Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(News 10 ABC Sacramento)   Karma's a biatch to a lawyer who sued more than 2,100 businesses for ADA compliance issues   (news10.net) divider line 88
    More: Ironic, ADA, Sacramento County Superior Court, paralegals, sexual harassments  
•       •       •

18014 clicks; posted to Main » on 03 Oct 2012 at 3:33 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



88 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-10-03 03:06:48 AM  
This is the guy who shut down Ford's Real Hamburgers. Sounds like a real class act.
 
2012-10-03 03:06:54 AM  
I think he was the guy who went after a bunch of places in Julian and Alpine in SoCal. From what I heard, this sounds about right.
 
2012-10-03 03:08:39 AM  

davidphogan: I think he was the guy who went after a bunch of places in Julian and Alpine in SoCal. From what I heard, this sounds about right.


I thought that was a different guy. I did hear that the SoCal guy got disbarred though.

/for filing lawsuits on behalf of a client without telling her, IIRC.
 
2012-10-03 03:38:13 AM  
"The former legal assistants also offer insight into allegations that contrary to his claims, Johnson never personally visited many of the businesses he has sued under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

The women said they would accompany Johnson in his van for "field work" during which he would send them into a business as customers to look for ADA violations.

"He would call such actions a visit to the property even if he never left the van," the lawsuit claims.

The women said they were uncomfortable going into a business under a ruse and felt as though they were committing fraud, but said they were paid a bonus for the field work."


If this is true, any speculation on whether it is illegal, or unethical, or something that should have this guy disbarred?
 
2012-10-03 03:52:31 AM  
Instant Karma....
 
2012-10-03 03:53:32 AM  
Wait, wait ... this must be one of those 99 percent of personal injury attorneys who give the remaining 1 percent a bad name.
 
2012-10-03 03:53:43 AM  
What goes around comes around....
 
2012-10-03 03:57:20 AM  
Not so instant as he has been at for a while. Sort of the local boogie man out here. He is a shiat bag, but on the plus side he and people like him are all that is out there that will make owners of buildings even think of providing access to their buildings. The whole system of having ADA enforced by lawsuits was such a horrible idea from day one.
 
2012-10-03 03:58:39 AM  
"... also forced to put lotion on Johnson" ~2:35

News 10 is doing it right.
 
2012-10-03 03:59:56 AM  
Didn't someone mention that he averaged $5,000 per settlement, I.e. to drop the lawsuit?

At 2,000 cases, that comes to....$10 farking million.

/scumbag
 
2012-10-03 04:01:25 AM  
I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.
 
2012-10-03 04:03:10 AM  

BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.


So public buildings should be allowed to forego installing elevators because of some asshat?
 
2012-10-03 04:05:36 AM  

themindiswatching: BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.

So public buildings should be allowed to forego installing elevators because of some asshat?


Old people aren't technically crippled - but they still prefer going up and down without excerting themselves, if you know what I mean.
 
2012-10-03 04:06:39 AM  

themindiswatching: davidphogan: I think he was the guy who went after a bunch of places in Julian and Alpine in SoCal. From what I heard, this sounds about right.

I thought that was a different guy. I did hear that the SoCal guy got disbarred though.

/for filing lawsuits on behalf of a client without telling her, IIRC.


I think it was a different guy, too. Something like "Trever (Trebber?) Law Group".
 
2012-10-03 04:07:06 AM  
I know a lot of good hearted, hardworking attorneys who are involved in civil rights legislation. People who represent those who were wronged in SERIOUS ways, and who get paid crap money to do it.

This bottom feeder was one reason why good attorney's and well meaning businessmen suffer. I remember reading about his antics. Pissed me right the hell off. I hope he catches hell for this.

Yeah, yeah, lawyers suck (insert jawyer jokes here) and businessmen are scumbags (insert G.Carlin rant here), but we're not all bad. Some of us are actually good people who use the law to help others who really need it. Hell, I could probably be in an office twice as large and driving a Benz instead of an old Toyota if I wanted to milk my clients and the system like some of these cocksuckers.

/feels nice to be at peace with my conscience and sleep like a baby at night, though.
 
