If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Twitter)   Have a look at Farker Neal Boortz's feed while Obama was imploding last night   (twitter.com) divider line 259
    More: Cool, Neal Boortz  
•       •       •

7251 clicks; posted to Politics » on 04 Oct 2012 at 12:53 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



259 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-10-04 09:51:55 AM
Neal Boortz is a Farker? What's his handle?
 
2012-10-04 09:56:17 AM
"Imploded"?
 
2012-10-04 10:01:30 AM
How about I don't.
 
2012-10-04 10:07:55 AM
Talk about spiking the football. Romney wins a debate and all the sudden it's "Obama was destroyed!" "Obama imploded!"

Wait for the standings at the end of the season, not just the first game.
 
2012-10-04 10:13:05 AM
More like, the game is already something like 35-0 and now its 35-7.

But there's still time! And the media loves sports cliches.
 
2012-10-04 10:14:32 AM
i194.photobucket.com

Oh haha, I get it. Obama is just like Mike Tyson. You see they are both black.
 
2012-10-04 10:19:15 AM
I used to like Neal Boortz until he started pulling this stuff.

/was introduced to Fark through him
 
2012-10-04 10:22:59 AM

Generation_D: More like, the game is already something like 35-0 and now its 35-7.

But there's still time! And the media loves sports cliches.


But Nate Silver is only giving Obama a 96.9% chance on the now cast. It was 97.3% yesterday. Clearly the Obama campaign is doomed. Doomed I tell you.
 
2012-10-04 10:25:23 AM
I do like his dog though.

si0.twimg.com
 
2012-10-04 10:28:49 AM
i194.photobucket.com

The Obama Media:

i194.photobucket.com

i194.photobucket.com
 
2012-10-04 10:33:20 AM
So today it's the Republicans' term to have it to explained to them that just because every TV newsbot in the land is nattering about "if the election were held today", the election is not in fact being held today.

Republicans are great at circular-firing-squad formation.
 
2012-10-04 10:39:03 AM
I'm pretty sure I have Boortz on ignore... ::shrug::
 
2012-10-04 10:42:58 AM
Lots of mitigating factors. Kerry won debate 1 in 2004, that didn't help him win over all. Obama did not gaffe, he only let Romney talk too much and wasn't aggressive enough. Romney came off as aggressive and this turns some people off.

All that being said, I think the collective mood of Obama supporters was somewhere between WTF and WTF.

Every cliche you can say about Obama's negatives: That he can't talk without a prompter, that he is aloof, that he doesn't give a crap about middle America, that he is in over his head, that he can't lead... all came through.

Romney came off like either a smarmy car salesman closing a deal or a corporate executive telling employees they wouldn't be laid off they'd be right sized.

The sucky thing is, that stuff sells. We'll see how much, and to what extent. Outside of talking head land, I still think Romney's a slimeball who'd sell out his own grandmother to make a profit, and Obama does know how to listen to strong advice and make the right call most of the time.

So my vote's unswayed. I just wish Obama came out and bloodied his knuckles like Bill Clinton would have. The damn race would be over with by now.
 
2012-10-04 10:49:53 AM
NB: "Obama REFUSES to recognize that cutting tax rates usually leads to increased tax revenues. Why won't Romney hit this point? "

Uh...because that's not true. We had the Bush cuts, which Obama reluctantly extended. What do we have as a result?
Highest number of uber-rich people, companies holding on to record amount of cash...money not moving.

If Neal is here (or someone in agreement with him), PLEASE cite an example where supply-side economics works. Tell us when things "trickled down".
It's probably the biggest ruse in history, purported by the mega-wealthy.
 
2012-10-04 10:54:38 AM

sweetmelissa31: [i194.photobucket.com image 506x81]

The Obama Media:

[i194.photobucket.com image 667x224]

[i194.photobucket.com image 342x264]


More like the Fartbamedia. Because President Obama is like a fart.
 
2012-10-04 10:55:52 AM
I was saying Boortz.
t1.gstatic.com
 
2012-10-04 11:05:21 AM
This is like being down 21 points and scoring a touchdown, and claiming you won the game. Hilarious overreaction by the GOP here.
 
2012-10-04 11:10:32 AM

Generation_D: Lots of mitigating factors. Kerry won debate 1 in 2004, that didn't help him win over all. Obama did not gaffe, he only let Romney talk too much and wasn't aggressive enough. Romney came off as aggressive and this turns some people off.

All that being said, I think the collective mood of Obama supporters was somewhere between WTF and WTF.

Every cliche you can say about Obama's negatives: That he can't talk without a prompter, that he is aloof, that he doesn't give a crap about middle America, that he is in over his head, that he can't lead... all came through.

