If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New York Times)   Apple and Google now spend more on buying and defending patents than R&D   (nytimes.com) divider line 5
    More: Fail, Google, Posner, plain, Nuance Communications  
•       •       •

901 clicks; posted to Business » on 08 Oct 2012 at 11:52 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-10-08 01:12:36 PM  
2 votes:
A is the expected revenue from suits, as projected by lawyers.
B is the expected revenue from features, as projected by marketers.
C is the expected revenue from exclusive apps/devices, as projected by engineering departments.

A, plus B, plus C, equals X. If X is less than the amount of expected revenue from defending the perceived patent in court, we don't develop that technology.
2012-10-08 02:58:09 PM  
1 votes:

clkeagle: I can't imagine why innovation is suffering, or point to a better indicator of our failing education system. We really are turning into a nation of B-Ark crew members.

/obscure? I hope not.


It's obscure in the same way that Princess Bride quotes are obscure.
2012-10-08 01:42:28 PM  
1 votes:
Too bad our legislature is too politically paralyzed to do anything about it.
2012-10-08 12:34:35 PM  
1 votes:
Self-sustaining circle of patent trolls
2012-10-08 12:00:01 PM  
1 votes:
with patents you are paying teams of lawyers. with R&D you are paying science/programmer guys(and gals!)

who do you think costs more?
 
Displayed 5 of 5 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report