2012-10-03 04:08:00 AM  

CAPTIAN SLAPPY: The whole system of having ADA enforced by lawsuits was such a horrible idea from day one.


I guess ideally it would result in some sort of suspension of their business license until the issue is fixed, kind of like the health depts. and eateries?
 
2012-10-03 04:09:44 AM  

BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.


Wellfair? I love it too.
 
2012-10-03 04:11:03 AM  

themindiswatching: BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.

So public buildings should be allowed to forego installing elevators because of some asshat?


elevators would be installed for the "Lazy" (i.e. ME) and just about any one who fights a a parking spot that isnt 10 feet from it.
 
2012-10-03 04:13:07 AM  

starsrift: CAPTIAN SLAPPY: The whole system of having ADA enforced by lawsuits was such a horrible idea from day one.

I guess ideally it would result in some sort of suspension of their business license until the issue is fixed, kind of like the health depts. and eateries?


Was there anyway to make it an incentive not a punishment? Or at least neutral?

Something like "Costs directly involved in bringing your facility up to code will be applied to property taxes".
 
2012-10-03 04:13:58 AM  
Better call Saul Johnson...
 
2012-10-03 04:17:03 AM  
Here is the reason that people like this guy are allowed to keep extorting money from people. And extortion is all it is. A local building department had me put this in bold on the face of a set of plans
"The City of Grass Valley Building Division does not review or approve plans for ADA compliance. ADA (the Americans with disability act) is civil rights legislation enacted by congress in 1991 and is not a building code; it is the owners responsibility for compliance."
All of that is true, however, the only way that non-compliance is noted is when the owner get sued. If there is a problem that the owner can pin on someone else then the third part gets sued in turn by the owner (architect and or contractor).
The real issue here is that most of these cases get settled before they go to court. So: scum bag attorney gets paid, lawsuit goes away and the problem is still not fixed. There are few allowances in the code that excuse existing buildings and even if you have a signed exemption from the local jurisdiction the owner can still be sued and lose.
 
2012-10-03 04:19:38 AM  

BLEMDAR: themindiswatching: BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.

So public buildings should be allowed to forego installing elevators because of some asshat?

elevators would be installed for the "Lazy" (i.e. ME) and just about any one who fights a a parking spot that isnt 10 feet from it.


My workplace is on the second floor and one of my co-workers needs a wheelchair to get around (she's partially paralyzed). If it weren't for the elevator in our building she wouldn't be able to do her job. Would you rather she sat home and collected money from the government instead of working? Because that's what would happen if she was denied access.
 
2012-10-03 04:22:08 AM  
Thank you CAPTIAN SLAPPY. Exactly my point. government BS gone way too left.


//Registered Democrat that hate both sides at the moment.
 
2012-10-03 04:25:57 AM  

Bathia_Mapes: BLEMDAR: themindiswatching: BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.

So public buildings should be allowed to forego installing elevators because of some asshat?

elevators would be installed for the "Lazy" (i.e. ME) and just about any one who fights a a parking spot that isnt 10 feet from it.

My workplace is on the second floor and one of my co-workers needs a wheelchair to get around (she's partially paralyzed). If it weren't for the elevator in our building she wouldn't be able to do her job. Would you rather she sat home and collected money from the government instead of working? Because that's what would happen if she was denied access.


That is an excellent reminder of the purpose of ADA: Allow more people to be able to provide for themselves, and be less dependent on others.
 
2012-10-03 04:26:00 AM  

CAPTIAN SLAPPY: Here is the reason that people like this guy are allowed to keep extorting money from people. And extortion is all it is. A local building department had me put this in bold on the face of a set of plans


Sounds like this can be fixed by fixing the ADA. Of course, the current GOP would repeal it altogether if they could get it past Congress and onto a hypothetical President Romney's desk.
 
2012-10-03 04:27:48 AM  

BLEMDAR: Thank you CAPTIAN SLAPPY. Exactly my point. government BS gone way too left.


//Registered Democrat that hate both sides at the moment.


I don't see how that could legitimately be construed as a "lefty" position.
 
