FunkOut: Of course, there's no such thing as medium tits, C cup and under are apparently considered a small niche market for men who are gay and/or secretly pedos. Or maybe it's D cup and under now that's considered small, I'm not up on the latest trends of breast size criticisms.
FunkOut: Louisiana_Sitar_Club: FunkOut: Of course, there's no such thing as medium tits, C cup and under are apparently considered a small niche market for men who are gay and/or secretly pedos. Or maybe it's D cup and under now that's considered small, I'm not up on the latest trends of breast size criticisms.You sound flat.Yes, 34D is considered tiny these days. You're right.
robohobo: Apparently charitable organizations turn down money all the time. I once offered my local PBS a great deal of money. I mean a LOT of money. Years of funding. It came with caveats, and they turned it down. Happens.
Louisiana_Sitar_Club: FunkOut: Of course, there's no such thing as medium tits, C cup and under are apparently considered a small niche market for men who are gay and/or secretly pedos. Or maybe it's D cup and under now that's considered small, I'm not up on the latest trends of breast size criticisms.You sound flat.
jehovahs witness protection: GAT_00: Why the fark are they wasting their money on Komen? Donate the money to a real research group.OH SHIAT!We agree on something.
save russian jews: tits are connected to farking PEOPLE. superficial bullshiat like "save the ta-tas" is what leads to misogynistic shiat like this, where we grieve so much for lost ~titties~ and the grief that causes us as men or what the fark ever.
Zon: Well, to be fair, it's likely actually about $22 out of $260 million, on modest assumptions and fuzzy math*. Still, that's pretty terrible, at ~8.4% efficiency.*The math gets wonky because the indirect treatment expenditures through intra-organizational donations. Komen spent $9 of $180 million directly (5%), but some portion of $76m (which is 42% of the $180m) indirectly on treatment [or other legitimate aim, such as research]. We might assume those organizations are equally (in)efficient, but on that assumption there are substantial doubly-indirect treatment expenditures, and so on. Doing an infinite sum would be silly, given the assumptions and vagueness involved (let alone the possibility of intra-organizational donation loops). So, just the first few iterations:$9m directly$3.8m indirectly (5% of $76m)$1.6m doubly-indirectly (42% of $76m is $32m, and 5% of that is $1.6m)$.65m triply-indirectly (42% of $32m is $13m, and 5% of that is $.65m)Since these are rough anyway, let's just call it $15m out of that $180m. That's 8.33% efficiency. They still have $80m unspent (well, presumably that's why their expenditures are $80m less than their revenue), and if applied at the same ratio would yield ...
snocone: Money is fungible, you santctimonious asshats.Unlike boobies.
British: Why not donate it to prostate cancer research charities? There seems to be a breast cancer research fundraiser going on every 2 seconds(including being prompted to do so when I buy coffee).You hear almost nothing for stopping prostate cancer. Guess guys aren't as important. You would think a porn site would want customers alive.
FunkOut: Of course, there's no such thing as medium tits, C cup and under...
yet_another_wumpus: Howie Spankowitz: Fear_and_Loathing: Howie Spankowitz: I tell charities all the time that there is such a thing as "bad" money.I worked for non-profits for 30 years. Unfortunately, most don't understand the concept of bad money and also mistakenly believe there is free money. I have lots of stories, but none of them are "CSB". Sadly.Exactly. Especially when you decide to accept corporate money. Corporations don't do philanthropy. They'll use the language of philanthropy, but what they do is marketing, and if you accept their money, you better know how to negotiate a gift agreement and understand the value of your charity's brand or the relationship will be imbalanced and...well, let's just say I could tell you some horror stories.That's the joke./Komen has existed solely for pinkwashing for years, who are they kidding with this?
mentula: good, they shouldn't accept money generated by a cheap patronizing stunt
Vodka Zombie: Of course they won't. Haven't we learned that Komen is kind of the Phelps Family of breast cancer? They just exist to sue people and be political trolls.
SilentStrider: Your can find pornhub links on tubegalore, or so I'm told.
Want the rest of the Farking story? Try
More threads. More community. More Farking.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Oct 17 2017 10:00:26
Runtime: 0.299 sec (299 ms)