Romney came off like either a smarmy car salesman closing a deal or a corporate executive telling employees they wouldn't be laid off they'd be right sized.

The sucky thing is, that stuff sells. We'll see how much, and to what extent. Outside of talking head land, I still think Romney's a slimeball who'd sell out his own grandmother to make a profit, and Obama does know how to listen to strong advice and make the right call most of the time.

So my vote's unswayed. I just wish Obama came out and bloodied his knuckles like Bill Clinton would have. The damn race would be over with by now.


I agree with pretty much all of this
 
2012-10-04 11:22:24 AM

Krymson Tyde: Neal Boortz is a Farker? What's his handle?


Yeah... which troll is he?
 
2012-10-04 11:28:13 AM

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Krymson Tyde: Neal Boortz is a Farker? What's his handle?

Yeah... which troll is he?


DIA and SkinnyHead
 
2012-10-04 11:28:37 AM
When will FARK greenlight my Twitter feed?
 
2012-10-04 11:39:36 AM
No thank you.
 
2012-10-04 11:41:33 AM

Bonkthat_Again:

If Neal is here (or someone in agreement with him), PLEASE cite an example where supply-side economics works. Tell us when things "trickled down".



Oh something trickled down alright. Not the money, of course, but something.
 
2012-10-04 11:48:59 AM

Generation_D: Lots of mitigating factors. Kerry won debate 1 in 2004, that didn't help him win over all. Obama did not gaffe, he only let Romney talk too much and wasn't aggressive enough. Romney came off as aggressive and this turns some people off.

All that being said, I think the collective mood of Obama supporters was somewhere between WTF and WTF.


This fits the bill perfectly.

Seriously, Obama. WTF. TOO folksy, TOO deferential, TOO "nice." And too distracted.

At least Obama didn't blatantly fark up...

cameroncrazy1984: This is like being down 21 points and scoring a touchdown, and claiming you won the game. Hilarious overreaction by the GOP here.


Nate Silver equated it to kicking a field goal while down by one touchdown. But, yeah. This debate WILL help Romney. Now, if Obama blows it in the next debate...well...

/he's like the Presidential Red Sox
 
2012-10-04 11:49:52 AM

GAT_00: MaudlinMutantMollusk: Krymson Tyde: Neal Boortz is a Farker? What's his handle?

Yeah... which troll is he?

DIA and SkinnyHead


Ah... that makes sense

/thank you
 
2012-10-04 11:51:01 AM

Bonkthat_Again: If Neal is here (or someone in agreement with him), PLEASE cite an example where supply-side economics works. Tell us when things "trickled down".


That's not the point. At least, not how I see it. Romney's "issues" were empty. But he DELIVERED the performance. It's like saying how "Lord of the Rings" didn't really mean anything because what happened in the movie was fiction.
 
2012-10-04 11:51:37 AM
I can't believe I just compared Romney's performance to LOTR.

...

That's it. I quit the Internet.

*shoots self*
 
2012-10-04 11:52:35 AM

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Krymson Tyde: Neal Boortz is a Farker? What's his handle?

Yeah... which troll is he?


Unless I get a definitively different answer I'm just going to assume it's skinnyhead.

Or is that Hannity's?
 
2012-10-04 12:06:27 PM

xanadian: That's not the point. At least, not how I see it. Romney's "issues" were empty. But he DELIVERED the performance. It's like saying how "Lord of the Rings" didn't really mean anything because what happened in the movie was fiction.


Look, I would have liked to see Obama go on the attack. But that is simply not his way. He takes in information, calculates, then makes a decision. That's one of the things i LIKE about him. He doesn't shoot from the hip. It's a quality i think all Presidents should be required to have. Heck, if that was either me or you up there, we would have flung our own poo after Romney's 3rd or 4th blatant lie.
 
2012-10-04 12:31:32 PM

Krymson Tyde: Neal Boortz is a Farker? What's his handle?


Gato Negro
 
2012-10-04 12:48:17 PM

Rev. Skarekroe: Krymson Tyde: Neal Boortz is a Farker? What's his handle?

Gato Negro


Looking at that feed, I sort of believe you.
 
2012-10-04 12:55:15 PM
An "implosion"? Really, subby?
 
2012-10-04 12:56:29 PM

sammyk: Generation_D: More like, the game is already something like 35-0 and now its 35-7.

But there's still time! And the media loves sports cliches.

But Nate Silver is only giving Obama a 96.9% chance on the now cast. It was 97.3% yesterday. Clearly the Obama campaign is doomed. Doomed I tell you.


The "now cast" was last updated at 1943EDT on October 3. It has not taken into account the result of the debate.
 
2012-10-04 12:56:35 PM
Seriously, a grown-ass man used the word "ObaMedia" in his political twitter feed in earnest.
 