2012-10-03 04:27:50 AM  
BLEMDAR- couldn't agree more. But it sure is paying my bills right now. I would really rather be designing something other than curb cut ramps and handrails for stairs
 
2012-10-03 04:29:14 AM  
wheel chair is different than a chain smoking COPD patient that can walk and act like a normal person, without an oxygen tank. she also smoked constantly. i dont know how much.But personal responsibility NEEDS to be a factor in some cases.
 
2012-10-03 04:32:10 AM  

Enigmamf: That is an excellent reminder of the purpose of ADA: Allow more people to be able to provide for themselves, and be less dependent on others.


I'm glad someone on this thread gets it.
 
2012-10-03 04:35:59 AM  

BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.


You're very bootstrappy, even though in spite of pulling yourself up by them you'd still fall down because you can't walk anyway.

/how's that for being un-pc?
 
2012-10-03 04:37:56 AM  
If that guy wasn't already in a chair, I know plenty of people who would love to put him in one, gratis. He's a massive, predatory, opportunistic POS. People should lock their business doors if they see him coming. I suppose that wouldn't help if he sent in one of his forced fondlers/legal assistants, but if it's him, definitely lock that door.
 
2012-10-03 04:38:29 AM  

nucular bum: BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.

You're very bootstrappy, even though in spite of pulling yourself up by them you'd still fall down because you can't walk anyway.

/how's that for being un-pc?


Funny as hell. I fell over while trying to get them up this mourning. But I can walk...sorta.
 
2012-10-03 04:44:15 AM  
So, douchey creep or creepy douche? This is why people walk around quoting Shakespeare's Henry VI.
 
2012-10-03 04:46:06 AM  

themindiswatching: CAPTIAN SLAPPY: Here is the reason that people like this guy are allowed to keep extorting money from people. And extortion is all it is. A local building department had me put this in bold on the face of a set of plans

Sounds like this can be fixed by fixing the ADA. Of course, the current GOP would repeal it altogether if they could get it past Congress and onto a hypothetical President Romney's desk.


Good work, comrade! Keep up the attacks on Romney, because there is no plausible defense for Obama's last four years!

\\yeah, feeding the trolls
 
2012-10-03 04:46:54 AM  

BLEMDAR: nucular bum: BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.

You're very bootstrappy, even though in spite of pulling yourself up by them you'd still fall down because you can't walk anyway.

/how's that for being un-pc?

Funny as hell. I fell over while trying to get them up this mourning. But I can walk...sorta.


Still mourning over your lost mobility?

With regard the case, what's wrong with a man only hiring attractive young women to handle him naked? If I had to have people wash me I too would rather they were attractive young women... I shouldn't be forced to hire ugly old moustachioed women if I don't want to.

If it turns out he's capable of washing himself and he just wants them to fondle him then fine, sue him, but I think he's just making the best of a bad situation.
 
2012-10-03 04:51:42 AM  
if only I new how to spell....


wait ... wait "knew how to spell"

sorry, my bad, my bad.
 
2012-10-03 04:53:34 AM  

BLEMDAR: nucular bum: BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.

You're very bootstrappy, even though in spite of pulling yourself up by them you'd still fall down because you can't walk anyway.

/how's that for being un-pc?

Funny as hell. I fell over while trying to get them up this mourning. But I can walk...sorta.


Then we cool, right?

Personally, I'm by and large in favor of the ADA, in spirit at least. If I were a wheelchair user, I'd rail against architectural barriers and be grateful for places I could roll on into and patronize just like everyone else. I wouldn't insist that every single bathroom be accessible, unlike Gary Johnson, (soon-to-no-longer-be) Esq. A shyster's a shyster regardless of ability to walk... or lack thereof.

/beyond the disability, a.b.'s and crips are pretty much the same
 
2012-10-03 04:53:36 AM  
He's not handicapped, he's handi-creepable!

/randy-capable?
//but seriously, what a creepy p.o's.
 
2012-10-03 04:57:20 AM  
"It rubs the lotion on my skin. It does this whenever it's told, or else it gets shiatcanned."

