle of Antietam. The Musée du Louvre is the most visited art museum in the world. I like cats.

Saying random things is fun.
2012-10-10 10:03:09 PM
1 votes:

GoSlash27: Did the Republicans vote to cut State Department funding?
Yup.
Did that *in any way* affect the outcome of the Benghazi consulate's request for additional security?
Nope.

/This thread is shameful


Lots of embassies/consulates are requesting more security. Get it?
We don't have enough money. Get it?
We can't predict all bad outcomes. We're making due with limited funds.
The terrorist are to blame for the deaths, not Americans.
2012-10-10 09:53:54 PM
1 votes:
"He shouldn't make my son's death part of his political agenda. It's wrong to use these brave young men, who wanted freedom for all, to degrade Obama," Barbara Doherty. mother of Glen Doherty.

"He actually approached him, using this private gathering as basically a political venture to further his image. And Glen just believed it to be very insincere and stale," Elf Ellefsen, identifed as Glen Doherty's friend.

Link

Politicizing the death of Americans by foreign terrorists, long a weapon of Republicans, is base and shameful.
2012-10-10 09:45:44 PM
1 votes:

rdondelinger: while SquiggsIN's "fresh perspective" is certainly not fresh as in new, it is most assuredly an oft-overlooked and under-appreciated viewpoint held by individual Farkers such as SquiggsIN and myself.


WHAT PERSPECTIVE?

He came in here and immediately told all of us Democrats / Republicans that we're all a bunch of feebs for voting Democrat or Republican.

Actually, he said that we should all be shot.

But yes, sure, we should really respect that "fresh perspective" of his. We'll all go out and shoot ourselves now. He's obviously very wise.
2012-10-10 09:30:44 PM
1 votes:
Benghazi is what the Repubs have in lieu of an actual foreign policy plan of their own (pretty much will be same as it ever was/currently is). They will feast on the corpse of the dead ambassador right up to election day. The `narrative' is `Obama is weak/ineffectual' - it's the `Carter & hostages in Tehran' in a teacup.

U.S. security policy has pretty much been a hostage of lack of an energy policy -one that serves the Republic -, since `73 - the actors change, the lobbyists don't, and, here we are.
2012-10-10 08:52:50 PM
1 votes:

GORDON: Eh, who cares. The President himself said the American deaths in the embassy were just "speed bumps."

Have you heard about Big Bird? Oh man, Romney is terrible.


Meh, at least he hasn't done something stupid like advocate the construction of 15 ships a year and 3 submarines while also trying to be the candidate of fiscal responsibility.

Oh wait...
2012-10-10 08:44:32 PM
1 votes:

Shaggy_C: MyRandomName: Seeing as State Department funding is up nearly 40% since 2009....

2012 - 53.4 Billion
2009 - 38.3 Billion

I'm sure the extra 1.5 billion they requested would have saved Stevens.

So this is all Obama's fault


Whatever.

If it's my job to ensure your safety, dollars mean nothing.

Mr. Obama dropped the ball here.

Is it reason to oust him? No.

But the truth is there.

Accept it.
2012-10-10 08:42:30 PM
1 votes:
Three alts use the word shamefull . I wonder if you are a volunteer, or you get paid to carry GOP water.
2012-10-10 08:40:50 PM
1 votes:

MFAWG: ecl: Mrtraveler01: Lando Lincoln: GoSlash27: Did the Republicans vote to cut State Department funding?
Yup.
Did that *in any way* affect the outcome of the Benghazi consulate's request for additional security?
Nope.

/This thread is shameful

Would extra security have stopped guys with rocket launchers?
Nope.

Probably not.

But I will say, even though this seems like a legitimate complaint, it's hard to take the GOP seriously over it.

They've cried wolf too many damn times that it's hard to take them seriously when they do have a legitimate complaint. 

That being said, how much more security do the Republicans think was needed to prevent something like this from happening?

Why don't the embassies have tanks?

There is no embassy in BenGahzi.


No, just a dead ambassador and 3 other patriots. Moron.
2012-10-10 08:37:37 PM
1 votes:

Kittypie070: free cell from obama 2012-10-10 08:25:09 PM

(blart)

My my my, what a shockingly original and creative username.


Tell me about it. Like I need to get Freecell from Obama. Windows comes with it already with a default install.
2012-10-10 08:36:38 PM
1 votes:
Anyone dumb enough to vote for Democrats or Republicans at this point should be shot.

