KiplingKat872: Jesus McSordid: Not even that. Jeez, standards were low back then.She is pretty, there is no denying that. I think in her era she would be considered more pretty than under our own modern standards of beauty.But as men over the age of thirty come to realize, "sexy" is only party in one's physical appearance. Attitude, wit, and a certain ineffable something can make a physically unremarkable woman become the center of attention in a crowded room. Physically Mata Hari's face would be considered "cute" at best, but it was her attitude that made her one of the greatest sex symbols of her time.
Jesus McSordid: Not even that. Jeez, standards were low back then.
AdolfOliverPanties: Kate Winslet? No. Not even close. Cate Blanchett maybe.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Aug 19 2017 10:22:35
Runtime: 0.255 sec (254 ms)