/window seat, please
 
2012-10-03 04:57:24 AM  

nucular bum: BLEMDAR: nucular bum: BLEMDAR: I disagree with disability acts. People abuse them as badly as wellfair. Even I am a cripple. Thats right a "cripple" No bubblegum BS sbout it, get over your PC crap. I dont use Handicapped spaces; I dont collect from the government.

You're very bootstrappy, even though in spite of pulling yourself up by them you'd still fall down because you can't walk anyway.

/how's that for being un-pc?

Funny as hell. I fell over while trying to get them up this mourning. But I can walk...sorta.

Then we cool, right?

Personally, I'm by and large in favor of the ADA, in spirit at least. If I were a wheelchair user, I'd rail against architectural barriers and be grateful for places I could roll on into and patronize just like everyone else. I wouldn't insist that every single bathroom be accessible, unlike Gary Johnson, (soon-to-no-longer-be) Esq. A shyster's a shyster regardless of ability to walk... or lack thereof.

/beyond the disability, a.b.'s and crips are pretty much the same


Says the guy with NO disability.
 
2012-10-03 04:58:34 AM  
I hope this piece of shiat dies old, alone and in pain.
 
2012-10-03 05:00:02 AM  
JK we're cool
 
2012-10-03 05:06:09 AM  

RoyBatty: starsrift: CAPTIAN SLAPPY: The whole system of having ADA enforced by lawsuits was such a horrible idea from day one.

I guess ideally it would result in some sort of suspension of their business license until the issue is fixed, kind of like the health depts. and eateries?

Was there anyway to make it an incentive not a punishment? Or at least neutral?

Something like "Costs directly involved in bringing your facility up to code will be applied to property taxes".


Seems a lot like passing the buck to the general public. Hmm. Tricky.
 
2012-10-03 05:15:18 AM  
" Here, smell my finger........pencil shavings....my secretary dosent even have pencil sharpener; let one a pencil." Hardee dee harr harr.
 
2012-10-03 05:18:23 AM  
So the guy who's made a career out of drawing attention to himself gets sued for...drawing attention to himself.

Works for me.
 
2012-10-03 05:29:37 AM  
after all the suffering he put honest people through, I hope his lawsuit goes well.

by going well, I hope its all true and the scumbag finally get what he deserves.
 
2012-10-03 05:35:22 AM  

starsrift: Seems a lot like passing the buck to the general public. Hmm. Tricky.


It is!

But it would presumably be for buildings and facilities built before passage of the ADA, and it would be for the public good of making these accessible to the disabled.

It works to eliminate the problem of old facilities and it gives owners an incentive, or at least doesn't punish them for complying.

There are all sorts of variations on that scheme: The ADA could have passed and facilities that came up to speed quickly got up to a 10% rebate, facilities that took longer got a revenue neutral credit, facilities that took more than 10 years got nothing.

The point is to encourage people to make their facilities compliant and to take away the incentives for lawyers to sue like this guy did.
 
2012-10-03 05:37:05 AM  
Yet another failed use of the IRONIC tag, since this blackmailing scumbag wasn't sued for an ADA
violation.
 
2012-10-03 05:38:31 AM  

RoyBatty: Something like "Costs directly involved in bringing your facility up to code will be applied to property taxes".


Calling spending programs "tax breaks" is terrible plan. It's that kind of ridiculous obfuscation that makes the existing tax code so complicated. If we want the government to subsidize handicap access we should create a program that sends out checks to people who spend money on handicap access. Direct payments provide for more transparency in government, are economically indifferent to tax breaks, and vastly reduce the complication of tax legislation and budgeting, as well as tax forms and their processing both by the government and the taxed.

Also incentives are nice, but when it comes to fundamental access they're really not sufficient. I doubt you'd satisfied with saying "Well, there's subsidy program to encourage lunch counters to serve blacks -- that's all we can do". It may not be economically viable to provide wheelchair access for the 1 disabled customer a store has, even with government subsidies. But disabled people still need to eat so we need grocery stores to provide access or other accommodation anyway.

I do agree that resolving these cases with individual lawsuits is petty silly. It's unlikely to properly compensate the parties that have been wronged, may or may not actually resolve the issue, doesn't provide much leeway for minor/temporary infractions, and is open to abuse as documented in the article.
 
