If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Spiegel)   Salman Rushdie releases new book thanking everybody from Khomeini to bin Laden for helping him pull Jeteresque levels of top-shelf tail despite looking like your uncle the community-college history professor   (spiegel.de) divider line 59
    More: Hero, Salman Rushdie, Ayatollah Khomeini, Osama bin Laden, Jeteresque, community colleges, City of London Police, SPIEGEL, uncles  
•       •       •

10164 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Oct 2012 at 9:33 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



59 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-10-08 09:36:54 AM
But I heard a death-mark wasn't an easy thing to live with?

/Not obscure.
 
2012-10-08 09:39:09 AM
Sad thing is that there's no way a similar book would get published today.
 
2012-10-08 09:41:02 AM

beefoe: Sad thing is that there's no way a similar book would get published today.


Of course it would. If anything it's easier now than before. He could even self publish if he wanted to.
 
2012-10-08 09:41:28 AM
he's not as wanted as he wants us to think. someone really wants a man dead, he's dead. we've all seen the movie.

/everybody wants somebody, sometimes
 
2012-10-08 09:41:32 AM
Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.
 
2012-10-08 09:41:56 AM
imageshack.us

Which...I think it's actually "Salmon."
 
2012-10-08 09:42:47 AM

Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.


She's just the most recent in a very long line that rated much, much higher.
 
2012-10-08 09:44:24 AM
Yeah but Watley regifted his Label Baby Junior. Better call Sal Bass!
 
2012-10-08 09:51:47 AM
Useless without pics of said tail...
 
2012-10-08 09:51:51 AM
I like the dig at Romney in the end.
 
ecl
2012-10-08 09:52:16 AM

sprawl15: [imageshack.us image 244x221]

Which...I think it's actually "Salmon."


CODY'S DOWN!
 
2012-10-08 10:01:02 AM
Did Obama blame Rushdie for mob violence?
 
2012-10-08 10:02:22 AM

Nickninja: Useless without pics of said tail...


Just GIS Hot Jewish American Princess. Definitely not Jeteresque, more like Seinfeldesque, which is a nice consolation prize for someone that looks like a bullfrog.
 
2012-10-08 10:03:30 AM

Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.


She was before the creep got to her.
 
2012-10-08 10:06:02 AM

ecl: sprawl15: [imageshack.us image 244x221]

Which...I think it's actually "Salmon."

CODY'S DOWN!


That show contains my favorite string of dialog ever.

Xtacle 2: Yeah, so who's read Flowers for Algernon?
Nearl: Ken!
Xtacle 3: About the kid with all the chains and the goggles and at the end he gets killed with a shotgun?
Xtacle 2: No, that's ...
Xtacle 4: Boosh!
Xtacle 3: Boosh!
Xtacle 1: Boosh!
Xtacle 2: No ...
Xtacle 4: Buh-buh-Boosh!
Xtacle 2: That's Harrison Bergeron.
[pause]
Xtacle 1/Xtacle 3/Xtacle 4: Hollywood Squares!
Xtacle 2: That's Tom Bergeron!
Xtacle 3: Brother of Menelaus.
Xtacle 2: Dammit, that's Agamemnon!
Xtacle 3: Boosh!
Xtacle 2: Okay.
Xtacle 1: Boosh!
Xtacle 2: Greek.

/boosh
//and or kakow
 
2012-10-08 10:07:39 AM

WanPhat: Did Obama blame Rushdie for mob violence?


Obama blamed Jeter for mob violence?
 
2012-10-08 10:09:05 AM

Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.


Yeah, knees way too sharp.

joshsgarage.typepad.com
 
2012-10-08 10:17:28 AM
But what I want to know is, is there another guy facing right behind the pole?
 
2012-10-08 10:21:29 AM

gerbilpox: Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.

Yeah, knees way too sharp.

[joshsgarage.typepad.com image 293x500]


Divorced...apparently Rushdie got tired of her shiat.
 
IP
2012-10-08 10:28:48 AM

TheOther: gerbilpox: Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.

Yeah, knees way too sharp.

[joshsgarage.typepad.com image 293x500]

Divorced...apparently Rushdie got tired of her shiat.


I'd like an opportunity to get tired of her shiat.


/fap
 
2012-10-08 10:31:29 AM
You ever take a dump and throw up on your dick?

/CODY!!
 
2012-10-08 10:32:35 AM
Joseph Anton? What, Sal Bass was taken?
 
2012-10-08 10:33:00 AM

gerbilpox: Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.

Yeah, knees way too sharp.

[joshsgarage.typepad.com image 293x500]


She may be ridiculously hot, but she's not Jeter-level tang. Yes we are splitting hairs here, but you have to when comparing tail of this high quality.
 
2012-10-08 10:34:39 AM
I had no idea sci-fi author K.W. Jeter got that much action.Q
 
2012-10-08 10:37:39 AM

Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.


4.bp.blogspot.com

ORLY?
 
2012-10-08 10:42:38 AM

Nightsweat: Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 400x533]

ORLY?


She is hot, but photo shoots pics are always shooped.
 
