If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   Which is worse, that a 23 year old has 5 kids or that she superglued one of her rug rats to the wall?   (cnn.com) divider line 216
    More: Sick, A Texas  
•       •       •

16946 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Oct 2012 at 6:02 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



216 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-10-09 08:21:14 AM  
Thank goodness the Pope won't let us give her condoms!
 
2012-10-09 08:22:52 AM  

Hawnkee: Good enough. Hang her by the ovaries until dead.


I make this counter-proposal;

I propose that we crazy glue her hands to the wall and then kick her to death.
 
2012-10-09 08:24:52 AM  

SpectroBoy: Thank goodness the Pope won't let us give her condoms!


She would not use them anyway. The mroe kids the bigger her check from Obama.
 
2012-10-09 08:25:04 AM  
Um, a lot of times it's the guy that doesn't want to wear a condom.. of course, she should be on her own birth control. Just sayin'. The father of this child needs to take equal responsibility.
 
2012-10-09 08:26:11 AM  
Please not my racw please not my race please not my race. Thank goodness
 
2012-10-09 08:27:46 AM  
When they scrub the glue off that kid he's going to have a wet back.
 
2012-10-09 08:38:09 AM  

cretinbob: Dunno...Is she white?


That was my first thought. Then mebee black. Didn't expect a Messican.
 
2012-10-09 08:39:55 AM  

cookiefleck: Um, a lot of times it's the guy that doesn't want to wear a condom.. of course, she should be on her own birth control. Just sayin'. The father of this child needs to take equal responsibility.


Feminists/progressives have been telling us that outside of the sperm fathers are unecessary and government fills thier role with social services and financial support A pregnant single mom has a whole bunch of "free stuff" sent her way paid for by the 53%.

Odds are she does not who the father is.
 
2012-10-09 08:41:30 AM  
No additional welfare or food stamps after two children. This will sort itdelf out. No im not punishing the children, their parents are
 
2012-10-09 08:43:24 AM  
Whoever mentioned incentivizing voluntary sterilization - I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Even if the state offered $1000 plus the cost of the surgery to women to voluntarily undergo a
tubal ligation, in the long run it would save money - particularly when applied to the cross section
of the population who:

a. are on welfare
b. keep having child after child (who also end up being on mom's welfare, receiving Medicaid, etc...)
c. have children in the system due to abuse / neglect

Are these people the ONLY ones who have multiple children and end up having run-ins with
DCF? Of course not. But the potential savings from that particular group alone would probably
be staggering.

My husband works for DCF and the stories he's brought home (names removed, of course), would
make you cry, they are so awful.

Case in point (totally not cool story, bro):

Several years ago, a little girl got raped and beaten by her father on Christmas Eve. The mother,
piece of shiat that she was, tried to convince the little girl that it wasn't really her father who did it,
but that it was really just someone in a "daddy mask".
 
2012-10-09 08:45:18 AM  
I was gonna say that I hope the 23 year old isn't my sister out in Texas...then I remembered that she's only 21 and has 5 babies...and that they've all been taken away by CPS already.

So never mind.
 
2012-10-09 08:46:25 AM  

NewportBarGuy: bdub77: Having children is worse. 20 years down the road the majority of them are going to be f*ckups.

Yet people still b*tch about Planned Parenthood's $47.8 billion government-funded abortionarium. I only hope they build 2 or 3 more.


But if you abort the bastard, you can't claim welfare benefits on them. Do you honestly think this gal supported her children via Job?
 
2012-10-09 08:48:42 AM  

cookiefleck: Um, a lot of times it's the guy that doesn't want to wear a condom.. of course, she should be on her own birth control. Just sayin'. The father of this child needs to take equal responsibility.


If one needs to wear a condom, then jerking off is the better option. Sex with a condom really isn't worth the effort. This is to say: don't have sex with anyone who you don't know is disease-free and using effective contraception.
 
2012-10-09 08:49:40 AM  
Future Democrats making Texas blue in just a few years!
 
2012-10-09 08:50:32 AM  
It seems the whole world is going this way. No father in sight. Screwy violent women with too many kids. State (us tax payers) acting like their husband/kids father.

Hope this nut ends up in prison...Make her work cleaning up our highways or something too. Make her pay for her cell.
 
2012-10-09 08:51:43 AM  

SkunkWerks: phrenicmonkey: I'm gonna guess Republican. Birth Control is a sin.

Well, the day she beat the kid, she made a post on facebook or some such that included the phrase "why does God put obstacles in my way?"

On the day she was arrested, she was quoted as saying "only God can judge me".

I'd go with Republican too.


Democrats tend to call upon God for their own purposes:

www.whudat.com
 
2012-10-09 08:52:12 AM  

Brontes: 42 year old woman has a 23 year old kid with 5 kids? Does the family just rut like animals?