2012-10-03 05:47:05 AM  
Another article indicates it's not the ADA itself that's at fault:

According to one estimate, at least 42 percent of the nation's ADA-related lawsuits are brought in California, making this state ground zero for access filings. It's not hard to understand why. In most states, ADA plaintiffs are entitled only to injunctive relief - that is, having an access issue remedied - plus attorneys fees. But in California, access violations also run afoul of the state's [laws], which allow plaintiffs to tack [on] state claims for ... treble damages, with a minimum of $4,000 per occurrence, plus attorneys fees. ...

Still, only a very small group of practitioners - perhaps no more than 20 - generate the bulk of the filings.


Bottom line, he's an arsehole -- and so are the state legislators who won't fix this.
 
2012-10-03 05:58:23 AM  
Assholes like this Johnson piece of shiat are the reason Disneyland has stated that they will NEVER rebuild the PeopleMover into a new attraction. The Casey Jr train, the Storybook Canal Boats, Alice in Wonderland, as well as numerous other unnecessary changes are being made because of the farking ADA piece of shiat!

There are some places you just can't go, farktards!!!
 
2012-10-03 06:02:23 AM  
While what is happening to this troll is not Irony, it most certainly IS Karma!
 
2012-10-03 06:12:22 AM  

Slaxl: With regard the case, what's wrong with a man only hiring attractive young women to handle him naked? If I had to have people wash me I too would rather they were attractive young women... I shouldn't be forced to hire ugly old moustachioed women if I don't want to.

If it turns out he's capable of washing himself and he just wants them to fondle him then fine, sue him, but I think he's just making the best of a bad situation.


It no doubt violates the law to discriminate by age and gender (and in some places, appearance), but he'd probably get away with it if he wasn't too obvious about it.

Having them wash him isn't a problem if that was a stated part of the job. Popping it on them later (so to speak) would be a little different, but TFA says they had to get training on "personal care," "learning to dress and undress their boss," as soon as they were hired.

The women are two 5-year employees, a 4-year employee, and a 1-1/2 year employee. So they knew about that duty from the beginning, but didn't find a new job or complain for several years?

Sounds like a shakedown to me. Isn't it awful how civil rights laws are used to harass the small businessman?
 
2012-10-03 06:24:39 AM  
GOOD!

I've been irked since the article about Ford's Burgers shutting down because of this jerk.

I think Karma got a double-whammy on this guy (one preemptive and now this) and I hope this lawsuit cripples his bank account and he gets disbarred.
 
2012-10-03 06:32:55 AM  
Can past businesses he's wrecked do anything now against him?
 
2012-10-03 06:45:39 AM  
What a douche bag. Someone should break his legs.
 
2012-10-03 07:13:49 AM  

Satanic_Hamster: What a douche bag. Someone should break his legs.


Like that would help.

bubbawheat.files.wordpress.com
Michael The Suit Minelli: Now... where is the Blankman? [he pours
hot coffee onto Mr. Stone, who sits in a wheelchair]
Mr. Stone: Hey, Einstein. In case you havent noticed, this isnt a
boil on my ass. Im paralyzed from the waist down. I cant feel a
thing. .
 
2012-10-03 07:22:47 AM  
How to be scum-of-the-earth asshole lawyer.

1. New ADA law goes into effect. Something like 'wheelchair ramps must now have a 5° slope instead of a 7° slope' or 'front doors must now be at least 3 feet wide'.
2. Drive around to as many businesses as you can to find the ones that either haven't had time to change, haven't yet heard of the new law taking effect, or do not have the money to tear down their entire store front to make their doors .5 feet wider.
3. Sue them in to non-existance.
4. Profit!
4a. (who cares if you put an entire family out of business, you just made a sweet $100,000 by driving around for 3 hours until you found a business who offended you by not digging up their 6° concrete wheelchair ramp and replacing it with a 7° one!)
 
2012-10-03 07:25:30 AM  
I remember hearing about this jackass on This American Life. Basically, ADA laws are so nitpicky you can get $5,000 for a mirror not being the right height. Here's how we make this right:

1. Take away all the money he's gotten from frivolous lawsuits.
2. Give it back to the businesses he shut down, with interest.
3. Kick him out of his wheelchair and make him crawl like the scum that he is.