They are both fine with taking public money to enrich the elite regardless of which party they are donating to. It's a joke that people think they are mutually exclusive. They agree on turning public wealth (taxes) into private wealth (kickbacks to their richest donors). They agree on policing the public and diminishing civil liberties under the guise of national security.

D and R are like 2 ends of a teeter totter. the people furthest from the center scream the loudest and jump up and down just to keep the majority of people near the middle off balance and confused. And it works for all you sheep who think either party has your best interests in mind.
2012-10-10 08:36:24 PM
1 votes:
The Benghazi murders are the result of incompetent leadership on the part of Obama.

NOT federal funding.
NOT some stupid YouTube video.
INCOMPETENCE
2012-10-10 08:35:16 PM
1 votes:
free cell from obama 2012-10-10 08:25:09 PM

(blart)

My my my, what a shockingly original and creative username.
2012-10-10 08:34:48 PM
1 votes:

FunkOut: CygnusDarius: And yet, Romney has a chance of winning.

/Americans
//You need to up your ante

If he does win, he's sacrificing the whole country to Molech.


Just the country? Whatever happens at the US reverberates in the whole world. Plus, you have nukes.
2012-10-10 08:34:23 PM
1 votes:

ecl: BravadoGT: This would be relevant if the reason for the lack of security was a staff or resource shortage due to funding. But it had nothing to do with that. Rather--it was because the gatekeeper for such appeals (Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Programs Charlene Lamb, and backed by her superiors assistant secretary of State for diplomatic security Eric Boswell and the principal deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security and director of the Diplomatic Security Service Scott P. Bultrowic) wanted to keep the U.S. security presence "artificially low," to promote the idea that Libya was stabilizing and safer.

Pretty lame attempt to try and dump this mess in the GOP's lap...

Those three have alot of credentials and aren't all D's or R's. People need to stop trying to toss the blame around. That includes you BravoGT.


I didn't assign any blame to anyone--I only challenged the false notion that this incident had anything to do with Republicans and their votes on embassy security funding.
2012-10-10 08:30:14 PM
1 votes:
I don't know about the rest of y'all, but I aint got the patience for another troll alt.
2012-10-10 08:29:27 PM
1 votes:

Satanic_Hamster: GoSlash27: Did the Republicans vote to cut State Department funding?
Yup.
Did that *in any way* affect the outcome of the Benghazi consulate's request for additional security?
Nope.

/This thread is shameful

Some times we have to protect our diplomatic missions with the security guards we have and not the ones we want.


*slow clap*
2012-10-10 08:28:28 PM
1 votes:

GoSlash27: Did the Republicans vote to cut State Department funding?
Yup.
Did that *in any way* affect the outcome of the Benghazi consulate's request for additional security?
Nope.

/This thread is shameful


Some times we have to protect our diplomatic missions with the security guards we have and not the ones we want.
2012-10-10 08:28:21 PM
1 votes:
And yet, Romney has a chance of winning.

/Americans
//You need to up your ante
2012-10-10 08:26:28 PM
1 votes:
All I saw in the article is that the GOP reduced the requested funding, not what the absolute figures turned out to be. Was that money in fact essential or was it like cutting the bottom four toys off a kid's list of a hundred things he'd like from Santa? Indulging every agency's fantasy budget is a great path to huge deficits, which Democrats used to claim would be a bad thing when a Republican was in the White House.
2012-10-10 08:25:42 PM
1 votes:
You know the difference between congress and the students of that "special" school down the road? Neither do I.
2012-10-10 08:25:09 PM
1 votes:

ifarkthereforiam: Hey folks, the 'big lie' strategy works. Why do you think the republicans keep doing it?

/same goes for whining about being persecuted by the liberal press.



You must think Obama is a Republican then. He lied about some video for 10 days all the while having intelligence that it was a terrorist attack, just as the Libyan government had warned of for three days prior.
2012-10-10 08:21:48 PM
1 votes:
Here's the biggest secret of the whole election political fracas:

The republickans have been manipulating the whole thang since for-EVER b/c dough.

Quit eating the pies, i.e. lies, e.g. lies.

Money has NEVER been your friend.

Wasn't then; wasn't now.

Never will be.

People, however, will scramble until there is no air left to breathe, so climb upon the mountains, and ride...

*)
2012-10-10 08:21:14 PM
1 votes:
I just got my ballot in the mail. Rosanne Barr is on there.