So, the woman had a child at 19, and her daughter had one kid a year starting at 18. DRTFA, so I don't know their finances, but that isn't freaky young for kids. Heck, My mom started having kids (2) when she was just 21. My grand-ma-ma was pregnent for most of the early and mid 1940s. Eighteen/nineteen years old is young but not a huge problem. The problem here far and away the super gluing.
 
2012-10-09 08:52:45 AM  
Probably not Republican or Democrat.

Probably Partido de Accion Nacional.
 
2012-10-09 08:52:50 AM  

JackieRabbit: Sex with a condom really isn't worth the effort.


Unless you're putting the condom on your brain, I'm thinking you may be doing something wrong.

JackieRabbit: This is to say: don't have sex with anyone who you don't know is disease-free and using effective contraception.


Well, "disease-free" is determinable by blood tests I suppose (though I know few people with that kind of patience, it's prudent). Not really sure how you test "effective contraception" beyond taking their word for it, which seems equally foolish if not moreso.
 
2012-10-09 08:54:31 AM  

hasty ambush: Democrats tend to call upon God for their own purposes:


So do Republicans. It's a big voting bloc to ignore, which is why the party doesn't ignore it.
 
2012-10-09 08:56:18 AM  
Khitbash?
 
2012-10-09 09:01:55 AM  

SgtArkie: NewportBarGuy: Kazan: vast majority of services provided by PP are not abortion

I mean... They are two very simple words. Planned. Parenthood. Planning to be a parent. Who the f*ck can honestly be against that?

Aside from their other medical services... That's why I give them money. It is a rational, sane, and intelligent, actually, for a society to plan for such things. It improves the community as a whole. As it only relates to those that actually need the assistance, most other people make that decision on their own, as a couple, or as adults.

 
ok I will give you some of that...PP on paper sounds great help the dumb/poor in making parental decisions, but since we have had PP for umpteen years show me stats where there has been a marked improvement in teen pregnancy, out of wedlock children.


Here you go.
 
2012-10-09 09:04:07 AM  

Mayhem of the Black Underclass: Incentivized sterilization. 1 case of per, and a pallet of Huggies, only after kid #2, we don't want anyone biatching that we've unduly removed someone's reproductive capabilities.

Or 2 coupons for half off at the nearest IHOP, for a gentleman requesting a vasectomy, with no requirement for children.


That's an easy sell, too. Just tell her she can have all of the crazy sex she wants without those nasty, two-legged side effects, with just one dose.

/I only assume she's into crazy sex, well... because.
 
2012-10-09 09:07:24 AM  

Lionel Mandrake: Lorelle: SilentStrider: She should be smacked.

Everyone knows you use duct tape to afix kids to the wall.

Or rope.

[content.internetvideoarchive.com image 320x240]

[encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com image 207x243]

Velcro


Came here for Velcro. Leaving satisfied.

/ Fark, why u no Texas tag?
 
2012-10-09 09:08:25 AM  
A per-requisite for any government assistance should be sterilization.

Liberals refuse to admit that people who can't take care of themselves shouldn't have children.
Conservatives refuse to admit that people who can't take care of themselves are still people.
 
2012-10-09 09:08:38 AM  

SkunkWerks: JackieRabbit: Sex with a condom really isn't worth the effort.

Unless you're putting the condom on your brain, I'm thinking you may be doing something wrong.

JackieRabbit: This is to say: don't have sex with anyone who you don't know is disease-free and using effective contraception.

Well, "disease-free" is determinable by blood tests I suppose (though I know few people with that kind of patience, it's prudent). Not really sure how you test "effective contraception" beyond taking their word for it, which seems equally foolish if not moreso.


You don't stick your dick into anyone you do not know reasonably well and trust. Never take anyone's word for it, when it comes to contraception. Know it first. This precludes all one-night stands and casual sex, of course, but if we are honest with ourselves and don't let our dicks dictate our behavior, we will understand that casual sex and one-night stands are more trouble than it is worth.
 
2012-10-09 09:09:17 AM  

Brostorm: No additional welfare or food stamps after two children. This will sort itdelf out. No im not punishing the children, their parents are


Some states have limits on the number they pay for but it does not matter they keep having kdis because as the oldest one ages out they have another one ready to take its palce so they don't face a reduction in benefits.

Also the more kids you have the bigger house government will pay for.
 
2012-10-09 09:14:14 AM  
 
2012-10-09 09:14:59 AM  

Brontes: 42 year old woman has a 23 year old kid with 5 kids? Does the family just rut like animals?


She looks spanish/latin of some sort...and they breed fast as they can. Especially those of Mexican/South American orientation...from what I understand its a cultural thing.
 