//ADA laws be damned
 
2012-10-03 07:32:32 AM  

7FARK7: Assholes like this Johnson piece of shiat are the reason Disneyland has stated that they will NEVER rebuild the PeopleMover into a new attraction. The Casey Jr train, the Storybook Canal Boats, Alice in Wonderland, as well as numerous other unnecessary changes are being made because of the farking ADA piece of shiat!

There are some places you just can't go, farktards!!!


Says the farktard who isn't disabled.

I'd tell you to spend a week handicapped, but you'd never make it past the first day.
 
2012-10-03 07:45:02 AM  

MythDragon: Satanic_Hamster: What a douche bag. Someone should break his legs.

Like that would help.

[bubbawheat.files.wordpress.com image 300x224]
Michael The Suit Minelli: Now... where is the Blankman? [he pours
hot coffee onto Mr. Stone, who sits in a wheelchair]
Mr. Stone: Hey, Einstein. In case you havent noticed, this isnt a
boil on my ass. Im paralyzed from the waist down. I cant feel a
thing. .


Also would have accepted a Family Guy reference.
 
2012-10-03 08:12:44 AM  
WHAR pics of the hot assistants WHAR
 
2012-10-03 08:26:26 AM  

traylor: WHAR pics of the hot assistants WHAR


GIS for "hot assistants"

myleaderpaper.com

/hotlinked
 
2012-10-03 08:44:06 AM  
I went into this expecting it to turn out the attorney was now disabled himself. Irony.

Then I saw the headline, and I was like "oh, wow, OK".

Then I read the first sentence, and I was like "there we go".
 
2012-10-03 08:50:27 AM  

Mr. Holmes: 1. Take away all the money he's gotten from frivolous lawsuits.2. Give it back to the businesses he shut down, with interest.


His money has already been spent, on women desperate enough for a job that this guy was able to intimidate them into being his personal sex slaves. Are you going to take the money from the abused women, to give it to the businesses?

/your plan
//not thought through
 
2012-10-03 09:11:31 AM  

Tatterdemalian: Mr. Holmes: 1. Take away all the money he's gotten from frivolous lawsuits.2. Give it back to the businesses he shut down, with interest.

His money has already been spent, on women desperate enough for a job that this guy was able to intimidate them into being his personal sex slaves. Are you going to take the money from the abused women, to give it to the businesses?

/your plan
//not thought through



LOL WUT

//If he spent all his money on the women, then why are they suing him?
 
2012-10-03 09:14:06 AM  

RoyBatty: starsrift: CAPTIAN SLAPPY: The whole system of having ADA enforced by lawsuits was such a horrible idea from day one.

I guess ideally it would result in some sort of suspension of their business license until the issue is fixed, kind of like the health depts. and eateries?

Was there anyway to make it an incentive not a punishment? Or at least neutral?

Something like "Costs directly involved in bringing your facility up to code will be applied to property taxes".


Right, like that wouldn't be gamed.
 
2012-10-03 09:30:25 AM  
WTH is up with this guy's tie? Would it still hang down past his crotch if he was standing up? 

i.imgur.com
 
2012-10-03 09:49:29 AM  

Mr. Holmes: Tatterdemalian: Mr. Holmes: 1. Take away all the money he's gotten from frivolous lawsuits.2. Give it back to the businesses he shut down, with interest.

His money has already been spent, on women desperate enough for a job that this guy was able to intimidate them into being his personal sex slaves. Are you going to take the money from the abused women, to give it to the businesses?

/your plan
//not thought through


LOL WUT

//If he spent all his money on the women, then why are they suing him?


He could make more.
 
2012-10-03 10:25:13 AM  

Rostin: WTH is up with this guy's tie? Would it still hang down past his crotch if he was standing up? 

[i.imgur.com image 478x358]


You don't know about crotch ties? They are the new thing. The rules are changing, my friend.
 