2012-10-08 10:43:10 AM

Cymbal: gerbilpox: Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.

Yeah, knees way too sharp.

[joshsgarage.typepad.com image 293x500]

She may be ridiculously hot, but she's not Jeter-level tang. Yes we are splitting hairs here, but you have to when comparing tail of this high quality.


You don't know what you're talking about. Yes, she's aged a bit, but she's still ridiculously hot. Plus she knows tons about cooking. COOKING.

Jeter just nails basic starlets and pulls all manner of cute bridge & tunnel wenches. He goes for a basic level of quality and takes the quantity for the win.
 
2012-10-08 10:45:04 AM

gerbilpox: Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.

Yeah, knees way too sharp.

[joshsgarage.typepad.com image 293x500]


You can't even see her knees in that pic. Your argument is invalid.
 
2012-10-08 10:45:27 AM

Scorpitron is reduced to a thin red paste: Cymbal: gerbilpox: Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.

Yeah, knees way too sharp.

[joshsgarage.typepad.com image 293x500]

She may be ridiculously hot, but she's not Jeter-level tang. Yes we are splitting hairs here, but you have to when comparing tail of this high quality.

You don't know what you're talking about. Yes, she's aged a bit, but she's still ridiculously hot. Plus she knows tons about cooking. COOKING.

Jeter just nails basic starlets and pulls all manner of cute bridge & tunnel wenches. He goes for a basic level of quality and takes the quantity for the win.


You think that biatch actually cooks? Please. And Minka Kelly > Padma
 
2012-10-08 10:45:45 AM

Girion47: I like the dig at Romney in the end.


Yeah that was pretty awesome.

"I don't want to comment when I don't know what I am talking about. I will leave that to Mitt Romney."

lol!
 
2012-10-08 10:48:52 AM

Helena Handbasket: Padma Lakshmi is not Jeteresque-level top-shelf by any means.


K2 is not as high as Everest.

But since your ass isn't climbing either of them ever it doesn't behoove you to bang on about it.
 
2012-10-08 10:48:59 AM

Cymbal: Minka Kelly > Padma


But we can agree Minka Kelly
 
2012-10-08 10:50:54 AM

thecpt: Cymbal: Minka Kelly > Padma

But we can agree Minka Kelly


whoa filter pwn

padme>minka kelly
 
2012-10-08 11:13:50 AM
Minka Kelly over Lakshmi? Nah. One is internationally famous, gorgeous, and very talented. The other has had a nice career and is gorgeous, but there's no comparison.
 
2012-10-08 11:20:24 AM

Scorpitron is reduced to a thin red paste: Minka Kelly over Lakshmi? Nah. One is internationally famous, gorgeous, and very talented. The other has had a nice career and is gorgeous, but there's no comparison.


Yeah, but with a name like Minka, she *HAS* to be good.
 
2012-10-08 11:31:02 AM

Girion47: I like the dig at Romney in the end.


I thought it was a little weird. Is he trying to remind people he is liberal? Maybe modern politics has made him concerned people might associate his "hate speech" with being conservative, and he justs wants everyone to be absolutely clear on where he stands?
 
2012-10-08 11:32:52 AM

4NTLRZ: You can't even see her knees in that pic. Your argument is invalid.


i491.photobucket.com
 
2012-10-08 11:33:06 AM

Big_Fat_Liar: Girion47: I like the dig at Romney in the end.

I thought it was a little weird. Is he trying to remind people he is liberal? Maybe modern politics has made him concerned people might associate his "hate speech" with being conservative, and he justs wants everyone to be absolutely clear on where he stands?


What he said wasn't Liberal vs. Conservative, it was him calling out someone for acting like a dumbass.


Facts are liberally biased though right?
 
2012-10-08 11:44:22 AM

thecpt: Cymbal: Minka Kelly > Padma

But we can agree Minka Kelly


No we most certainly cannot:

Padma:
lh3.ggpht.com

Minka:
thechive.files.wordpress.com

not even close, and add in that you could have an intelligent conversation with Padma afterwards and the chance she might cook you breakfast? it's not even a fair fight
 
2012-10-08 11:49:40 AM
This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.
 
2012-10-08 11:50:15 AM

Magorn: No we most certainly cannot:


My post got filter pwned (see below it)

Here was my comparison:

images3.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2012-10-08 12:31:58 PM

Sinister 161: This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.


He's paid more taxes than you have. A LOT more taxes than you have.

And did he agree to pay for this security? Or even ask for it?
 
2012-10-08 12:49:27 PM

Moopy Mac: Sinister 161: This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.

He's paid more taxes than you have. A LOT more taxes than you have.

And did he agree to pay for this security? Or even ask for it?


I can guarantee that in % of income less what has been taken out that I have paid much more tax and I haven't written a book designed to anger conservative Islam and then go running to the UK government for protection when the predicted outrage occurred. He could have paid for his own protection but decided that the taxpayer should pay the bill.
He's done really well out of that fatwa, a decent human might be inclined to pay back the country that protected him from his own stupidity.

/yes I've read the book and was utterly unimpressed, literately genius he is not.
 