2012-10-09 09:16:37 AM  

RembrandtQEinstein: A per-requisite for any government assistance should be sterilization.

Liberals refuse to admit that people who can't take care of themselves shouldn't have children.
Conservatives refuse to admit that people who can't take care of themselves are still people.


I can't decide if you are a really bad troll or just plain stupid. Inasmuch as you don't know how to spell prerequisite, we'll go with the later.
 
2012-10-09 09:18:44 AM  
The hilarious moment when Fark turns into a bingo hall full of grannies talking about how "people" are just bad, sick and awful...

This woman is clearly an idiot. If the $0.40 gang tats, Jersey Shore style dye job, and vacant stare didn't convince you, RTFA-ing and seeing details of her life will.

If this woman beats and murders her children:

(a) Why do we care? These kids are obviously at least half-idiot.

(b) Why do we bother? This woman is going to take up way more in resources than she'll ever pay into the system if we try to stop her from doing every stupid thing she puts her mind to.

Leave her alone, let nature sort this one out... it will...
 
2012-10-09 09:18:45 AM  

hasty ambush: Woman With 15 Kids: "Somebody needs to be held accountable, and they need to pay."


The smartest youtube comment ever is on there first: "Pro-Lifers, where are you now?"
 
2012-10-09 09:20:46 AM  

Headso: hasty ambush: Woman With 15 Kids: "Somebody needs to be held accountable, and they need to pay."

The smartest youtube comment ever is on there first: "Pro-Lifers, where are you now?"


So you are saying this woman should have been forced to have abortions?
 
2012-10-09 09:25:34 AM  
Hey, someone's gotta breed. It won't be subby, because it requires sex.
 
2012-10-09 09:26:05 AM  

JackieRabbit: You don't stick your dick into anyone you do not know reasonably well and trust.


Sounds like a good rule of thumb. And yet people who feel they have your trust are in an excellent position to lie to you. Not giving them complete control over the birth control decision puts an awful lot more discretion in your hands.

"Oh sure, I'm on the pill honey."

This also leaves a lot of room for honest mistakes, as well.

JackieRabbit: Never take anyone's word for it, when it comes to contraception.


The only way to be sure is to see to it personally, then.

I've heard they're looking at an effective birth control method for men that's similar to the pill for women. Sadly, it doesn't quite exist yet, so this means (unless you'd like at least to have a temporary vasectomy) condoms.

JackieRabbit: This precludes all one-night stands and casual sex, of course, but if we are honest with ourselves and don't let our dicks dictate our behavior, we will understand that casual sex and one-night stands are more trouble than it is worth.


Well, here we agree. I don't believe in "casual sex" anyway. And by "don't believe in", I'm not asserting a moral or ethical stand on the issue, nor am I addressing character flaws in people who engage in it. I'm actually saying that genuine examples of the concept is by and large so rare as to be mythical as far as homo sapiens is concerned.

But, like other mythical human traits (multitasking, anyone?), we sure like to pretend it exists... usually because it's a convenient excuse for something we know we shouldn't be doing.
 
2012-10-09 09:28:33 AM  
Forget forced sterilization, take advantage of her skill. Forced pregnancy for infertile couples. Lock her up in some sort of breeding center so she can't harm the fetus. 20 years of being constantly pregnant should teach her to not glue kids to the wall and beat them.
 
2012-10-09 09:32:46 AM  

Nome de Plume: Future Democrats making Texas blue in just a few years!


If you can't vote them out, breed them out?
 
2012-10-09 09:34:11 AM  

JackieRabbit: RembrandtQEinstein: A per-requisite for any government assistance should be sterilization.

Liberals refuse to admit that people who can't take care of themselves shouldn't have children.
Conservatives refuse to admit that people who can't take care of themselves are still people.

I can't decide if you are a really bad troll or just plain stupid. Inasmuch as you don't know how to spell prerequisite, we'll go with the later.


OMG I picked the wrong word from the spellcheck list. My point is totally invalidated! You win at internet rhetoric this time JR but I'll get you next time! NEXT TIME!!!1!one!
 
2012-10-09 09:40:35 AM  

JackieRabbit: If one needs to wear a condom, then jerking off is the better option. Sex with a condom really isn't worth the effort. This is to say: don't have sex with anyone who you don't know is disease-free and using effective contraception.


So my wife and I should just have not have sex? We don't want kids, hormonal birth control is ineffective due to her medication, and copper IUDs were out of the question because she's allergic to certain metals. Not everyone fits into neat little categories.
 
2012-10-09 09:45:10 AM  

hasty ambush: Headso: hasty ambush: Woman With 15 Kids: "Somebody needs to be held accountable, and they need to pay."