2012-10-03 10:36:59 AM  
My old boss is probably the happiest guy on earth right now. He's been waiting years for something like this to get a class action going against this asshat. Now this douchebag is going to know what it feels like to be sued into penury. Hey Johnson? Do us all a favor and just roll your crippled ass into the river and save us the trouble.
 
2012-10-03 10:53:46 AM  
"Johnson told her not to interview "men, ugly women and anyone over 30," regardless of their qualifications."

More like US business SOP than a lot of people would like to admit.
 
2012-10-03 10:55:01 AM  

RoyBatty: "The former legal assistants also offer insight into allegations that contrary to his claims, Johnson never personally visited many of the businesses he has sued under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

The women said they would accompany Johnson in his van for "field work" during which he would send them into a business as customers to look for ADA violations.

"He would call such actions a visit to the property even if he never left the van," the lawsuit claims.

The women said they were uncomfortable going into a business under a ruse and felt as though they were committing fraud, but said they were paid a bonus for the field work."

If this is true, any speculation on whether it is illegal, or unethical, or something that should have this guy disbarred?


I don't know about disbarment, but (ironically) he could be busted on at least two if not three different civil rights violations re discrimination in hiring (a California-specific law re appearance, as well as federal EEOC charges on age discrimination and sexual discrimination against men--yes, this is one of those rare cases of age discrimination that's provable). Which is especially hilarious seeing as he's set himself up as a Professional Attention Whore re ADA violations--you'd actually think he would know better. :D
 
2012-10-03 11:13:41 AM  

gerbilpox: Slaxl: With regard the case, what's wrong with a man only hiring attractive young women to handle him naked? If I had to have people wash me I too would rather they were attractive young women... I shouldn't be forced to hire ugly old moustachioed women if I don't want to.

If it turns out he's capable of washing himself and he just wants them to fondle him then fine, sue him, but I think he's just making the best of a bad situation.

It no doubt violates the law to discriminate by age and gender (and in some places, appearance), but he'd probably get away with it if he wasn't too obvious about it.

Having them wash him isn't a problem if that was a stated part of the job. Popping it on them later (so to speak) would be a little different, but TFA says they had to get training on "personal care," "learning to dress and undress their boss," as soon as they were hired.

The women are two 5-year employees, a 4-year employee, and a 1-1/2 year employee. So they knew about that duty from the beginning, but didn't find a new job or complain for several years?


In case you haven't noticed, our society has a surfeit of lawyers, and the economy's been in the crapper for the last five years. Not every new grad goes to work for BigLaw or the government; I'm sure they had student loans to pay, and this was work.

It's also cross-training; if lawyering doesn't work out, they can go into home care.

/Scott's still a dick
//next time I am in Sac, a stop at Texas West is on the list
 
2012-10-03 11:29:04 AM  
next time I am in Sac, a stop at Texas West is on the list

Don't forget to swing by Jamie's while you're there...Been craving one of his reubens for months.
 
2012-10-03 11:41:38 AM  
Wow. Never said this before, but he deserves to be crippled.
 
2012-10-03 12:18:53 PM  
So are they gonna be able to re-open the 50-year-old burger joint??
 
2012-10-03 12:46:00 PM  

drewogatory: next time I am in Sac, a stop at Texas West is on the list

Don't forget to swing by Jamie's while you're there...Been craving one of his reubens for months.


Have lunch at Chop's or the Broiler as well.
 
2012-10-03 01:26:01 PM  

BolshyGreatYarblocks: "Johnson told her not to interview "men, ugly women and anyone over 30," regardless of their qualifications."

More like US business SOP than a lot of people would like to admit.


Except the airline industry. Those are the only people they'll hire nowadays. When was the last time you saw an attractive, young flight attendant on a U.S. airline? That's why all my flights out of the country are on Asian or Middle Eastern airlines.
 
2012-10-03 01:51:25 PM  

CAPTIAN SLAPPY: Not so instant as he has been at for a while. Sort of the local boogie man out here. He is a shiat bag, but on the plus side he and people like him are all that is out there that will make owners of buildings even think of providing access to their buildings. The whole system of having ADA enforced by lawsuits was such a horrible idea from day one.


