KatjaMouse: AdolfOliverPanties: Kate Winslet? No. Not even close. Cate Blanchett maybe.Let's settle this:[i.dailymail.co.uk image 317x367] [img2.timeinc.net image 300x400][www.trendnista.com image 300x400]
KiplingKat872: Jesus McSordid: Not even that. Jeez, standards were low back then.And it is not a matter of "low standards," it is a matter of different standards. Half the women held up as icons of beauty now would be considered skeletal or too undeveloped to men back then. Some of the square jaws favored in women now would be considered manish back then.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jul 27 2017 15:16:59
Runtime: 0.263 sec (262 ms)