Seems as good as any on the list this time.
2012-10-10 08:19:30 PM
1 votes:
This entire argument hinges on a simple question: Did they provide enough of a budget for the embassy to have more security than it did on the day of the attacks?
2012-10-10 08:17:42 PM
1 votes:
So the Obama administration and State Department (same thing) totally botch this whole thing...and it's the republican's fault? Sounds legit.
2012-10-10 08:16:56 PM
1 votes:

James F. Campbell: Nobody cares. The Republicans could vote to fund live kitten eating, and the only ones who will take flak for it are the Democrats. The Republicans can say or do anything -- anything -- and it won't affect them.



That's pretty much it. Romney enacted an assault weapons ban in Massachusettes. Obama allowed more concealed carry access. Guess who the NRA is endorsing.
2012-10-10 08:16:23 PM
1 votes:

Richard Saunders: Government.

As an American voter, whachoo gonna do?

/i'm sick of the games


Either vote for the guy that said he'd cure cancer and failed, or vote for cancer.
2012-10-10 08:15:30 PM
1 votes:
This would be relevant if the reason for the lack of security was a staff or resource shortage due to funding. But it had nothing to do with that. Rather--it was because the gatekeeper for such appeals (Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Programs Charlene Lamb, and backed by her superiors assistant secretary of State for diplomatic security Eric Boswell and the principal deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security and director of the Diplomatic Security Service Scott P. Bultrowic) wanted to keep the U.S. security presence "artificially low," to promote the idea that Libya was stabilizing and safer.

Pretty lame attempt to try and dump this mess in the GOP's lap...
2012-10-10 08:15:28 PM
1 votes:
Did the Republicans vote to cut State Department funding?
Yup.
Did that *in any way* affect the outcome of the Benghazi consulate's request for additional security?
Nope.

/This thread is shameful
2012-10-10 08:13:24 PM
1 votes:

Mrbogey: So no one cares that specific security requests, which Republicans have no say in, were turned down for Libya? No one upset that the whole start of the attack was lied about by this administration?


Never ascribe to malice that which incompetency will explain.
2012-10-10 08:12:35 PM
1 votes:
Hey folks, the 'big lie' strategy works. Why do you think the republicans keep doing it?

/same goes for whining about being persecuted by the liberal press.
2012-10-10 08:12:27 PM
1 votes:

Summoner101: Well at least we're all still comfortable making political hay out of American deaths when it's convenient to our interests.


Stick with what works right?:

images2.dailykos.com
2012-10-10 08:11:37 PM
1 votes:
The vote was to reduce funding for the year 2013. Last time I checked, we're not there yet. So....Jesus, libs are terrible.
2012-10-10 08:11:19 PM
1 votes:

sheep snorter: Nov 19 2012: Watch as all these special particular certain loudmouth republicans(domestic terrorists) get rounded up and given a proper burial at deep sea with their hero Osama Bin Laden. As per U.S. anti-terrorism laws.

/slug to the face optional(slithering slimer is so kinky)
//Please sign the petition to restore the 'truth in newscast laws'.


I bet you think you're reality based and a moderate.

I like the advocacy of pogroms. Nice touch.
2012-10-10 08:08:51 PM
1 votes:

Via Infinito: thismomentinblackhistory: James F. Campbell: Nobody cares. The Republicans could vote to fund live kitten eating, and the only ones who will take flak for it are the Democrats. The Republicans can say or do anything -- anything -- and it won't affect them.

Why is this?

Not to threadjack, but you have one of the best farkies ever.

"Why does Kirk Cameron keep asking this reporter out on a date?"


Answer: we had 9x the people at the Toledo fark party than he had at his birthday party :)
2012-10-10 07:51:02 PM
1 votes:
The asshole family value pro life adulterer doctor/congressman that made his patient/mistress get an abortion is biatching about this on his Facebook page. Several people are saying he voted to defund security, but I can't find a link to verify it.
2012-10-10 07:46:55 PM
1 votes:

Mentat: Hillary Clinton needs to show up at the House and tear this guy 12 new assholes.


Oh, yes, please this! You are very correct. This needs to happen. I would so love to watch this.
2012-10-10 07:07:46 PM
1 votes:

James F. Campbell: Nobody cares. The Republicans could vote to fund live kitten eating, and the only ones who will take flak for it are the Democrats. The Republicans can say or do anything -- anything -- and it won't affect them.


Why is this?
 
Displayed 69 of 69 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report