Like most 'good intention' sounding laws the ADA is just make work for lawyers accomplishing nothing.
 
2012-10-03 01:54:18 PM  
That makes me a sad panda.
 
2012-10-03 02:09:48 PM  

StoPPeRmobile: Something like "Costs directly involved in bringing your facility up to code will be applied to property taxes".

Right, like that wouldn't be gamed.


I would like to say, of course it would be gamed, but that's what building inspectors, regulatory departments, etc. are for.

Are there no other programs where citizens essentially send in receipts to have them reimbursed? Like taxes? And if they game the system and are audited, they are fined or even sent to jail?
 
2012-10-03 02:13:02 PM  
Boy Eric Roberts really looks bad
 
2012-10-03 02:15:57 PM  

profplump: RoyBatty: Something like "Costs directly involved in bringing your facility up to code will be applied to property taxes".

Calling spending programs "tax breaks" is terrible plan. It's that kind of ridiculous obfuscation that makes the existing tax code so complicated. If we want the government to subsidize handicap access we should create a program that sends out checks to people who spend money on handicap access. Direct payments provide for more transparency in government, are economically indifferent to tax breaks, and vastly reduce the complication of tax legislation and budgeting, as well as tax forms and their processing both by the government and the taxed.


That seems to be a good point, and I'd probably be okay with that

Also incentives are nice, but when it comes to fundamental access they're really not sufficient. I doubt you'd satisfied with saying "Well, there's subsidy program to encourage lunch counters to serve blacks -- that's all we can do". It may not be economically viable to provide wheelchair access for the 1 disabled customer a store has, even with government subsidies. But disabled people still need to eat so we need grocery stores to provide access or other accommodation anyway.


But this seems different from allowing blacks access to lunch counters. There is no reason that allowing blacks access to lunch counters can't occur literally overnight, but that's not true for building elevators, restrooms, etc.

So they could have forced new construction and remodeling to be compliant, and then provided a reasonable time period of a year, five years, ten years, for older construction to be made compliant with various incentives to do so early, and fines if you don't.

In general, I would prefer to see goverment work on incentivizing good behavior not the constant criminalization and fining of bad behavior.
 
2012-10-03 02:28:35 PM  

Banned on the Run: Wow. Never said this before, but he deserves to be crippled.


And the worst part?

He's been FAKING it THIS WHOLE TIME. HE CAN WALK!!!!
 
2012-10-03 05:37:28 PM  
RoyBatty: "The former legal assistants also offer insight into allegations that contrary to his claims, Johnson never personally visited many of the businesses he has sued under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

The women said they would accompany Johnson in his van for "field work" during which he would send them into a business as customers to look for ADA violations.

"He would call such actions a visit to the property even if he never left the van," the lawsuit claims.

The women said they were uncomfortable going into a business under a ruse and felt as though they were committing fraud, but said they were paid a bonus for the field work."

If this is true, any speculation on whether it is illegal, or unethical, or something that should have this guy disbarred?


I don't claim to be a lawyer but if he never ACTUALLY visited the business and perjured himself by claiming that he did, that would be illegal.
 
2012-10-03 07:01:34 PM  

Oldiron_79: RoyBatty: "The former legal assistants also offer insight into allegations that contrary to his claims, Johnson never personally visited many of the businesses he has sued under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

The women said they would accompany Johnson in his van for "field work" during which he would send them into a business as customers to look for ADA violations.

"He would call such actions a visit to the property even if he never left the van," the lawsuit claims.

The women said they were uncomfortable going into a business under a ruse and felt as though they were committing fraud, but said they were paid a bonus for the field work."

If this is true, any speculation on whether it is illegal, or unethical, or something that should have this guy disbarred?

I don't claim to be a lawyer but if he never ACTUALLY visited the business and perjured himself by claiming that he did, that would be illegal.


I wonder if there are any California based attorneys that visit FARK that need to do some pro-bono work to help clean up their profession!?
 
2012-10-03 09:35:25 PM  
I wonder if there are any California based attorneys assassins that visit FARK that need to do some pro-bono work to help clean up their profession!? the planet. 

FTFY
 
Displayed 88 of 88 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report