2012-10-04 12:56:49 PM

sweetmelissa31: [i194.photobucket.com image 506x81]

The Obama Media:

[i194.photobucket.com image 667x224]

[i194.photobucket.com image 342x264]


Anything that isn't 100% "Romney was perfect Obama is worst president forever" is liberal media.
 
2012-10-04 12:57:19 PM

FloydA: Bonkthat_Again:

If Neal is here (or someone in agreement with him), PLEASE cite an example where supply-side economics works. Tell us when things "trickled down".


Oh something trickled down alright. Not the money, of course, but something.


Gold, of course. Wonderful, beautiful showers of gold.
 
2012-10-04 12:58:31 PM
Who?
 
2012-10-04 12:59:58 PM
the best part is that last week it was "you can't trust the polls, MSM liberal kool aid drinking media" today its "Look at the polls, Obama lost!!!"

trust the media when they agree with you, thats the GOP way!
 
2012-10-04 01:00:22 PM
Damn, all I use Twitter for is harassing Bobby Jindal. Then again, I'm trying to get him to block me. There's a bottle of Dom Perignon on the line.
 
2012-10-04 01:00:56 PM
Boortz was moderately amusing until he started to metamorphose into a Republican, all the while exclaiming that he wasn't a Republican, but always spewing Republican talking points.

Oh, and the debate wasn't as much of a landslide for those who paid attention. Only the most hardcore Mitt-ites I've seen are saying he won. The rest of the people go from, "geez, what an asshole" to "he didn't really tell us anything" in their opinions.
 
2012-10-04 01:01:30 PM
Neal Boortz @Talkmaster
There was NO surplus in 2001. That surplus was a PROJECTION and it assumed a continuation of the Dot-com economic explosion.

--------------------
And assuming there would be no massive tax cut, or wars waged.
 
2012-10-04 01:01:49 PM
Ask anybody why Romney won or why Obama "imploded" and you won't get anything but bullshiat takes on "style" and the likes.

Ask them next what is more important to them, that a candidate tells them the truth or that they lie and attempt to look good doing it and you'll see that most people who are responding to an uneventful debate in any way other than "meh" are completely full of shiat.
 
2012-10-04 01:02:13 PM
Farker Neal Boortz
 
2012-10-04 01:02:19 PM

whizbangthedirtfarmer: Boortz was moderately amusing until he started to metamorphose into a Republican, all the while exclaiming that he wasn't a Republican, but always spewing Republican talking points.

Oh, and the debate wasn't as much of a landslide for those who paid attention. Only the most hardcore Mitt-ites I've seen are saying he won. The rest of the people go from, "geez, what an asshole" to "he didn't really tell us anything" in their opinions.


There seems to be a near-universal belief that Romney beat, or at least met, expectations while Obama didn't. That probably accounts for most of the "Romney won" narrative.
 
2012-10-04 01:03:03 PM
and

Neal Boortz @Talkmaster
Obama just WILL NOT look at Romney while Romney speaks. Why?


Because Obama is talking to the voters. You know, the ones who he is supposed to be talking to.
 
2012-10-04 01:03:29 PM

gittlebass: the best part is that last week it was "you can't trust the polls, MSM liberal kool aid drinking media" today its "Look at the polls, Obama lost!!!"

trust the media when they agree with you, thats the GOP way!


Well according to Unskewed Polls, it's Fox News and Rasmussen that's actually giving Obama the blowjobs.

growlersoftware.com
 
2012-10-04 01:04:25 PM

blastoh: and

Neal Boortz @Talkmaster
Obama just WILL NOT look at Romney while Romney speaks. Why?


Because Obama is talking to the voters. You know, the ones who he is supposed to be talking to.


Romney didn't look at Obama either during some of the speaking. He was looking down and away a lot. They both pretty much did that to each other.
 
2012-10-04 01:04:29 PM
Obama imploded, subby?

So, Romney didn't actually win - Obama just didn't do well.

Thanks for doing our spin for us.
 
2012-10-04 01:05:09 PM

qorkfiend: An "implosion"? Really, subby?


Apparently I was wrong in thinking that a campaign implosion was an unforced error by the candidate or his surrogates that completely deflates that candidate's electoral chances. Apparently it means not doing anything controversial but not performing as well as your opponent in a competition. Who knew?
 
2012-10-04 01:05:37 PM

sammyk: Generation_D: More like, the game is already something like 35-0 and now its 35-7.

But there's still time! And the media loves sports cliches.

But Nate Silver is only giving Obama a 96.9% chance on the now cast. It was 97.3% yesterday. Clearly the Obama campaign is doomed. Doomed I tell you.


fc00.deviantart.net
 
Displayed 50 of 259 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report