The smartest youtube comment ever is on there first: "Pro-Lifers, where are you now?"

So you are saying this woman should have been forced to have abortions?


No. The state should not pay for her decisions though. If hee children die from starvation she should be held accountable
 
2012-10-09 09:47:15 AM  

Brostorm: If hee children die from starvation she should be held accountable


That still leaves a bunch of dead kids we knew were going to die from starvation, yet never lifted a finger to do anything about.

Culpability is fun.
 
2012-10-09 09:52:25 AM  

SkunkWerks: Brostorm: If hee children die from starvation she should be held accountable

That still leaves a bunch of dead kids we knew were going to die from starvation, yet never lifted a finger to do anything about.

Culpability is fun.


And the person responsible will be held accountable. The finger will justice, throwing money at people that should not have children has failed. When you subsidize something you just get more of it.
 
2012-10-09 09:56:32 AM  

Brostorm: And the person responsible will be held accountable.


So we'll be holding ourselves accountable then? Excellent.

What about the kids? They didn't have a choice in the matter. Should we just leave parents to beat the eversnot out of their children because removing them from the home and caring for them in a safe place costs the state money as well?
 
2012-10-09 09:58:38 AM  

Brostorm: When you subsidize something you just get more of it.


I agree. People are terrible. We should subsidize less of them.
 
2012-10-09 09:59:09 AM  

SkunkWerks: Brostorm: If hee children die from starvation she should be held accountable

That still leaves a bunch of dead kids we knew were going to die from starvation, yet never lifted a finger to do anything about.

Culpability is fun.


That is kind of the point of not having the state intervene. If an individual or group wants to feed the kids, let them. They are free to, or not. Anybody that chooses to help children is a better person than me. But I am free to choose to be a bad person, unless the state forces us (through taxes) to help. Then we are not free to be good or bad.
 
2012-10-09 10:00:13 AM  

SkunkWerks: I agree. People are terrible. We should subsidize less of them.


Or just stop subsidizing the terrible people, and start spending our money on the good ones.

This woman wants to die, and her kids are doomed as well. Let her finish the job, and spend our law enforcement dollars on preventing honor students from getting raped on buses.
 
2012-10-09 10:00:23 AM  

hasty ambush: Headso: hasty ambush: Woman With 15 Kids: "Somebody needs to be held accountable, and they need to pay."

The smartest youtube comment ever is on there first: "Pro-Lifers, where are you now?"

So you are saying this woman should have been forced to have abortions?


Where are all the pro-lifers to help care for these children in need.
 
2012-10-09 10:02:23 AM  

fireclown: Brontes: 42 year old woman has a 23 year old kid with 5 kids? Does the family just rut like animals?

So, the woman had a child at 19, and her daughter had one kid a year starting at 18. .


One kid a year, no matter what age, or what financial situation, is just completely negligent of the 3 ish month old baby/other children you just had. I don't know how any caring responsible mother could want to get pregnant again and be able to manage the tremendous task or raising an infant while dealing at the same time with another pregnanacy. Let alone the fact that a mother only has so much attention and focus that can go around, and trying to raise a 5 year old, 4 year old, 3 year old, 2 year old, and 1 year old all at the same time, would be emotionally trying on ANYONE. And what ends up happening is the mother becomes mentally unstable and we get things like this. Not to mention that the kids themselves are way more likely to be farked up as adults.

Maybe this is just a cultural thing, but so were human sacrafice and slavery
 
2012-10-09 10:04:05 AM  

SkunkWerks: Brostorm: And the person responsible will be held accountable.

So we'll be holding ourselves accountable then? Excellent.

What about the kids? They didn't have a choice in the matter. Should we just leave parents to beat the eversnot out of their children because removing them from the home and caring for them in a safe place costs the state money as well?


I never said that or anything close to it. Abusing children us a crime a punishable. Having mire children than you can afford is incentivised
 
2012-10-09 10:04:16 AM  

sodomizer: Or just stop subsidizing the terrible people, and start spending our money on the good ones.


Were the kids "good ones" or "bad ones" in this equation?

I'm unclear on this point. I thought a large part of the whole point of having children is that they have the potential to grow up a lot of different ways. Assuming they don't starve to death because of their parents (and a state who decided to play hear no evil/see no evil/speak no evil), of course.

AmbassadorBooze: That is kind of the point of not having the state intervene. If an individual or group wants to feed the kids, let them. They are free to, or not. Anybody that chooses to help children is a better person than me. But I am free to choose to be a bad person, unless the state forces us (through taxes) to help. Then we are not free to be good or bad.


Those kids sure aren't free to be good or bad. their parents made that decision for them... apparently.
 
Displayed 50 of 216 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report