2012-10-08 12:52:02 PM

Moopy Mac: Sinister 161: This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.

He's paid more taxes than you have. A LOT more taxes than you have.

And did he agree to pay for this security? Or even ask for it?



As a permanent member of America's Welfare Class (TM) I assure you that Mr. Rushdie has not, does not and will not pay more taxes than my family and I, whether individually, communally, or overall.

And we don't ask for security either. Cops? Meh. Cops are for rich people. We get hammers.
 
ecl
2012-10-08 01:27:27 PM

Sinister 161: Moopy Mac: Sinister 161: This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.

He's paid more taxes than you have. A LOT more taxes than you have.

And did he agree to pay for this security? Or even ask for it?

I can guarantee that in % of income less what has been taken out that I have paid much more tax and I haven't written a book designed to anger conservative Islam and then go running to the UK government for protection when the predicted outrage occurred. He could have paid for his own protection but decided that the taxpayer should pay the bill.
He's done really well out of that fatwa, a decent human might be inclined to pay back the country that protected him from his own stupidity.

/yes I've read the book and was utterly unimpressed, literately genius he is not.


You're first sentence is nonsensical gibberish.
 
2012-10-08 01:31:25 PM
when seconds count the police are only minutes away.
I just bought a SIG P220 in .45 ACP...
//why yes things at work are getting much much more interesting. why do you ask?
 
2012-10-08 02:01:42 PM

Sinister 161: Moopy Mac: Sinister 161: This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.

He's paid more taxes than you have. A LOT more taxes than you have.

And did he agree to pay for this security? Or even ask for it?

I can guarantee that in % of income less what has been taken out that I have paid much more tax and I haven't written a book designed to anger conservative Islam and then go running to the UK government for protection when the predicted outrage occurred. He could have paid for his own protection but decided that the taxpayer should pay the bill.
He's done really well out of that fatwa, a decent human might be inclined to pay back the country that protected him from his own stupidity.

/yes I've read the book and was utterly unimpressed, literately genius he is not.


I'll be certain to carefully consider your eloquent opinions on who is and is not a "literately genius", Sir.
 
2012-10-08 02:04:17 PM

ecl: Sinister 161: Moopy Mac: Sinister 161: This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.

He's paid more taxes than you have. A LOT more taxes than you have.

And did he agree to pay for this security? Or even ask for it?

I can guarantee that in % of income less what has been taken out that I have paid much more tax and I haven't written a book designed to anger conservative Islam and then go running to the UK government for protection when the predicted outrage occurred. He could have paid for his own protection but decided that the taxpayer should pay the bill.
He's done really well out of that fatwa, a decent human might be inclined to pay back the country that protected him from his own stupidity.

/yes I've read the book and was utterly unimpressed, literately genius he is not.

You're first sentence is nonsensical gibberish.


Then allow me to unravel it for you so you can comment on the subject not my grammer. What I meant was that if you calculated as a % of earnings the tax both I and Rushdie pay then deduct the value of the public services we used (of in his case used) I guarantee I contribute more nett to the UK than he ever will.
 
2012-10-08 02:06:04 PM

Inchoate: Sinister 161: Moopy Mac: Sinister 161: This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.

He's paid more taxes than you have. A LOT more taxes than you have.

And did he agree to pay for this security? Or even ask for it?

I can guarantee that in % of income less what has been taken out that I have paid much more tax and I haven't written a book designed to anger conservative Islam and then go running to the UK government for protection when the predicted outrage occurred. He could have paid for his own protection but decided that the taxpayer should pay the bill.
He's done really well out of that fatwa, a decent human might be inclined to pay back the country that protected him from his own stupidity.

/yes I've read the book and was utterly unimpressed, literately genius he is not.

I'll be certain to carefully consider your eloquent opinions on who is and is not a "literately genius", Sir.


I do believe my opinions are my own and are not up for consideration, as I expect yours to be too.
 
ecl
2012-10-08 02:16:18 PM

Sinister 161: ecl: Sinister 161: Moopy Mac: Sinister 161: This man is no hero.

/UK tax payer waiting for him to pay us back.

He's paid more taxes than you have. A LOT more taxes than you have.

And did he agree to pay for this security? Or even ask for it?

I can guarantee that in % of income less what has been taken out that I have paid much more tax and I haven't written a book designed to anger conservative Islam and then go running to the UK government for protection when the predicted outrage occurred. He could have paid for his own protection but decided that the taxpayer should pay the bill.
He's done really well out of that fatwa, a decent human might be inclined to pay back the country that protected him from his own stupidity.

/yes I've read the book and was utterly unimpressed, literately genius he is not.

You're first sentence is nonsensical gibberish.

Then allow me to unravel it for you so you can comment on the subject not my grammer. What I meant was that if you calculated as a % of earnings the tax both I and Rushdie pay then deduct the value of the public services we used (of in his case used) I guarantee I contribute more nett to the UK than he ever will.


Do you have hard evidence to back up these claims or is this all true just because you feel like it's the truth in your heart?
 
Displayed 50 of 59 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report